{"schema":"https://ver.cy/schemas/card/1.0.0","id":"vr.wm-dat-007","code":"wm-dat-007-data-quality-assessment","url":"https://ver.cy/models/wm-dat-007-data-quality-assessment/","name":"Data Quality Assessment","alternateNames":[],"kind":"world-model","status":"published","version":"0.3.0-research.1","language":"en","classifiers":{"family":"World Models","category":"Information and virtual systems","entryKind":"aggregate","plane":"","domain":["INF.DAT.QLT"],"industry":["Cross-industry"],"navPath":"NAV.INF.DAT.QLT","tags":["data","quality","assessment","inf.dat.qlt"],"facets":{}},"whatItIs":"Owns assessment identity, version and lifecycle; assessed subject and version bindings; consumer, use case, purpose and fitness criteria; quality framework, categories, dimensions, metrics, rules, thresholds and requirements; plan, population, sample, method, tool and execution references; observations, measurements, violations, scores, uncertainty and purpose-qualified verdicts; evidence, provenance, review, conflicts, annotations, exceptions, issue and remediation references, access, retention, audit and projections. Dataset, data product, contract, schema, pipeline, run, metric registry, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external where authoritative.","purpose":"Represent one governed, reproducible assessment that qualifies data quality for a declared subject, version, population, purpose and time without treating quality as a universal intrinsic property.","scope":{"in":["Assessment identity, subject and version, purpose, audience, quality model, metrics, rules, thresholds, plan, sampling, methods and execution evidence","Observations, results, uncertainty, violations, scores, fitness verdicts, evidence, review, conflicts, exceptions, lifecycle, issue and remediation references, access, records and projections"],"out":["Owning Dataset, Data Product, Data Contract, Schema, Pipeline, Run, Issue, Remediation, Certificate, Audit or Records masters","Treating a pass, score, green dashboard, completed run or certificate as proof of universal correctness, completeness, fitness, safety, compliance or absence of harm","Autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or physical records disposition"],"boundaries":[{"neighbor":"WM-DAT-001 Dataset","distinction":"The unified parent signal and incoming candidate relation identify the assessed dataset and version. The assessment owns source-qualified quality definitions and assertions; it does not own dataset identity, contents or lifecycle."},{"neighbor":"WM-DAT-004 Data Schema / Data Contract","distinction":"A contract or schema owns agreed structure and obligations. This assessment binds a version and records whether bounded rules were evaluated, not the contract lifecycle itself."},{"neighbor":"WM-DAT-005 Data Pipeline and WM-ACT-053 Data Processing Job / Pipeline Run","distinction":"Pipelines own reusable transformations and runs own executions. The assessment references exact runs, inputs and logs while owning the interpretation and verdict for its declared purpose."},{"neighbor":"Issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records","distinction":"These masters retain independent authority and lifecycles. The assessment stores non-owning references, review evidence, qualified annotations and successor corrections."},{"neighbor":"DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN NQAF, OECD QFS, NIST RDaF, QUDT, OWL-Time and RFC 3339","distinction":"These vocabularies and frameworks have distinct scopes and normative force. Every mapping is version-pinned, profile-qualified and loss-declaring."}]},"distinguishingFeatures":["Qualifies data for a declared purpose, version, population and time, not as a universal property.","Holds metrics, rules, observations and verdicts, while issues and remediation are linked records.","Differs from a data contract, which states expectations, while the assessment measures against them.","Allows conflicting assessments for different purposes to coexist."],"structure":{"bundles":[{"id":"assessment-identity-scope-subject-and-purpose","name":"Assessment identity, scope, subject and purpose","description":"Groups governed data-quality context for assessment identity, scope, subject and purpose.","layers":[{"id":"assessment-root-version-state-and-authority","name":"Assessment root, version, state and authority","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for assessment root, version, state and authority.","findings":[{"id":"assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status","name":"Assessment identity, type, version, current head and status","description":"Records assessment identity, type, version, current head and status as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish assessment identity, type, version, current head and status?","id":"assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status-q01","kind":"identity"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on assessment identity, type, version, current head and status, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status-q02","kind":"event"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify assessment identity, type, version, current head and status?","id":"assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status-q03","kind":"process"}]},{"id":"issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability","name":"Issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability","description":"Records issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability?","id":"issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability-q01","kind":"ownership"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability-q02","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability?","id":"issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"subject-population-purpose-and-decision-context","name":"Subject, population, purpose and decision context","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for subject, population, purpose and decision context.","findings":[{"id":"assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample","name":"Assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample","description":"Records assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample?","id":"assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample-q02","kind":"composition"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample?","id":"assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample-q03","kind":"privacy"}]},{"id":"consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion","name":"Consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion","description":"Records consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion?","id":"consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion-q01","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion?","id":"consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion-q03","kind":"lifecycle"}]}]}]},{"id":"quality-model-dimensions-metrics-rules-and-requirements","name":"Quality