{"schema":"https://ver.cy/schemas/card/1.0.0","id":"vr.tr.opposition-q3884233","code":"thing-q3884233","url":"https://ver.cy/models/thing/q3884233/","name":"opposition","alternateNames":["contrary motion"],"kind":"thing","status":"research-draft","version":"0.1.0-research.1","language":"en","classifiers":{"family":"Thing Registry","category":"Cross-cutting context","entryKind":"thing","plane":"XCT","domain":["XCT.REL"],"industry":[],"navPath":"","tags":[],"facets":{}},"whatItIs":"Opposition is a relation in which terms, propositions, positions, or forces stand against one another through incompatibility, contrast, or counteraction, with the precise relation depending on the domain.","purpose":"Enable an agent to identify, interpret and assess an opposition between terms, positions or tendencies without confusing difference, incompatibility and active resistance.","scope":{"in":["The terms, positions or tendencies opposed and the respect in which they oppose one another","Definitions of opposition attributed to particular disciplines, traditions or participants","Criteria distinguishing contradiction, contrariety, polarity and practical counteraction","Context, evidence and operational tests supporting an opposition claim","Changes in the opposition and conditions under which it persists or dissolves"],"out":["Political opposition parties and their institutional organisation","Military conflict, competitive events and their execution","Astronomical opposition and its geometric measurements","Anatomical opposition movements and their biomechanics","Complete models of the propositions, agents or processes participating in an opposition"],"boundaries":[]},"distinguishingFeatures":["An opposition claim identifies a respect in which the relata stand against one another; merely showing that they differ is insufficient.","A contradiction test asks whether exactly one alternative must hold, while a contrariety test asks whether both may fail; their application depends on the stated framework.","A polarity claim requires an interpretable axis or ordering that makes the relata opposed poles, rather than an arbitrary pair.","Practical opposition requires evidence of counteraction or resistance; incompatible descriptions alone do not establish opposing behaviour.","Opposition on one issue does not establish opposition on every issue, permanent hostility or exhaustive division into two sides."],"structure":{"bundles":[{"id":"opposed-relata-and-respect","name":"Opposed relata and respect","description":"Establishes what is opposed and the precise respect that makes the relation oppositional.","layers":[{"id":"relata-identification","name":"Relata identification","description":"Separates the opposed entities from their descriptions and representatives.","findings":[{"id":"terms-of-the-opposition","name":"Terms of the opposition","description":"Record the actual relata and distinguish a position from the person or institution expressing it.","questions":[{"text":"Which exact terms, claims, positions or tendencies are said to oppose one another?","id":"terms-of-the-opposition-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Does the opposition concern the relata themselves, their descriptions or particular commitments attributed to them?","id":"terms-of-the-opposition-q02","kind":"boundary"}]}]},{"id":"shared-respect","name":"Shared respect","description":"Locates the issue, dimension or effect on which the relata stand against one another.","findings":[{"id":"respect-and-conditions","name":"Respect and conditions","description":"Require the opposition claim to specify a comparable respect and its contextual conditions.","questions":[{"text":"On what issue, predicate, axis or objective are these relata opposed?","id":"respect-and-conditions-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Does the opposition remain when time, reference, qualifications and circumstances are held constant?","id":"respect-and-conditions-q02","kind":"boundary"}]}]}]},{"id":"forms-of-opposition","name":"Forms of opposition","description":"Distinguishes interpretations with different logical, semantic and practical consequences.","layers":[{"id":"exclusion-and-exhaustiveness","name":"Exclusion and exhaustiveness","description":"Examines whether alternatives can hold together or fail together.","findings":[{"id":"joint-possibility-tests","name":"Joint possibility tests","description":"Record coexistence and joint-failure judgments within an explicitly identified framework.","questions":[{"text":"Under the adopted framework, can both alternatives hold in the same respect at the same time?","id":"joint-possibility-tests-q01","kind":"boundary"},{"text":"Can neither alternative hold, and what example or argument establishes that possibility?","id":"joint-possibility-tests-q02","kind":"boundary"}]}]},{"id":"polarity-and-counteraction","name":"Polarity and counteraction","description":"Separates opposed locations on a dimension from action directed against another action or objective.","findings":[{"id":"basis-of-standing-against","name":"Basis of standing against","description":"Identify whether opposition rests on semantic organisation, an ordered dimension or demonstrated counteraction.","questions":[{"text":"What axis, ordering, convention or opposing effect supports describing these relata as opposed?","id":"basis-of-standing-against-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"What observation would distinguish active counteraction from mere disagreement or separation?","id":"basis-of-standing-against-q02","kind":"measurement"}]}]}]},{"id":"interpretations-and-disputes","name":"Interpretations and disputes","description":"Preserves competing definitions and disagreements about an opposition's existence or character.","layers":[{"id":"attributed-definitions","name":"Attributed definitions","description":"Connects each interpretation to its proponents