{"schema":"https://ver.cy/schemas/card/1.0.0","id":"vr.wm-liv-006","code":"wm-liv-006-ecosystem-biome","url":"https://ver.cy/models/wm-liv-006-ecosystem-biome/","name":"Ecosystem / Biome","alternateNames":["P8"],"kind":"world-model","status":"published","version":"0.3.0-reviewable-draft","language":"en","classifiers":{"family":"World Models","category":"Physical world and living systems","entryKind":"entity","plane":"","domain":["PHY.LIV.ECO"],"industry":["Cross-industry"],"navPath":"NAV.PHY.LIV.ECO","tags":["ecosystem","biome","phy.liv.eco"],"facets":{}},"whatItIs":"The root is one steward-identified ecological unit with versioned delineations and assertions. Biomes and ecosystem types are externally governed classifier references. Physical processes, extent, condition and capacity context are local; economic valuation, species masters, land rights and physical intervention are external.","purpose":"Describe a delineated ecosystem as a changing biophysical system with qualified class assignments, evidence and assessments.","scope":{"in":["Persistent unit identity and versioned spatial extent","Qualified biome/type assignments, crosswalks and uncertainty","Biotic and abiotic evidence, ecological processes, condition and change","Physical capacity context and controlled evidence projections"],"out":["Global classifier authoring and universal ecosystem inventory","Species, specimen, water, soil, weather and climate master lifecycles","Land ownership, protected-area designation and access-right adjudication","Monetary valuation, credits, offsets and certified sustainability claims","Physical restoration, extraction, hazard response and autonomous environmental intervention","Official collapse-risk assessment algorithms and executable conformance certification"],"boundaries":[{"neighbor":"Biome and ecosystem-type classifiers","distinction":"A type is a concept and the unit is a referent. Preserve scheme, release and assertion status; do not confuse biome with realm or create a second classifier root."},{"neighbor":"Vegetation, wildlife and other biological record masters","distinction":"Carry composition summaries and supporting references only. Individual populations, taxa and observations retain their own master identities."},{"neighbor":"Habitat, protected area and land tenure","distinction":"A habitat or designated area may overlap a unit but is not automatically coextensive with it. Record stewardship confers no land or resource rights."},{"neighbor":"Environmental substrate and climate models","distinction":"Reference unit-specific setting and observations without owning the source water, soil, terrain, weather or climate record lifecycle."},{"neighbor":"Valuation and official accounts","distinction":"Physical evidence may feed external accounts or valuation, but the unit neither prices services nor certifies an official account."},{"neighbor":"Risk assessment and operational activities","distinction":"Reference the assessed type, scope and issuing authority; a local change or milestone does not establish a global risk class or authorize intervention."}]},"distinguishingFeatures":["Unlike Biome and ecosystem-type classifiers: A type is a concept and the unit is a referent. Preserve scheme, release and assertion status; do not confuse biome with realm or create a second classifier root.","Unlike Vegetation, wildlife and other biological record masters: Carry composition summaries and supporting references only. Individual populations, taxa and observations retain their own master identities.","Unlike Habitat, protected area and land tenure: A habitat or designated area may overlap a unit but is not automatically coextensive with it. Record stewardship confers no land or resource rights.","Unlike Environmental substrate and climate models: Reference unit-specific setting and observations without owning the source water, soil, terrain, weather or climate record lifecycle.","Unlike Valuation and official accounts: Physical evidence may feed external accounts or valuation, but the unit neither prices services nor certifies an official account.","Unlike Risk assessment and operational activities: Reference the assessed type, scope and issuing authority; a local change or milestone does not establish a global risk class or authorize intervention."],"structure":{"bundles":[{"id":"ecosystem-identity","name":"Unit identity and continuity","description":"Proposed ecosystem context for unit identity and continuity.","layers":[{"id":"ecosystem-unit-layer","name":"Ecological unit","description":"Represent one delineated ecological system with a persistent steward-assigned identity. Record the operational boundary and map revision separately; the unit is neither a taxon nor a protected-area designation.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-unit-boundary","name":"Identified ecosystem unit","description":"Represent one delineated ecological system with a persistent steward-assigned identity. Record the operational boundary and map revision separately; the unit is neither a taxon nor a protected-area designation.","questions":[{"text":"Which authoritative identifier identifies this unit independently of its map epoch?","id":"ecosystem-unit-boundary-q1","kind":"identity"},{"text":"Which interacting living and nonliving components justify treating the subject as a functional unit?","id":"ecosystem-unit-boundary-q2","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Who stewards the record, and which distinct tenure or customary-rights references govern the location?","id":"ecosystem-unit-boundary-q3","kind":"ownership"},{"text":"How are split, merge, supersession and uncertain continuity recorded without reusing a retired identifier?","id":"ecosystem-unit-boundary-q4","kind":"lifecycle"}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-classification-layer","name":"Classification assertions","description":"Attach a qualified type assignment using a named classification release. Biome, realm and ecosystem type are classification concepts, not interchangeable root instances. Crosswalks may be partial, disputed or many-to-many.