{"schema":"https://ver.cy/schemas/card/1.0.0","id":"vr.wm-knw-009","code":"wm-knw-009-hypothesis","url":"https://ver.cy/models/wm-knw-009-hypothesis/","name":"Hypothesis","alternateNames":[],"kind":"world-model","status":"published","version":"0.3.0-research.1","language":"en","classifiers":{"family":"World Models","category":"Information and virtual systems","entryKind":"entity","plane":"","domain":["INF.KNW.HYP"],"industry":["Cross-industry"],"navPath":"NAV.INF.KNW.HYP","tags":["hypothesis","inf.knw.hyp"],"facets":{}},"whatItIs":"Owns hypothesis identity and revision; proposition expressions; hypothesis kind and profile; subject domain, population, unit, variables, relationships, conditions and boundary; proposer, owner, source, motivation, rationale, assumptions and prior-evidence references; operational definitions, measures, estimands, predictions, falsifiers and criteria; preregistration and deviations; study, test, dataset, analysis, result and evidence references; source-qualified assessments, uncertainty, conflicts, review, correction, lifecycle, access, retention and loss-aware projections. Generic claims, assumptions, theories, questions, studies, protocols, tests, data, observations, results, evidence, citations, publications, people, organizations, decisions and policies remain external masters.","purpose":"Represent a versioned provisional proposition with explicit scope, operationalization, predictions, evaluation criteria and source-qualified assessment and revision history.","scope":{"in":["Hypothesis identity, formulation, kind, scope, variables, conditions, revision and successor lineage","Rationale, assumptions, prior evidence, operationalization, predictions, criteria, preregistration and evaluation bindings","Assessment, uncertainty, conflict, lifecycle, provenance, governance, access, retention and interoperability"],"out":["Owning generic claim, assumption, theory, question, study, protocol, test, dataset, observation, result, evidence, citation, publication, party, decision or policy lifecycles","Equating hypothesis with question, assumption, prediction, theory, model, objective, requirement, result or truth, or equating non-rejection, statistical significance, practical importance, causality and truth","Executing research participation, experiments, protected-data access, publication, policy decisions, external system mutation or irreversible deletion"],"boundaries":[{"neighbor":"WM-KNW-007 Claim / Proposition","distinction":"Hypothesis specializes a proposition as provisional and evaluable through scope, predictions and criteria. Generic claim identity and assertion lifecycle remain external; the candidate parent signal is held for review."},{"neighbor":"WM-KNW-016 Assumption","distinction":"An assumption is a premise accepted for a bounded purpose. A hypothesis is proposed for evaluation; assumptions it depends on remain separately identifiable."},{"neighbor":"Research question, theory, model and prediction","distinction":"A question solicits an answer, a theory or model supplies explanatory structure and a prediction states an expected observation. The hypothesis links them without importing their identities."},{"neighbor":"Study, protocol, test and preregistration","distinction":"These define or execute an evaluation. The hypothesis records typed references, criteria and deviations but not operational study lifecycle."},{"neighbor":"Result, evidence and assessment","distinction":"Results and evidence are external records. The hypothesis owns source-qualified assessment links but no context-free truth flag."},{"neighbor":"Decision and policy","distinction":"An assessment may inform an external decision, but the accountable choice, policy, clinical action or regulatory consequence is not owned by the hypothesis."},{"neighbor":"Research object and publication","distinction":"RO-Crate, DataCite and FAIR projections package or identify research outputs. They do not replace the hypothesis proposition, revision or evaluation semantics."}]},"distinguishingFeatures":["A testable provisional proposition about a defined population and variables, unlike a research question, which asks without asserting.","Differs from an assumption, which is taken as true for a purpose and is not put to test.","Differs from a theory or model, which explains many findings, and from a prediction, which is one expected observation derived from it.","Failure to reject a hypothesis is not proof of it, and statistical significance is not practical importance."],"structure":{"bundles":[{"id":"hypothesis-identity-formulation-and-kind","name":"Hypothesis identity, formulation and kind","description":"Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for hypothesis identity, formulation and kind.","layers":[{"id":"identity-revision-and-related-concept-boundary","name":"Identity, revision and related-concept boundary","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for identity, revision and related-concept boundary without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"hypothesis-identifier-namespace-version-revision-and-successor","name":"Hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor","description":"Records hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor?","id":"hypothesis-identifier-namespace-version-revision-and-successor-q01","kind":"identity"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor, and under which authority?","id":"hypothesis-identifier-namespace-version-revision-and-successor-q02","kind":"ownership"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor?","id":"hypothesis-identifier-namespace-version-revision-and-successor-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"hypothesis-question-assumption-prediction-theory-claim-objective-and-result-distinction","name":"Hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction","description":"Records hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction?","id":"hypothesis-question-assumption-prediction-theory-claim-objective-and-result-distinction-q01","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction, and under which authority?","id":"hypothesis-question-assumption-prediction-theory-claim-objective-and-result-distinction-q02","kind":"authority"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction?","id":"hypothesis-question-assumption-prediction-theory-claim-objective-and-result-distinction-q03","kind":"security"}]}]},{"id":"expression-language-and-formalization","name":"Expression, language and formalization","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for expression, language and formalization without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"natural-language-proposition-language-terms-and-scope-note","name":"Natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note","description":"Records natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note?","id":"natural-language-proposition-language-terms-and-scope-note-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note, and under which authority?","id":"natural-language-proposition-language-terms-and-scope-note-q02","kind":"requirement"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note?","id":"natural-language-proposition-language-terms-and-scope-note-q03","kind":"privacy"}]},{"id":"formal-expression-variables-quantifiers-negation-relation-and-logic-profile","name":"Formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile","description":"Records formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile?","id":"formal-expression-variables-quantifiers-negation-relation-and-logic-profile-q01","kind":"constraint"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile, and under which authority?","id":"formal-expression-variables-quantifiers-negation-relation-and-logic-profile-q02","kind":"constraint"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile?","id":"formal-expression-variables-quantifiers-negation-relation-and-logic-profile-q03","kind":"retention"}]}]}]},{"id":"classification-scope-variables-and-conditions","name":"Classification, scope, variables and conditions","description":"Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for classification, scope, variables and conditions.","layers":[{"id":"hypothesis-type-and-test-profile","name":"Hypothesis type and test profile","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for hypothesis type and test profile without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"scientific-statistical-causal-associational-descriptive-explanatory-and-predictive-kind","name":"Scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind","description":"Records scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind?","id":"scientific-statistical-causal-associational-descriptive-explanatory-and-predictive-kind-q01","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind, and under which authority?","id":"scientific-statistical-causal-associational-descriptive-explanatory-and-predictive-kind-q02","kind":"process"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind?","id":"scientific-statistical-causal-associational-descriptive-explanatory-and-predictive-kind-q03","kind":"access"}]},{"id":"null-alternative-directional-equivalence-noninferiority-universal-and-existential-profile","name":"Null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile","description":"Records null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile?","id":"null-alternative-directional-equivalence-noninferiority-universal-and-existential-profile-q01","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile, and under which authority?","id":"null-alternative-directional-equivalence-noninferiority-universal-and-existential-profile-q02","kind":"event"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile?","id":"null-alternative-directional-equivalence-noninferiority-universal-and-existential-profile-q03","kind":"exception"}]}]},{"id":"population-variables-relations-and-boundary","name":"Population, variables, relations and boundary","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for population, variables, relations and boundary without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"domain-population-unit-phenomenon-context-condition-and-exclusion","name":"Domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion","description":"Records domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion?","id":"domain-population-unit-phenomenon-context-condition-and-exclusion-q01","kind":"constraint"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion, and under which authority?","id":"domain-population-unit-phenomenon-context-condition-and-exclusion-q02","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion?","id":"domain-population-unit-phenomenon-context-condition-and-exclusion-q03","kind":"interoperability"}]},{"id":"independent-dependent-exposure-outcome-comparator-confounder-covariate-and-mediator","name":"Independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator","description":"Records independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator?","id":"independent-dependent-exposure-outcome-comparator-confounder-covariate-and-mediator-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator, and under which authority?","id":"independent-dependent-exposure-outcome-comparator-confounder-covariate-and-mediator-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator?","id":"independent-dependent-exposure-outcome-comparator-confounder-covariate-and-mediator-q03","kind":"decision"}]}]}]},{"id":"provenance-rationale-assumptions-and-prior-evidence","name":"Provenance, rationale, assumptions