{"schema":"https://ver.cy/schemas/card/1.0.0","id":"vr.wm-mem-002","code":"wm-mem-002-memory-item","url":"https://ver.cy/models/wm-mem-002-memory-item/","name":"Memory Item","alternateNames":[],"kind":"world-model","status":"published","version":"0.1.0-reviewable","language":"en","classifiers":{"family":"World Models","category":"Information and virtual systems","entryKind":"entity","plane":"","domain":["INF.MEM.ITM"],"industry":["Cross-industry"],"navPath":"NAV.INF.MEM.ITM","tags":["memory","item","inf.mem.itm"],"facets":{}},"whatItIs":"One retained memory item envelope and its revisions, independent of storage, transport or retrieval implementation. This is a proposed research profile, not a normative universal memory format.","purpose":"Describe one atomic agent-held record with source provenance, applicability, accountable ownership and record lifecycle.","scope":{"in":["Logical record identity, content binding, attribution and source evidence.","Applicability and recording times, revision and externally authorized status.","Item-level references to permissions, assessments, restrictions, retention and derived representations."],"out":["Memory-store administration, retrieval, ranking, embedding generation and context assembly.","Generic claim truth evaluation, trust scoring, conflict precedence, formation and consolidation execution.","Grant approval, incident investigation, quarantine decisions, redaction production and physical erasure.","Full person profiles, episode chronology, learned procedures and portability packaging."],"boundaries":[{"neighbor":"WM-KNW-007","distinction":"Registry parent Claim / Proposition is conceptual alignment only. A retained assertion is not proof of truth; generic claim evaluation remains external."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-001","distinction":"Memory Store owns tenancy infrastructure and storage execution; the item carries a store binding."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-003","distinction":"Interaction Episode owns session chronology and participants; the item may reference an episode."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-004","distinction":"Entity Profile Memory owns the accumulated profile; aboutness links do not import its aggregation lifecycle."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-005","distinction":"Procedural Memory owns learned ways of acting; retained descriptive content does not execute a procedure."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-006","distinction":"Memory Formation Event owns extraction method and event lifecycle; the item carries its formation reference."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-007","distinction":"Memory Recall Event owns query, ranking and use trace; the item carries optional use references."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-008","distinction":"Memory Consolidation owns merge and summary decisions; the item records authorized lineage and replacement references."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-009","distinction":"Memory Conflict and Precedence Rule owns conflict evaluation and precedence; the item retains contrary evidence links."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-010","distinction":"Memory Retention and Forgetting Policy owns decay and erasure rules; the store executes disposal and the item records receipts."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-011","distinction":"Memory Scope and Sharing Grant owns permission lifecycle; the item carries scoped grants without granting access."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-012","distinction":"Memory Portability Package owns export and import packaging; this item declares mapping and transfer references."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-013","distinction":"Context Assembly owns budget and context selection; remembered content is not an instruction to that assembly."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-014","distinction":"Retrieval Index owns embeddings, index refresh and search; the item references derived representations only."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-015","distinction":"Retrieval Passage owns retrieved segment lineage; an item may reference it without becoming a retrieval unit by default."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-016","distinction":"Answer Grounding owns answer-to-evidence bindings; item identity does not depend on answer generation."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-017","distinction":"Context Policy owns precedence over ordinary memory during recall; this item never establishes higher-priority instruction authority."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-018","distinction":"Memory Trust Assessment owns scoring and trust evaluation; this item stores qualified assessment references."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-019","distinction":"Memory Poisoning Incident owns investigation and remediation; this item only references incident-related restrictions."},{"neighbor":"WM-MEM-020","distinction":"Memory Quarantine and Redaction owns restriction decisions and redacted-view production; this item records their bindings."},{"neighbor":"Registry entry kind","distinction":"standalone-mm is a registry record-plane label. The subject is an entity because its identity persists across record revisions, not a formation or recall event."