{"schema":"https://ver.cy/schemas/card/1.0.0","id":"vr.wm-pol-009","code":"wm-pol-009-court-arbitration-case","url":"https://ver.cy/models/wm-pol-009-court-arbitration-case/","name":"Court / Arbitration Case","alternateNames":["A19"],"kind":"world-model","status":"published","version":"0.3.0-research.1","language":"en","classifiers":{"family":"World Models","category":"Society, people and institutions","entryKind":"aggregate","plane":"","domain":["SOC.POL.CSE"],"industry":["Cross-industry"],"navPath":"NAV.SOC.POL.CSE","tags":["court","arbitration","case","soc.pol.cse"],"facets":{}},"whatItIs":"Owns case identity, forum assignment, jurisdiction basis, dispute and claim references, procedural-party roles, docket events, schedules, hearings, procedural rulings, child filing, evidence and decision membership, remedy and review references, access views and closure. Forum, party, claim, filing content, evidence lifecycle, judgment content, remedy performance, appeal and enforcement masters remain external or child models.","purpose":"Represent a governed court, tribunal or arbitration proceeding with authoritative docket identity, procedural history and child legal records independent of storage and interface format.","scope":{"in":["Docket identity, court or arbitration profile, forum assignment, jurisdiction, seat, parties, claims and procedural roles","Docket events, service, deadlines, hearings, evidence-use rulings, procedural orders and safeguards","Judgment-child links, remedies, finality, review and enforcement references, access, retention, interoperability and safe operations"],"out":["Forum organization, party identity, lawyer engagement, underlying contract, offense, asset or event masters","WM-POL-019 filing content, WM-POL-020 evidence lifecycle, WM-POL-021 judgment content, remedy execution and enforcement case masters","Automated adjudication, legal advice, outcome prediction or universal procedural law"],"boundaries":[{"neighbor":"Court, Tribunal or Arbitral Institution","distinction":"The forum is an external organization with competence; the case is one proceeding in its docket or administration."},{"neighbor":"Legal Filing / Pleading","distinction":"WM-POL-019 owns each procedural submission; the case composes its identifier, role, receipt and docket relation."},{"neighbor":"Evidence Item / Exhibit","distinction":"WM-POL-020 owns evidence identity, custody and integrity; the case records submission, admission, exclusion, weight and use."},{"neighbor":"Judgment / Legal Decision","distinction":"WM-POL-021 owns decision text and identity; the case records membership, outcome, finality and review links."},{"neighbor":"Enforcement and Remedy","distinction":"A case may order or reference remedies, but recognition, enforcement, performance and satisfaction have separate authority and lifecycles."}]},"distinguishingFeatures":["Models the procedural container of a dispute in one forum, not the dispute, claim or underlying event.","Keeps filings, evidence and judgments as child records with their own identity.","Separates allegations, findings, orders and enforceable judgments as distinct states.","Links appeals, recognition and enforcement as separate cases rather than extending this one."],"structure":{"bundles":[{"id":"case-identity-forum-and-procedure-profile","name":"Case identity, forum and procedure profile","description":"Identifies one proceeding in its authoritative docket and pins the forum, jurisdiction and applicable procedure.","layers":[{"id":"docket-identity-class-and-master-register","name":"Docket identity, class and master register","description":"Stable case identity and jurisdiction-qualified classification.","findings":[{"id":"case-identifier-docket-register-alias-and-consolidation","name":"Case identifier, docket register, alias and consolidation","description":"Master case identifier, namespace, docket, aliases, joined or severed case links, resolver, version and collision state.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define case identifier, docket register, alias and consolidation for this case?","id":"case-identifier-docket-register-alias-and-consolidation-q01","kind":"identity"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports case identifier, docket register, alias and consolidation?","id":"case-identifier-docket-register-alias-and-consolidation-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may case identifier, docket register, alias and consolidation be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"case-identifier-docket-register-alias-and-consolidation-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"court-tribunal-arbitration-stage-track-and-procedure-class","name":"Court, tribunal, arbitration, stage, track and procedure class","description":"Forum-kind profile, matter class, instance, track, expedited status, procedure rules and classification versions.