Performance, Evidence and Calibration
The review cycle, criteria, observations, feedback, achievements, disputes and calibration decisions. Assessments must not become permanent properties of a person.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Note: Research contour: bundles not designed yet; questions are listed as open questions.
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- Enterprise profiles
- Category
- Enterprise subject
- Entry kind
- subject
- Domain
- EnterprisePEO
- Industry
- Cross-industry
- Tags
- EM-PEO-06W3subjectPerformanceCycleAssessmentMethodPerformanceObservationFeedbackAssessment
What it is Filled
The review cycle, criteria, observations, feedback, achievements, disputes and calibration decisions. Assessments must not become permanent properties of a person.
Why it exists Filled
The review cycle, criteria, observations, feedback, achievements, disputes and calibration decisions. Assessments must not become permanent properties of a person.
Distinguishing features Derived, awaiting review
- An assessment is bound to a method and a period
- Commit count is not identical to performance
- A disputed claim does not become a confirmed fact by default
What robots and AI may and may not do Derived, awaiting review
Must not
- Negative case: An automatic employee rating is built from closed tasks without regard to role, complexity and team contribution.
Note: Negative case of the research brief, not yet a rule for agents.
Moral aspects Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Owners Filled
Steward
Руководитель HR / ответственный за персонал
Master systems
- HRIS
- кадровый реестр
- ATS
- LMS
Links to other meta-models Filled
references
- WM-ORG-017 - conceptual-candidate
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Incomplete
Identity and identifiers required Derived, awaiting review
- PerformanceCycle
- AssessmentMethod
- PerformanceObservation
- Feedback
- Assessment
- Calibration
- Appeal
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
Not applicable
Enterprise record contour: physical properties belong to referenced world models.
Recognition required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Capabilities and actions required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Hazards and failure modes required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Standards and interfaces required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Context of use required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Sources Filled
- HR Open: exchange of HR data
- W3C ORG and ESCO/SFIA: relationships, skills and levels of responsibility
- HRIS/ATS/LMS practice and independent verification of outcome measurement via SPACE
Open questions
- How are observation, contribution attribution, assessment and decision separated?
- Which scales are comparable across roles and periods?
- How are a negative event, the person's response and a revision stored without asserting fault?
- Установить границу и решение reuse/extend/new по действующим спецификациям.
- Подтвердить semantic crosswalk, права и source mastership.
- Выбрать immutable refs; провести проверки fixtures до заявления о публикационной готовности.
Machine files
Provenance
enterprise research programme · published-partial
Built from: enterprise/models/em-peo-06/brief.json
Still in Russian: suggested owner, blocking decisions, vercy candidates. Translate in research/enterprise/i18n/units.en.json.