{"schema":"https://ver.cy/schemas/card/1.0.0","id":"vr.wm-liv-001","code":"wm-liv-001-taxon","url":"https://ver.cy/models/wm-liv-001-taxon/","name":"Taxon","alternateNames":["P6","P7"],"kind":"world-model","status":"published","version":"0.3.0-research.1","language":"en","classifiers":{"family":"World Models","category":"Physical world and living systems","entryKind":"entity","plane":"","domain":["PHY.LIV.TAX"],"industry":["Cross-industry"],"navPath":"NAV.PHY.LIV.TAX","tags":["taxon","phy.liv.tax"],"facets":{}},"whatItIs":"Owns taxon-concept identity, according-to authority, circumscription, source-relative name usages, placement, concept relations, mappings, diagnosis, evidence references, uncertainty, version history, stewardship and projections while external systems own nomenclatural codes and acts, publications, names, specimens, organisms, occurrences, sequences, habitats, distributions and conservation assessments.","purpose":"Represent a governed, source-qualified taxon concept so agents can identify, compare, cite, revise and exchange biological classifications without confusing concepts with names or organisms.","scope":{"in":["Taxon concept identity, source, release, circumscription, scope, code applicability, name usages, rank or rankless placement and hierarchy","Concept succession and cross-classification relations, diagnosis, evidence references, confidence, disputes, stewardship, access, retention and provenance","TCS, Darwin Core, Catalogue of Life, GBIF, NCBI and machine or human projections with version and loss controls"],"out":["Organism, population, specimen, material sample, occurrence, observation, sequence, trait, distribution, habitat or conservation-assessment master lifecycle","Nomenclatural code, act, publication, scientific-name master, type-specimen custody or registry-service implementation","Universal acceptance, placement or equivalence inferred from a name string, rank, matching label or one preferred backbone"],"boundaries":[{"neighbor":"Taxon Name and Nomenclatural Act","distinction":"A taxon concept is a circumscribed grouping according to a source; names, typification and code-governed acts have separate identity and lifecycle and are attached as usages or evidence."},{"neighbor":"Organism, Population, Specimen and Occurrence","distinction":"Physical or observed biological entities may support or instantiate identification, but their properties, location, custody and event history do not become properties of the concept."},{"neighbor":"Classification Scheme","distinction":"A classification owns the ordered system and release; this model owns one source-qualified concept and its placement assertions within that system."},{"neighbor":"Distribution, Habitat, Trait and Conservation Assessment","distinction":"These are time- and evidence-dependent assertions about members or populations and remain external references rather than defining taxon-concept identity by default."},{"neighbor":"Checklist and Taxonomy Registry","distinction":"Catalogue of Life, GBIF and NCBI own service releases and local identifiers; Vercy preserves mappings and scope instead of declaring their records universally equivalent."}]},"distinguishingFeatures":["A taxon concept according to a stated authority, not the bare scientific name.","The same name can denote different circumscriptions in different sources, and the model keeps them apart.","Concept relations such as congruent, includes or overlaps link concepts across classifications.","Organisms, specimens and occurrences are separate records that reference a taxon."],"structure":{"bundles":[{"id":"concept-identity-authority-and-scope","name":"Concept identity, authority and scope","description":"Establishes which taxon concept is asserted, by whom, in which classification and with which circumscription.","layers":[{"id":"concept-identity-and-source","name":"Concept identity and source","description":"Stable identity and according-to authority for a concept assertion.","findings":[{"id":"taxon-concept-master-identity","name":"Taxon concept master identity","description":"Records the authoritative concept identifier, governed namespace, alternate identifiers, source release and collision history independently of names.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for taxon concept master identity?","id":"taxon-concept-master-identity-q01","kind":"identity"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish taxon concept master identity, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"taxon-concept-master-identity-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must taxon concept master identity be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"taxon-concept-master-identity-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"according-to-source-and-circumscription","name":"According-to source and circumscription","description":"Binds the concept to the classification, checklist, revision, publication or database that asserts its included and excluded biological scope.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for according-to source and circumscription?","id":"according-to-source-and-circumscription-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish according-to source and circumscription, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"according-to-source-and-circumscription-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must according-to source and circumscription be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"according-to-source-and-circumscription-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"scope-applicability-and-boundary","name":"Scope, applicability and boundary","description":"Domain applicability and separation from neighboring biological records.","findings":[{"id":"taxonomic-scope-and-code-applicability","name":"Taxonomic scope and code applicability","description":"Records kingdom or organismal domain, extant or fossil scope, hybrid or operational treatment, applicable nomenclatural code and explicit exceptions.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for taxonomic scope and code applicability?","id":"taxonomic-scope-and-code-applicability-q01","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish taxonomic scope and code applicability, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"taxonomic-scope-and-code-applicability-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must taxonomic scope and code applicability be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"taxonomic-scope-and-code-applicability-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"concept-name-organism-and-specimen-boundary","name":"Concept, name, organism and specimen boundary","description":"States why the concept is distinct from its name usages, organisms, populations, specimens, occurrences and observations, with typed references only.