# EM-LND-17 provider comparison

Claude and Grok agree that Asset Place Landscape is a governed declaration with local artifact identity, Occupancy View is a projection without independent identity, and spatial and physical-item masters remain authoritative. Both require placement, custody, title, responsibility, occupancy, availability and maintenance to remain separate.

Grok accepted the two independent relation candidates with conditions. The frozen audit accepted that identity decision and found fifteen enforceability defects. The candidates now use conditional provenance, explicit planned/observed divergence, separate placement/status/whereabouts states, immutable bitemporal versions, consistent succession lineage, placement exclusivity and gap semantics, closed locus kinds, explicit responsibility scope, authority-bearing transfer/suspension/revocation/delegation, overlap controls and disclosure metadata. Projection rules moved to a shared no-identity Landscape Projection definition with pinned inputs, digest, suppression, no-refinement and anti-differencing controls.

No registry or runtime identifier is allocated. Both relation candidates remain unassigned and canonical publication remains held by the recorded base, registry, relation, crosswalk, privacy and live-verification gaps.