# Exact unsent Grok prompt — EM-TEC-09

Independent enterprise metamodel review. Do not browse, invent identifiers or claim publication readiness.

EM-TEC-09 covers Technology, TechnologyAdoption, ArchitectureStandard, ConformanceAssessment and ArchitectureException. Relevant drafts are WM-KNW-012 Policy/Rule, WM-KNW-013 Constraint/Requirement Rule, WM-ACT-034 Assessment/Evaluation, the WM-KNW-010/WM-ACT-024/WM-REC-010 decision triad, and software product/component boundaries. WM-REC-005 is legacy-only and does not clearly model a normative standard.

Assess this proposal: Technology, Technology Adoption and Architecture Exception require independent identity but remain identifier-unassigned. Architecture Standard profiles WM-KNW-012 and references WM-KNW-013 rules. Conformance Assessment profiles WM-ACT-034. ADR reuses the decision triad. Separate abstract technology from product, release and deployment; upstream lifecycle from vendor support and local adoption; adoption from conformance; standard expression from rule; exception from assessment, nonconformity and risk acceptance. Exception must identify subject, exact rules, authority, owner, conditions and bounded expiry; renewal is a new grant.

Test standard v1/v2, one application assessed against both and a temporary R7 exception. Reject the claim that using a recommended language proves whole-system conformance.

Return <=900 words with: Verdict; strongest evidence; strongest counterexample; identity/mastership; technology/product/version; adoption/lifecycle; standard/rules; conformance assessment; exception/waiver; ADR; time/version/scenario; scenario; at least 10 invariants; minimum model set; blockers. Explicitly decide whether Technology Adoption and Architecture Exception need independent roots and resolve waiver mastership.