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for concept, name, organism and specimen boundary?","id":"concept-name-organism-and-specimen-boundary-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish concept, name, organism and specimen boundary, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"concept-name-organism-and-specimen-boundary-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must concept, name, organism and specimen boundary be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"concept-name-organism-and-specimen-boundary-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"name-usage-and-nomenclature","name":"Name usage and nomenclature","description":"Represents scientific and vernacular name usages attached to a taxon concept without collapsing names into concepts.","layers":[{"id":"scientific-name-usage","name":"Scientific name usage","description":"Scientific name forms and source-relative usage status.","findings":[{"id":"scientific-name-and-canonical-form","name":"Scientific name and canonical form","description":"Records the full scientific name, canonical form, rank context, spelling, identifier, language or script and exact source usage.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for scientific name and canonical form?","id":"scientific-name-and-canonical-form-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish scientific name and canonical form, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"scientific-name-and-canonical-form-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must scientific name and canonical form be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"scientific-name-and-canonical-form-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"accepted-synonym-and-misapplied-usage","name":"Accepted, synonym and misapplied usage","description":"Classifies a name usage as accepted, synonym, misapplied, doubtful, unavailable, invalid or another governed source-relative status.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for accepted, synonym and misapplied usage?","id":"accepted-synonym-and-misapplied-usage-q01","kind":"state"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish accepted, synonym and misapplied usage, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"accepted-synonym-and-misapplied-usage-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must accepted, synonym and misapplied usage be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"accepted-synonym-and-misapplied-usage-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"authorship-publication-and-type","name":"Authorship, publication and type","description":"Nomenclatural evidence referenced from authoritative masters.","findings":[{"id":"authorship-and-original-publication","name":"Authorship and original publication","description":"Records parsed and verbatim authorship, basionym or original combination references, publication citation and source-specific interpretation.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for authorship and original publication?","id":"authorship-and-original-publication-q01","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish authorship and original publication, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"authorship-and-original-publication-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must authorship and original publication be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"authorship-and-original-publication-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"type-and-nomenclatural-act-reference","name":"Type and nomenclatural act reference","description":"References name-bearing type material, typification, proposal, conservation, rejection, ruling or other act without importing specimen or act lifecycle.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for type and nomenclatural act reference?","id":"type-and-nomenclatural-act-reference-q01","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish type and nomenclatural act reference, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"type-and-nomenclatural-act-reference-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must type and nomenclatural act reference be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"type-and-nomenclatural-act-reference-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"vernacular-usage","name":"Vernacular usage","description":"Human-language names with geographic and community context.","findings":[{"id":"vernacular-name-language-and-script","name":"Vernacular name, language and script","description":"Records a vernacular label, normalized and verbatim forms, language, script, grammatical notes and source citation.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for vernacular name, language and script?","id":"vernacular-name-language-and-script-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish vernacular name, language and script, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"vernacular-name-language-and-script-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must vernacular name, language and script be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"vernacular-name-language-and-script-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"regional-preference-community-and-source","name":"Regional preference, community and source","description":"Qualifies geographic scope, community, preferred or deprecated use, season or context, evidence and responsible steward.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for regional preference, community and source?","id":"regional-preference-community-and-source-q01","kind":"spatial"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish regional preference, community and source, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"regional-preference-community-and-source-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must regional preference, community and source be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"regional-preference-community-and-source-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"classification-placement-and-membership","name":"Classification placement and membership","description":"Represents rank or rankless placement, parentage, paths and direct members inside a named classification version.","layers":[{"id":"rank-parentage-and-root","name":"Rank, parentage and root","description":"Immediate governed placement within one classification.","findings":[{"id":"rank-or-rankless-placement","name":"Rank or rankless placement","description":"Records the exact rank term, vocabulary and source, or an explicit rankless treatment without forcing a Linnaean rank.