# Exact unsent Grok prompt — EM-LND-04

Independent enterprise metamodel review. Do not browse, invent identifiers or claim standards conformance.

EM-LND-04 covers StrategyLandscape and StrategicAlignment but has no target model IDs. Available masters include WM-KNW-011 objectives/targets, WM-MAT-008 plus WM-XCT-025 measurements, WM-ACT-030 initiatives/hypotheses, WM-ACT-029/005 portfolio/project and WM-ACT-034 assessments. Strategy and Outcome/Benefit candidates are unallocated; reserved WM-ACT-001 Capability has no usable specification.

Assess this proposal: both candidates are read-only profile/projection constructs with no new business ID. Alignment edges require an assessment, observation or attributable justified expert judgment. Causal output→outcome→benefit edges remain hypotheses until a method-bound assessment confirms them. Tags, budgets, completion and portfolio membership prove neither alignment nor benefit. Unallocated and blocked referents remain visible. Views separate effective/knowledge/measurement times and authoritative, replay and scenario classes; missing measurements create owner-addressed findings rather than zero.

Test an initiative without an objective, an objective without measurement and a constraining-but-blocked capability; also test a project tagged strategy. Return <=900 words with: Verdict; strongest evidence; strongest counterexample; identity/mastership; strategic elements; alignment/causality; output/outcome/benefit; capability constraint; time/scenario; findings; scenario; at least 10 invariants; minimum profile shape; blockers. Explicitly decide whether either candidate requires independent identity.