EM-PRD-05 · Subject model · W2
Intellectual property and usage rights
Protected object, application, registration, ownership and licensed use. The brand as a business association is separated from the trademark.
Partially published; research continues
Claude: complete-frozen-study-and-audit; Grok: complete-browser-study.
Published results
Research note, in Russian: Canonical promotion remains held by the limits published with the profile.
Subject boundary and candidate types
- IPAsset
- IPRegistration
- RightsClaim
- UsageGrant
Deep research questions
- How does a patent application differ from a granted right?
- How to model territory and term?
- How to separate the creator, the owner and the licensee?
Verifiable invariants
- A right has a subject and a basis
- Registration is not universal across all countries
- A license does not transfer ownership without a basis
End-to-end acceptance scenario
Show one brand with two territorial registrations and a license expiring earlier than the registration.
Negative case
A company logo automatically proves an exclusive right worldwide.
Approaches to compare
- TM Forum SID: product/service/resource and commercial roles
- IDTA AAS: physical assets and composite descriptions
- Product management and engineering configuration; compare selected PLM and software practices
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-KNW-003 · Intellectual Property Right · 0.2.0-legacy · not installed automatically
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.