}]},"distinguishingFeatures":["Unlike WM-KNW-007: Registry parent Claim / Proposition is conceptual alignment only. A retained assertion is not proof of truth; generic claim evaluation remains external.","Unlike WM-MEM-001: Memory Store owns tenancy infrastructure and storage execution; the item carries a store binding.","Unlike WM-MEM-003: Interaction Episode owns session chronology and participants; the item may reference an episode.","Unlike WM-MEM-004: Entity Profile Memory owns the accumulated profile; aboutness links do not import its aggregation lifecycle.","Unlike WM-MEM-005: Procedural Memory owns learned ways of acting; retained descriptive content does not execute a procedure.","Unlike WM-MEM-006: Memory Formation Event owns extraction method and event lifecycle; the item carries its formation reference.","Unlike WM-MEM-007: Memory Recall Event owns query, ranking and use trace; the item carries optional use references.","Unlike WM-MEM-008: Memory Consolidation owns merge and summary decisions; the item records authorized lineage and replacement references.","Unlike WM-MEM-009: Memory Conflict and Precedence Rule owns conflict evaluation and precedence; the item retains contrary evidence links.","Unlike WM-MEM-010: Memory Retention and Forgetting Policy owns decay and erasure rules; the store executes disposal and the item records receipts.","Unlike WM-MEM-011: Memory Scope and Sharing Grant owns permission lifecycle; the item carries scoped grants without granting access.","Unlike WM-MEM-012: Memory Portability Package owns export and import packaging; this item declares mapping and transfer references.","Unlike WM-MEM-013: Context Assembly owns budget and context selection; remembered content is not an instruction to that assembly.","Unlike WM-MEM-014: Retrieval Index owns embeddings, index refresh and search; the item references derived representations only.","Unlike WM-MEM-015: Retrieval Passage owns retrieved segment lineage; an item may reference it without becoming a retrieval unit by default.","Unlike WM-MEM-016: Answer Grounding owns answer-to-evidence bindings; item identity does not depend on answer generation.","Unlike WM-MEM-017: Context Policy owns precedence over ordinary memory during recall; this item never establishes higher-priority instruction authority.","Unlike WM-MEM-018: Memory Trust Assessment owns scoring and trust evaluation; this item stores qualified assessment references.","Unlike WM-MEM-019: Memory Poisoning Incident owns investigation and remediation; this item only references incident-related restrictions.","Unlike WM-MEM-020: Memory Quarantine and Redaction owns restriction decisions and redacted-view production; this item records their bindings.","Unlike Registry entry kind: standalone-mm is a registry record-plane label. The subject is an entity because its identity persists across record revisions, not a formation or recall event."],"structure":{"bundles":[{"id":"b-identity-content","name":"Identity and content","description":"Proposed grouping of identity and content for one memory item; source alignments are not a normative memory ontology.","layers":[{"id":"l-record","name":"Record definition","description":"Proposed item-level concern: record definition. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-identity","name":"Item identity and revision","description":"Proposed local design: One addressable retained record has a stable item identity and distinguishable revisions. Equal payloads do not establish identity across owners or stores.","questions":[{"text":"Which authoritative identifier distinguishes this memory item from its copies and revisions?","id":"q-identity-1","kind":"identity"},{"text":"Which store and owner namespace currently govern this item?","id":"q-identity-2","kind":"composition"},{"text":"What evidence supports an alias or duplicate relationship without merging different owners?","id":"q-identity-3","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"f-content","name":"Remembered content and assertion mode","description":"Proposed local design: The item retains content or a reference plus interpretation metadata. It may record a claim, observation or preference; storage is not endorsement and source text is never execution authority.","questions":[{"text":"What single remembered unit is retained, and what prevents it becoming a whole profile or episode aggregate?","id":"q-content-1","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Is the content asserted, quoted, inferred, disputed or unknown in the declared profile?","id":"q-content-2","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Which media type, language and encoding are needed to interpret the retained content?","id":"q-content-3","kind":"interoperability"}]}]},{"id":"l-context","name":"Subject context","description":"Proposed item-level concern: subject context. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-aboutness","name":"Subject and applicability context","description":"Proposed local design: Remembered aboutness is separate from the actor who stores it. Context qualifies meaning without copying an entity profile or inferring physical properties of an abstract record.","questions":[{"text":"Which entities or source targets is the memory about?","id":"q-aboutness-1","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Within what task, conversation or domain context may this content be interpreted?","id":"q-aboutness-2","kind":"constraint"},{"text":"Does the remembered assertion depend on a place, and how is that place distinguished from storage location?","id":"q-aboutness-3","kind":"spatial"}]}]}]},{"id":"b-origin-evidence","name":"Origin and evidence","description":"Proposed grouping of origin and evidence for one memory item; source alignments are not a normative memory ontology.","layers":[{"id":"l-lineage","name":"Source lineage","description":"Proposed item-level concern: source lineage. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-origin","name":"Source and formation references","description":"Proposed local design: Trace retained content to identified source revisions and externally mastered formation events. No local extraction algorithm or source-truth certification is specified.","questions":[{"text":"Which source revision and formation event produced this item revision?","id":"q-origin-1","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Which segment or selector locates the supporting material without retaining unnecessary source content?","id":"q-origin-2","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How is the item qualified when its source is missing, inaccessible or changed?","id":"q-origin-3","kind":"exception"}]},{"id":"f-attribution","name":"Attribution and accountable roles","description":"Proposed local design: Keep source author, formation actor, custodian and rights holder distinct. The operator is a role reference, never a commercial name or a claim of unlimited ownership.","questions":[{"text":"Who is accountable for this item under the adopting Dimension?","id":"q-attribution-1","kind":"ownership"},{"text":"Who asserted the remembered content and who recorded it?","id":"q-attribution-2","kind":"provenance"},{"text":"Which mandate or permission reference authorizes this item to be retained?","id":"q-attribution-3","kind":"authority"}]}]},{"id":"l-qualification","name":"Evidence qualification","description":"Proposed item-level concern: evidence qualification. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-assessment","name":"Evidence qualification and trust references","description":"Proposed local design: Carry assessment references and interpretation limits. The trust model owns scoring; confidence, similarity and frequency are not interchangeable and cannot prove truth.","questions":[{"text":"Which assessment qualifies this specific revision and what limitations does it report?","id":"q-assessment-1","kind":"quality"},{"text":"If a confidence value is retained, what scale, method and calibration make it interpretable?","id":"q-assessment-2","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"What contrary evidence remains linked without selecting a winning assertion locally?","id":"q-assessment-3","kind":"evidence"}]}]}]},{"id":"b-time-state","name":"Time and record state","description":"Proposed grouping of time and record state for one memory item; source alignments are not a normative memory ontology.","layers":[{"id":"l-time","name":"Temporal qualifiers","description":"Proposed item-level concern: temporal qualifiers. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-validity","name":"Temporal applicability","description":"Proposed local design: Represent when content is claimed applicable separately from when it was learned. Unknown bounds, open bounds and a known instant are distinct; no universal end-bound convention is assumed.","questions":[{"text":"During which interval or instant is the remembered assertion claimed to apply?","id":"q-validity-1","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"What should consumers do when applicability bounds are incomplete or contradictory?","id":"q-validity-2","kind":"constraint"},{"text":"Which evidence or external rule justifies a change to the applicability interval?","id":"q-validity-3","kind":"relationship"}]},{"id":"f-recorded-time","name":"Observation and recording times","description":"Proposed local design: Keep asserted event time, source observation, ingestion and revision recording separate. Representation precision must not manufacture measurement precision.","questions":[{"text":"When was the source observed and when was this item ingested?","id":"q-recorded-time-1","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"Which occurrence time belongs to the remembered event rather than to its recording?","id":"q-recorded-time-2","kind":"event"},{"text":"What clock uncertainty or date-only precision limits temporal comparison?","id":"q-recorded-time-3","kind":"quality"}]}]},{"id":"l-status","name":"Record status","description":"Proposed item-level concern: record status. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-state","name":"Record status and freshness","description":"Proposed local design: Proposed statuses describe record availability, not truth or permission. Active, superseded, withdrawn and tombstoned states are profile choices; expiry and quarantine are separate policy bindings.","questions":[{"text":"What is the current record status and which evidence authorizes that status?","id":"q-state-1","kind":"state"},{"text":"What review or expiry condition qualifies further use of the record?","id":"q-state-2","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"How is an unknown or stale status communicated to a consumer?","id":"q-state-3","kind":"exception"}]}]}]},{"id":"b-continuity-reuse","name":"Continuity and reuse","description":"Proposed grouping of continuity and reuse for one memory item; source alignments are not a normative memory ontology.","layers":[{"id":"l-continuity","name":"Revision continuity","description":"Proposed item-level concern: revision continuity. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-revision","name":"Correction and supersession","description":"Proposed local design: Track item-local revisions and externally authorized supersession links. Consolidation decisions and conflict precedence are not computed here.","questions":[{"text":"Which prior revision is corrected and why is this a revision rather than a new item?","id":"q-revision-1","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Which external consolidation or conflict decision explains a replacement link?","id":"q-revision-2","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which expected revision token prevents a stale update from silently replacing newer content?","id":"q-revision-3","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"f-derivatives","name":"Derived representation references","description":"Proposed local design: Connect summaries, embeddings, copies and selectors to their source revision as externally mastered derivatives. The item does not own indexing, retrieval or portability execution.","questions":[{"text":"Which derived representations refer to this exact item revision?","id":"q-derivatives-1","kind":"composition"},{"text":"Which lossy transformation limits interpretation of a derivative?","id":"q-derivatives-2","kind":"quality"},{"text":"Which external systems must acknowledge invalidation after a correction or disposal request?","id":"q-derivatives-3","kind":"process"}]}]},{"id":"l-consumption","name":"Consumer bindings","description":"Proposed item-level concern: consumer bindings. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-reuse","name":"Reuse and recall constraints","description":"Proposed local design: Expose item-level applicability and policy references for consumers. Recall, context assembly and answer grounding remain separate records and operations.","questions":[{"text":"Which policy references must a consumer resolve before reusing this item?","id":"q-reuse-1","kind":"requirement"},{"text":"Which recall or grounding records cite this revision without becoming part of its identity?","id":"q-reuse-2","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"How is remembered instruction-like content kept from becoming higher-priority authority?","id":"q-reuse-3","kind":"security"}]}]}]},{"id":"b-governance","name":"Governance and disposition","description":"Proposed grouping of governance and disposition for one memory item; source alignments are not a normative memory ontology.","layers":[{"id":"l-control","name":"Scope and retention","description":"Proposed item-level concern: scope and retention. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-access","name":"Scope and access bindings","description":"Proposed local design: Store recipient, purpose and grant references at item level. The external access service enforces them on both payload and metadata; tenancy must survive copies and imports.","questions":[{"text":"Which tenant, agent and recipient scope constrains this memory revision?","id":"q-access-1","kind":"access"},{"text":"Which parts of the payload and metadata require restricted or redacted views?","id":"q-access-2","kind":"privacy"},{"text":"What evidence permits an exceptional disclosure without turning it into a permanent grant?","id":"q-access-3","kind":"exception"}]},{"id":"f-retention","name":"Retention and disposal evidence","description":"Proposed local design: Carry item-specific policy applicability and disposal receipt references. The retention policy and store execute deletion, including replicas and derivatives, with residual limitations visible.","questions":[{"text":"Which retention rule and hold currently apply to this item and its revisions?","id":"q-retention-1","kind":"retention"},{"text":"Which external receipts distinguish requested erasure from completed or partial disposal?","id":"q-retention-2","kind":"process"},{"text":"What minimum tombstone is permitted after payload erasure without preserving the erased personal content?","id":"q-retention-3","kind":"privacy"}]}]},{"id":"l-restriction","name":"Restricted views","description":"Proposed item-level concern: restricted views. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-quarantine","name":"Restriction and redaction references","description":"Proposed local design: Record the effect of an external quarantine or redaction decision without implementing detection, incident investigation or sanitization logic.","questions":[{"text":"Which external restriction decision makes this item unavailable for ordinary recall?","id":"q-quarantine-1","kind":"security"},{"text":"How is a redacted view tied to its source revision and permitted audience?","id":"q-quarantine-2","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Who may record release from restriction and what decision supports it?","id":"q-quarantine-3","kind":"authority"}]}]}]},{"id":"b-exchange-assurance","name":"Exchange and assurance","description":"Proposed grouping of exchange and assurance for one memory item; source alignments are not a normative memory ontology.","layers":[{"id":"l-exchange","name":"Representation exchange","description":"Proposed item-level concern: representation exchange. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-mapping","name":"Exchange and vocabulary alignment","description":"Proposed local design: Document item-level mappings and losses. Open specifications are alignments; portability packaging and transport belong elsewhere.","questions":[{"text":"Which versioned mapping preserves item identity, provenance, scope and temporal qualifications during exchange?","id":"q-mapping-1","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"Which required semantics cannot be represented by the destination?","id":"q-mapping-2","kind":"exception"},{"text":"Which portability package or import receipt binds the transferred item to its original namespace?","id":"q-mapping-3","kind":"composition"}]},{"id":"f-integrity","name":"Representation integrity and artifact identity","description":"Proposed local design: Use byte-level integrity evidence for a specified representation without claiming semantic truth. A new encoding can change a digest while preserving the logical item.","questions":[{"text":"Which artifact identifier and revision distinguish each retained representation?","id":"q-integrity-1","kind":"identity"},{"text":"What bytes and algorithm were used for the integrity check?","id":"q-integrity-2","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How is a mismatched or missing representation reported without inventing replacement evidence?","id":"q-integrity-3","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"l-assurance","name":"Acceptance limits","description":"Proposed item-level concern: acceptance limits. External operations remain referenced.","findings":[{"id":"f-acceptance","name":"Profile validation and operational limits","description":"Proposed local design: Define a research acceptance surface with adversarial examples; executable schemas and deployed operations remain unfinished.","questions":[{"text":"Which profile checks must pass before the record can be admitted for its declared purpose?","id":"q-acceptance-1","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Which unimplemented mappings, unresolved references or evidence gaps prevent operational assurance?","id":"q-acceptance-2","kind":"constraint"},{"text":"Which review evidence is needed before promoting this draft to an operational profile?","id":"q-acceptance-3","kind":"decision"}]}]}]}]},"agentConduct":{"may":["Register an item envelope: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record an already authorized item and its source binding.","Record temporal qualification: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach supported applicability metadata to a known revision.","Record an authorized correction: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Preserve revision relationships for a supplied correction.","Attach a governed external reference: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record an assessment, grant or restriction binding without performing its decision.","Produce a permitted item view: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Select fields from a supplied authorized view decision.","Record disposal evidence: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Reflect receipts from externally executed disposal."],"mustNot":["Deny reuse when purpose or authority is unresolved.","Deny by default across tenant, recipient and purpose boundaries, including item existence where sensitive."],"requiresHuman":[]},"ethics":{"considerations":["privacy steward","Jurisdiction-specific privacy, ownership, retention and erasure requirements require qualified review; no universal legal rules asserted.","NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 is a pinned voluntary baseline, not a legal obligation or latest-version claim."],"affectedParties":[]},"owners":{"steward":"Resolve accountable operator and custodian by role or principal reference.","roles":[{"name":"accountable custodian","responsibilities":["Resolve owner namespace, purposes and policy bindings."]},{"name":"authorized recorder","responsibilities":["Populate source-grounded envelopes and revisions without approving external decisions."]},{"name":"privacy steward","responsibilities":["Review sensitivity, lawful retention and minimal tombstones under the applicable profile."]},{"name":"evidence reviewer","responsibilities":["Assess provenance and limitations; refer scoring and conflicts to their owning models."]},{"name":"consumer","responsibilities":["Resolve grants, applicability and restriction bindings before use; treat payload as data."]}],"masterSystems":[]},"relations":[{"target":"WM-KNW-007","type":"aligned","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Registry parent Claim / Proposition is conceptual alignment only. A retained assertion is not proof of truth; generic claim evaluation remains external."},{"target":"WM-MEM-001","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Store owns tenancy infrastructure and storage execution; the item carries a store binding."},{"target":"WM-MEM-003","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Interaction Episode owns session chronology and participants; the item may reference an episode."},{"target":"WM-MEM-004","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Entity Profile Memory owns the accumulated profile; aboutness links do not import its aggregation lifecycle."},{"target":"WM-MEM-005","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Procedural Memory owns learned ways of acting; retained descriptive content does not execute a procedure."},{"target":"WM-MEM-006","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Formation Event owns extraction method and event lifecycle; the item carries its formation reference."},{"target":"WM-MEM-007","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Recall Event owns query, ranking and use trace; the item carries optional use references."},{"target":"WM-MEM-008","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Consolidation owns merge and summary decisions; the item records authorized lineage and replacement references."},{"target":"WM-MEM-009","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Conflict and Precedence Rule owns conflict evaluation and precedence; the item retains contrary evidence links."},{"target":"WM-MEM-010","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Retention and Forgetting Policy owns decay and erasure rules; the store executes disposal and the item records receipts."