and domain of use.","findings":[{"id":"definition-holder","name":"Definition holder","description":"Record who defines the opposition and which criteria their account requires.","questions":[{"text":"Which source, school or participant supplies the operative definition of opposition?","id":"definition-holder-q01","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"What must an instance satisfy under that definition, and which nearby relations does it exclude?","id":"definition-holder-q02","kind":"definition"}]}]},{"id":"contested-framing","name":"Contested framing","description":"Makes disagreements about the proposed opposition explicit.","findings":[{"id":"alternative-accounts","name":"Alternative accounts","description":"Compare accounts that classify the same case differently or reject its oppositional framing.","questions":[{"text":"Who disputes this opposition, and do they dispute the relata, the shared respect or the criterion of opposition?","id":"alternative-accounts-q01","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Which example or observation would distinguish the competing accounts?","id":"alternative-accounts-q02","kind":"measurement"}]}]}]},{"id":"recognition-and-evidence","name":"Recognition and evidence","description":"Turns an opposition claim into a checkable interpretation while testing for misleading binaries.","layers":[{"id":"instance-tests","name":"Instance tests","description":"Links recognition criteria to evidence appropriate to the claimed kind of opposition.","findings":[{"id":"operational-criterion","name":"Operational criterion","description":"Specify whether recognition depends on a formal argument, usage evidence, stated commitments or observed effects.","questions":[{"text":"What repeatable test determines whether this case counts as opposition under the chosen definition?","id":"operational-criterion-q01","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Which evidence supports the result, and what result would overturn it?","id":"operational-criterion-q02","kind":"provenance"}]}]},{"id":"binary-framing-checks","name":"Binary framing checks","description":"Searches for omitted alternatives, mixtures and changes of meaning.","findings":[{"id":"missing-middle-and-equivocation","name":"Missing middle and equivocation","description":"Check whether an apparent opposition depends on excluding legitimate cases or using a term in different senses.","questions":[{"text":"Are intermediate, mixed, independent or neither-side cases possible, and does the framing acknowledge them?","id":"missing-middle-and-equivocation-q01","kind":"boundary"},{"text":"Does either term change meaning between the statements used to establish the opposition?","id":"missing-middle-and-equivocation-q02","kind":"boundary"}]}]}]},{"id":"persistence-and-response","name":"Persistence and response","description":"Assesses what sustains an opposition and which responses are coherent for its identified form.","layers":[{"id":"conditions-of-persistence","name":"Conditions of persistence","description":"Tracks whether opposition survives changes in commitments, circumstances or interpretation.","findings":[{"id":"continuity-or-dissolution","name":"Continuity or dissolution","description":"Distinguish changes to the relata from changes to the context or language that makes them opposed.","questions":[{"text":"Which commitments, definitions or circumstances must remain for this opposition to persist?","id":"continuity-or-dissolution-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"What evidence would show that the opposition ended rather than became less visible or changed its terms?","id":"continuity-or-dissolution-q02","kind":"measurement"}]}]},{"id":"form-appropriate-response","name":"Form-appropriate response","description":"Relates possible action to the kind and basis of opposition established.","findings":[{"id":"response-and-success-criterion","name":"Response and success criterion","description":"Evaluate whether a proposed response resolves ambiguity, changes commitments, introduces alternatives or reduces counteracting effects.","questions":[{"text":"Would clarification, reframing, compromise or changed behaviour address the established basis of this opposition?","id":"response-and-success-criterion-q01","kind":"action"},{"text":"What would count as success, and would it dissolve the opposition or only alter its practical consequences?","id":"response-and-success-criterion-q02","kind":"action"}]}]}]},{"id":"evidence-and-external-alignment","name":"Evidence and external alignment","description":"What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.","layers":[{"id":"reported-evidence","name":"Reported evidence","description":"Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.","findings":[{"id":"evidence-confidence-notes","name":"Check these first","description":"Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.","questions":[{"text":"Which of these check these first hold for the sense of opposition this model covers, and on what evidence?","id":"evidence-confidence-notes-q01","kind":"provenance"}]},{"id":"evidence-kinds","name":"Kinds and varieties","description":"Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.","questions":[{"text":"Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of opposition this model covers, and on what evidence?","id":"evidence-kinds-q01","kind":"provenance"}]},{"id":"evidence-real-world-use","name":"Real-world use","description":"Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.","questions":[{"text":"Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of opposition this model covers, and on what evidence?","id":"evidence-real-world-use-q01","kind":"provenance"}]},{"id":"evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards","name":"Failure modes and hazards","description":"Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.","questions":[{"text":"Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of