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-type-assignment","name":"Versioned type and biome assignment","description":"Attach a qualified type assignment using a named classification release. Biome, realm and ecosystem type are classification concepts, not interchangeable root instances. Crosswalks may be partial, disputed or many-to-many.","questions":[{"text":"Which scheme, release, code and hierarchy level define the assigned class?","id":"ecosystem-type-assignment-q1","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Which diagnostic observations support this assignment and what alternatives remain plausible?","id":"ecosystem-type-assignment-q2","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"What mapping relation and loss of detail apply when translating to another scheme?","id":"ecosystem-type-assignment-q3","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"How are transitional, mixed, artificial or unclassified units represented without forcing an unsupported single class?","id":"ecosystem-type-assignment-q4","kind":"exception"}]}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-extent","name":"Extent and spatial context","description":"Proposed ecosystem context for extent and spatial context.","layers":[{"id":"ecosystem-delineation-layer","name":"Delineation and geometry","description":"Bind the unit to a delineation product and valid period, preserving mapping grain and vertical or tidal context where relevant. An accounting partition is a selected projection, not a claim that ecological boundaries never overlap.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-mapped-extent","name":"Qualified spatial extent","description":"Bind the unit to a delineation product and valid period, preserving mapping grain and vertical or tidal context where relevant. An accounting partition is a selected projection, not a claim that ecological boundaries never overlap.","questions":[{"text":"What geometry, coordinate reference system and vertical or depth range describe the unit for the stated period?","id":"ecosystem-mapped-extent-q1","kind":"spatial"},{"text":"How was area or volume derived, in which units and with what uncertainty?","id":"ecosystem-mapped-extent-q2","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Which spatial resolution, minimum mapping unit and boundary limitations constrain use?","id":"ecosystem-mapped-extent-q3","kind":"quality"},{"text":"What overlap, gap and coverage rules apply within the selected accounting area?","id":"ecosystem-mapped-extent-q4","kind":"constraint"}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-connections-layer","name":"Spatial and environmental relationships","description":"Reference water, soil, terrain and climate masters and describe the unit-specific context. Connectivity assertions require a process, organism group, scale and method; adjacency alone is not functional connectivity.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-connected-setting","name":"Qualified setting and connectivity","description":"Reference water, soil, terrain and climate masters and describe the unit-specific context. Connectivity assertions require a process, organism group, scale and method; adjacency alone is not functional connectivity.","questions":[{"text":"Which external water, soil, terrain and climate records describe the unit at compatible scales and times?","id":"ecosystem-connected-setting-q1","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"What connectivity or fragmentation metric is being claimed, for which process or organism group?","id":"ecosystem-connected-setting-q2","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Which neighboring units, corridors or barriers are included in the analysis boundary?","id":"ecosystem-connected-setting-q3","kind":"spatial"},{"text":"How do missing neighbors, seasonal barriers or resolution changes limit the connection claim?","id":"ecosystem-connected-setting-q4","kind":"quality"}]}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-evidence","name":"Composition and observations","description":"Proposed ecosystem context for composition and observations.","layers":[{"id":"ecosystem-community-layer","name":"Biotic composition and structure","description":"Link biotic observations to the ecosystem without copying species or specimen masters. Community summaries may include microbial groups, abundance, cover and vertical structure when evidenced; missing observations are not absence.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-community-evidence","name":"Community composition evidence","description":"Link biotic observations to the ecosystem without copying species or specimen masters. Community summaries may include microbial groups, abundance, cover and vertical structure when evidenced; missing observations are not absence.","questions":[{"text":"Which taxa or functional groups and structural strata are evidenced in this unit?","id":"ecosystem-community-evidence-q1","kind":"composition"},{"text":"Which abundance, cover or diversity measure is reported with units and spatial support?","id":"ecosystem-community-evidence-q2","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Which survey events, sampling protocols and effort support the summary?","id":"ecosystem-community-evidence-q3","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How are nondetection, confirmed absence, taxonomic uncertainty and unsurveyed areas distinguished?","id":"ecosystem-community-evidence-q4","kind":"exception"}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-observation-layer","name":"Observation attribution","description":"Distinguish direct measurement, remote sensing, model output and expert interpretation. A sample has its own identity and spatial support; a derived unit estimate must disclose extrapolation and uncertainty.