and prior evidence","description":"Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for provenance, rationale, assumptions and prior evidence.","layers":[{"id":"authorship-motivation-and-rationale","name":"Authorship, motivation and rationale","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for authorship, motivation and rationale without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"proposer-owner-contributor-source-time-and-authority","name":"Proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority","description":"Records proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority?","id":"proposer-owner-contributor-source-time-and-authority-q01","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority, and under which authority?","id":"proposer-owner-contributor-source-time-and-authority-q02","kind":"quality"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority?","id":"proposer-owner-contributor-source-time-and-authority-q03","kind":"identity"}]},{"id":"research-question-motivation-gap-mechanism-rationale-and-intended-use","name":"Research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use","description":"Records research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use?","id":"research-question-motivation-gap-mechanism-rationale-and-intended-use-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use, and under which authority?","id":"research-question-motivation-gap-mechanism-rationale-and-intended-use-q02","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use?","id":"research-question-motivation-gap-mechanism-rationale-and-intended-use-q03","kind":"classification"}]}]},{"id":"assumption-theory-prior-and-evidence-context","name":"Assumption, theory, prior and evidence context","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for assumption, theory, prior and evidence context without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"background-theory-model-assumption-prior-belief-and-dependency","name":"Background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency","description":"Records background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency?","id":"background-theory-model-assumption-prior-belief-and-dependency-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency, and under which authority?","id":"background-theory-model-assumption-prior-belief-and-dependency-q02","kind":"security"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency?","id":"background-theory-model-assumption-prior-belief-and-dependency-q03","kind":"composition"}]},{"id":"prior-evidence-citation-support-challenge-gap-bias-and-conflict","name":"Prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict","description":"Records prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict?","id":"prior-evidence-citation-support-challenge-gap-bias-and-conflict-q01","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict, and under which authority?","id":"prior-evidence-citation-support-challenge-gap-bias-and-conflict-q02","kind":"privacy"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict?","id":"prior-evidence-citation-support-challenge-gap-bias-and-conflict-q03","kind":"relationship"}]}]}]},{"id":"operationalization-prediction-criteria-and-evaluation-design","name":"Operationalization, prediction, criteria and evaluation design","description":"Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for operationalization, prediction, criteria and evaluation design.","layers":[{"id":"operational-definition-measure-and-prediction","name":"Operational definition, measure and prediction","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for operational definition, measure and prediction without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"construct-indicator-operation-instrument-measure-estimand-and-unit","name":"Construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit","description":"Records construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit?","id":"construct-indicator-operation-instrument-measure-estimand-and-unit-q01","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit, and under which authority?","id":"construct-indicator-operation-instrument-measure-estimand-and-unit-q02","kind":"retention"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit?","id":"construct-indicator-operation-instrument-measure-estimand-and-unit-q03","kind":"state"}]},{"id":"predicted-observation-effect-direction-range-timing-and-potential-falsifier","name":"Predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier","description":"Records predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier?","id":"predicted-observation-effect-direction-range-timing-and-potential-falsifier-q01","kind":"requirement"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier, and under which authority?","id":"predicted-observation-effect-direction-range-timing-and-potential-falsifier-q02","kind":"access"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier?","id":"predicted-observation-effect-direction-range-timing-and-potential-falsifier-q03","kind":"lifecycle"}]}]},{"id":"criterion-protocol-study-and-preregistration","name":"Criterion, protocol, study and preregistration","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for criterion, protocol, study and preregistration without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"decision-threshold-error-rate-power-multiplicity-practical-significance-and-stop-rule","name":"Decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule","description":"Records decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule?","id":"decision-threshold-error-rate-power-multiplicity-practical-significance-and-stop-rule-q01","kind":"decision"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule, and