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for rank or rankless placement?","id":"rank-or-rankless-placement-q01","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish rank or rankless placement, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"rank-or-rankless-placement-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must rank or rankless placement be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"rank-or-rankless-placement-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"parent-concept-and-classification-root","name":"Parent concept and classification root","description":"Links the immediate parent and root in the same classification release, with placement authority and effective interval.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for parent concept and classification root?","id":"parent-concept-and-classification-root-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish parent concept and classification root, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"parent-concept-and-classification-root-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must parent concept and classification root be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"parent-concept-and-classification-root-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"path-membership-and-uncertain-placement","name":"Path, membership and uncertain placement","description":"Ancestor path, direct children and unresolved position.","findings":[{"id":"classification-path-and-child-membership","name":"Classification path and child membership","description":"Records ordered ancestor references, directly included child concepts, membership role, source release and consistency evidence.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for classification path and child membership?","id":"classification-path-and-child-membership-q01","kind":"composition"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish classification path and child membership, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"classification-path-and-child-membership-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must classification path and child membership be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"classification-path-and-child-membership-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"uncertain-placement-and-incertae-sedis","name":"Uncertain placement and incertae sedis","description":"Records unresolved, provisional or competing placements, candidate parents, reason, method, evidence, confidence and review status.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for uncertain placement and incertae sedis?","id":"uncertain-placement-and-incertae-sedis-q01","kind":"quality"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish uncertain placement and incertae sedis, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"uncertain-placement-and-incertae-sedis-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must uncertain placement and incertae sedis be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"uncertain-placement-and-incertae-sedis-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"concept-relations-and-reconciliation","name":"Concept relations and reconciliation","description":"Preserves taxonomic change and maps concepts across classifications using explicit evidence-bearing semantics.","layers":[{"id":"within-classification-relations","name":"Within-classification relations","description":"Name relationships and concept succession inside an authority context.","findings":[{"id":"synonymy-basionym-and-combination","name":"Synonymy, basionym and combination","description":"Records typed name and usage relationships, direction, applicable code, source assertion and exceptions without treating every synonym as concept identity.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for synonymy, basionym and combination?","id":"synonymy-basionym-and-combination-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish synonymy, basionym and combination, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"synonymy-basionym-and-combination-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must synonymy, basionym and combination be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"synonymy-basionym-and-combination-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"split-lump-replacement-and-successor","name":"Split, lump, replacement and successor","description":"Records taxonomic revision events that create successor concepts, retained portions, split or merged scopes and change rationale.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for split, lump, replacement and successor?","id":"split-lump-replacement-and-successor-q01","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish split, lump, replacement and successor, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"split-lump-replacement-and-successor-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must split, lump, replacement and successor be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"split-lump-replacement-and-successor-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"cross-classification-mapping","name":"Cross-classification mapping","description":"Set-theoretic concept relationships across authorities and releases.","findings":[{"id":"congruence-inclusion-and-direction","name":"Congruence, inclusion and direction","description":"Records congruent, includes or is-included-in relationships between source-qualified concepts, including direction and compared circumscriptions.