# Exact unsent Grok prompt — EM-LEG-05

Independent enterprise metamodel review. Do not browse, invent identifiers or claim publication readiness.

EM-LEG-05 covers LegalCase, Claim, ProceedingEvent and CaseOutcome. Complete WM-POL-009 covers Court / Arbitration Case; adjacent drafts cover claims/propositions, citations/evidence, decision rationale, contracts and financial statements. Reserved WM-POL-019 Filing, WM-POL-020 Evidence Item and WM-POL-021 Judgment lack complete specs.

Assess this proposal: profile WM-POL-009 as one forum-qualified proceeding; create an identifier-unassigned Dispute / Matter root for the contested matter across proceedings; keep procedural claim/counterclaim/defense and ProceedingEvent case-owned; profile allegations on WM-KNW-007; keep findings authority-owned; treat CaseOutcome as a projection over judgment, finality and remedies. Keep Appeal / Review, Enforcement / Recognition Case and Remedy Obligation unassigned gaps pending registry adjudication. Allocate no identifier.

Separate dispute, proceeding, forum, party role, pleading, allegation, claim, evidence item, admissibility/use, docket event, finding, legal conclusion, judgment, remedy, appeal, enforcement, financial provision and confirmed debt. Decide whether Dispute / Matter needs independent identity and whether any requested candidate needs another root.

Test a claim, counterclaim and first-instance decision later set aside on appeal. Preserve all decisions, findings, evidence restrictions, service/effective/knowledge times and source provenance. Reject the claimed amount as confirmed debt or automatic financial provision.

Return <=900 words with: Verdict; strongest evidence; strongest counterexample; identity/mastership; dispute/proceedings; claims/allegations/findings; events/filings/evidence; judgments/outcomes/remedies; appeal/enforcement; finance boundary; time/access/provenance; governance; scenario; at least 10 invariants; minimum model set; blockers. Flag missing reserved specs and relation contradictions.