# Exact unsent Grok prompt — EM-WRK-05

Independent enterprise metamodel review. Do not browse, invent identifiers or claim publication readiness.

EM-WRK-05 covers ResourceDemand, ResourcePool, CapacityPlan, ResourceAllocation and AllocationScenario. Complete adjacent drafts cover WM-ORG-016 Work Assignment, WM-ECO-012 Budget, WM-PER-001 Person, WM-OBJ-001 Physical Item, WM-XCT-009 Time / Calendar, WM-ACT-008 Plan / Schedule and WM-FLW-015 Resource Consumption.

Assess this proposal: create identifier-unassigned Resource Demand and Resource Pool roots; profile Capacity Plan on WM-ACT-008; keep AllocationScenario as a plan-owned immutable release and ResourceAllocation as a scenario-owned assertion. Keep people, assignments, assets, money, calendars and actual consumption in their source masters.

Separate competence demand from named-person assignment; pool membership from employment and asset mastership; capacity from availability; demand from allocation; reservation from confirmation; alternative scenario from approved baseline; plan from schedule, assignment and actual use. Preserve quantity kind, units, calendars, time zones, scenario identity, uncertainty, divisibility, exclusivity, reservation expiry and explicit overbooking policy. Reject summing FTE, GPU-hours and currency.

Test two projects competing for one specialist and one GPU pool. In one scenario, specialist shares total 110% and exclusive GPU jobs overlap; in another scenario intervals do not overlap. Detect conflicts without changing worker, employment, assignment or asset records.

Return <=900 words with: Verdict; strongest evidence; strongest counterexample; identity/mastership; resource kinds/units; demand/pool; capacity plan/scenarios; allocation/reservation; human/asset/compute boundaries; time/calendar; plan versus fact; scenario; at least 10 invariants; minimum model set; blockers. Explicitly decide which candidates need independent roots and when values above 100% are or are not errors.