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for congruence, inclusion and direction?","id":"congruence-inclusion-and-direction-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish congruence, inclusion and direction, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"congruence-inclusion-and-direction-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must congruence, inclusion and direction be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"congruence-inclusion-and-direction-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"overlap-disjointness-and-mapping-provenance","name":"Overlap, disjointness and mapping provenance","description":"Records partial overlap, disjointness or unresolved relation with mapper, method, evidence, confidence, date and supersession.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for overlap, disjointness and mapping provenance?","id":"overlap-disjointness-and-mapping-provenance-q01","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish overlap, disjointness and mapping provenance, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"overlap-disjointness-and-mapping-provenance-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must overlap, disjointness and mapping provenance be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"overlap-disjointness-and-mapping-provenance-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"diagnosis-evidence-and-uncertainty","name":"Diagnosis, evidence and uncertainty","description":"Captures how the concept is recognized and what supports or disputes its circumscription without absorbing evidence-object masters.","layers":[{"id":"diagnosis-and-recognition","name":"Diagnosis and recognition","description":"Defining description and differential characters.","findings":[{"id":"diagnostic-description-and-source","name":"Diagnostic description and source","description":"Records the concept diagnosis, character statement, covered life stage or sex, method, source, language and applicability limits.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for diagnostic description and source?","id":"diagnostic-description-and-source-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish diagnostic description and source, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"diagnostic-description-and-source-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must diagnostic description and source be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"diagnostic-description-and-source-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"differential-characters-and-confusing-concepts","name":"Differential characters and confusing concepts","description":"Records features that distinguish the concept from named alternatives, observation method, conditions, thresholds, uncertainty and failure modes.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for differential characters and confusing concepts?","id":"differential-characters-and-confusing-concepts-q01","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish differential characters and confusing concepts, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"differential-characters-and-confusing-concepts-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must differential characters and confusing concepts be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"differential-characters-and-confusing-concepts-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"specimen-sequence-literature-and-expert-evidence","name":"Specimen, sequence, literature and expert evidence","description":"External evidence references and their role in concept support.","findings":[{"id":"specimen-and-sequence-evidence-reference","name":"Specimen and sequence evidence reference","description":"Links type, voucher, collection, material sample or sequence identifiers with evidence role, custody source, quality and access marking.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for specimen and sequence evidence reference?","id":"specimen-and-sequence-evidence-reference-q01","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish specimen and sequence evidence reference, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"specimen-and-sequence-evidence-reference-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must specimen and sequence evidence reference be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"specimen-and-sequence-evidence-reference-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"literature-and-expert-assertion","name":"Literature and expert assertion","description":"Links supporting or rejecting publications, datasets and expert judgments with claim, author, method, review status and provenance.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for literature and expert assertion?","id":"literature-and-expert-assertion-q01","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish literature and expert assertion, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"literature-and-expert-assertion-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must literature and expert assertion be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"literature-and-expert-assertion-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"confidence-dispute-and-revision-need","name":"Confidence, dispute and revision need","description":"Assessment quality and visible unresolved taxonomic judgment.","findings":[{"id":"confidence-method-and-review-status","name":"Confidence, method and review status","description":"Records confidence scale, assessment method, reviewer, evidence cut-off, result, limitations and next review trigger.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for confidence, method and review status?","id":"confidence-method-and-review-status-q01","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish confidence, method and review status, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"confidence-method-and-review-status-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must confidence, method and review status be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"confidence-method-and-review-status-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"dispute-species-complex-and-pending-revision","name":"Dispute, species complex and pending revision","description":"Preserves competing circumscriptions, unresolved identification, cryptic complex, disputed placement and planned revision without forcing consensus.