under which authority?","id":"decision-threshold-error-rate-power-multiplicity-practical-significance-and-stop-rule-q02","kind":"exception"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule?","id":"decision-threshold-error-rate-power-multiplicity-practical-significance-and-stop-rule-q03","kind":"temporal"}]},{"id":"protocol-study-experiment-test-dataset-analysis-plan-registration-and-deviation","name":"Protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation","description":"Records protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation?","id":"protocol-study-experiment-test-dataset-analysis-plan-registration-and-deviation-q01","kind":"process"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation, and under which authority?","id":"protocol-study-experiment-test-dataset-analysis-plan-registration-and-deviation-q02","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation?","id":"protocol-study-experiment-test-dataset-analysis-plan-registration-and-deviation-q03","kind":"spatial"}]}]}]},{"id":"assessment-evidence-uncertainty-and-lifecycle","name":"Assessment, evidence, uncertainty and lifecycle","description":"Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for assessment, evidence, uncertainty and lifecycle.","layers":[{"id":"result-evidence-and-assessment","name":"Result, evidence and assessment","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for result, evidence and assessment without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"observation-result-estimate-effect-uncertainty-pvalue-confidence-and-bayes-factor","name":"Observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and Bayes factor","description":"Records observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and bayes factor as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and bayes factor?","id":"observation-result-estimate-effect-uncertainty-pvalue-confidence-and-bayes-factor-q01","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and bayes factor, and under which authority?","id":"observation-result-estimate-effect-uncertainty-pvalue-confidence-and-bayes-factor-q02","kind":"decision"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and bayes factor?","id":"observation-result-estimate-effect-uncertainty-pvalue-confidence-and-bayes-factor-q03","kind":"provenance"}]},{"id":"support-challenge-refutation-corroboration-inconclusive-and-scope-qualified-assessment","name":"Support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment","description":"Records support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment?","id":"support-challenge-refutation-corroboration-inconclusive-and-scope-qualified-assessment-q01","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment, and under which authority?","id":"support-challenge-refutation-corroboration-inconclusive-and-scope-qualified-assessment-q02","kind":"identity"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment?","id":"support-challenge-refutation-corroboration-inconclusive-and-scope-qualified-assessment-q03","kind":"ownership"}]}]},{"id":"state-review-correction-and-evolution","name":"State, review, correction and evolution","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for state, review, correction and evolution without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"proposed-preregistered-under-test-evaluated-supported-unsupported-refuted-and-withdrawn-state","name":"Proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state","description":"Records proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state?","id":"proposed-preregistered-under-test-evaluated-supported-unsupported-refuted-and-withdrawn-state-q01","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state, and under which authority?","id":"proposed-preregistered-under-test-evaluated-supported-unsupported-refuted-and-withdrawn-state-q02","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state?","id":"proposed-preregistered-under-test-evaluated-supported-unsupported-refuted-and-withdrawn-state-q03","kind":"authority"}]},{"id":"review-dispute-correction-reformulation-split-merge-revision-and-supersession","name":"Review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession","description":"Records review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession?","id":"review-dispute-correction-reformulation-split-merge-revision-and-supersession-q01","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession, and under which authority?","id":"review-dispute-correction-reformulation-split-merge-revision-and-supersession-q02","kind":"composition"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession?","id":"review-dispute-correction-reformulation-split-merge-revision-and-supersession-q03","kind":"requirement"}]}]}]},{"id":"governance-access-reuse-and-interoperability","name":"Governance, access, reuse and interoperability","description":"Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for governance, access, reuse and interoperability.","layers":[{"id":"roles-ethics-quality-access-and-retention","name":"Roles, ethics, quality, access and retention","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for roles, ethics, quality, access and retention without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"owner-investigator-reviewer-steward-conflict-ethics-and-accountability","name":"Owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability","description":"Records owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability?","id":"owner-investigator-reviewer-steward-conflict-ethics-and-accountability-q01","kind":"authority"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability, and under which