Enterprise Disclosure Review
Describe exact packages of single-object metadata projections, preserve attributed joint-disclosure reviews, and check their applicability under explicit current context.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled
4 bundles · 8 layers · 24 findings · 24 questions
Identity and classification Identity and classification for an exact metadata proposal and attributed joint review.
Objects and proposal boundary
Objects and proposal boundary with explicit local and external responsibilities.
Which single object does each member describe?
Coverage: local-structure; external identity truth.
- Which single object does each member describe? governed-context
Which exact source revision and schema were used?
Coverage: local-equality; host resolution.
- Which exact source revision and schema were used? governed-context
Is this a projection, a package or a domain aggregate?
Coverage: modeled boundary; calculation outside scope.
- Is this a projection, a package or a domain aggregate? governed-context
Classification references
Classification references with explicit local and external responsibilities.
Which classification binds every selected field?
Coverage: local cardinality; external binding interpretation.
- Which classification binds every selected field? governed-context
Who may correct or downgrade a classification?
Coverage: host-only authority; no classification mutation.
- Who may correct or downgrade a classification? governed-context
Are schemes or compartments comparable?
Coverage: deferred comparison engine.
- Are schemes or compartments comparable? governed-context
Proposed disclosure and current authority Proposed disclosure and current authority for an exact metadata proposal and attributed joint review.
Closed metadata shape
Closed metadata shape with explicit local and external responsibilities.
Which fields are proposed for disclosure?
Coverage: local declaration; no payload serving.
- Which fields are proposed for disclosure? governed-context
Can nested values introduce another object?
Coverage: local syntax; scalar truth is host attestation.
- Can nested values introduce another object? governed-context
Can notes, identifiers, counts or errors reveal withheld facts?
Coverage: manual assessment; no leakage detector.
- Can notes, identifiers, counts or errors reveal withheld facts? governed-context
Current authority and freshness
Current authority and freshness with explicit local and external responsibilities.
What current grant permits this audience and purpose?
Coverage: outside implementation; mandatory before serving.
- What current grant permits this audience and purpose? governed-context
Has context changed since assessment?
Coverage: local exact comparison; host completeness.
- Has context changed since assessment? governed-context
May an earlier result be reused now?
Coverage: local applicability; cache/atomic serving external.
- May an earlier result be reused now? governed-context
Joint review and aggregate boundaries Joint review and aggregate boundaries for an exact metadata proposal and attributed joint review.
Exact joint context
Exact joint context with explicit local and external responsibilities.
Which exact component set was jointly reviewed?
Coverage: local exact pinning.
- Which exact component set was jointly reviewed? governed-context
What combined inference risk was assessed?
Coverage: local attribution; no inference proof.
- What combined inference risk was assessed? governed-context
Which earlier releases were considered?
Coverage: local context binding; not all recipient knowledge.
- Which earlier releases were considered? governed-context
Domain aggregates and assessment scope
Domain aggregates and assessment scope with explicit local and external responsibilities.
Who owns a source aggregate and its calculation?
Coverage: outside implementation.
- Who owns a source aggregate and its calculation? governed-context
Which privacy mechanism or grain applies?
Coverage: deferred privacy mechanisms.
- Which privacy mechanism or grain applies? governed-context
Does a review apply to another recipient or environment?
Coverage: local binding; no transferable grant.
- Does a review apply to another recipient or environment? governed-context
Continuity and custody Continuity and custody for an exact metadata proposal and attributed joint review.
Expiry and custody boundaries
Expiry and custody boundaries with explicit local and external responsibilities.
When must serving stop versus evidence remain?
Coverage: local review expiry only.
- When must serving stop versus evidence remain? governed-context
Who controls source, output, cache and backup copies?
Coverage: outside implementation; opaque context pin.
- Who controls source, output, cache and backup copies? governed-context
Do retention, destruction deadlines and holds conflict?
Coverage: deferred disposition engine.
- Do retention, destruction deadlines and holds conflict? governed-context
Disposal and migration evidence
Disposal and migration evidence with explicit local and external responsibilities.
Was disposal requested, executed or verified?
Coverage: outside implementation.
- Was disposal requested, executed or verified? governed-context
What evidence may survive disposal?
Coverage: outside implementation.
- What evidence may survive disposal? governed-context
Can the register migrate without losing meaning?
Coverage: local roundtrip; cross-version migration deferred.
- Can the register migrate without losing meaning? governed-context
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- Enterprise profiles
- Category
- Cross-cutting context
- Entry kind
- companion-contract
- Navigation path
- NAV.XCT
- Domain
- EnterpriseDisclosure reviewInformation governance
- Industry
- Cross-industry
- Tags
- EM-XCT-05disclosureclassificationprojectionreviewcustody
- Also called
- Context Package Proposal, Disclosure classification and custody, EM-XCT-05, Joint Disclosure Review
What it is Filled
A companion contract for a Company Dimension that describes exact packages of metadata projections proposed for disclosure and keeps attributed reviews of what their joint release could reveal, checked against the current context.