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define court, tribunal, arbitration, stage, track and procedure class for this case?","id":"court-tribunal-arbitration-stage-track-and-procedure-class-q01","kind":"classification"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports court, tribunal, arbitration, stage, track and procedure class?","id":"court-tribunal-arbitration-stage-track-and-procedure-class-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may court, tribunal, arbitration, stage, track and procedure class be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"court-tribunal-arbitration-stage-track-and-procedure-class-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"forum-assignment-jurisdiction-seat-and-competence","name":"Forum assignment, jurisdiction, seat and competence","description":"References the deciding body and the asserted basis for competence.","findings":[{"id":"forum-organization-chamber-panel-judge-arbitrator-and-clerk-reference","name":"Forum organization, chamber, panel, judge, arbitrator and clerk reference","description":"External organization and person references, procedural roles, appointment, assignment, recusal and valid intervals.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define forum organization, chamber, panel, judge, arbitrator and clerk reference for this case?","id":"forum-organization-chamber-panel-judge-arbitrator-and-clerk-reference-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports forum organization, chamber, panel, judge, arbitrator and clerk reference?","id":"forum-organization-chamber-panel-judge-arbitrator-and-clerk-reference-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may forum organization, chamber, panel, judge, arbitrator and clerk reference be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"forum-organization-chamber-panel-judge-arbitrator-and-clerk-reference-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"subject-personal-territorial-jurisdiction-seat-venue-and-referral-basis","name":"Subject, personal and territorial jurisdiction, seat, venue and referral basis","description":"Jurisdiction assertions, arbitration agreement or referral, seat, venue, competence decision, challenge and applicable procedure.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define subject, personal and territorial jurisdiction, seat, venue and referral basis for this case?","id":"subject-personal-territorial-jurisdiction-seat-venue-and-referral-basis-q01","kind":"authority"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports subject, personal and territorial jurisdiction, seat, venue and referral basis?","id":"subject-personal-territorial-jurisdiction-seat-venue-and-referral-basis-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may subject, personal and territorial jurisdiction, seat, venue and referral basis be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"subject-personal-territorial-jurisdiction-seat-venue-and-referral-basis-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"dispute-claims-parties-and-representation","name":"Dispute, claims, parties and representation","description":"Defines what is contested and records procedural roles without importing party, contract, offense or claim masters.","layers":[{"id":"dispute-claim-counterclaim-defense-and-issues","name":"Dispute, claim, counterclaim, defense and issues","description":"References asserted causes, relief and contested questions.","findings":[{"id":"underlying-dispute-contract-offense-event-and-subject-reference","name":"Underlying dispute, contract, offense, event and subject reference","description":"External matter identifiers, relationship to the case, jurisdiction, factual scope, value and non-inference boundaries.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define underlying dispute, contract, offense, event and subject reference for this case?","id":"underlying-dispute-contract-offense-event-and-subject-reference-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports underlying dispute, contract, offense, event and subject reference?","id":"underlying-dispute-contract-offense-event-and-subject-reference-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may underlying dispute, contract, offense, event and subject reference be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"underlying-dispute-contract-offense-event-and-subject-reference-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"claim-counterclaim-defense-issue-relief-and-controversy-state","name":"Claim, counterclaim, defense, issue, relief and controversy state","description":"Claim reference, proponent, respondent, legal and factual basis, requested relief, amount, status, disposition and dependencies.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define claim, counterclaim, defense, issue, relief and controversy state for this case?","id":"claim-counterclaim-defense-issue-relief-and-controversy-state-q01","kind":"definition"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports claim, counterclaim, defense, issue, relief and controversy state?","id":"claim-counterclaim-defense-issue-relief-and-controversy-state-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may claim, counterclaim, defense, issue, relief and controversy state be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"claim-counterclaim-defense-issue-relief-and-controversy-state-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"party-role-standing-capacity-and-representation","name":"Party role, standing, capacity and representation","description":"Records case-specific participation and authority.","findings":[{"id":"claimant-respondent-appellant-intervenor-witness-and-other-role","name":"Claimant, respondent, appellant, intervenor, witness and other role","description":"External party reference, procedural role, side, capacity, standing assertion, confidentiality class and interval.