model, dimensions, metrics, rules and requirements","description":"Groups governed data-quality context for quality model, dimensions, metrics, rules and requirements.","layers":[{"id":"framework-category-dimension-and-metric-definition","name":"Framework, category, dimension and metric definition","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for framework, category, dimension and metric definition.","findings":[{"id":"quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope","name":"Quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope","description":"Records quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope?","id":"quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope-q01","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope-q02","kind":"ownership"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope?","id":"quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope-q03","kind":"quality"}]},{"id":"metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation","name":"Metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation","description":"Records metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation?","id":"metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation-q01","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation-q02","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation?","id":"metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation-q03","kind":"security"}]}]},{"id":"rules-thresholds-tolerances-and-requirements","name":"Rules, thresholds, tolerances and requirements","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for rules, thresholds, tolerances and requirements.","findings":[{"id":"rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy","name":"Rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy","description":"Records rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy?","id":"rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy-q01","kind":"constraint"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy-q02","kind":"exception"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy?","id":"rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy-q03","kind":"retention"}]},{"id":"requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping","name":"Requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping","description":"Records requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping?","id":"requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping-q01","kind":"requirement"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping-q02","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping?","id":"requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping-q03","kind":"interoperability"}]}]}]},{"id":"assessment-plan-method-sampling-and-execution","name":"Assessment plan, method, sampling and execution","description":"Groups governed data-quality context for assessment plan, method, sampling and execution.","layers":[{"id":"campaign-window-trigger-and-sampling-design","name":"Campaign, window, trigger and sampling design","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for campaign, window, trigger and sampling design.","findings":[{"id":"assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window","name":"Assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window","description":"Records assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window?","id":"assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window-q01","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window-q02","kind":"process"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window?","id":"assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window-q03","kind":"decision"}]},{"id":"population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness","name":"Population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness","description":"Records population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness?","id":"population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness-q01","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness-q02","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness?","id":"population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness-q03","kind":"state"}]}]},{"id":"procedure-tool-inputs-and-run-evidence","name":"Procedure, tool, inputs and run evidence","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for procedure, tool, inputs and run evidence.","findings":[{"id":"method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition","name":"Method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition","description":"Records method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition?","id":"method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition-q01","kind":"process"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition-q02","kind":"privacy"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition?","id":"method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition-q03","kind":"identity"}]},{"id":"execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility","name":"Execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility","description":"Records execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility?","id":"execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility-q01","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility-q02","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility?","id":"execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility-q03","kind":"classification"}]}]}]},{"id":"observations-measurements-results-verdicts-and-fitness","name":"Observations, measurements, results, verdicts and fitness","description":"Groups governed data-quality context for observations, measurements, results, verdicts and fitness.","layers":[{"id":"observations-values-uncertainty-and-rule-results","name":"Observations, values, uncertainty and rule results","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for observations, values, uncertainty and rule results.","findings":[{"id":"observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time","name":"Observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time","description":"Records observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time?","id":"observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time-q01","kind":"event"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time-q02","kind":"quality"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time?","id":"observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time-q03","kind":"relationship"}]},{"id":"measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit","name":"Measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit","description":"Records measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit?","id":"measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit-q01","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit-q02","kind":"security"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit?","id":"measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit-q03","kind":"authority"}]}]},{"id":"violations-aggregation-score-and-fitness-decision","name":"Violations, aggregation, score and fitness decision","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for violations, aggregation, score and fitness decision.","findings":[{"id":"rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope","name":"Rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope","description":"Records rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope?","id":"rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope-q01","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope-q02","kind":"retention"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope?","id":"rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope-q03","kind":"requirement"}]},{"id":"aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use","name":"Aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use","description":"Records aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use?","id":"aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use-q01","kind":"decision"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use-q02","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use?","id":"aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use-q03","kind":"constraint"}]}]}]},{"id":"evidence-provenance-feedback-issues-and-remediation","name":"Evidence, provenance, feedback, issues and remediation","description":"Groups governed data-quality context for evidence, provenance, feedback, issues and remediation.","layers":[{"id":"evidence-provenance-review-and-annotation","name":"Evidence, provenance, review and annotation","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for evidence, provenance, review and annotation.","findings":[{"id":"source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody","name":"Source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody","description":"Records source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody?","id":"source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody-q01","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody-q02","kind":"decision"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody?","id":"source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody-q03","kind":"event"}]},{"id":"assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence","name":"Assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence","description":"Records assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence?","id":"assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence-q01","kind":"authority"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence-q02","kind":"state"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence?","id":"assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence-q03","kind":"temporal"}]}]},{"id":"defects-causes-actions-and-reassessment","name":"Defects, causes, actions and reassessment","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for defects, causes, actions and reassessment.","findings":[{"id":"anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference","name":"Anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference","description":"Records anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference?","id":"anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference-q02","kind":"identity"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference?","id":"anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference-q03","kind":"composition"}]},{"id":"remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness","name":"Remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness","description":"Records remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness?","id":"remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness-q01","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness-q02","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness?","id":"remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness-q03","kind":"evidence"}]}]}]},{"id":"governance-lifecycle-access-records-and-projections","name":"Governance, lifecycle, access, records and projections","description":"Groups governed data-quality context for governance, lifecycle, access, records and projections.","layers":[{"id":"approval-publication-expiry-exception-and-records","name":"Approval, publication, expiry, exception and records","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for approval, publication, expiry, exception and records.","findings":[{"id":"draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked","name":"Draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked","description":"Records draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked?","id":"draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked-q01","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked-q02","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked?","id":"draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked-q03","kind":"ownership"}]},{"id":"exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold","name":"Exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold","description":"Records exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold?","id":"exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold-q01","kind":"privacy"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold-q02","kind":"authority"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold?","id":"exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold-q03","kind":"measurement"}]}]},{"id":"audit-correction-interoperability-and-projection-loss","name":"Audit, correction, interoperability and projection loss","description":"Groups source-qualified assessment context for audit, correction, interoperability and projection loss.","findings":[{"id":"audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time","name":"Audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time","description":"Records audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time?","id":"audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time-q01","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time-q02","kind":"requirement"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time?","id":"audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time-q03","kind":"exception"}]},{"id":"dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection","name":"DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN, OECD, NIST, QUDT and time projection","description":"Records dqv, dcat, prov, shacl, json schema, ssn, iso, un, oecd, nist, qudt and time projection as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.","questions":[{"text":"What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish dqv, dcat, prov, shacl, json schema, ssn, iso, un, oecd, nist, qudt and time