# Exact unsent Grok prompt — EM-WRK-04

Independent enterprise metamodel review. Do not browse, invent identifiers or claim publication readiness.

EM-WRK-04 covers Portfolio, PortfolioComponent, SelectionCriterion, Prioritization, InvestmentAllocation and PortfolioScenario. Complete adjacent drafts cover WM-ACT-029 Program / Portfolio, WM-ACT-005 Project, WM-ACT-030 Initiative, WM-ECO-012 Budget, WM-KNW-011 Goal / Objective and the decision triad.

Assess this proposal: profile Portfolio on WM-ACT-029; treat PortfolioComponent, Prioritization, InvestmentAllocation and PortfolioScenario as addressable portfolio-owned releases; create an identifier-unassigned Selection Criteria Set root because released sets are reusable across portfolios and cycles. Keep component mastership, budget authority, observations, accounting actuals and decision records external. Allocate no other identifier.

Separate Portfolio from Program, catalogue, project and initiative; membership from mastership; criteria from observations and ranking; rank from intrinsic work properties; portfolio allocation from budget authority, commitment, actual and component funding; scenario from approved baseline; strategic alignment from causal benefit claims.

Test two portfolios referencing one initiative with 0.6 and 0.4 funding shares while the selected scenario preserves criteria and decision evidence. Permit unrelated components and reject automatic Program semantics.

Return <=900 words with: Verdict; strongest evidence; strongest counterexample; identity/mastership; boundaries; components/membership; criteria/scoring/prioritization; allocation/funding; scenarios/decisions; governance; time/version/rebalance; scenario; at least 10 invariants; minimum model set; blockers. Explicitly decide whether Selection Criteria Set needs independent identity and address cross-portfolio double funding and double counting.