{"schema":"https://ver.cy/schemas/card/1.0.0","id":"vr.wm-knw-001","code":"wm-knw-001-model-ontology","url":"https://ver.cy/models/wm-knw-001-model-ontology/","name":"Model / Ontology","alternateNames":["N6"],"kind":"world-model","status":"published","version":"0.1.0-reviewable-draft","language":"en","classifiers":{"family":"World Models","category":"Information and virtual systems","entryKind":"entity","plane":"","domain":["INF.KNW.MDL"],"industry":["Cross-industry"],"navPath":"NAV.INF.KNW.MDL","tags":["model","ontology","inf.knw.mdl"],"facets":{}},"whatItIs":"One model, metamodel, schema, vocabulary or ontology as a maintained semantic asset. Versions, representations and scoped claims describe this asset; the root is neither a catalogue of all models nor the instances, software or specification documents that use or embody it. Proposed governance supports draft and retired assets as well as released ones.","purpose":"Describe a semantic asset with stable identity, explicit meaning, version-bound dependencies, qualified mappings and assessment evidence.","scope":{"in":["Asset identity, kind, purpose, steward reference, namespace bindings and declared formalism","Version-specific semantic inventories, restrictions, imports, mappings, content fingerprints and change assertions","Local release status, conformance claims, external assessment references, access and retirement decisions"],"out":["Dataset instances and domain entities described by the asset; trained parameter sets and runtime simulation executions","Authoritative document and standards issuance, software execution, identifier-scheme administration, translation and intellectual-property adjudication","Universal ontology truth, automatic semantic-equivalence proofs, executing migrations or certifying implementations"],"boundaries":[{"neighbor":"WM-REC-005 Standard / Spec Artifact","distinction":"The registered N6 split assigns the semantic asset here and the published standard/specification artifact there. Link a version-specific specification without acquiring its issuer or publication lifecycle."},{"neighbor":"WM-REC-001 Document / Record","distinction":"Files and governed documents are representations or evidence; their storage identity and records lifecycle remain external."},{"neighbor":"WM-DAT-001 Dataset","distinction":"Instance datasets and assessment fixtures are referenced by snapshot; their content and access rights are not owned by this semantic asset."},{"neighbor":"WM-SFT-001 Software Product","distinction":"Parser, reasoner and validator implementations are referenced with versions. This asset records outputs without owning tool execution or software lifecycle."},{"neighbor":"WM-XCT-011 Identifier Scheme","distinction":"Store scoped identifier and namespace bindings; naming-scheme ownership, issuance and resolution policies remain external."},{"neighbor":"WM-KNW-002 Language / Terminology and WM-KNW-003 Intellectual Property Right","distinction":"Keep language tags, term references and rights evidence local to the asset; language management, translation and determination of rights remain outside its boundary."}]},"distinguishingFeatures":["Unlike WM-REC-005 Standard / Spec Artifact: The registered N6 split assigns the semantic asset here and the published standard/specification artifact there. Link a version-specific specification without acquiring its issuer or publication lifecycle.","Unlike WM-REC-001 Document / Record: Files and governed documents are representations or evidence; their storage identity and records lifecycle remain external.","Unlike WM-DAT-001 Dataset: Instance datasets and assessment fixtures are referenced by snapshot; their content and access rights are not owned by this semantic asset.","Unlike WM-SFT-001 Software Product: Parser, reasoner and validator implementations are referenced with versions. This asset records outputs without owning tool execution or software lifecycle.","Unlike WM-XCT-011 Identifier Scheme: Store scoped identifier and namespace bindings; naming-scheme ownership, issuance and resolution policies remain external.","Unlike WM-KNW-002 Language / Terminology and WM-KNW-003 Intellectual Property Right: Keep language tags, term references and rights evidence local to the asset; language management, translation and determination of rights remain outside its boundary."],"structure":{"bundles":[{"id":"bundle-registration","name":"Identity and scope","description":"Establish the semantic asset and its recognition evidence.","layers":[{"id":"layer-identity","name":"Asset identity","description":"Establish the semantic asset and its recognition evidence. Identify the maintained semantic asset separately from any registry listing or downloadable file. An anonymous source ontology can receive a local registration ID without inventing a source IRI.","findings":[{"id":"finding-identity","name":"Asset identity","description":"Identify the maintained semantic asset separately from any registry listing or downloadable file. An anonymous source ontology can receive a local registration ID without inventing a source IRI. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which master identifier identifies this asset rather than a version or document?","id":"finding-identity-q1","kind":"identity"},{"text":"Which asset kind and modeling level are declared for this registration?","id":"finding-identity-q2","kind":"classification"},{"text":"What intended domain and competency scope delimit this asset?","id":"finding-identity-q3","kind":"definition"}]}]},{"id":"layer-namespace","name":"Namespace and recognition","description":"Establish the semantic asset and its recognition evidence. Recognize a version through declared identifiers, names and representation evidence. Prefixes and labels are aliases, not authority proofs; namespace availability does not prove ownership.","findings":[{"id":"finding-namespace","name":"Namespace and recognition","description":"Recognize a version through declared identifiers, names and representation evidence. Prefixes and labels are aliases, not authority proofs; namespace availability does not prove ownership. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which namespace bindings and external naming authorities apply to this asset?","id":"finding-namespace-q1","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which labels and language tags help distinguish this asset from similarly named assets?","id":"finding-namespace-q2","kind":"quality"},{"text":"Which observations support recognizing a representation as belonging to this asset?","id":"finding-namespace-q3","kind":"evidence"}]}]}]},{"id":"bundle-meaning","name":"Meaning and rules","description":"Describe the selected version without equating axioms, constraints and data.","layers":[{"id":"layer-structure","name":"Semantic inventory","description":"Describe the selected version without equating axioms, constraints and data. Record what a selected version declares, including its formalism and element roles. The inventory can point into an authoritative representation without copying every domain object.","findings":[{"id":"finding-structure","name":"Semantic inventory","description":"Record what a selected version declares, including its formalism and element roles. The inventory can point into an authoritative representation without copying every domain object. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which local elements and modules comprise the selected version?","id":"finding-structure-q1","kind":"composition"},{"text":"Which formal language and interpretation regime apply to its declarations?","id":"finding-structure-q2","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Which terms or constructs are unavailable or deliberately outside this profile?","id":"finding-structure-q3","kind":"constraint"}]}]},{"id":"layer-constraints","name":"Axioms and validation rules","description":"Describe the selected version without equating axioms, constraints and data. Keep descriptive axioms, application constraints and examples distinguishable. A constraint profile is a referenced evaluation basis rather than a claim that the asset or all its instances pass.","findings":[{"id":"finding-constraints","name":"Axioms and validation rules","description":"Keep descriptive axioms, application constraints and examples distinguishable. A constraint profile is a referenced evaluation basis rather than a claim that the asset or all its instances pass. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which axioms or constraints are normative for the selected profile?","id":"finding-constraints-q1","kind":"requirement"},{"text":"What entailment and data-closure assumptions apply when checking those rules?","id":"finding-constraints-q2","kind":"validation"},{"text":"How are unsupported rules and undecidable or failed checks reported?","id":"finding-constraints-q3","kind":"exception"}]}]}]},{"id":"bundle-versions","name":"Versions and integrity","description":"Keep release decisions and scoped content checks distinct.","layers":[{"id":"layer-release","name":"Version and release state","description":"Keep release decisions and scoped content checks distinct. Use distinct identity for the asset, its version and each representation. Local immutable release snapshots and change classes are proposed stewardship rules; a current alias never supplies a historical pin.","findings":[{"id":"finding-release","name":"Version and release state","description":"Use distinct identity for the asset, its version and each representation. Local immutable release snapshots and change classes are proposed stewardship rules; a current alias never supplies a historical pin. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which state and predecessor relations describe this version?","id":"finding-release-q1","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"When did the release decision take effect and when was it recorded?","id":"finding-release-q2","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"Which recorded approval authorizes designating this version as released or current?","id":"finding-release-q3","kind":"authority"}]}]},{"id":"layer-fingerprint","name":"Representation and integrity","description":"Keep release decisions and scoped content checks distinct. Bind integrity evidence to declared input content, algorithm and transformations. Isomorphic RDF datasets can canonicalize alike; a hash is not proof of semantic equivalence, licensing or authenticity.","findings":[{"id":"finding-fingerprint","name":"Representation and integrity","description":"Bind integrity evidence to declared input content, algorithm and transformations. Isomorphic RDF datasets can canonicalize alike; a hash is not proof of semantic equivalence, licensing or authenticity. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"What exact representation or dataset scope is covered by this fingerprint?","id":"finding-fingerprint-q1","kind":"identity"},{"text":"Which canonicalization and digest algorithms produced this value?","id":"finding-fingerprint-q2","kind":"process"},{"text":"Which exclusions or processing failures limit comparison with another fingerprint?","id":"finding-fingerprint-q3","kind":"quality"}]}]}]},{"id":"bundle-reuse","name":"Dependencies and mappings","description":"Make reuse explicit, pinned and qualified by scope.","layers":[{"id":"layer-dependencies","name":"Imports and external dependencies","description":"Make reuse explicit, pinned and qualified by scope. Track declared imports separately from the resolved dependency snapshot. Unresolved references and cycles remain visible; automatic retrieval of arbitrary import URLs is outside local record maintenance.","findings":[{"id":"finding-dependencies","name":"Imports and external dependencies","description":"Track declared imports separately from the resolved dependency snapshot. Unresolved references and cycles remain visible; automatic retrieval of arbitrary import URLs is outside local record maintenance. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which imports or extensions are declared and at what exact target versions?","id":"finding-dependencies-q1","kind":"composition"},{"text":"Which dependency versions were actually resolved for this assessment or release?","id":"finding-dependencies-q2","kind":"state"},{"text":"Which retrieval policy and limits apply to untrusted or cyclic dependencies?","id":"finding-dependencies-q3","kind":"security"}]}]},{"id":"layer-alignment","name":"Mapping and compatibility","description":"Make reuse explicit, pinned and qualified by scope. Treat a mapping as a scoped assertion between pinned endpoints with review evidence. Concept matching, identity, logical equivalence, transformation and compatibility are different relations.","findings":[{"id":"finding-alignment","name":"Mapping and compatibility","description":"Treat a mapping as a scoped assertion between pinned endpoints with review evidence. Concept matching, identity, logical equivalence, transformation and compatibility are different relations. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which versioned terms are connected by each mapping and in what direction?","id":"finding-alignment-q1","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"Who asserted and reviewed the mapping and what evidence supports its scope?","id":"finding-alignment-q2","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Which consumer-specific compatibility claim survives the stated changes and losses?","id":"finding-alignment-q3","kind":"decision"}]}]}]},{"id":"bundle-assurance","name":"Claims and evidence","description":"Separate assertions from version-matched assessment evidence.","layers":[{"id":"layer-claim","name":"Conformance claim scope","description":"Separate assertions from version-matched assessment evidence. A claim names its subject, profile, claimant and evidence status. A self-declaration can be recorded as unverified; it must never be displayed as assessed or certified without matching evidence.","findings":[{"id":"finding-claim","name":"Conformance claim scope","description":"A claim names its subject, profile, claimant and evidence status. A self-declaration can be recorded as unverified; it must never be displayed as assessed or certified without matching evidence. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which exact subject and profile version does this conformance claim cover?","id":"finding-claim-q1","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Which claimant is accountable for the assertion and its limitations?","id":"finding-claim-q2","kind":"ownership"},{"text":"Is this claim asserted, supported, disputed, withdrawn or awaiting assessment?","id":"finding-claim-q3","kind":"state"}]}]},{"id":"layer-assessment","name":"Assessment evidence","description":"Separate assertions from version-matched assessment evidence. Record the outcome of an external assessment with its inputs, tool and conditions. A successful check answers only the defined test; failure, not run and unknown remain distinct from pass and nonconformance.","findings":[{"id":"finding-assessment","name":"Assessment evidence","description":"Record the outcome of an external assessment with its inputs, tool and conditions. A successful check answers only the defined test; failure, not run and unknown remain distinct from pass and nonconformance. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which immutable inputs and evaluator configuration produced this report?","id":"finding-assessment-q1","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"What results, omissions and execution status were actually reported?","id":"finding-assessment-q2","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"When was the assessment run and is its evidence still applicable to this version?","id":"finding-assessment-q3","kind":"temporal"}]}]}]},{"id":"bundle-governance","name":"Stewardship and continuity","description":"Govern changes, access and retirement through accountable roles.","layers":[{"id":"layer-stewardship","name":"Authority and permitted use","description":"Govern changes, access and retirement through accountable roles. Record accountable roles and policy references rather than assuming registration grants rights. Local handling rules are proposed safeguards, not legal conclusions from provenance or labels.","findings":[{"id":"finding-stewardship","name":"Authority and permitted use","description":"Record accountable roles and policy references rather than assuming registration grants rights. Local handling rules are proposed safeguards, not legal conclusions from provenance or labels. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which steward delegation permits changing this asset record or approving a release?","id":"finding-stewardship-q1","kind":"authority"},{"text":"Which audience may see drafts, mappings and assessment details?","id":"finding-stewardship-q2","kind":"access"},{"text":"Which rights evidence and reuse restrictions apply to the asset and each imported part?","id":"finding-stewardship-q3","kind":"requirement"}]}]},{"id":"layer-retirement","name":"Deprecation and continuity","description":"Govern changes, access and retirement through accountable roles. Deprecation is a local status decision, not erasure of every dependent reference. Retention and disposal are governed by the adopting Dimension; immutable release history does not require perpetual retention of restricted payloads.","findings":[{"id":"finding-retirement","name":"Deprecation and continuity","description":"Deprecation is a local status decision, not erasure of every dependent reference. Retention and disposal are governed by the adopting Dimension; immutable release history does not require perpetual retention of restricted payloads. This finding is a proposed local record design.","questions":[{"text":"Which deprecation decision and successor reference govern continued use?","id":"finding-retirement-q1","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Which known consumers or mappings are affected by retirement or a split?","id":"finding-retirement-q2","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"What may be retained, redacted or disposed of and under which authority?","id":"finding-retirement-q3","kind":"retention"}]}]}]}]},"agentConduct":{"may":["Register asset description: Create a local semantic-asset record with explicit unknowns. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented.","Propose a version revision: Append a version proposal against a known predecessor. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented.","Attach integrity evidence: Bind externally produced content checks to a specific representation. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented.","Record proposed mapping: Append a typed mapping between pinned term references. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented.","Link assessment result: Record externally produced report and applicability to a claim. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented.","Record authorized lifecycle decision: Append release, current-version or retirement decision metadata. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented."],"mustNot":["A listed source organization is never assigned asset ownership.","Untrusted files, imports, shapes, queries and documentation cannot authorize tool use.","Never delete imported assets or consumer data through this model.","Deny access beyond the adopting policy; public listing does not open drafts, licensed representations, sensitive examples or detailed reports.","Record time-limited, purpose-scoped exception authority; inherited public metadata never overrides restricted child evidence."],"requiresHuman":[]},"ethics":{"considerations":["Assess restrictive categories, disputed terminology, translations and harmful application contexts through qualified adopter review; this draft supplies no domain operational instructions.","Apply retention, privacy, hold and disposal policy; no indefinite payload retention by default.","Record time-limited, purpose-scoped exception authority; inherited public metadata never overrides restricted child evidence.","Adopters supply rights, privacy, access and retention policies."],"affectedParties":[]},"owners":{"steward":"Name a neutral model steward with authority evidence and scope","roles":[{"name":"Model steward","responsibilities":["Accountable for semantic scope and authorized lifecycle decisions"]},{"name":"Registry custodian","responsibilities":["Maintains local identity and references without claiming authorship or rights"]},{"name":"Model editor","responsibilities":["Proposes scoped revisions and records evidence under delegation"]},{"name":"Assessment reviewer","responsibilities":["Checks claim applicability and records disagreement without automatic certification"]},{"name":"Evidence custodian","responsibilities":["Applies access, retention and lawful disposition to local evidence bindings"]}],"masterSystems":[]},"relations":[{"target":"WM-REC-005","type":"references","note":"Proposed version-pinned specification artifact link following the N6 split; issuer and artifact lifecycle stay external."},{"target":"WM-REC-001","type":"references","note":"Proposed governed representation and evidence-document link; document retention execution is not owned here."},{"target":"WM-DAT-001","type":"references","note":"Proposed snapshot links to instance datasets and test fixtures; no dataset lifecycle ownership."},{"target":"WM-SFT-001","type":"references","note":"Proposed evaluator or implementation version link; runtime execution remains external."},{"target":"WM-XCT-011","type":"references","note":"Proposed naming-scheme binding; identifier issuance and namespace authority are not inferred."},{"target":"WM-KNW-002","type":"references","note":"Proposed language/terminology links supporting labels; translation and general terminology management remain external."},{"target":"WM-KNW-003","type":"references","note":"Proposed rights evidence link; provenance does not establish entitlement."},{"target":"https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/","type":"aligned","note":"Optional ontology-kind structural alignment with explicit language profile; not universal OWL conformance."},{"target":"https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/","type":"aligned","note":"Optional concept-scheme and mapping alignment; no promotion of concept matches to logical equivalence."},{"target":"https://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.5.1","type":"aligned","note":"Optional metamodel profile reference; selected scope reading supplies no implementation compliance certificate."