{"schema":"https://ver.cy/schemas/card/1.0.0","id":"vr.tr.dominance","code":"thing-dominance","url":"https://ver.cy/models/thing/dominance/","name":"dominance","alternateNames":["transcendence","transcendency","superiority","ascendance","ascendence","ascendancy","ascendency","control","ascendant","ascendent","domination","mastery"],"kind":"thing","status":"published","version":"0.2.0-wave.5","language":"en","classifiers":{"family":"Thing Registry","category":"Cross-cutting context","entryKind":"noun.state","plane":"XCT","domain":["XCT.STA"],"industry":[],"navPath":"","tags":[],"facets":{"substance":"abstract","origin":"conceptual","agency":"inert","mobility":"not-applicable","scale":"not-applicable","affordances":["observable"]}},"whatItIs":"The state that exists when one person or group has power over another; ascendancy or control of one party over others, studied in social science as social dominance and in ethology as dominance hierarchies.","purpose":"Let an agent describe a situation of dominance by parties, form of power, evidence and effects, telling legitimate authority from coercion, and point to safeguards where dominance is abusive.","scope":{"in":[],"out":[],"boundaries":[]},"distinguishingFeatures":["A relation between people or groups, not a trait of one person; it can exist as dependence or capacity to interfere even when power is not exercised.","Dominance, legitimacy and abuse are assessed separately: accepted rules can support authority without excluding abuse.","Coercive dominance differs from prestige, influence based on recognised competence."],"structure":{"bundles":[{"id":"parties","name":"Parties","description":"Who dominates whom.","layers":[{"id":"parties","name":"Parties","description":"Dominant and subordinate.","findings":[{"id":"parties","name":"Parties","description":"Parties, domain and period of the power relation, dependence and capacity to interfere.","questions":[{"text":"Who holds power over whom?","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"In which setting?","kind":"definition"}]}]},{"id":"basis","name":"Basis","description":"Source of power.","findings":[{"id":"power-basis","name":"Power basis","description":"Force, resources, status, rules.","questions":[{"text":"What gives one party power?","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Is it backed by institutions?","kind":"boundary"}]}]}]},{"id":"form","name":"Form","description":"How power is exercised.","layers":[{"id":"means","name":"Means","description":"Means of control.","findings":[{"id":"means","name":"Means","description":"Observed means.","questions":[{"text":"Which means of control are evidenced?","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Are they coercive?","kind":"boundary"}]}]},{"id":"legitimacy","name":"Legitimacy","description":"Authority or domination.","findings":[{"id":"legitimacy","name":"Legitimacy","description":"Rules and consent.","questions":[{"text":"Is the power exercised under accepted rules?","kind":"boundary"},{"text":"Can the subordinate party exit or appeal?","kind":"boundary"}]}]}]},{"id":"effects","name":"Effects","description":"Consequences.","layers":[{"id":"effects-on-people","name":"Effects on people","description":"Autonomy and wellbeing.","findings":[{"id":"effect","name":"Effect","description":"Observed effect.","questions":[{"text":"What effects on the subordinate party are evidenced?","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"How serious are they?","kind":"measurement"}]}]},{"id":"effects-on-markets-or-groups","name":"Effects on markets or groups","description":"Wider effects.","findings":[{"id":"wider-effect","name":"Wider effect","description":"Competition or social effect.","questions":[{"text":"Does it harm competition or groups?","kind":"boundary"},{"text":"Which authority assessed it?","kind":"provenance"}]}]}]},{"id":"remedies","name":"Remedies","description":"Safeguards.","layers":[{"id":"legal-remedies","name":"Legal remedies","description":"Law and authorities.","findings":[{"id":"remedy","name":"Remedy","description":"Law and body.","questions":[{"text":"Which law applies?","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Which authority can act?","kind":"provenance"}]}]},{"id":"support","name":"Support","description":"Help for affected people.","findings":[{"id":"support","name":"Support","description":"Services.","questions":[{"text":"Which support services exist?","kind":"action"},{"text":"How can