# EM-DAT-06 provider comparison

Claude and Grok independently select **COMPLETE RESERVED MODEL** for reserved WM-REC-002 Report / Statement; neither supports allocating another identifier. They agree that one aggregate owns immutable reusable report-definition versions and immutable issued report statements, while processing runs, record artifacts, publication operations, bibliographic editions, disclosure policies, metric definitions and catalogue records retain separate identities and lifecycles.

The reconciled candidate makes audience, permitted projection, default disclosure binding and authority explicit on the definition version. Each issue now pins cutoff rule and instant, as-of basis, inputs, measure or query bindings, execution evidence, record artifacts with fixity, an exact disclosure tuple and compiled-template fingerprint. Corrected inputs create a successor issue; an issued predecessor is never overwritten.

Grok sharpened four fail-closed rules adopted in candidate.2: a statement without a pinned definition is invalid; widening disclosure creates a new issue; a carrier digest change alone is an external custody event; and dashboard layout never participates in issue identity. New fixtures cover each case.

Both reviews support a reviewable completion draft only. Candidate relation rows, the unallocated EM-DAT-05 Metric Definition authority, declarative disclosure validation, standards crosswalk limits, package conversion and canonical live verification remain explicit holds.