},{"target":"WM-REC-005 Standard / Spec Artifact","type":"neighbor","note":"The registered N6 split assigns the semantic asset here and the published standard/specification artifact there. Link a version-specific specification without acquiring its issuer or publication lifecycle."},{"target":"WM-REC-001 Document / Record","type":"neighbor","note":"Files and governed documents are representations or evidence; their storage identity and records lifecycle remain external."},{"target":"WM-DAT-001 Dataset","type":"neighbor","note":"Instance datasets and assessment fixtures are referenced by snapshot; their content and access rights are not owned by this semantic asset."},{"target":"WM-SFT-001 Software Product","type":"neighbor","note":"Parser, reasoner and validator implementations are referenced with versions. This asset records outputs without owning tool execution or software lifecycle."},{"target":"WM-XCT-011 Identifier Scheme","type":"neighbor","note":"Store scoped identifier and namespace bindings; naming-scheme ownership, issuance and resolution policies remain external."},{"target":"WM-KNW-002 Language / Terminology and WM-KNW-003 Intellectual Property Right","type":"neighbor","note":"Keep language tags, term references and rights evidence local to the asset; language management, translation and determination of rights remain outside its boundary."}],"interaction":{"identity":{"applicability":"required","items":["Authoritative master-system identifier","Governed global identifier or IRI","UUID or ULID allocated by the adopting Dimension"]},"properties":{"applicability":"not-applicable","items":[]},"recognition":{"applicability":"optional","items":[]},"capabilities":{"applicability":"required","items":["Register asset description: Create a local semantic-asset record with explicit unknowns. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented.","Propose a version revision: Append a version proposal against a known predecessor. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented.","Attach integrity evidence: Bind externally produced content checks to a specific representation. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented.","Record proposed mapping: Append a typed mapping between pinned term references. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented.","Link assessment result: Record externally produced report and applicability to a claim. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented.","Record authorized lifecycle decision: Append release, current-version or retirement decision metadata. Proposed local operation only; unimplemented."]},"hazards":{"applicability":"optional","items":[]},"interfaces":{"applicability":"required","items":["PROV-O: The PROV Ontology"]},"context":{"applicability":"required","items":["No jurisdiction or industry-specific legal authority is inferred. Adopters supply rights, privacy, access and retention policies.","Standards are used in their named versions; adopting a newer edition requires separate review."]}},"sources":[{"title":"OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax (Second Edition)","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"RDF Dataset Canonicalization","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-canon/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"PROV-O: The PROV Ontology","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification","url":"https://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.5.1/PDF","note":"Object Management Group"},{"title":"Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339.html","note":"Internet Engineering Task Force"}],"openQuestions":["Verify exact source editions and errata, reproducible retrieval and rights for adopting profiles; broaden non-RDF and informal-model coverage where needed.","Develop nested schemas and fixtures for anonymous drafts, multiple representations, incompatible mappings, unresolved imports, failed assessments, lawful redaction and retirement with unknown consumers.","Restore independent external review before promotion to canonical or publishable-draft status.","No executable nested instance schemas, reasoner, import resolver, canonicalizer or test suite is supplied.","Non-RDF schemas, informal models, multilingual terminology disputes, advanced modularity and formal compatibility proofs need dedicated profiles.","No current-version/errata completeness, legal rights determination or production conformance certification."],"resources":{"spec":"/models/wm-knw-001-model-ontology/spec.yaml","agents":"/models/wm-knw-001-model-ontology/AGENTS.md","source":"https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-knw-001"},"provenance":{"origin":"world-models research","builtFrom":["models/wm-knw-001-model-ontology/spec.yaml"],"providers":["Codex"],"researchStatus":"reviewable-draft","generatedAt":"2026-10-06T14:56:16Z","builder":"tools/build_cards.py@1.0.0"},"completeness":{"sections":{"classifiers":"filled","whatItIs":"filled","purpose":"filled","distinguishingFeatures":"derived","structure":"filled","agentConduct":"derived","ethics":"derived","owners":"filled","relations":"filled","interaction.identity":"filled","interaction.properties":"not-applicable","interaction.recognition":"missing","interaction.capabilities":"filled","interaction.hazards":"missing","interaction.interfaces":"derived","interaction.context":"filled","sources":"filled"},"notes":{"distinguishingFeatures":"Derived from boundary notes against neighbouring models.","agentConduct":"Derived from functions, policies, CRUD and access rules; prohibitions were not authored for agents as such.","ethics":"Sentences mentioning harm, privacy, consent or similar, collected from the specification.","interaction.properties":"Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties."},"score":0.75}}