Why it exists Filled
Describe exact packages of single-object metadata projections, preserve attributed joint-disclosure reviews, and check their applicability under explicit current context.
Distinguishing features Filled
- Reviews packages of metadata projections for joint disclosure risk, not single fields in isolation.
- Checks that a review still applies under the current context and returns stale when inputs changed.
- No review status is a grant: serving data needs a separate current authorization.
What robots and AI may and may not do Filled
Must not
- Treat a positive review as permission to disclose.
- Invent calculated aggregate values.
- Downgrade an opaque pin to make a review pass.
- Reuse a review for a different revision or digest.
Only with a human decision
- Assessing rejected, inconclusive or conflicting reviews.
- Deciding to disclose a package that combines sensitive fields.
May
- Validate the member grammar and pins of a disclosure package.
- Record a concern about side channels and keep reports internal.
- Return stale or insufficient-context when the current context differs.
Moral aspects Filled
- Combining harmless fields can re-identify people; joint review exists to prevent that.
- Review reports themselves may reveal sensitive structure and must stay internal.
- Over-disclosure harms people irreversibly; when in doubt the review must not pass.
Who is affected
- People whose data could be re-identified
- Recipients who rely on disclosed data
Owners Filled
Steward
The information governance or privacy office stewards disclosure reviews; each data domain owns its own fields.
Master systems
- Data catalogue with classification
- Host authorization service
Links to other meta-models Filled
references
- WM-XCT-002 - 0.3.0-research.1
- WM-XCT-003 - 0.3.0-research.1
- WM-XCT-020 - 0.3.0-research.1
- WM-DAT-004 - 0.3.0-research.1
- WM-KNW-012 - 0.3.0-research.1
aligned
- vr.wm-xct-002
- vr.wm-xct-003
- vr.wm-xct-020
- vr.wm-dat-004
- vr.wm-knw-012
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled
Identity and identifiers required Filled
- Package ID with exact member pins.
- Review ID bound to the package revision and digest.
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
Not applicable
Institutional or informational subject: it has no physical body to measure.
Recognition optional Filled
- A disclosure review covers a named package of metadata projections and an attributed verdict.
Capabilities and actions required Filled
- Validate exact member grammar; ask domain steward for identity evidence. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Compare exact pins; request independently resolved source metadata. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Keep member/package identities distinct; ask domain owner for aggregate calculation. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Reject missing bindings; ask classification authority for pinned scheme and term. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Request a governed correction; do not change an opaque pin as a downgrade. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Host evaluator returns insufficient-context for unsupported comparison. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority. inspect() does not perform this check; applicable-review does not establish comparison or custody resolution.
- Validate metadata selection; ask host for separate current serving authorization. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Reject nested/wildcard field names; require separate member for another object. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Record concern; keep reports internal; ask host to assess side channels. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Request host decision; no review status establishes a grant. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Compare all declared current inputs; return stale on disagreement. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Reevaluate; retain old snapshot only as historical evidence. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Refuse review for a different revision/digest; request new review after change. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Keep rejection/inconclusive/conflict; request qualified human assessment. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Request missing release history; stale if current context differs. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Ask source domain owner; never invent calculated values here. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Require a separately verified implementation and explicit limits. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Return stale when context differs; obtain new proposal/review. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Reevaluate review window; ask host to stop serving and custodian to decide retention. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Identify missing custodian; request owner decision. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Host evaluator returns insufficient-context until actual custodian resolves; perform no destruction. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority. inspect() does not perform this check; applicable-review does not establish comparison or custody resolution.
- Keep unknown execution unknown; a marker is not destruction. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Request authorized custody decision without perpetual-retention assumption. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
- Roundtrip same version; refuse unsupported version conversion. Proposed operation only; requires the named host/domain authority.
Hazards and failure modes required Filled
- Re-identification through combined fields.
- Stale approval reused after the data changed.
Standards and interfaces required Filled
- ISO/IEC 27701 privacy information management.
- Statistical disclosure control practice.
Context of use required Filled
- Applies before company data is released inside or outside the organization.
Sources Filled
- Research record EM-XCT-05: independent provider studies, audits and reconciled findings - Evidence behind the release; claims in the card trace to it.
- Enterprise Disclosure Review 0.1.0 specification - Normative release, digest sha256:208854fbc8c1737ec87acfa54c618b85a9efc1f619e109556d2df8c9267b5017
Open questions
- Use the pinned companion schema/validator and trusted-host binding. Native outer validation alone does not enforce nested semantics. Consult the released adoption limits.
Machine files
Provenance
enterprise research · reviewable-draft
Built from: models/enterprise-disclosure-review/versions/0.1.0/spec.json, models/enterprise-disclosure-review/catalogue-entry.json, ver-cy/world-models/card-supplements/enterprise-disclosure-review.json