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define claimant, respondent, appellant, intervenor, witness and other role for this case?","id":"claimant-respondent-appellant-intervenor-witness-and-other-role-q01","kind":"relationship"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports claimant, respondent, appellant, intervenor, witness and other role?","id":"claimant-respondent-appellant-intervenor-witness-and-other-role-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may claimant, respondent, appellant, intervenor, witness and other role be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"claimant-respondent-appellant-intervenor-witness-and-other-role-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"representative-counsel-mandate-legal-aid-notice-and-conflict","name":"Representative, counsel, mandate, legal aid, notice and conflict","description":"External representative, engagement or authority reference, scope, service address, legal aid, conflicts and termination.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define representative, counsel, mandate, legal aid, notice and conflict for this case?","id":"representative-counsel-mandate-legal-aid-notice-and-conflict-q01","kind":"authority"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports representative, counsel, mandate, legal aid, notice and conflict?","id":"representative-counsel-mandate-legal-aid-notice-and-conflict-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may representative, counsel, mandate, legal aid, notice and conflict be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"representative-counsel-mandate-legal-aid-notice-and-conflict-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"docket-filings-service-schedule-and-hearings","name":"Docket, filings, service, schedule and hearings","description":"Orders procedural events and composes child filings while preserving cross-border service and deadline evidence.","layers":[{"id":"docket-events-filings-motions-and-service","name":"Docket events, filings, motions and service","description":"Maintains append-only procedural history and child-record membership.","findings":[{"id":"filing-pleading-motion-notice-order-and-child-membership","name":"Filing, pleading, motion, notice, order and child membership","description":"WM-POL-019 child identifiers, filing kind, submitter role, target issue, receipt, acceptance, seal, confidentiality and supersession.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define filing, pleading, motion, notice, order and child membership for this case?","id":"filing-pleading-motion-notice-order-and-child-membership-q01","kind":"composition"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports filing, pleading, motion, notice, order and child membership?","id":"filing-pleading-motion-notice-order-and-child-membership-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may filing, pleading, motion, notice, order and child membership be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"filing-pleading-motion-notice-order-and-child-membership-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"service-method-recipient-address-certificate-effective-time-and-contest","name":"Service method, recipient, address, certificate, effective time and contest","description":"Transmission channel, serving authority, recipient, address, delivery evidence, legal-effect rule, failure and challenge.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define service method, recipient, address, certificate, effective time and contest for this case?","id":"service-method-recipient-address-certificate-effective-time-and-contest-q01","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports service method, recipient, address, certificate, effective time and contest?","id":"service-method-recipient-address-certificate-effective-time-and-contest-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may service method, recipient, address, certificate, effective time and contest be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"service-method-recipient-address-certificate-effective-time-and-contest-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"deadlines-calendar-hearings-and-participation","name":"Deadlines, calendar, hearings and participation","description":"Represents scheduled and actual procedural time with attendance and accessibility.","findings":[{"id":"deadline-trigger-calculation-extension-stay-default-and-compliance","name":"Deadline, trigger, calculation, extension, stay, default and compliance","description":"Rule source, trigger event, computed due time, calendar, timezone, extension, stay, filing event, lateness and excusal.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define deadline, trigger, calculation, extension, stay, default and compliance for this case?","id":"deadline-trigger-calculation-extension-stay-default-and-compliance-q01","kind":"temporal"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports deadline, trigger, calculation, extension, stay, default and compliance?","id":"deadline-trigger-calculation-extension-stay-default-and-compliance-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may deadline, trigger, calculation, extension, stay, default and compliance be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"deadline-trigger-calculation-extension-stay-default-and-compliance-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"hearing-session-location-mode-participants-record-and-outcome","name":"Hearing, session, location, mode, participants, record and outcome","description":"Scheduled and actual times, physical or remote venue, panel, attendance, interpretation, accessibility, transcript and procedural outcome.