authority?","id":"owner-investigator-reviewer-steward-conflict-ethics-and-accountability-q02","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability?","id":"owner-investigator-reviewer-steward-conflict-ethics-and-accountability-q03","kind":"constraint"}]},{"id":"consent-privacy-confidentiality-openness-license-access-retention-and-legal-hold","name":"Consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold","description":"Records consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold?","id":"consent-privacy-confidentiality-openness-license-access-retention-and-legal-hold-q01","kind":"access"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold, and under which authority?","id":"consent-privacy-confidentiality-openness-license-access-retention-and-legal-hold-q02","kind":"state"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold?","id":"consent-privacy-confidentiality-openness-license-access-retention-and-legal-hold-q03","kind":"process"}]}]},{"id":"standards-crosswalk-conformance-and-loss","name":"Standards crosswalk, conformance and loss","description":"Groups Resource Consumption context for standards crosswalk, conformance and loss without importing neighboring master lifecycles.","findings":[{"id":"nist-iso-jcgm-trial-obi-stato-eco-w3c-datacite-rocrate-and-fair-crosswalk","name":"NIST, ISO, JCGM, trial, OBI, STATO, ECO, W3C, DataCite, RO-Crate and FAIR crosswalk","description":"Records nist, iso, jcgm, trial, obi, stato, eco, w3c, datacite, ro-crate and fair crosswalk as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish nist, iso, jcgm, trial, obi, stato, eco, w3c, datacite, ro-crate and fair crosswalk?","id":"nist-iso-jcgm-trial-obi-stato-eco-w3c-datacite-rocrate-and-fair-crosswalk-q01","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses nist, iso, jcgm, trial, obi, stato, eco, w3c, datacite, ro-crate and fair crosswalk, and under which authority?","id":"nist-iso-jcgm-trial-obi-stato-eco-w3c-datacite-rocrate-and-fair-crosswalk-q02","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify nist, iso, jcgm, trial, obi, stato, eco, w3c, datacite, ro-crate and fair crosswalk?","id":"nist-iso-jcgm-trial-obi-stato-eco-w3c-datacite-rocrate-and-fair-crosswalk-q03","kind":"event"}]},{"id":"profile-version-license-conformance-transformation-and-semantic-loss","name":"Profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss","description":"Records profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.","questions":[{"text":"Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss?","id":"profile-version-license-conformance-transformation-and-semantic-loss-q01","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss, and under which authority?","id":"profile-version-license-conformance-transformation-and-semantic-loss-q02","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss?","id":"profile-version-license-conformance-transformation-and-semantic-loss-q03","kind":"measurement"}]}]}]}]},"agentConduct":{"may":["Record a hypothesis with its proposition, variables, population, conditions and rationale.","Operationalise it with measures and an evaluation plan linked to a study.","Compare a reported analysis with the preregistered plan and flag deviations.","Record an assessment with its evidence, uncertainty and the method used."],"mustNot":["Mark a hypothesis as true or confirmed on the basis of one result, p-value or citation count.","Rewrite a preregistered hypothesis after the results are known without recording the change.","Draw causal conclusions from a correlational design.","Start data collection from human participants or access protected data.","Publish a finding or claim on behalf of investigators."],"requiresHuman":["Approving research that involves human or animal subjects.","Publishing claims or conclusions drawn from the hypothesis.","Using an assessed hypothesis as the basis for a policy or clinical decision."]},"ethics":{"considerations":["Hypotheses about groups of people can stigmatise them if framed or reported carelessly.","Changing hypotheses after seeing data and selective reporting mislead others who rely on the findings.","Testing on people or animals needs ethical review, consent and the least harmful design."],"affectedParties":["Research participants and animals used in studies","Communities and groups the hypothesis is about","Researchers and reviewers","Decision makers and the public who use the findings"]},"owners":{"steward":"Declare the Dimension owner, hypothesis steward, knowledge owners, investigators, measurement authorities, reviewers and accountable decision roles.","roles":[{"name":"Dimension owner","responsibilities":["Own namespace, mastership, delegation, access, retention and federation rules."]},{"name":"Hypothesis steward","responsibilities":["Own hypothesis identity, kind, formulation, lifecycle and revision policy."]},{"name":"Proposer or investigator","responsibilities":["Own formulation, rationale, assumptions, scope and declared conflicts."]},{"name":"Method or measurement steward","responsibilities":["Own operational definitions, measures, instruments, protocols and quality assertions."]},{"name":"Analyst or evaluator","responsibilities":["Own analysis method, result interpretation, uncertainty and assessment assertion."]},{"name":"Independent reviewer","responsibilities":["Review scope, preregistration, deviations, evidence, bias, conflicts and corrections without rewriting originals."]},{"name":"Ethics or data steward","responsibilities":["Own consent, privacy, confidentiality, data use and retention constraints."]},{"name":"Disclosure authority","responsibilities":["Approve recipient, purpose, redaction, publication claim and timing."]