# Exact unsent Grok prompt — EM-LND-17

Independent enterprise metamodel review. Do not browse, invent identifiers or claim standards conformance.

EM-LND-17 covers AssetPlaceLandscape and OccupancyView using WM-BLT-006 Facility and WM-BLT-008 Site / Campus, with WM-BLT-001 Building, WM-OBJ-001 Physical Item, WM-PLC-010 Gazetteer Place, WM-XCT-010 Address and WM-ACT-007 Work Order boundaries.

Assess this proposal: reuse the existing spatial and asset masters; Asset Place Landscape is a governed declaration with local artifact identity for scope/viewpoint/owner/pinned inputs/as-of/disclosure/digest but no allocated catalogue/runtime ID; Occupancy View is a projection. Asset Placement Episode and Operational Responsibility Assignment are genuine relation candidates with identifiers unassigned. Keep place, site, facility, building, interior space and movable asset identities separate. Keep placement, custody, title, responsibility, occupancy, availability and maintenance separate. Containment is evidenced, never inferred from geometry or common address. Planned and observed placements remain distinct. Availability is derived per purpose. Personal and sensitive locations are generalized or withheld through every projection.

Test a leased asset moving from Site A to Site B while ownership stays with the lessor, custody and responsibility change independently, maintenance remains due, and all history is reconstructable. Reject the inference that a company's registered address locates all its assets.

Return <=900 words with: Verdict; strongest evidence; strongest counterexample; identity/mastership; spatial spine; placement/custody/title/responsibility; planned versus observed; occupancy/availability; maintenance; privacy; scenario; at least 10 invariants; minimum profile shape; blockers. Explicitly decide which candidates require independent identity.