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define hearing, session, location, mode, participants, record and outcome for this case?","id":"hearing-session-location-mode-participants-record-and-outcome-q01","kind":"event"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports hearing, session, location, mode, participants, record and outcome?","id":"hearing-session-location-mode-participants-record-and-outcome-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may hearing, session, location, mode, participants, record and outcome be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"hearing-session-location-mode-participants-record-and-outcome-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"evidence-findings-orders-and-procedural-safeguards","name":"Evidence, findings, orders and procedural safeguards","description":"Composes evidence-item references and records admission, weighing and procedural control without duplicating evidence or decision content.","layers":[{"id":"evidence-record-admission-custody-and-findings","name":"Evidence record, admission, custody and findings","description":"Links child evidence items to case-specific rulings and uses.","findings":[{"id":"evidence-item-exhibit-submission-custody-and-child-membership","name":"Evidence item, exhibit, submission, custody and child membership","description":"WM-POL-020 child identifier, proponent, issue, submission event, custody reference, confidentiality, version and disposition.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define evidence item, exhibit, submission, custody and child membership for this case?","id":"evidence-item-exhibit-submission-custody-and-child-membership-q01","kind":"composition"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports evidence item, exhibit, submission, custody and child membership?","id":"evidence-item-exhibit-submission-custody-and-child-membership-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may evidence item, exhibit, submission, custody and child membership be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"evidence-item-exhibit-submission-custody-and-child-membership-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"admission-exclusion-weight-credibility-finding-and-burden","name":"Admission, exclusion, weight, credibility, finding and burden","description":"Decision maker, rule, hearing context, ruling, weight, credibility, standard or burden, fact finding, reasons and challenge.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define admission, exclusion, weight, credibility, finding and burden for this case?","id":"admission-exclusion-weight-credibility-finding-and-burden-q01","kind":"decision"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports admission, exclusion, weight, credibility, finding and burden?","id":"admission-exclusion-weight-credibility-finding-and-burden-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may admission, exclusion, weight, credibility, finding and burden be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"admission-exclusion-weight-credibility-finding-and-burden-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"interim-procedural-orders-fairness-and-participation","name":"Interim and procedural orders, fairness and participation","description":"Records case-management control and safeguard assertions.","findings":[{"id":"interim-measure-procedural-order-injunction-security-and-cost-order","name":"Interim measure, procedural order, injunction, security and cost order","description":"Order reference, authority, affected parties, terms, issue and expiry time, reasons, security, challenge and compliance reference.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define interim measure, procedural order, injunction, security and cost order for this case?","id":"interim-measure-procedural-order-injunction-security-and-cost-order-q01","kind":"decision"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports interim measure, procedural order, injunction, security and cost order?","id":"interim-measure-procedural-order-injunction-security-and-cost-order-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may interim measure, procedural order, injunction, security and cost order be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"interim-measure-procedural-order-injunction-security-and-cost-order-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"notice-opportunity-to-be-heard-equality-impartiality-recusal-and-accommodation","name":"Notice, opportunity to be heard, equality, impartiality, recusal and accommodation","description":"Safeguard profile, party, required opportunity, actual event, panel conflict, recusal, accessibility response and contest.