}],"masterSystems":[]},"relations":[{"target":"WM-KNW-007 Claim / Proposition","type":"references","note":"Resolve the broader truth-apt proposition while the candidate parent relation remains under joint boundary review."},{"target":"WM-KNW-016 Assumption and research-question, theory, model and prediction masters","type":"references","note":"Resolve premises and conceptual context without conflating them with the hypothesis."},{"target":"Study, protocol, experiment, test, dataset, observation, result, evidence and publication masters","type":"references","note":"Resolve evaluation design, execution and evidence while preserving external lifecycle authority."},{"target":"NIST statistics, ISO 3534-1 and JCGM VIM and GUM","type":"aligned","note":"Project statistical-test, measurement and uncertainty semantics as pinned methods."},{"target":"ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO trial registration","type":"aligned","note":"Project prospective health-study hypothesis, outcome, protocol and result views as domain profiles."},{"target":"OSF preregistration, OECD Frascati and UNESCO Open Science","type":"aligned","note":"Project registration, research-activity and transparent scientific-process context."},{"target":"OBI, STATO and ECO","type":"aligned","note":"Project investigation, statistical-method, evidence and conclusion vocabulary with domain caveats."},{"target":"PROV-O, Web Annotation, DQV, ODRL and SHACL","type":"aligned","note":"Project provenance, annotation, quality, access and graph-validation semantics."},{"target":"DataCite 4.7, RO-Crate 1.3, Schema.org Claim and FAIR","type":"aligned","note":"Project research-resource identity, packaging, claim discovery and reuse metadata."},{"target":"RFC 3339","type":"aligned","note":"Project unambiguous proposal, registration, evaluation, review and correction clocks."},{"target":"WM-KNW-007 Claim / Proposition","type":"neighbor","note":"Hypothesis specializes a proposition as provisional and evaluable through scope, predictions and criteria. Generic claim identity and assertion lifecycle remain external; the candidate parent signal is held for review."},{"target":"WM-KNW-016 Assumption","type":"neighbor","note":"An assumption is a premise accepted for a bounded purpose. A hypothesis is proposed for evaluation; assumptions it depends on remain separately identifiable."},{"target":"Research question, theory, model and prediction","type":"neighbor","note":"A question solicits an answer, a theory or model supplies explanatory structure and a prediction states an expected observation. The hypothesis links them without importing their identities."},{"target":"Study, protocol, test and preregistration","type":"neighbor","note":"These define or execute an evaluation. The hypothesis records typed references, criteria and deviations but not operational study lifecycle."},{"target":"Result, evidence and assessment","type":"neighbor","note":"Results and evidence are external records. The hypothesis owns source-qualified assessment links but no context-free truth flag."},{"target":"Decision and policy","type":"neighbor","note":"An assessment may inform an external decision, but the accountable choice, policy, clinical action or regulatory consequence is not owned by the hypothesis."},{"target":"Research object and publication","type":"neighbor","note":"RO-Crate, DataCite and FAIR projections package or identify research outputs. They do not replace the hypothesis proposition, revision or evaluation semantics."},{"target":"WM-KNW-007","type":"parent"}],"interaction":{"identity":{"applicability":"required","items":["Authoritative master-system identifier for the hypothesis and immutable proposition revision.","Governed globally resolvable hypothesis or registration IRI.","Adopting-Dimension UUID or ULID when no authoritative external identifier exists."]},"properties":{"applicability":"not-applicable","items":[]},"recognition":{"applicability":"optional","items":["A hypothesis record states a proposition that can be tested, the population, variables and conditions, and links to studies and assessments.","Often confused with a research question, an assumption, a claim and a study result."]},"capabilities":{"applicability":"required","items":["Register hypothesis: Create one stable provisional-proposition identity and initial revision.","Formulate proposition: Record natural-language and optional formal expressions with terminology and logic profile.","Classify and scope hypothesis: Assign hypothesis kind, domain, population, unit, variables, conditions and exclusions.","Record rationale and dependencies: Bind motivation, assumptions, theory, priors, citations and prior evidence as external references.","Operationalize hypothesis: Define constructs, indicators, measures, estimands, predictions and potential falsifiers.","Preregister evaluation: Freeze protocol, outcomes, analysis criteria, timestamps and permitted deviations before results.","Bind study and results: Link external studies, tests, datasets, analyses, observations and results without importing their lifecycles.","Record assessment: Append one source-qualified support, challenge, refutation or inconclusive assessment with uncertainty.","Revise or supersede: Create a corrected, reformulated, split, merged or successor hypothesis without overwriting history.","Project hypothesis view: Produce minimum-necessary standards-aligned views with declared semantic loss."]},"hazards":{"applicability":"required","items":["False findings from flexible analysis or undisclosed changes after seeing data.","Overclaiming causality or importance from weak evidence.","Harm to participants from poorly justified studies.","Stigma from findings about groups reported without context."]