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-observation-basis","name":"Qualified observation and estimate","description":"Distinguish direct measurement, remote sensing, model output and expert interpretation. A sample has its own identity and spatial support; a derived unit estimate must disclose extrapolation and uncertainty.","questions":[{"text":"Which feature, property, procedure and source dataset generated this result?","id":"ecosystem-observation-basis-q1","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"What phenomenon interval, result time and ingestion time apply, including seasonal coverage?","id":"ecosystem-observation-basis-q2","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"What measurement or model uncertainty, quality flags and validation limits accompany the value?","id":"ecosystem-observation-basis-q3","kind":"quality"},{"text":"How is the sample-to-unit inference justified and which conditions invalidate its reuse?","id":"ecosystem-observation-basis-q4","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-condition","name":"Condition and ecological processes","description":"Proposed ecosystem context for condition and ecological processes.","layers":[{"id":"ecosystem-assessment-layer","name":"Condition assessment","description":"Keep measured characteristics distinct from scored indicators and any aggregate. The proposed assessment contract requires an explicit reference basis, missingness policy and comparison limits; no universal good-condition threshold is supplied.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-condition-basis","name":"Condition relative to an explicit reference","description":"Keep measured characteristics distinct from scored indicators and any aggregate. The proposed assessment contract requires an explicit reference basis, missingness policy and comparison limits; no universal good-condition threshold is supplied.","questions":[{"text":"Which characteristic, reference condition and eligible ecosystem types define this indicator?","id":"ecosystem-condition-basis-q1","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Which raw values, units, normalization and direction of interpretation produced the score?","id":"ecosystem-condition-basis-q2","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"How are missing values, weights and aggregation limits reported for any composite assessment?","id":"ecosystem-condition-basis-q3","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Are compared assessments compatible in reference basis, season, method and boundary revision?","id":"ecosystem-condition-basis-q4","kind":"temporal"}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-process-layer","name":"Processes and fluxes","description":"Describe ecosystem processes through qualified observations or estimates. Quantities retain system boundary, stock/rate distinction and evidence basis; ecological behaviour is not a permission for an agent to alter the physical system.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-process-quantity","name":"Biophysical process and flux assertion","description":"Describe ecosystem processes through qualified observations or estimates. Quantities retain system boundary, stock/rate distinction and evidence basis; ecological behaviour is not a permission for an agent to alter the physical system.","questions":[{"text":"Which ecological process and system boundary does the assertion describe?","id":"ecosystem-process-quantity-q1","kind":"definition"},{"text":"What quantity, unit, sign convention and integration interval distinguish the stock or flux?","id":"ecosystem-process-quantity-q2","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Is the value measured, modelled or inferred, and which method and input revisions support it?","id":"ecosystem-process-quantity-q3","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Which uncertainty, scale and boundary conditions limit aggregation or interpretation?","id":"ecosystem-process-quantity-q4","kind":"constraint"}]}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-change","name":"Change and disturbance","description":"Proposed ecosystem context for change and disturbance.","layers":[{"id":"ecosystem-transition-layer","name":"Extent and classification changes","description":"A new map can reflect physical conversion, better delineation or a classification revision. Preserve before/after support and a reasoned change category. The local record does not infer a physical loss merely from a changed code or polygon.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-change-attribution","name":"Comparable change with continuity","description":"A new map can reflect physical conversion, better delineation or a classification revision. Preserve before/after support and a reasoned change category. The local record does not infer a physical loss merely from a changed code or polygon.","questions":[{"text":"Which before and after epochs, unit revisions and common comparison area are used?","id":"ecosystem-change-attribution-q1","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"What evidence distinguishes ecological conversion from map correction or typology revision?","id":"ecosystem-change-attribution-q2","kind":"event"},{"text":"What gross gains, losses and net change can be reported without counting overlapping units twice?","id":"ecosystem-change-attribution-q3","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"How are split and merge lineage, reclassification and unresolved transitions preserved?","id":"ecosystem-change-attribution-q4","kind":"lifecycle"}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-pressure-layer","name":"Pressures and assessed outcomes","description":"Link pressures or disturbance events to observed responses with qualified attribution. Local condition, restoration progress and an external type-level collapse-risk assessment remain separate assertions. No official category is calculated by this draft.