Please provide an independent deep semantic research review for Vercy WM-ORG-017 Performance Objective / Review. This is a generic public enterprise model, with synthetic cases only. No other provider answer is supplied. This is a browser design-review pass; an earlier CLI research transport timed out with no usable response. Read primary public sources if available, distinguish observed source statements, design inferences and unverified mappings. Do not claim standard or legal compliance. Boundary: a governed, independently identified performance case linking objectives, evidence/attribution, reviewer assignments, period-specific assessment, optional calibration, appeal/correction, recognition and purpose-limited disclosure. Person, Employment, Membership, Work Assignment, Organization, raw evidence and downstream pay/hiring/dismissal decisions retain separate masters. Vercy whole-object facets are identity/class, direct properties, recognition/observation, capabilities/behaviour/actions, context/evidence. Structure must map bundles to layers to findings/questions/artifacts. Please challenge this boundary and propose a coherent alternative when needed. Give: (1) identity, lifecycle, cardinalities and ownership; (2) 6-8 domain bundles with concrete findings and sources; (3) minimal startup and international enterprise profiles; (4) at least 10 invariants and negative cases; (5) serious omissions and publishable-draft versus canonical gates; (6) primary URL references and exactly what they support. Pay particular attention to narrative-only contractor reviews without an Employment record or rating scale; initial drafts without assessments; several concurrent employments with one governing context per case; contested shared credit with unknown shares; repeated calibration and appeals; correction versus opinion disagreement; employer change without copying a confidential dossier; no portable person score or automatic employment decisions based on commits, keystrokes or surveillance proxies. Reference precedents include HR Open EPM (public overview, not an assumed field-level XSD mapping), W3C ORG/PROV, SFIA/ESCO as capability vocabulary, SPACE as multidimensional productivity research, and OPM as a public-sector process example, not universal law. We need a practical research memo of roughly 2000-3500 words with explicit decisions and no invented source verification.