},"interfaces":{"applicability":"required","items":["ISO 3534-1 statistics vocabulary and symbols.","OBI and STATO ontologies for study design and statistical methods.","Study registration on ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP for health research.","W3C PROV-O for provenance of formulations and assessments."]},"context":{"applicability":"required","items":["ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO are health-research profiles rather than universal hypothesis registries.","OBI, STATO and ECO are strong scientific ontologies with biomedical roots and do not define all disciplinary practice.","Ethics, consent, ownership, publication, retention and legal consequences depend on discipline, institution and jurisdiction."]}},"sources":[{"title":"NIST/SEMATECH Engineering Statistics Handbook","url":"https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/nistsematech-engineering-statistics-handbook","note":"National Institute of Standards and Technology"},{"title":"Product and Process Comparisons: Introduction","url":"https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/prc/section1/prc1.htm","note":"National Institute of Standards and Technology"},{"title":"ISO 3534-1 Statistics vocabulary","url":"https://www.iso.org/standard/40145.html","note":"International Organization for Standardization"},{"title":"International Vocabulary of Metrology","url":"https://www.bipm.org/en/doi/10.59161/jcgm200-2012","note":"Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology"},{"title":"Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement","url":"https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf","note":"Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology"},{"title":"Protocol Registration Data Element Definitions","url":"https://clinicaltrials.gov/policy/protocol-definitions","note":"United States National Library of Medicine"},{"title":"Results Data Element Definitions","url":"https://clinicaltrials.gov/policy/results-definitions","note":"United States National Library of Medicine"},{"title":"WHO Trial Registration Data Set","url":"https://www.who.int/tools/clinical-trials-registry-platform/network/who-data-set","note":"World Health Organization"},{"title":"Create a Preregistration","url":"https://help.osf.io/article/158-create-a-preregistration","note":"Center for Open Science"},{"title":"Frascati Manual 2015","url":"https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/frascati-manual-2015_9789264239012-en.html","note":"Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development"},{"title":"Recommendation on Open Science","url":"https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-science","note":"UNESCO"},{"title":"Ontology for Biomedical Investigations","url":"https://obi-ontology.org/","note":"OBI Consortium"},{"title":"STATO: an Ontology of Statistical Methods","url":"https://stato-ontology.org/","note":"STATO Consortium"},{"title":"Evidence and Conclusion Ontology","url":"https://evidenceontology.org/","note":"ECO Consortium"},{"title":"PROV-O: The PROV Ontology","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Web Annotation Data Model","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Data Quality Vocabulary","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"ODRL Information Model 2.2","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Shapes Constraint Language","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"DataCite Metadata Schema","url":"https://schema.datacite.org/","note":"DataCite"},{"title":"RO-Crate Specification","url":"https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/specification.html","note":"RO-Crate Community"},{"title":"Schema.org Claim","url":"https://schema.org/Claim","note":"Schema.org Community Group"},{"title":"RFC 3339 Date and Time on the Internet","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339.html","note":"Internet Engineering Task Force"},{"title":"FAIR Guiding Principles","url":"https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618","note":"Nature Scientific Data"}],"openQuestions":["Discipline, study-design, statistical, Bayesian, causal-inference, machine-learning, ethics, jurisdiction, privacy, licensing and retention profiles require expert review.","Claims, assumptions, theories, questions, studies, protocols, tests, datasets, observations, results, evidence, publications and decisions remain neighboring masters.","Automated experiment design, causal identification, power calculation, model selection, evidence grading, replication scoring and truth adjudication remain future work."],"resources":{"spec":"/models/wm-knw-009-hypothesis/spec.yaml","agents":"/models/wm-knw-009-hypothesis/AGENTS.md","source":"https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-knw-009"},"provenance":{"origin":"world-models research","builtFrom":["models/wm-knw-009-hypothesis/spec.yaml","ver-cy/world-models/card-supplements/wm-knw-009-hypothesis.json"],"providers":["Codex"],"researchStatus":"reviewable-draft","generatedAt":"2026-09-06T21:49:32Z","builder":"tools/build_cards.py@1.0.0"},"completeness":{"sections":{"classifiers":"filled","whatItIs":"filled","purpose":"filled","distinguishingFeatures":"filled","structure":"filled","agentConduct":"filled","ethics":"filled","owners":"filled","relations":"filled","interaction.identity":"filled","interaction.properties":"not-applicable","interaction.recognition":"filled","interaction.capabilities":"filled","interaction.hazards":"filled","interaction.interfaces":"filled","interaction.context":"filled","sources":"filled"},"notes":{"interaction.properties":"Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties.","_supplement":"Sections authored in card supplement 1.0.0 by Claude (Opus 5.5) (2026-10-05, unreviewed). Written from the published specification and established practice in the field; no new sources were read. Unreviewed."},"score":1.0}}