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-disturbance-response","name":"Disturbance, recovery and risk context","description":"Link pressures or disturbance events to observed responses with qualified attribution. Local condition, restoration progress and an external type-level collapse-risk assessment remain separate assertions. No official category is calculated by this draft.","questions":[{"text":"Which event or continuing pressure affected what portion of the unit and when?","id":"ecosystem-disturbance-response-q1","kind":"event"},{"text":"What observations support the response and what alternative causes or uncertainty remain?","id":"ecosystem-disturbance-response-q2","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"Which recovery or restoration target and follow-up observations support a reported milestone?","id":"ecosystem-disturbance-response-q3","kind":"state"},{"text":"What ecosystem type, assessment region, date and authority bound any linked collapse-risk category?","id":"ecosystem-disturbance-response-q4","kind":"constraint"}]}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-use","name":"Biophysical use and accountable exchange","description":"Proposed ecosystem context for biophysical use and accountable exchange.","layers":[{"id":"ecosystem-capacity-layer","name":"Physical service context","description":"Record proposed physical capacity estimates separately from observed service flows, use and monetary appraisal. Capacity claims require a scenario, conditions and method; positive capacity does not establish sustainable extraction or restoration success.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-capacity-estimate","name":"Qualified capacity and realized flow","description":"Record proposed physical capacity estimates separately from observed service flows, use and monetary appraisal. Capacity claims require a scenario, conditions and method; positive capacity does not establish sustainable extraction or restoration success.","questions":[{"text":"Which physical output and recipient context does the capacity or flow claim concern?","id":"ecosystem-capacity-estimate-q1","kind":"definition"},{"text":"What physical quantity, units, period and spatial support are reported?","id":"ecosystem-capacity-estimate-q2","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Which ecological conditions, scenario assumptions and sustainability limits qualify the estimate?","id":"ecosystem-capacity-estimate-q3","kind":"constraint"},{"text":"How are capacity, realized flow and downstream valuation separated to avoid duplicate claims?","id":"ecosystem-capacity-estimate-q4","kind":"interoperability"}]}]},{"id":"ecosystem-release-layer","name":"Governed evidence exchange","description":"A released map or assessment has its own revision and derivation trail. Access to precise evidence is governed separately from record stewardship. Preserve a documented generalized view without implying that its coordinates are the original precision.","findings":[{"id":"ecosystem-release-provenance","name":"Reviewable release and sensitive evidence","description":"A released map or assessment has its own revision and derivation trail. Access to precise evidence is governed separately from record stewardship. Preserve a documented generalized view without implying that its coordinates are the original precision.","questions":[{"text":"Which steward authorization, evidence-use rights and review decision support this release?","id":"ecosystem-release-provenance-q1","kind":"authority"},{"text":"Which sensitive fields, locations or linked records require restricted or generalized views?","id":"ecosystem-release-provenance-q2","kind":"access"},{"text":"Which source revisions, derivation steps and integrity checks identify the released artifact?","id":"ecosystem-release-provenance-q3","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"What retention, withdrawal and permitted deletion rules govern originals, public views and minimal tombstones?","id":"ecosystem-release-provenance-q4","kind":"retention"}]}]}]}]},"agentConduct":{"may":["Register a local unit proposal: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Create a proposed local record; do not establish tenure or designate protected land.","Attach a qualified classification assertion: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Link the assignment without altering the external classifier or converting the ecosystem physically.","Link evidence to a unit revision: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Append provenance and uncertainty; do not infer absence from missing survey data.","Record a reviewed condition assessment: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Record supplied results and review status; do not execute a universal condition or collapse classifier.","Record an evidenced unit transition: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Add lineage and qualified quantities; preserve superseded records according to retention policy.","Prepare an authorized evidence projection: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Generate a local candidate only; do not publish externally or grant new access."],"mustNot":["Public aggregate access never permits reconstructing withheld sites through linked artifacts or metadata."],"requiresHuman":["No map, record or model link establishes tenure, consent, protection designation or resource-use authority."]