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define notice, opportunity to be heard, equality, impartiality, recusal and accommodation for this case?","id":"notice-opportunity-to-be-heard-equality-impartiality-recusal-and-accommodation-q01","kind":"validation"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports notice, opportunity to be heard, equality, impartiality, recusal and accommodation?","id":"notice-opportunity-to-be-heard-equality-impartiality-recusal-and-accommodation-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may notice, opportunity to be heard, equality, impartiality, recusal and accommodation be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"notice-opportunity-to-be-heard-equality-impartiality-recusal-and-accommodation-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"decisions-remedies-review-recognition-and-closure","name":"Decisions, remedies, review, recognition and closure","description":"Composes judgment children and links remedy, review and enforcement processes while keeping their masters separate.","layers":[{"id":"judgment-award-reasons-remedies-and-finality","name":"Judgment, award, reasons, remedies and finality","description":"Records child decision membership and outcome metadata.","findings":[{"id":"judgment-award-order-reasons-dissent-and-child-membership","name":"Judgment, award, order, reasons, dissent and child membership","description":"WM-POL-021 child identifier, decision kind, deciding composition, outcome, reasons, opinions, issue and publication references.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define judgment, award, order, reasons, dissent and child membership for this case?","id":"judgment-award-order-reasons-dissent-and-child-membership-q01","kind":"composition"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports judgment, award, order, reasons, dissent and child membership?","id":"judgment-award-order-reasons-dissent-and-child-membership-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may judgment, award, order, reasons, dissent and child membership be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"judgment-award-order-reasons-dissent-and-child-membership-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"remedy-cost-interest-performance-declaration-and-finality-state","name":"Remedy, cost, interest, performance, declaration and finality state","description":"External remedy references, addressee, terms, amount, currency, interest, finality assertion, operative scope and correction status.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define remedy, cost, interest, performance, declaration and finality state for this case?","id":"remedy-cost-interest-performance-declaration-and-finality-state-q01","kind":"state"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports remedy, cost, interest, performance, declaration and finality state?","id":"remedy-cost-interest-performance-declaration-and-finality-state-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may remedy, cost, interest, performance, declaration and finality state be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"remedy-cost-interest-performance-declaration-and-finality-state-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"appeal-set-aside-recognition-enforcement-and-retention","name":"Appeal, set-aside, recognition, enforcement and retention","description":"Links successor proceedings and external execution without treating them as state flags.","findings":[{"id":"appeal-review-rehearing-set-aside-correction-and-successor-case","name":"Appeal, review, rehearing, set-aside, correction and successor case","description":"Challenged decision, route, forum, grounds, deadline, successor case, stay, outcome and effect on finality.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define appeal, review, rehearing, set-aside, correction and successor case for this case?","id":"appeal-review-rehearing-set-aside-correction-and-successor-case-q01","kind":"lifecycle"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports appeal, review, rehearing, set-aside, correction and successor case?","id":"appeal-review-rehearing-set-aside-correction-and-successor-case-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may appeal, review, rehearing, set-aside, correction and successor case be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"appeal-review-rehearing-set-aside-correction-and-successor-case-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"recognition-enforcement-satisfaction-closure-archive-and-legal-hold","name":"Recognition, enforcement, satisfaction, closure, archive and legal hold","description":"External recognition or enforcement case, jurisdiction, refusal ground, satisfaction reference, closure basis, retention and hold.