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for dispute, species complex and pending revision?","id":"dispute-species-complex-and-pending-revision-q01","kind":"exception"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish dispute, species complex and pending revision, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"dispute-species-complex-and-pending-revision-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must dispute, species complex and pending revision be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"dispute-species-complex-and-pending-revision-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"lifecycle-stewardship-and-governance","name":"Lifecycle, stewardship and governance","description":"Controls immutable versions, review authority, access, licence, retention and non-destructive retirement.","layers":[{"id":"version-lifecycle-and-change","name":"Version lifecycle and change","description":"Release identity, effective time and succession.","findings":[{"id":"concept-version-effective-and-record-time","name":"Concept version, effective and record time","description":"Records immutable concept version, release, effective interval, publication date, review time, ingestion time and assertion status as distinct values.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for concept version, effective and record time?","id":"concept-version-effective-and-record-time-q01","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish concept version, effective and record time, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"concept-version-effective-and-record-time-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must concept version, effective and record time be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"concept-version-effective-and-record-time-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"supersession-deprecation-and-change-rationale","name":"Supersession, deprecation and change rationale","description":"Links predecessor and successor concepts, changed boundary, name or placement, reason, authority, migration impact and continued resolution policy.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for supersession, deprecation and change rationale?","id":"supersession-deprecation-and-change-rationale-q01","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish supersession, deprecation and change rationale, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"supersession-deprecation-and-change-rationale-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must supersession, deprecation and change rationale be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"supersession-deprecation-and-change-rationale-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"stewardship-access-and-retention","name":"Stewardship, access and retention","description":"Responsibility, review, rights and preservation.","findings":[{"id":"taxonomic-authority-review-and-provenance","name":"Taxonomic authority, review and provenance","description":"Records asserting authority, steward, editor, reviewer, delegated role, method, source chain, decision and accountable timestamps.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for taxonomic authority, review and provenance?","id":"taxonomic-authority-review-and-provenance-q01","kind":"ownership"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish taxonomic authority, review and provenance, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"taxonomic-authority-review-and-provenance-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must taxonomic authority, review and provenance be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"taxonomic-authority-review-and-provenance-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"licence-access-retention-and-tombstone","name":"Licence, access, retention and tombstone","description":"Records license, attribution, sensitive evidence, withholding or generalization, retention, legal hold, deletion authority and tombstone behavior.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for licence, access, retention and tombstone?","id":"licence-access-retention-and-tombstone-q01","kind":"retention"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish licence, access, retention and tombstone, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"licence-access-retention-and-tombstone-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must licence, access, retention and tombstone be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"licence-access-retention-and-tombstone-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"interoperability-and-projections","name":"Interoperability and projections","description":"Maps the semantic model to biodiversity standards, registries, APIs and serializations without coupling identity to a format.","layers":[{"id":"standard-and-registry-bindings","name":"Standard and registry bindings","description":"Pinned mappings to principal taxonomic exchange systems.","findings":[{"id":"tcs-and-darwin-core-binding","name":"TCS and Darwin Core binding","description":"Maps concept, name, according-to, parent, child, accepted usage, synonym and mapping fields to pinned TCS and Darwin Core terms with loss disclosure.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for tcs and darwin core binding?","id":"tcs-and-darwin-core-binding-q01","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish tcs and darwin core binding, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"tcs-and-darwin-core-binding-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must tcs and darwin core binding be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"tcs-and-darwin-core-binding-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"catalogue-of-life-gbif-and-ncbi-binding","name":"Catalogue of Life, GBIF and NCBI binding","description":"Maps source dataset, release, taxon identifiers, name usage, hierarchy and reconciliation status to each registry without claiming universal equivalence.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for catalogue of life, gbif and ncbi binding?","id":"catalogue-of-life-gbif-and-ncbi-binding-q01","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish catalogue of life, gbif and ncbi binding, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"catalogue-of-life-gbif-and-ncbi-binding-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must catalogue of life, gbif and ncbi binding be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"catalogue-of-life-gbif-and-ncbi-binding-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"canonical-and-serialized-projections","name":"Canonical and serialized projections","description":"Resolvable citation, integrity and representation variants.","findings":[{"id":"canonical-uri-citation-and-digest","name":"Canonical URI, citation and digest","description":"Records stable resolution URI, human citation, source snapshot, media type, byte length and digest for a concept version and mapping set.