# Exact unsent Grok prompt — EM-STR-01

Independent enterprise metamodel review. Do not browse, invent identifiers or claim publication readiness.

EM-STR-01 covers Strategy, BusinessModel, StrategicTheme, ValueProposition, ValueStream and StrategicScenario. Adjacent complete drafts are WM-KNW-011 Goal/Objective, WM-ACT-030 Initiative, WM-KNW-010 Decision/Rationale, WM-ACT-024 Decision/Approval Activity and WM-REC-010 Decision/Approval Record. WM-ACT-001 Capability and WM-ACT-003 Process/Workflow are legacy-only. Outcome and Benefit Realization is already an identifier-unassigned candidate.

Assess this proposal: Strategy, Business Model, Value Stream and Strategic Scenario each need independent identity and lifecycle but remain identifier-unassigned. Strategic Theme is contained by Strategy; Value Proposition is contained by Business Model. Reuse the adjacent drafts by reference. Strategy owns choice sets, rejected alternatives, assumptions, horizon and review triggers, not plans or projects. Business Model owns value mechanism, not organization or offers. Value Stream owns recipient-triggered value-state stages, not internal processes. Strategic Scenario is a hypothesis space and never a source of record. Keep forecasts, outcomes and benefits distinct and forbid scenario outputs from becoming actuals or baselines.

Test a startup changing from direct to marketplace channel and a multi-industry group exiting one segment. Reject a project list labelled strategy.

Return <=900 words with: Verdict; strongest evidence; strongest counterexample; identity/mastership; strategy/themes; business model/value proposition; value stream/process; scenarios/hypotheses; objectives/capabilities/initiatives/decisions; time/version/review; scenario; at least 10 invariants; minimum model set; blockers. Explicitly decide whether the four proposed roots are truly independent or whether any should be merged/profiled, and why.