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define recognition, enforcement, satisfaction, closure, archive and legal hold for this case?","id":"recognition-enforcement-satisfaction-closure-archive-and-legal-hold-q01","kind":"retention"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports recognition, enforcement, satisfaction, closure, archive and legal hold?","id":"recognition-enforcement-satisfaction-closure-archive-and-legal-hold-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may recognition, enforcement, satisfaction, closure, archive and legal hold be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"recognition-enforcement-satisfaction-closure-archive-and-legal-hold-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]},{"id":"publication-interoperability-and-agent-governance","name":"Publication, interoperability and agent governance","description":"Provides purpose-bound views, judicial-document projections and safe automated case maintenance.","layers":[{"id":"access-confidentiality-publication-and-statistics","name":"Access, confidentiality, publication and statistics","description":"Controls party, forum, public and analytical projections.","findings":[{"id":"party-forum-public-confidential-sealed-and-redacted-view","name":"Party, forum, public, confidential, sealed and redacted view","description":"Audience, purpose, authority, field policy, pseudonymization, sealed scope, reasons access, expiry and re-identification risk.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define party, forum, public, confidential, sealed and redacted view for this case?","id":"party-forum-public-confidential-sealed-and-redacted-view-q01","kind":"access"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports party, forum, public, confidential, sealed and redacted view?","id":"party-forum-public-confidential-sealed-and-redacted-view-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may party, forum, public, confidential, sealed and redacted view be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"party-forum-public-confidential-sealed-and-redacted-view-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"caseload-duration-outcome-publication-and-bias-statistics","name":"Caseload, duration, outcome, publication and bias statistics","description":"Dataset, cohort, case stage, measures, denominator, suppression, method, uncertainty and prohibited individual inference.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define caseload, duration, outcome, publication and bias statistics for this case?","id":"caseload-duration-outcome-publication-and-bias-statistics-q01","kind":"measurement"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports caseload, duration, outcome, publication and bias statistics?","id":"caseload-duration-outcome-publication-and-bias-statistics-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may caseload, duration, outcome, publication and bias statistics be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"caseload-duration-outcome-publication-and-bias-statistics-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]},{"id":"akoma-ecli-provenance-and-safe-agent-operations","name":"Akoma, ECLI, provenance and safe agent operations","description":"Maps case and decision metadata and controls autonomous actions.","findings":[{"id":"akoma-ntoso-ecli-legalruleml-and-prov-projection","name":"Akoma Ntoso, ECLI, LegalRuleML and PROV projection","description":"Source and target versions, case and decision mapping, authority, transformed fields, omissions and round-trip limits.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define akoma ntoso, ecli, legalruleml and prov projection for this case?","id":"akoma-ntoso-ecli-legalruleml-and-prov-projection-q01","kind":"interoperability"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports akoma ntoso, ecli, legalruleml and prov projection?","id":"akoma-ntoso-ecli-legalruleml-and-prov-projection-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may akoma ntoso, ecli, legalruleml and prov projection be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"akoma-ntoso-ecli-legalruleml-and-prov-projection-q03","kind":"validation"}]},{"id":"agent-operation-authority-prewrite-postwrite-concurrency-and-recovery","name":"Agent operation, authority, pre-write, post-write, concurrency and recovery","description":"Operation class, actor, authority, preconditions, expected effects, stale-head check, validation, rollback and audit evidence.","questions":[{"text":"What exact identities, roles, classes, values, links and unknowns define agent operation, authority, pre-write, post-write, concurrency and recovery for this case?","id":"agent-operation-authority-prewrite-postwrite-concurrency-and-recovery-q01","kind":"security"},{"text":"Which forum authority, procedural rule, filing, evidence, order and event or knowledge time supports agent operation, authority, pre-write, post-write, concurrency and recovery?","id":"agent-operation-authority-prewrite-postwrite-concurrency-and-recovery-q02","kind":"evidence"},{"text":"How may agent operation, authority, pre-write, post-write, concurrency and recovery be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without adjudicating the dispute or erasing history?","id":"agent-operation-authority-prewrite-postwrite-concurrency-and-recovery-q03","kind":"validation"}]}]}]}]},"agentConduct":{"may":["Docket filings and compute procedural deadlines from forum rules for checking.","Schedule hearings and send service notices on instruction of the registry.","Prepare a case chronology or index of filings for the tribunal.","Check filings for format and completeness against forum rules."],"mustNot":["Issue or draft as final any order, finding, judgment or award.","Disclose sealed, confidential or anonymised material to unauthorised parties.","Treat an allegation or admitted exhibit as an established fact.","Change the docket record after the fact without a correction entry.","Communicate with one party about the merits outside the forum procedure."],"requiresHuman":["Any adjudicative or adverse procedural decision.","Unsealing, anonymisation choices and publication of case material.","Declaring finality, closure or reopening of a case."]