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for canonical uri, citation and digest?","id":"canonical-uri-citation-and-digest-q01","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish canonical uri, citation and digest, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"canonical-uri-citation-and-digest-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must canonical uri, citation and digest be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"canonical-uri-citation-and-digest-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"machine-human-and-round-trip-projections","name":"Machine, human and round-trip projections","description":"Defines JSON, RDF, CSV, Darwin Core Archive, API and human-card projections with schema, ordering, omitted values and round-trip tests.","questions":[{"text":"What exact values and source-qualified meaning must be recorded for machine, human and round-trip projections?","id":"machine-human-and-round-trip-projections-q01","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"Which authority, source, method and evidence establish machine, human and round-trip projections, with what confidence, effective time and limitations?","id":"machine-human-and-round-trip-projections-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How must machine, human and round-trip projections be related, validated and preserved when classifications disagree or change?","id":"machine-human-and-round-trip-projections-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]}]},"agentConduct":{"may":["Resolve a name to candidate taxon concepts with their authorities.","Report concept relations and mappings between checklists.","Suggest an identification with stated uncertainty.","Record evidence references for a placement."],"mustNot":["Treat a name string match as proof that two concepts are the same.","Publish a new name or nomenclatural act.","Disclose precise locations of threatened taxa where data are sensitive.","Overwrite earlier concept versions.","Give certain identifications of toxic or dangerous species from images alone."],"requiresHuman":["Taxonomic revisions and acceptance decisions in a checklist.","Identifications used for medical, legal or biosecurity decisions.","Release of sensitive occurrence data."]},"ethics":{"considerations":["Precise locations of rare species can be used by poachers and collectors.","Misidentifying poisonous or invasive species can harm people and ecosystems.","Indigenous and local names and knowledge deserve credit and consent."],"affectedParties":["Wild species and ecosystems","Taxonomists, collectors and data publishers","Indigenous and local communities"]},"owners":{"steward":"Dimension identity, owner, accountable taxonomic steward and namespace","roles":[{"name":"Dimension owner","responsibilities":["Own namespace, mastership, autonomy, access, retention and federation rules."]},{"name":"Taxonomic authority or concept author","responsibilities":["Own circumscription, placement, revision rationale and scientific judgment."]},{"name":"Nomenclatural steward","responsibilities":["Interpret applicable code, name usage, authorship, typification and acts."]},{"name":"Checklist or registry publisher","responsibilities":["Own releases, identifiers, resolution, availability, licence and distribution metadata."]},{"name":"Data curator","responsibilities":["Maintain mappings, references, quality flags, provenance and issue queues."]},{"name":"Reviewer or mapping expert","responsibilities":["Assess evidence, competing concepts, mappings, confidence and conformance."]},{"name":"Evidence custodian","responsibilities":["Own specimen, sequence, publication or dataset records and their access controls."]},{"name":"Access and compliance authority","responsibilities":["Govern restricted evidence, licensing, disclosure, retention and audit."]}],"masterSystems":[]},"relations":[{"target":"Scientific Name, Nomenclatural Act, Publication and Type Specimen models","type":"references","note":"Bind code-governed name and evidence identities without importing their lifecycle."},{"target":"Organism, Population, Specimen, Occurrence, Sequence, Trait, Distribution, Habitat and Conservation models","type":"references","note":"Connect observations and domain evidence while retaining their direct properties and mastership externally."},{"target":"Classification, Evidence, Provenance, Person, Organization, Language and Geography models","type":"references","note":"Resolve source authority, mappings, review, vernacular context and provenance by typed identities."},{"target":"Taxon Concept Standard","type":"aligned","note":"Supports format-independent Taxon Concept, Taxon Name, Mapping and Nomenclatural Type semantics."},{"target":"Darwin Core","type":"aligned","note":"Supports broad biodiversity exchange while requiring explicit concept-versus-name-usage interpretation."},{"target":"Catalogue of Life, GBIF and NCBI taxonomy services","type":"aligned","note":"Supports operational identifier, checklist, hierarchy and reconciliation projections with source-relative scope."},{"target":"Taxon Name and Nomenclatural Act","type":"neighbor","note":"A taxon concept is a circumscribed grouping according to a source; names, typification and code-governed acts have separate identity and lifecycle and are attached as usages or evidence."},{"target":"Organism, Population, Specimen and Occurrence","type":"neighbor","note":"Physical or observed biological entities may support or instantiate identification, but their properties, location, custody and event history do not become properties of the concept."},{"target":"Classification Scheme","type":"neighbor","note":"A classification owns the ordered system and release; this model owns one source-qualified concept and its placement assertions within that system."},{"target":"Distribution, Habitat, Trait and Conservation Assessment","type":"neighbor","note":"These are time- and evidence-dependent assertions about members or populations and remain external references rather than defining taxon-concept identity by default."},{"target":"Checklist and Taxonomy Registry","type":"neighbor","note":"Catalogue of Life, GBIF and NCBI own service releases and local identifiers; Vercy preserves mappings and scope instead of declaring their records universally equivalent."