# EM-LND-02 provider comparison

Claude and Grok agree that Group Landscape is a governed profile over WM-ORG-001 subjects and purpose-qualified WM-ORG-012 relationships, while Group Scope View is an immutable generated projection. Neither has independent business-object identity and no runtime/model identifier is allocated. A body with independent standing belongs in WM-ORG-001 even before registration; a convenient name alone does not justify promotion.

Both providers preserve six parallel purpose graphs: legal ownership/control, accounting consolidation, management, operational perimeter, brand affiliation and franchise/network participation. Security trust remains an unowned axis and access is not another membership graph. The profile does not union these graphs or emit a canonical member list.

Grok sharpens view identity and access. The digest binds the landscape revision, world time, knowledge time, scenario, graph rules, source revisions, grant set, disclosure shape and generated projection. Identical pins and projection yield the same digest; any change yields a new immutable digest. Grants and shapes remain external masters and are never stored on the view. Every cross-organization fact requires an authorized WM-XCT-002 grant and WM-XCT-003 shape.

The reconciled result preserves typed unknown, disputed and unverified assertions, fact owner and claimant capacity. A pinned graph rule or disclosure shape may exclude a typed state, but the exclusion must remain visible in the pins and cannot mutate the source assertion. A profile name is only an operator handle; consumers cite a view by digest and pin set and cannot use the profile name as a party, ledger or contract key.

The disposition remains a held profile with no new identifier. Publication still depends on canonical parent readiness, resolving the WM-ORG-012 parent/reference conflict, completing relationship and graph fixtures, and validating multi-profile projection semantics.