},"ethics":{"considerations":["Due process, equality of arms and the right to be heard must not be weakened by automation.","Case records expose parties, witnesses and minors to stigma; disclosure must follow anonymisation rules.","Missed deadlines computed wrongly can cost a party its claim or defence."],"affectedParties":["Parties and their counsel","Witnesses, victims and minors named in the case","Judges, arbitrators and registry staff"]},"owners":{"steward":"Dimension identity, owner, court or arbitration case authority, records authority and namespace","roles":[{"name":"Forum records authority","responsibilities":["Own canonical case identity, docket integrity and official procedural state."]},{"name":"Judge, tribunal or arbitral panel","responsibilities":["Issue findings, orders and decisions within established competence."]},{"name":"Clerk or case administrator","responsibilities":["Docket submissions, manage schedules, service records and procedural notices."]},{"name":"Party or representative","responsibilities":["Submit filings, answer evidence and exercise procedural access and challenge rights."]},{"name":"Evidence custodian","responsibilities":["Maintain external evidence identity, custody and integrity."]},{"name":"Publication and access steward","responsibilities":["Apply public, sealed, confidential, redaction and statistical-view policy."]},{"name":"Records and retention steward","responsibilities":["Apply archive, legal hold, disposition and recovery policy."]}],"masterSystems":[]},"relations":[{"target":"WM-POL-019 Legal Filing / Pleading","type":"child","note":"Compose filings and pleadings into the docket while preserving their identity and lifecycle."},{"target":"WM-POL-020 Evidence Item / Exhibit","type":"child","note":"Compose evidence references and case-specific admission or use without taking custody ownership."},{"target":"WM-POL-021 Judgment / Legal Decision","type":"child","note":"Compose judgments, awards and decisions while keeping content, opinions and corrections independently governed."},{"target":"Forum, Person, Organization, Claim, Remedy, Review and Enforcement models","type":"references","note":"Resolve external actors, underlying matters, ordered consequences and post-decision processes."},{"target":"Akoma Ntoso, ECLI, LegalRuleML and PROV-O","type":"aligned","note":"Project judicial documents, case-law identity, legal assertions and provenance with declared loss."},{"target":"Court, Tribunal or Arbitral Institution","type":"neighbor","note":"The forum is an external organization with competence; the case is one proceeding in its docket or administration."},{"target":"Legal Filing / Pleading","type":"neighbor","note":"WM-POL-019 owns each procedural submission; the case composes its identifier, role, receipt and docket relation."},{"target":"Evidence Item / Exhibit","type":"neighbor","note":"WM-POL-020 owns evidence identity, custody and integrity; the case records submission, admission, exclusion, weight and use."},{"target":"Judgment / Legal Decision","type":"neighbor","note":"WM-POL-021 owns decision text and identity; the case records membership, outcome, finality and review links."},{"target":"Enforcement and Remedy","type":"neighbor","note":"A case may order or reference remedies, but recognition, enforcement, performance and satisfaction have separate authority and lifecycles."},{"target":"WM-POL-019","type":"contains"},{"target":"WM-POL-020","type":"contains"},{"target":"WM-POL-021","type":"contains"}],"interaction":{"identity":{"applicability":"required","items":["Authoritative master-system docket or case-management identifier qualified by forum and jurisdiction.","Governed globally resolvable case IRI with authoritative docket binding.","Dimension UUID or ULID when no external identifier exists."]},"properties":{"applicability":"not-applicable","items":[]},"recognition":{"applicability":"optional","items":["A case has a forum, a case number, parties in procedural roles and a docket of dated events.","It is confused with the underlying dispute, a single filing, a judgment or an enforcement case."]},"capabilities":{"applicability":"required","items":["Open case: Create docket identity, profile, forum assignment, jurisdiction basis and initial parties and claims.","Assign panel and procedural roles: Bind judges, arbitrators, clerk, parties and representatives with authority and conflict checks.","Docket filing and service: Attach a WM-POL-019 child, record receipt, acceptance and legally relevant service assertion.","Schedule deadline or hearing: Create a rule-grounded deadline, session or hearing with timezone, participants and accessibility needs.","Attach evidence and record ruling: Compose a WM-POL-020 child and record admission, exclusion, weight or custody references.","Issue procedural or interim order: Record authority, terms, reasons, affected parties, effect interval and challenge route.","Register judgment or award child: Compose WM-POL-021 and record outcome, finality, remedy references, publication and opinions.","Link review, recognition or enforcement case: Connect appeal, set-aside, recognition or enforcement successors and effects on finality.","Issue purpose-bound case view: Create party, forum, public, confidential, statistical or interoperability projection.","Close, archive or reopen case: Record closure basis, archive, legal hold or authorized reopening while preserving all cited history."]