},"ethics":{"considerations":["No map, record or model link establishes tenure, consent, protection designation or resource-use authority."],"affectedParties":[]},"owners":{"steward":"Identify the adopting ecology data steward by role and governing authority; stewardship is not land ownership.","roles":[{"name":"Ecology data steward","responsibilities":["Own the local namespace and profile decisions; resolve continuity and references."]},{"name":"Observation contributor","responsibilities":["Submit attributable evidence, uncertainty and use-rights metadata."]},{"name":"Ecological reviewer","responsibilities":["Evaluate classification, comparison basis and assessment claims within documented expertise."]},{"name":"Data custodian","responsibilities":["Apply audience restrictions, retention and controlled release rules."]},{"name":"Consumer or auditor","responsibilities":["Inspect applicable limitations and report errors without modifying source masters."]}],"masterSystems":[]},"relations":[{"target":"WM-LIV-004","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Vegetation evidence and structure references; preserve vegetation record masters."},{"target":"WM-LIV-005","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Wildlife observation references; no population lifecycle duplication."},{"target":"WM-PLC-003","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Water-body and hydrological setting references, with explicit temporal support."},{"target":"WM-EAR-003","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Soil setting and property evidence remain separately mastered."},{"target":"WM-PLC-001","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Terrain and landform context remains external."},{"target":"WM-EAR-001","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Observed weather context is separate from long-term climatic class."},{"target":"WM-EAR-002","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Climate regime references and applicable periods are not copied as climate masters."},{"target":"WM-EAR-005","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Hazard occurrence references support disturbance attribution only."},{"target":"WM-FLW-006","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Emission flow references retain their own accounting boundary; legacy F6 is ambiguous and does not justify sustainability-claim inheritance."},{"target":"WM-ACT-011","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Agricultural activity references may evidence pressures; no operational controls are imported."},{"target":"WM-ACT-012","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Extraction activity references may evidence pressures; no resource-use permission follows."},{"target":"WM-DAT-002","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. External statistical releases may consume extent and condition projections; official production remains external."},{"target":"WM-ECO-002","type":"references","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. External valuation receives physical references; monetary appraisal remains out of scope."},{"target":"IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology","type":"aligned","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Versioned class references only; no classifier conformance claim."},{"target":"SEEA Ecosystem Accounting","type":"aligned","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Conceptual extent/condition projection only, replacing unsupported legacy COMPOSE semantics."},{"target":"SOSA/SSN","type":"aligned","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Observation-feature and time mapping proposal; serialization is unimplemented."},{"target":"Darwin Core","type":"aligned","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Biotic event, occurrence and location reference mapping proposal."},{"target":"PROV-O","type":"aligned","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Provenance and revision mapping proposal; does not certify truth."},{"target":"IUCN Red List of Ecosystems","type":"aligned","note":"Candidate binding requiring a version pin. Referenced assessment categories and scope only; no automatic category assignment."},{"target":"Biome and ecosystem-type classifiers","type":"neighbor","note":"A type is a concept and the unit is a referent. Preserve scheme, release and assertion status; do not confuse biome with realm or create a second classifier root."},{"target":"Vegetation, wildlife and other biological record masters","type":"neighbor","note":"Carry composition summaries and supporting references only. Individual populations, taxa and observations retain their own master identities."},{"target":"Habitat, protected area and land tenure","type":"neighbor","note":"A habitat or designated area may overlap a unit but is not automatically coextensive with it. Record stewardship confers no land or resource rights."},{"target":"Environmental substrate and climate models","type":"neighbor","note":"Reference unit-specific setting and observations without owning the source water, soil, terrain, weather or climate record lifecycle."},{"target":"Valuation and official accounts","type":"neighbor","note":"Physical evidence may feed external accounts or valuation, but the unit neither prices services nor certifies an official account."},{"target":"Risk assessment and operational activities","type":"neighbor","note":"Reference the assessed type, scope and issuing authority; a local change or milestone does not establish a global risk class or authorize intervention."