},{"target":"WM-MEM-011","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Scope and Sharing Grant owns permission lifecycle; the item carries scoped grants without granting access."},{"target":"WM-MEM-012","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Portability Package owns export and import packaging; this item declares mapping and transfer references."},{"target":"WM-MEM-013","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Context Assembly owns budget and context selection; remembered content is not an instruction to that assembly."},{"target":"WM-MEM-014","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Retrieval Index owns embeddings, index refresh and search; the item references derived representations only."},{"target":"WM-MEM-015","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Retrieval Passage owns retrieved segment lineage; an item may reference it without becoming a retrieval unit by default."},{"target":"WM-MEM-016","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Answer Grounding owns answer-to-evidence bindings; item identity does not depend on answer generation."},{"target":"WM-MEM-017","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Context Policy owns precedence over ordinary memory during recall; this item never establishes higher-priority instruction authority."},{"target":"WM-MEM-018","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Trust Assessment owns scoring and trust evaluation; this item stores qualified assessment references."},{"target":"WM-MEM-019","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Poisoning Incident owns investigation and remediation; this item only references incident-related restrictions."},{"target":"WM-MEM-020","type":"references","note":"Proposed binding pending neighbor version review. Memory Quarantine and Redaction owns restriction decisions and redacted-view production; this item records their bindings."},{"target":"PROV-O","type":"aligned","note":"Conceptual mapping for item revisions and provenance; no complete ontology conformance claimed."},{"target":"Web Annotation Data Model","type":"aligned","note":"Optional body, target and selector mapping; memory items are not necessarily annotations."},{"target":"OWL-Time","type":"aligned","note":"Optional temporal interval mapping with profile-specific endpoint conventions."},{"target":"DCMI Metadata Terms","type":"aligned","note":"Descriptive metadata alignment only; no memory lifecycle supplied by this vocabulary."},{"target":"WM-KNW-007","type":"neighbor","note":"Registry parent Claim / Proposition is conceptual alignment only. A retained assertion is not proof of truth; generic claim evaluation remains external."},{"target":"WM-MEM-001","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Store owns tenancy infrastructure and storage execution; the item carries a store binding."},{"target":"WM-MEM-003","type":"neighbor","note":"Interaction Episode owns session chronology and participants; the item may reference an episode."},{"target":"WM-MEM-004","type":"neighbor","note":"Entity Profile Memory owns the accumulated profile; aboutness links do not import its aggregation lifecycle."},{"target":"WM-MEM-005","type":"neighbor","note":"Procedural Memory owns learned ways of acting; retained descriptive content does not execute a procedure."},{"target":"WM-MEM-006","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Formation Event owns extraction method and event lifecycle; the item carries its formation reference."},{"target":"WM-MEM-007","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Recall Event owns query, ranking and use trace; the item carries optional use references."},{"target":"WM-MEM-008","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Consolidation owns merge and summary decisions; the item records authorized lineage and replacement references."},{"target":"WM-MEM-009","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Conflict and Precedence Rule owns conflict evaluation and precedence; the item retains contrary evidence links."},{"target":"WM-MEM-010","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Retention and Forgetting Policy owns decay and erasure rules; the store executes disposal and the item records receipts."},{"target":"WM-MEM-011","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Scope and Sharing Grant owns permission lifecycle; the item carries scoped grants without granting access."},{"target":"WM-MEM-012","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Portability Package owns export and import packaging; this item declares mapping and transfer references."},{"target":"WM-MEM-013","type":"neighbor","note":"Context Assembly owns budget and context selection; remembered content is not an instruction to that assembly."},{"target":"WM-MEM-014","type":"neighbor","note":"Retrieval Index owns embeddings, index refresh and search; the item references derived representations only."},{"target":"WM-MEM-015","type":"neighbor","note":"Retrieval Passage owns retrieved segment lineage; an item may reference it without becoming a retrieval unit by default."},{"target":"WM-MEM-016","type":"neighbor","note":"Answer Grounding owns answer-to-evidence bindings; item identity does not depend on answer generation."},{"target":"WM-MEM-017","type":"neighbor","note":"Context Policy owns precedence over ordinary memory during recall; this item never establishes higher-priority instruction authority."},{"target":"WM-MEM-018","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Trust Assessment owns scoring and trust evaluation; this item stores qualified assessment references."