},"hazards":{"applicability":"required","items":["Wrong deadline computation leading to default or forfeiture.","Leak of sealed evidence or witness identity.","Misattribution of a filing to the wrong case or party."]},"interfaces":{"applicability":"required","items":["ECLI European Case Law Identifier.","OASIS LegalXML Electronic Court Filing.","Akoma Ntoso for judgments and orders.","e-CODEX for cross-border judicial exchange in the EU."]},"context":{"applicability":"required","items":["ECLI is a European judicial-decision identifier and does not identify every case or define universal procedure.","UNCITRAL instruments concern arbitration and depend on agreement and applicable national law.","HCCH conventions govern specific cross-border service or judgment contexts and do not define domestic case lifecycle."]}},"sources":[{"title":"Akoma Ntoso Version 1.0, Part 1: XML Vocabulary","url":"https://docs.oasis-open.org/legaldocml/akn-core/v1.0/os/part1-vocabulary/akn-core-v1.0-os-part1-vocabulary.html","note":"OASIS"},{"title":"LegalRuleML Core Specification Version 1.0","url":"https://docs.oasis-open.org/legalruleml/legalruleml-core-spec/v1.0/os/legalruleml-core-spec-v1.0-os.html","note":"OASIS"},{"title":"Council Conclusions on the European Case Law Identifier and minimum uniform metadata","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52019XG1024%2801%29","note":"Council of the European Union"},{"title":"UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules","url":"https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/contractualtexts/arbitration","note":"United Nations Commission on International Trade Law"},{"title":"UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration","url":"https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/modellaw/commercial_arbitration","note":"United Nations Commission on International Trade Law"},{"title":"Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters","url":"https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=137","note":"Hague Conference on Private International Law"},{"title":"Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents","url":"https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=17","note":"Hague Conference on Private International Law"},{"title":"PROV-O: The PROV Ontology","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Time Ontology in OWL","url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/","note":"World Wide Web Consortium"},{"title":"Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339","note":"Internet Engineering Task Force"}],"openQuestions":["Approve composition cardinalities and ownership contracts for filings, evidence items and judgments.","Develop court, tribunal, arbitration, appellate, criminal, civil and cross-border procedure profiles.","Create fixtures for joinder, severance, transfer, failed service, sealed records, recusal, interim measures, partial awards, appeal, set-aside and reopening.","Validate certified judicial-document and case-law projections with authority, time, access, information-loss and round-trip tests.","No independent Claude or Grok result was available; later judicial-administration and arbitration review is required before canonical promotion.","Jurisdiction-specific civil, criminal, administrative, constitutional, family, insolvency, appellate and arbitral procedure profiles require specialist review.","Approved candidate CONTAINS relations identify child models but cardinalities and lifecycle contracts still require governance review.","Certified Akoma Ntoso, ECLI, LegalRuleML and court-system crosswalks and conformance fixtures remain future work."],"resources":{"spec":"/models/wm-pol-009-court-arbitration-case/spec.yaml","agents":"/models/wm-pol-009-court-arbitration-case/AGENTS.md","source":"https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-pol-009"},"provenance":{"origin":"world-models research","builtFrom":["models/wm-pol-009-court-arbitration-case/spec.yaml","ver-cy/world-models/card-supplements/wm-pol-009-court-arbitration-case.json"],"providers":["Codex"],"researchStatus":"reviewable-draft","generatedAt":"2026-09-06T03:13:47Z","builder":"tools/build_cards.py@1.0.0"},"completeness":{"sections":{"classifiers":"filled","whatItIs":"filled","purpose":"filled","distinguishingFeatures":"filled","structure":"filled","agentConduct":"filled","ethics":"filled","owners":"filled","relations":"filled","interaction.identity":"filled","interaction.properties":"not-applicable","interaction.recognition":"filled","interaction.capabilities":"filled","interaction.hazards":"filled","interaction.interfaces":"filled","interaction.context":"filled","sources":"filled"},"notes":{"interaction.properties":"Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties.","_supplement":"Sections authored in card supplement 1.0.0 by Claude (Opus 5.5) (2026-10-05, unreviewed). Written from the published specification and established practice in the field; no new sources were read. Unreviewed."},"score":1.0}}