}],"interaction":{"identity":{"applicability":"required","items":["Authoritative master-system artifact identifier","Governed persistent global identifier or IRI","Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID"]},"properties":{"applicability":"required","items":[]},"recognition":{"applicability":"required","items":[]},"capabilities":{"applicability":"required","items":["Register a local unit proposal: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Create a proposed local record; do not establish tenure or designate protected land.","Attach a qualified classification assertion: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Link the assignment without altering the external classifier or converting the ecosystem physically.","Link evidence to a unit revision: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Append provenance and uncertainty; do not infer absence from missing survey data.","Record a reviewed condition assessment: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Record supplied results and review status; do not execute a universal condition or collapse classifier.","Record an evidenced unit transition: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Add lineage and qualified quantities; preserve superseded records according to retention policy.","Prepare an authorized evidence projection: Proposed, unimplemented local record operation. Generate a local candidate only; do not publish externally or grant new access."]},"hazards":{"applicability":"required","items":[]},"interfaces":{"applicability":"required","items":["SEEA Ecosystem Accounting: methodology overview","PROV-O: The PROV Ontology","SEEA Frequently Asked Questions"]},"context":{"applicability":"required","items":["No jurisdiction, universal mapping grain, ecological reference state, risk threshold or land-rights regime is assumed.","Classifier terminology differs across schemes; the draft selects no exclusive global classification."]}},"sources":[{"title":"Convention on Biological Diversity, Article 2: Use of Terms","url":"https://www.cbd.int/convention/articles/default.shtml?a=cbd-02","note":"Convention on Biological Diversity Secretariat"},{"title":"IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology: conservation tool","url":"https://iucn.org/resources/conservation-tool/iucn-global-ecosystem-typology","note":"International Union for Conservation of Nature"},{"title":"SEEA Ecosystem Accounting: methodology overview","url":"https://seea.un.org/en/methodology/ecosystem-accounting","note":"United Nations Statistics Division"},{"title":"Semantic Sensor Network Ontology","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Darwin Core Quick Reference Guide","url":"https://dwc.tdwg.org/terms/","note":"Biodiversity Information Standards"},{"title":"PROV-O: The PROV Ontology","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Current Best Practices for Generalizing Sensitive Species Occurrence Data","url":"https://docs.gbif.org/sensitive-species-best-practices/master/en/","note":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat"},{"title":"Red List of Ecosystems: Categories and Criteria","url":"https://www.iucnrle.org/rle-categ-and-criteria","note":"International Union for Conservation of Nature"},{"title":"SEEA Frequently Asked Questions","url":"https://seea.un.org/en/about-seea/frequently-asked-questions","note":"United Nations Statistics Division"}],"openQuestions":["Retrieve and verify full SEEA documentation and pinned typology, term and risk-assessment releases; complete claim-level, license and direct HTTP review.","Develop profiles and adversarial fixtures for marine/depth, subterranean, microbial, seasonal, transitional and managed ecosystems, including incompatible comparisons and map-only changes.","Implement nested schemas, mapping and uncertainty contracts, local operation validation and privacy-preserving release tests without importing external master lifecycles.","Restore independent external review before canonical or publishable-draft promotion.","Full normative SEEA text and exact typology/term releases were not retrieved and verified.","Nested instance schemas, uncertainty propagation, geometry engines and conformance fixtures remain unimplemented.","Marine depth, subterranean, microbial, seasonal, managed and transitional ecosystem profiles need qualified examples.","Community knowledge governance, jurisdiction-specific tenure, licensing and retention require local review.","ENVO and SWEET imports from the legacy card were not admitted without separate source verification."],"resources":{"spec":"/models/wm-liv-006-ecosystem-biome/spec.yaml","agents":"/models/wm-liv-006-ecosystem-biome/AGENTS.md","source":"https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-liv-006"},"provenance":{"origin":"world-models research","builtFrom":["models/wm-liv-006-ecosystem-biome/spec.yaml"],"providers":["Codex"],"researchStatus":"reviewable-draft","generatedAt":"2026-10-07T08:49:24Z","builder":"tools/build_cards.py@1.0.0"},"completeness":{"sections":{"classifiers":"filled","whatItIs":"filled","purpose":"filled","distinguishingFeatures":"derived","structure":"filled","agentConduct":"derived","ethics":"derived","owners":"filled","relations":"filled","interaction.identity":"filled","interaction.properties":"missing","interaction.recognition":"missing","interaction.capabilities":"filled","interaction.hazards":"missing","interaction.interfaces":"derived","interaction.context":"filled","sources":"filled"},"notes":{"distinguishingFeatures":"Derived from boundary notes against neighbouring models.","agentConduct":"Derived from functions, policies, CRUD and access rules; prohibitions were not authored for agents as such.","ethics":"Sentences mentioning harm, privacy, consent or similar, collected from the specification."},"score":0.706}}