they be reached?","kind":"action"}]}]}]}]},"agentConduct":{"may":["describe and analyse power relations","point to support services"],"mustNot":["coach anyone to dominate or control another person","label a named person abusive without evidence"],"requiresHuman":["cases of abuse, which go to support services or authorities"]},"ethics":{"considerations":["dignity and autonomy","protection of vulnerable people"],"affectedParties":["subordinated people and groups"]},"owners":{"steward":"nobody; a state of relations between parties","roles":[],"masterSystems":[]},"relations":[{"target":"oewn-13943868-n","type":"parent","note":"registry parent class"},{"target":"power relation","type":"related","note":"social relation"},{"target":"authority","type":"related","note":"legitimacy assessed separately"},{"target":"prestige","type":"related","note":"influence without force"},{"target":"dominance hierarchy in animals","type":"related","note":"a separate ethological sense"}],"interaction":{"identity":{"applicability":"required","items":["Vercy registry: vr.tr.dominance","Open English WordNet: oewn-14465291-n"]},"properties":{"applicability":"not-applicable","items":[]},"recognition":{"applicability":"optional","items":["Observed through behaviour, decisions and control of resources, not directly"]},"capabilities":{"applicability":"required","items":["identify the parties and form of power","tell dominance from legitimate authority","describe effects on subordinate parties","point to safeguards and support where dominance is abusive"]},"hazards":{"applicability":"required","items":["Abuse of power and exploitation","Coercive control in relationships","Market abuse by dominant firms"]},"interfaces":{"applicability":"required","items":["Competition law on abuse of a dominant market position, such as Article 102 TFEU (dominance itself is not unlawful)","Laws against domestic abuse and coercive control, by jurisdiction"]},"context":{"applicability":"required","items":["Describing and analysing relations of power between people and groups.","interpersonal dominance","group-based dominance (as in Social Dominance Theory)","economic and market dominance","political dominance"]}},"sources":[{"title":"Domination","url":"https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/domination/","note":"Social power, structural dependence, potential versus exercised power, and competing accounts of domination."},{"title":"Authority","url":"https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/authority/","note":"Distinctions between power, de facto authority and legitimate authority; legitimacy and coercion."},{"title":"Article 102 Investigations","url":"https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/antitrust-and-cartels/procedures/article-102-investigations_en","note":"Market dominance, Article 102 TFEU and the distinction between dominance and its abuse."},{"title":"Controlling or coercive behaviour: statutory guidance framework","url":"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/controlling-or-coercive-behaviour-statutory-guidance-framework/controlling-or-coercive-behaviour-statutory-guidance-framework-accessible","note":"Coercive control as a pattern of domestic abuse and the jurisdiction-specific legal context."}],"openQuestions":["The registry sense comes from a lexical source; should market dominance be a separate entry?"],"resources":{"spec":"/models/things/publications/thing-dominance/spec.json"},"provenance":{"origin":"thing registry research (pass 2)","builtFrom":["models/things/publications/thing-dominance/spec.json"],"providers":["Claude"],"researchStatus":"unreviewed","generatedAt":"2026-10-21T20:24:21Z","builder":"tools/build_cards.py@1.0.0"},"completeness":{"sections":{"classifiers":"filled","whatItIs":"filled","purpose":"filled","distinguishingFeatures":"filled","structure":"filled","agentConduct":"filled","ethics":"filled","owners":"filled","relations":"filled","interaction.identity":"filled","interaction.properties":"not-applicable","interaction.recognition":"filled","interaction.capabilities":"filled","interaction.hazards":"filled","interaction.interfaces":"filled","interaction.context":"filled","sources":"filled"},"notes":{"_gate":"Published through the thing publication gate 1.0 on 2026-10-21T20:39:50+00:00: completeness 1.00; sense: WordNet gloss; 4 live sources; review by codex: pass","interaction.properties":"A social relation has no physical properties."},"score":1.0}}