# R2 disposition: revise before publication

Actual complete-input static audits disagree: Claude BLOCK, Grok ACCEPT WITH LIMITS. Both responses were read in full; raw text and exact method/input limits are preserved. R1 was withdrawn before audit and is not counted as a completed review. No catalogue model publication is authorized by these responses; the owner already authorized the program, but this candidate has unresolved code defects.

Accepted for R3 correction: bind the reducer/schema build and each derived outcome into durable history; reject prohibited control characters consistently; compare derived state by canonical bytes (not Python bool/int equality); constrain occurrence correction lookup to an authorized scope/purpose; retain compact bounded conflict diagnostics; explicitly authorize coverage attestations; normalize invalid calendar error handling. Tighten mapping correction predecessors and state the authority/liveness/export/transport boundaries explicitly. Add meaningful tests for the reproduced defects and uncovered independent guards. Do not simply count provider votes.

Supply complete generated examples, tool pin inventory and literal model.scope in the next audit, alongside exact changed code/schema/docs and test/acceptance reports. Toolchain execution remains author evidence, not static reviewer execution. Upstream bytes and historical research may remain independently hash-listed with explicit scope; do not claim they were read in this audit.

R2 38-file freeze remains unchanged and publicly inspectable at implementation-r2/. R3 requires a new freeze and explicit changed-input review by BOTH providers. Version 0.1.0 has not been released; draft build changes must nevertheless become distinguishable in local stores/archives. No live connectors, distributed semantics, writable restore, business effects or production certification are added implicitly.