# EM-LND-04 provider comparison

Claude and Grok agree that StrategyLandscape and StrategicAlignment are read-only projection/profile constructs with no independent business identity. Both retain existing mastership, keep Strategy and Outcome/Benefit unallocated, keep WM-ACT-001 visibly blocked, separate authoritative/replay/scenario classes, and reject tags, budget, completion or membership as proof of alignment or benefit.

Grok sharpened the negative boundary: an initiative without an objective stays unlinked; an objective without a measurement produces a finding rather than zero; a blocked capability is unenforceable; and confirmation cannot rewrite an earlier knowledge-time state. The frozen audit accepted the identity decision but found eleven candidate-artifact omissions. The dossier now uses a closed basis allow-list, requires justified expert judgment, prevents promotion on unallocated or blocked referents, caps attribution, defines positive realization evidence, separates all time axes, requires WM-MAT-008 as the WM-XCT-025 host, distinguishes objective from portfolio, constrains findings, and keeps blocked referents visible without ranking.

No new model or runtime identifier is allocated. Canonical publication remains held by unallocated roots, the unavailable capability specification, non-canonical bases, missing relationship contracts and unverified crosswalks.