}],"interaction":{"identity":{"applicability":"required","items":["Authoritative checklist, taxonomic publication or taxonomy master-system concept identifier plus source release.","Governed globally resolvable taxon-concept IRI qualified by according-to authority.","Adopting-Dimension UUID or ULID when no authoritative external concept identifier exists."]},"properties":{"applicability":"not-applicable","items":[]},"recognition":{"applicability":"required","items":["A taxon concept is recognised by a scientific name plus the according-to source and a diagnosis.","Organisms of a taxon are confused with look-alike species, hybrids and different life stages."]},"capabilities":{"applicability":"required","items":["Register taxon concept: Create a stable source-qualified concept identity and initial circumscription.","Bind name usage: Attach a scientific or vernacular name usage with source-relative status.","Place in classification: Assert rank or rankless parentage in one classification release.","Revise circumscription: Create a successor concept for a boundary, split, lump or placement change.","Map taxon concepts: Record congruence, inclusion, overlap, disjointness or unresolved relation across classifications.","Attach diagnostic evidence: Reference diagnosis, distinguishing characters, specimens, sequences, literature or expert assertions.","Review taxonomic assertion: Record an accountable assessment of identity, placement, mapping or evidence.","Validate classification: Check identifiers, parentage, source bindings, code applicability, mappings and version lineage.","Deprecate taxon concept: Retire a concept version while preserving citation and successor navigation.","Publish checklist projection: Render a governed classification or checklist without changing source concepts.","Reconcile registry identifiers: Link Catalogue of Life, GBIF, NCBI and other source identifiers with explicit match semantics.","Export taxon concept: Produce a selected format or API representation with declared omissions and round-trip limits."]},"hazards":{"applicability":"required","items":["Wrong identification of venomous, poisonous or invasive organisms.","Merging distinct concepts and losing conservation status.","Leak of sensitive locations of threatened species."]},"interfaces":{"applicability":"required","items":["TDWG Darwin Core.","TDWG Taxonomic Concept Transfer Schema (TCS).","Catalogue of Life ColDP format.","International Codes of Nomenclature (ICZN, ICN, ICNP)."]},"context":{"applicability":"required","items":["Applicable nomenclatural code depends on organismal domain and edition, not geography alone.","Catalogue of Life, GBIF and NCBI are authoritative for their own releases and scopes, not universal arbiters of all taxonomy.","Vernacular names and preferences are language, community and region specific."]}},"sources":[{"title":"Taxon Concept Standard","url":"https://tcs.tdwg.org/","note":"Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)"},{"title":"Taxon Concept Standard examples","url":"https://tcs.tdwg.org/examples/","note":"Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)"},{"title":"Darwin Core Quick Reference Guide","url":"https://dwc.tdwg.org/terms/","note":"Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)"},{"title":"International Code of Zoological Nomenclature","url":"https://code.iczn.org/introduction/","note":"International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature"},{"title":"International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants","url":"https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php","note":"International Association for Plant Taxonomy"},{"title":"ChecklistBank","url":"https://www.catalogueoflife.org/about/checklistbank","note":"Catalogue of Life"},{"title":"Species API","url":"https://techdocs.gbif.org/en/openapi/v1/species","note":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility"},{"title":"NCBI Taxonomy","url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy","note":"National Center for Biotechnology Information"},{"title":"PROV-O: The PROV Ontology","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"RFC 3339: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339","note":"Internet Engineering Task Force"}],"openQuestions":["Validate separate ICN, ICZN, ICNP and ICTV nomenclatural profiles and their name, type, authorship and act mappings.","Create rankless, hybrid, fossil, microbial, viral and species-complex recipes with explicit applicability and evidence rules.","Develop deterministic fixtures for parent cycles, split and lump lineage, RCC-5 mappings, source disagreement, tombstones and loss-aware projections.","Approve sibling model identifiers and relation cardinalities for names, organisms, populations, specimens, occurrences, sequences, classifications, evidence, traits, distributions, habitats and conservation assessments.","Code-specific botanical, zoological, prokaryotic and viral nomenclature require separate expert profiles.","Organism, population, specimen, occurrence, sequence, trait, distribution, habitat and conservation-assessment lifecycles remain in neighboring models.","Certified registry crosswalks, full TCS conformance fixtures, phylogenetic rankless profiles and mapping benchmarks remain future work."],"resources":{"spec":"/models/wm-liv-001-taxon/spec.yaml","agents":"/models/wm-liv-001-taxon/AGENTS.md","source":"https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-liv-001"},"provenance":{"origin":"world-models research","builtFrom":["models/wm-liv-001-taxon/spec.yaml","ver-cy/world-models/card-supplements/wm-liv-001-taxon.json"],"providers":["Codex"],"researchStatus":"reviewable-draft","generatedAt":"2026-09-06T00:35:00Z","builder":"tools/build_cards.py@1.0.0"},"completeness":{"sections":{"classifiers":"filled","whatItIs":"filled","purpose":"filled","distinguishingFeatures":"filled","structure":"filled","agentConduct":"filled","ethics":"filled","owners":"filled","relations":"filled","interaction.identity":"filled","interaction.properties":"not-applicable","interaction.recognition":"filled","interaction.capabilities":"filled","interaction.hazards":"filled","interaction.interfaces":"filled","interaction.context":"filled","sources":"filled"},"notes":{"interaction.properties":"A taxon is an abstract classification concept; organisms and specimens carry the physical properties.","_supplement":"Sections authored in card supplement 1.0.0 by Claude (Opus 5.5) (2026-10-05, unreviewed). Written from the published specification and established practice in the field; no new sources were read. Unreviewed."},"score":1.0}}