projection?","id":"dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection-q01","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on dqv, dcat, prov, shacl, json schema, ssn, iso, un, oecd, nist, qudt and time projection, for which purpose and under what authority?","id":"dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection-q02","kind":"constraint"},{"text":"Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify dqv, dcat, prov, shacl, json schema, ssn, iso, un, oecd, nist, qudt and time projection?","id":"dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection-q03","kind":"provenance"}]}]}]}]},"agentConduct":{"may":["Run declared quality rules and record measurements with method and time.","Derive a fitness verdict under the declared criteria.","Link failing checks to issues for owners.","Report trends across assessments of the same subject."],"mustNot":["Mutate production data or contracts to make checks pass.","Change thresholds after seeing results.","Issue certification of the data.","Present a pass for one purpose as fitness for all purposes.","Close issues without reassessment."],"requiresHuman":["Approving or publishing an assessment.","Changing quality thresholds or criteria.","Accepting known defects for a use case."]},"ethics":{"considerations":["Poor quality data used in decisions about people can cause unfair outcomes.","Quality checks on personal data should use minimal samples and access.","Hiding known defects misleads data consumers."],"affectedParties":["People affected by decisions using the data","Data consumers","Data producers whose work is judged"]},"owners":{"steward":"Dimension owner, namespace authority, data governance mandate and accountable data product owner","roles":[{"name":"Data product owner","responsibilities":["Own assessment purpose, consumer outcomes, risk acceptance and accountable use of quality evidence."]},{"name":"Data steward","responsibilities":["Own subject semantics, quality framework, requirements, definitions, classifications and retention profiles."]},{"name":"Quality analyst and metric author","responsibilities":["Define metrics, rules, methods, sampling, thresholds, aggregation, uncertainty and limitations."]},{"name":"Assessment operator","responsibilities":["Bind inputs, tools, runs, observations, logs and reproducibility evidence without changing authoritative data."]},{"name":"Independent reviewer and approval authority","responsibilities":["Review scope, methods, evidence, conflicts, verdicts, exceptions and publication decisions within mandate."]},{"name":"Subject owner and remediation coordinator","responsibilities":["Receive findings, link external issues and actions, and provide retest evidence without rewriting assessments."]},{"name":"Privacy, security and records steward","responsibilities":["Own protected access, minimization, disclosure, legal hold, retention, disposition, audit and projection policy."]}],"masterSystems":[]},"relations":[{"target":"WM-DAT-001 Dataset","type":"references","note":"Represent the unfrozen parent and incoming candidate composition boundary without ownership, mutation or cascade authority."},{"target":"WM-DAT-004 Data Schema / Data Contract","type":"references","note":"Resolve authoritative structural and contractual requirements without absorbing their lifecycle."},{"target":"WM-DAT-005 Data Pipeline and WM-ACT-053 Data Processing Job / Pipeline Run","type":"references","note":"Resolve reusable processing and exact executions without acquiring execution authority."},{"target":"Data Product, Metric Registry, Issue, Remediation, Certificate, Evidence, Audit and Records models","type":"references","note":"Resolve authoritative definitions, actions, attestations and evidence without changing their ownership."},{"target":"DQV, DCAT 3, PROV-O, SHACL, JSON Schema 2020-12, SSN 2023, ISO/IEC 25012, ISO/IEC 25024, ISO 8000-8, ISO 19157-1, UN NQAF, OECD QFS, NIST RDaF, QUDT 3.1.10, OWL-Time and RFC 3339","type":"aligned","note":"Project version-pinned quality, catalog, provenance, validation, observation, measurement, statistical, research-data, unit and time views with declared loss."},{"target":"WM-DAT-001 Dataset","type":"neighbor","note":"The unified parent signal and incoming candidate relation identify the assessed dataset and version. The assessment owns source-qualified quality definitions and assertions; it does not own dataset identity, contents or lifecycle."},{"target":"WM-DAT-004 Data Schema / Data Contract","type":"neighbor","note":"A contract or schema owns agreed structure and obligations. This assessment binds a version and records whether bounded rules were evaluated, not the contract lifecycle itself."},{"target":"WM-DAT-005 Data Pipeline and WM-ACT-053 Data Processing Job / Pipeline Run","type":"neighbor","note":"Pipelines own reusable transformations and runs own executions. The assessment references exact runs, inputs and logs while owning the interpretation and verdict for its declared purpose."},{"target":"Issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records","type":"neighbor","note":"These masters retain independent authority and lifecycles. The assessment stores non-owning references, review evidence, qualified annotations and successor corrections."},{"target":"DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN NQAF, OECD QFS, NIST RDaF, QUDT, OWL-Time and RFC 3339","type":"neighbor","note":"These vocabularies and frameworks have distinct scopes and normative force. Every mapping is version-pinned, profile-qualified and loss-declaring."}],"interaction":{"identity":{"applicability":"required","items":["Authoritative master-system identifier for each assessment, version, definition, observation, result, verdict or projection, qualified by issuer, namespace and record kind.","Governed globally resolvable assessment IRI.","Dimension UUID or ULID when neither preceding identifier exists."]},"properties":{"applicability":"not-applicable","items":[]},"recognition":{"applicability":"optional","items":["An assessment names a subject version, a purpose, metrics, rules, a time window and a verdict.","Often confused with a data contract, a monitoring dashboard, a data profile or a certificate."]