Provenance, trust and assertions
A common form for source, derivation, confirmation level, uncertainty and knowledge correction.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Note: Research contour: bundles not designed yet; questions are listed as open questions.
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- Enterprise profiles
- Category
- Enterprise contract
- Entry kind
- contract
- Domain
- EnterpriseXCT
- Industry
- Cross-industry
- Tags
- EM-XCT-03W0contractProvenanceRecordEvidenceLinkConfidenceAssessment
What it is Filled
A common form for source, derivation, confirmation level, uncertainty and knowledge correction.
Why it exists Filled
A common form for source, derivation, confirmation level, uncertainty and knowledge correction.
Distinguishing features Derived, awaiting review
- A citation does not confirm truth
- Confidence is not a probability without a methodology
- A correction preserves the previous record
What robots and AI may and may not do Derived, awaiting review
Must not
- Negative case: AI analysis of a local file is presented as a check of a live system.
Note: Negative case of the research brief, not yet a rule for agents.
Moral aspects Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Owners Filled
Steward
Куратор мета-моделей Vercy
Master systems
- Реестр моделей
- sources.yaml
- vercy.lock
- политики
Links to other meta-models Filled
references
- WM-XCT-012 - conceptual-candidate
- WM-XCT-026 - conceptual-candidate
- WM-XCT-028 - conceptual-candidate
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Incomplete
Identity and identifiers required Derived, awaiting review
- ProvenanceRecord
- EvidenceLink
- ConfidenceAssessment
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
Not applicable
Enterprise record contour: physical properties belong to referenced world models.
Recognition required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Capabilities and actions required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Hazards and failure modes required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Standards and interfaces required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Context of use required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Sources Filled
- Current Vercy protocol/MMAS/whole-object and the published WM-XCT
- W3C PROV/SKOS/SHACL/ODRL where applicable
- Practice of source connectors, versioned schemas and policy enforcement
Open questions
- What was observed directly?
- How to mark AI synthesis versus a source-asserted fact?
- How to retract an unreliable assertion?
- Установить границу и решение reuse/extend/new по действующим спецификациям.
- Подтвердить semantic crosswalk, права и source mastership.
- Выбрать immutable refs; провести проверки fixtures до заявления о публикационной готовности.
Machine files
Provenance
enterprise research programme · published-partial
Built from: enterprise/models/em-xct-03/brief.json
Still in Russian: suggested owner, blocking decisions, vercy candidates. Translate in research/enterprise/i18n/units.en.json.