},{"target":"WM-MEM-019","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Poisoning Incident owns investigation and remediation; this item only references incident-related restrictions."},{"target":"WM-MEM-020","type":"neighbor","note":"Memory Quarantine and Redaction owns restriction decisions and redacted-view production; this item records their bindings."},{"target":"Registry entry kind","type":"neighbor","note":"standalone-mm is a registry record-plane label. The subject is an entity because its identity persists across record revisions, not a formation or recall event."},{"target":"WM-KNW-007","type":"parent"}],"interaction":{"identity":{"applicability":"required","items":["Authoritative master-system identifier","Governed global identifier or IRI","UUID or ULID assigned by the adopting Dimension"]},"properties":{"applicability":"not-applicable","items":[]},"recognition":{"applicability":"optional","items":[]},"capabilities":{"applicability":"required","items":["Register an item envelope: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record an already authorized item and its source binding.","Record temporal qualification: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach supported applicability metadata to a known revision.","Record an authorized correction: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Preserve revision relationships for a supplied correction.","Attach a governed external reference: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record an assessment, grant or restriction binding without performing its decision.","Produce a permitted item view: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Select fields from a supplied authorized view decision.","Record disposal evidence: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Reflect receipts from externally executed disposal."]},"hazards":{"applicability":"optional","items":[]},"interfaces":{"applicability":"required","items":["PROV-O: The PROV Ontology","RFC 3339: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps","NIST Privacy Framework: A Tool for Improving Privacy through Enterprise Risk Management, Version 1.0"]},"context":{"applicability":"required","items":["No jurisdiction selected. NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 is a pinned voluntary baseline, not a legal obligation or latest-version claim.","RFC 3339 timestamps do not define local civil-time policy or prove source-time precision."]}},"sources":[{"title":"PROV-O: The PROV Ontology","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/","note":"W3C"},{"title":"Web Annotation Data Model","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-annotation-model-20170223/","note":"W3C"},{"title":"Time Ontology in OWL","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-owl-time-20171019/","note":"W3C"},{"title":"RFC 3339: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339","note":"IETF"},{"title":"DCMI Metadata Terms","url":"https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/2020-01-20/","note":"DCMI"},{"title":"NIST Privacy Framework: A Tool for Improving Privacy through Enterprise Risk Management, Version 1.0","url":"https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/CSWP/NIST.CSWP.01162020.pdf","note":"NIST"}],"openQuestions":["Complete direct source checks and substantive current-version, errata and applicability review without treating HTTP success as claim verification.","Pin neighbor and policy profiles, implement nested schemas and mappings, and test stale updates, unknown intervals, cross-tenant equal content, instruction-like data, partial disposal and redacted metadata.","Restore independent external review before any promotion beyond a noncanonical reviewable draft.","Independent external review has not occurred; the separate audit is a local self-audit.","Direct HTTP status, response hashes and comprehensive current-version/errata checks await coordinator execution.","Nested field schemas, controlled status vocabularies, concrete mappings and executable adversarial fixtures are not supplied.","Neighbor versions and binding cardinalities require profile review; all composition bindings are optional proposals.","Jurisdiction-specific privacy, ownership, retention and erasure requirements require qualified review; no universal legal rules asserted."],"resources":{"spec":"/models/wm-mem-002-memory-item/spec.yaml","agents":"/models/wm-mem-002-memory-item/AGENTS.md","source":"../../research/runs/wm-mem-002/"},"provenance":{"origin":"world-models research","builtFrom":["models/wm-mem-002-memory-item/spec.yaml"],"providers":["Codex"],"researchStatus":"reviewable-draft","generatedAt":"2026-10-21T15:53:29Z","builder":"tools/build_cards.py@1.0.0"},"completeness":{"sections":{"classifiers":"filled","whatItIs":"filled","purpose":"filled","distinguishingFeatures":"derived","structure":"filled","agentConduct":"derived","ethics":"derived","owners":"filled","relations":"filled","interaction.identity":"filled","interaction.properties":"not-applicable","interaction.recognition":"missing","interaction.capabilities":"filled","interaction.hazards":"missing","interaction.interfaces":"derived","interaction.context":"filled","sources":"filled"},"notes":{"distinguishingFeatures":"Derived from boundary notes against neighbouring models.","agentConduct":"Derived from functions, policies, CRUD and access rules; prohibitions were not authored for agents as such.","ethics":"Sentences mentioning harm, privacy, consent or similar, collected from the specification.","interaction.properties":"Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties."},"score":0.75}}