},"capabilities":{"applicability":"required","items":["Register a data quality assessment: Governed operation to register a data quality assessment without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.","Bind the assessed subject, purpose and audience: Governed operation to bind the assessed subject, purpose and audience without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.","Select a quality model, metrics and rules: Governed operation to select a quality model, metrics and rules without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.","Define the plan, time window and sampling design: Governed operation to define the plan, time window and sampling design without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.","Bind method, tool and execution evidence: Governed operation to bind method, tool and execution evidence without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.","Record observations and measurements: Governed operation to record observations and measurements without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.","Evaluate rules and derive a fitness verdict: Governed operation to evaluate rules and derive a fitness verdict without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.","Review, approve, publish or withdraw an assessment: Governed operation to review, approve, publish or withdraw an assessment without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.","Link issues, remediation and reassessment: Governed operation to link issues, remediation and reassessment without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.","Query, project, correct, retain and audit: Governed operation to query, project, correct, retain and audit without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition."]},"hazards":{"applicability":"required","items":["False pass leading to use of bad data.","Sampling that misses affected populations.","Outdated verdict applied to a newer data version."]},"interfaces":{"applicability":"required","items":["W3C Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV).","ISO/IEC 25012 data quality model.","ISO 8000 data quality.","W3C SHACL.","W3C PROV-O and DCAT 3."]},"context":{"applicability":"required","items":["Quality requirements, evidentiary weight, certification, privacy, access, retention and disclosure depend on domain, jurisdiction and organization.","UN and OECD sources are official-statistics profiles; NIST RDaF is a research-data profile and none is universal.","W3C, JSON Schema, ISO, QUDT and RFC sources are versioned profiles and mappings are not assumed binding, lossless or universally applicable."]}},"sources":[{"title":"Data on the Web Best Practices Data Quality Vocabulary","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Data Catalog Vocabulary DCAT Version 3","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Data on the Web Best Practices","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"PROV-O The PROV Ontology","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Shapes Constraint Language SHACL","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"JSON Schema Draft 2020-12","url":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12","note":"JSON Schema Project"},{"title":"Semantic Sensor Network Ontology 2023 Edition","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn-2023/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Data quality model","url":"https://www.iso.org/standard/35736.html","note":"International Organization for Standardization"},{"title":"Measurement of data quality","url":"https://www.iso.org/standard/35749.html","note":"International Organization for Standardization"},{"title":"Information and data quality Concepts and measuring","url":"https://www.iso.org/obp/ui?_escaped_fragment_=iso%3Astd%3Aiso%3A8000%3A-8%3Aed-1%3Av1%3Aen","note":"International Organization for Standardization"},{"title":"Geographic information Data quality Part 1 General requirements","url":"https://www.iso.org/standard/78900.html","note":"International Organization for Standardization"},{"title":"United Nations National Quality Assurance Frameworks Manual for Official Statistics","url":"https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/50th-session/documents/BG-Item3d-NQAF-Manual-E.pdf","note":"United Nations Statistics Division"},{"title":"Quality Framework and Guidelines for OECD Statistical Activities","url":"https://one.oecd.org/document/STD/QFS%282011%291/en/pdf","note":"Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development"},{"title":"NIST Research Data Framework Version 2.0","url":"https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/1500-18/NIST.SP.1500-18r2.html","note":"National Institute of Standards and Technology"},{"title":"Quantities Units Dimensions and Types Schema","url":"https://www.qudt.org/doc/2026/01/DOC_SCHEMA-QUDT.html","note":"QUDT.org"},{"title":"Time Ontology in OWL","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Date and Time on the Internet Timestamps","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339/","note":"Internet Engineering Task Force"}],"openQuestions":["Approve or reject the WM-DAT-001 composition relation and register Data Product, Data Contract, Schema, Pipeline, Run, Metric Registry, Issue, Remediation, Certificate, Evidence, Audit and Records edges.","Create domain, subject-type, quality-framework, sampling, metric, uncertainty, verdict, certification, privacy, jurisdiction and organizational profiles.","Conformance-test metric formulas, units, thresholds, aggregation, missing-state behavior, uncertainty and reproducibility against concrete engines and reference datasets.","Validate organization-specific access, row-level evidence, data-subject rights, publication, risk acceptance, legal hold, retention and disposition policies.","Test version-pinned DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN, OECD, NIST, QUDT and time mappings and obtain independent external review before canonical promotion.","Claude and Grok each timed out on one bounded attempt; no independent external result was admitted.","The WM-DAT-001 parent signal and candidate incoming COMPOSE relation are not approved frozen composition edges.","Domain-specific metric catalogues, thresholds, sampling methods, uncertainty models, fitness decision rules and certification schemes require separate profiles.","ISO/IEC 25012, ISO/IEC 25024, ISO 8000-8 and ISO 19157-1 are used only from public metadata or preview text; access-restricted clauses were not inferred."],"resources":{"spec":"/models/wm-dat-007-data-quality-assessment/spec.yaml","agents":"/models/wm-dat-007-data-quality-assessment/AGENTS.md","source":"https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/publications/wm-dat-007-data-quality-assessment"},"provenance":{"origin":"world-models research","builtFrom":["models/wm-dat-007-data-quality-assessment/spec.yaml","ver-cy/world-models/card-supplements/wm-dat-007-data-quality-assessment.json"],"providers":["Codex"],"researchStatus":"reviewable-draft","generatedAt":"2026-09-06T12:55:08Z","builder":"tools/build_cards.py@1.0.0"},"completeness":{"sections":{"classifiers":"filled","whatItIs":"filled","purpose":"filled","distinguishingFeatures":"filled","structure":"filled","agentConduct":"filled","ethics":"filled","owners":"filled","relations":"filled","interaction.identity":"filled","interaction.properties":"not-applicable","interaction.recognition":"filled","interaction.capabilities":"filled","interaction.hazards":"filled","interaction.interfaces":"filled","interaction.context":"filled","sources":"filled"},"notes":{"interaction.properties":"Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties.","_supplement":"Sections authored in card supplement 1.0.0 by Claude (Opus 5.5) (2026-10-05, unreviewed). Written from the published specification and established practice in the field; no new sources were read. Unreviewed."},"score":1.0}}