opposition this model covers, and on what evidence?","id":"evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01","kind":"provenance"}]},{"id":"evidence-neighbours","name":"Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart","description":"Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.","questions":[{"text":"Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of opposition this model covers, and on what evidence?","id":"evidence-neighbours-q01","kind":"provenance"}]}]}]}]},"agentConduct":{"may":["Explain how terms, claims or forces stand in opposition within a stated field.","Identify contradictions in a text or argument and point them out."],"mustNot":["Present contrasting positions as opposed when they are compatible, in order to inflame conflict.","Frame people as enemies on the basis of a contrast it has drawn.","Misstate which claims contradict each other in legal or contractual texts."],"requiresHuman":["Resolving a conflict between rules or instructions that affects people's rights."]},"ethics":{"considerations":["Framing issues as binary oppositions can deepen social division.","Getting contradictions wrong in law or logic leads to unsound decisions."],"affectedParties":["Parties to a dispute","Readers relying on the analysis","Groups framed as opponents"]},"owners":{"steward":"Nobody owns it; it is an abstract relation.","roles":[],"masterSystems":[]},"relations":[{"target":"Q10862449","type":"parent","note":"registry parent class"},{"target":"Q3505845","type":"parent","note":"registry parent class"},{"target":"Q621461","type":"parent","note":"registry parent class"}],"interaction":{"identity":{"applicability":"required","items":["Vercy registry: vr.tr.opposition-q3884233","Wikidata: Q3884233 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3884233)"]},"properties":{"applicability":"not-applicable","items":["Opposed relata: Identified pair or explicitly structured set of terms, propositions, positions, agents or tendencies","Respect of opposition: Named issue, predicate, semantic dimension, objective or effect","Opposition interpretation: Contradiction; contrariety; polarity; counteraction; framework-specific interpretation; unresolved","Joint satisfiability: Both may hold; both cannot hold; context-dependent; unresolved","Joint failure: Both may fail; both cannot fail; context-dependent; unresolved","Direction of counteraction: First relatum resists second; second resists first; reciprocal; not applicable; unknown","Interpretive attribution: Source, discipline, school or participant asserting the opposition and its definition","Temporal standing: Currently supported; historically supported; anticipated; ceased; unresolved, with applicable interval"]},"recognition":{"applicability":"not-applicable","items":[]},"capabilities":{"applicability":"required","items":["Reconstruct an opposition claim by identifying its relata, respect and interpretive framework.","Test whether the claimed opposition permits coexistence, intermediate cases or neither alternative.","Compare competing accounts of why the same relata are opposed.","Detect false dichotomies, shifts of meaning and unsupported attribution of opposition.","Evaluate whether clarification, reframing, compromise or removal of counteraction addresses the identified kind of opposition."]},"hazards":{"applicability":"required","items":["False dichotomies hide middle positions and compromise.","Missed contradictions let inconsistent rules be applied."]},"interfaces":{"applicability":"not-applicable","items":[]},"context":{"applicability":"required","items":["Opposition is used in philosophy and logic to examine how concepts, judgments or propositions contrast or exclude one another.","It helps distinguish relations such as contradiction and contrariety when evaluating arguments and conceptual systems."]}},"sources":[{"title":"Wikidata item Q3884233: opposition","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3884233","note":"identity and sense of the item"}],"openQuestions":["Does Wikidata item Q3884233 identify opposition as a general relation or a narrower disciplinary concept requiring a different scope?","Which reference works and traditions should anchor the competing definitions, and how do their classifications overlap or conflict?","Should practical counteraction remain within this registry entry or be linked to a separate model once the intended sense is verified?","Which operational tests are established for the intended domain, and where must recognition remain an attributed interpretive judgment?","Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept and therefore need to serve as its single source of truth?"],"resources":{"spec":"/models/things/publications/thing-q3884233/spec.json"},"provenance":{"origin":"thing registry research (pass 2)","builtFrom":["models/things/publications/thing-q3884233/spec.json"],"providers":["Codex"],"researchStatus":"unreviewed","generatedAt":"2026-09-12T11:46:08Z","builder":"tools/build_cards.py@1.0.0"},"completeness":{"sections":{"classifiers":"filled","whatItIs":"filled","purpose":"filled","distinguishingFeatures":"filled","structure":"filled","agentConduct":"filled","ethics":"filled","owners":"filled","relations":"filled","interaction.identity":"filled","interaction.properties":"not-applicable","interaction.recognition":"not-applicable","interaction.capabilities":"filled","interaction.hazards":"filled","interaction.interfaces":"not-applicable","interaction.context":"filled","sources":"filled"},"notes":{"interaction.properties":"Plane XCT: no invented physical properties.","interaction.interfaces":"No generally applicable standard, law or official classification governs opposition as a philosophical relation.","interaction.recognition":"Philosophical opposition is an abstract relation with no defining visual appearance."},"score":1.0}}