EM-XCT-04 · Enterprise profiles · Published 0.1.0

Enterprise Temporal History

Record effective timelines, preserve earlier recorded views and bind schemas and domain states without rewriting history.

4 bundles · 8 layers · 22 findings · 22 questions

Independent audit still pending

Claude and Grok completed independent research. Claude completed three frozen static implementation audits after remediation. Grok’s separate implementation audit is unavailable and pending browser recovery; no Grok code-acceptance verdict is claimed.

Use in a Company Dimension

Start with one fact scope, a pinned domain value and its schema, then append complete effective-time snapshots. Query by effective date and recorded cutoff; later corrections preserve earlier recorded views. The package includes three synthetic examples, a closed schema, a reference validator and native installation checks.

Research assurance: reviewable-draft. This is a bounded original companion. A trusted host owns authentication, latest history, receipt clock and durable conflict handling. This companion does not establish source truth, domain transition legality or payload-schema conformance. Adoption limits.

Bundles → Layers → Findings → Questions

Collect the expected evidence for each question. Unknown context remains explicit. Listed actions confer no operational permission.

TH-B-scopeScope and interpretation2 layers

Scope and interpretation with explicit uncertainty and host responsibility.

TH-L-identityIdentity and boundaries3 findings

Identity and boundaries for one governed temporal assertion scope.

TH-F01

What is the governed fact scope?

What is the governed fact scope?

Questions
  1. TH-Q01 What is the governed fact scope?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Dimension, timeline and subject/predicate/context URIs
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Dimension, timeline and subject/predicate/context URIsExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Compare exact references; request missing context
TH-F02

What survives a rename, transfer or split?

What survives a rename, transfer or split?

Questions
  1. TH-Q02 What survives a rename, transfer or split?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • External identity decision and fixed timeline header
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • External identity decision and fixed timeline headerExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Keep stable scope; create a new governed scope when meaning changes
TH-F03

Can two masters or values apply simultaneously?

Can two masters or values apply simultaneously?

Questions
  1. TH-Q03 Can two masters or values apply simultaneously?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Scope/master register and separate context keys
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Scope/master register and separate context keysExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Separate scopes; request an authority decision, never silently choose a winner
TH-L-bindingsSchema and state bindings3 findings

Schema and state bindings for one governed temporal assertion scope.

TH-F04

Which schema interprets this value?

Which schema interprets this value?

Questions
  1. TH-Q04 Which schema interprets this value?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Exact schema ID, numeric version and digest; external payload pin
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Exact schema ID, numeric version and digest; external payload pinExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Check accepted tuple; delegate payload validation
TH-F05

Which status axis and vocabulary are in use?

Which status axis and vocabulary are in use?

Questions
  1. TH-Q05 Which status axis and vocabulary are in use?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • State profile pin, axis and code
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • State profile pin, axis and codeExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Check vocabulary membership only
TH-F06

Did a legitimate domain transition occur?

Did a legitimate domain transition occur?

Questions
  1. TH-Q06 Did a legitimate domain transition occur?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Host transition definition, execution and provenance evidence
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Host transition definition, execution and provenance evidenceExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Route to the domain owner; report legality not evaluated
TH-B-historyEffective and recorded history2 layers

Effective and recorded history with explicit uncertainty and host responsibility.

TH-L-validEffective intervals3 findings

Effective intervals for one governed temporal assertion scope.

TH-F07

What is recorded as effective on the selected date?

What is recorded as effective on the selected date?

Questions
  1. TH-Q07 What is recorded as effective on the selected date?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Explicit validAt and selected segment
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Explicit validAt and selected segmentExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Resolve within the selected recorded snapshot
TH-F08

Does the exact endpoint belong to this interval?

Does the exact endpoint belong to this interval?

Questions
  1. TH-Q08 Does the exact endpoint belong to this interval?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Half-open interval boundaries
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Half-open interval boundariesExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Exclude validTo; reject zero duration or overlap
TH-F09

What do uncovered periods or an empty snapshot mean?

What do uncovered periods or an empty snapshot mean?

Questions
  1. TH-Q09 What do uncovered periods or an empty snapshot mean?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Coverage gaps and missing-context explanation
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Coverage gaps and missing-context explanationExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Return insufficient context, never false
TH-L-receiptReceipts and corrections3 findings

Receipts and corrections for one governed temporal assertion scope.

TH-F10

What had this timeline host recorded by a cutoff?

What had this timeline host recorded by a cutoff?

Questions
  1. TH-Q10 What had this timeline host recorded by a cutoff?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • knownAt, optional knownSequence and selected receipt
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • knownAt, optional knownSequence and selected receiptExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Choose the latest eligible commit; before first receipt return unknown
TH-F11

Which of two same-second receipts is intended?

Which of two same-second receipts is intended?

Questions
  1. TH-Q11 Which of two same-second receipts is intended?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Host sequence and receipt time
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Host sequence and receipt timeExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Pin the returned sequence for stable historical content
TH-F12

How does a late correction preserve earlier answers?

How does a late correction preserve earlier answers?

Questions
  1. TH-Q12 How does a late correction preserve earlier answers?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Two complete snapshots and predecessor digest
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Two complete snapshots and predecessor digestExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Append a corrected snapshot; compare historical answers
TH-B-controlAuthority and controlled operations2 layers

Authority and controlled operations with explicit uncertainty and host responsibility.

TH-L-writesWrite integrity3 findings

Write integrity for one governed temporal assertion scope.

TH-F13

Was this retry already applied?

Was this retry already applied?

Questions
  1. TH-Q13 Was this retry already applied?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Original key, full request and first receipt
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Original key, full request and first receiptExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Return unchanged root only for exact authorized replay
TH-F14

Is this write based on the current head?

Is this write based on the current head?

Questions
  1. TH-Q14 Is this write based on the current head?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Expected/current head and host conflict artifact
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Expected/current head and host conflict artifactExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Reject stale writes; host records conflict without altering history
TH-F15

Who may assert this scope now?

Who may assert this scope now?

Questions
  1. TH-Q15 Who may assert this scope now?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Current host config, authenticated writer and mastership evidence
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Current host config, authenticated writer and mastership evidenceExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Require current grant; preserve old attribution
TH-L-readsHistorical disclosure2 findings

Historical disclosure for one governed temporal assertion scope.

TH-F16

May this role read historical data for this purpose?

May this role read historical data for this purpose?

Questions
  1. TH-Q16 May this role read historical data for this purpose?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Current full-timeline reader/purpose decision
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Current full-timeline reader/purpose decisionExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Deny before hidden ledger/query diagnostics
TH-F17

Does a pinned assertion establish truth or permission?

Does a pinned assertion establish truth or permission?

Questions
  1. TH-Q17 Does a pinned assertion establish truth or permission?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Selected assertion plus independently governed evidence
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Selected assertion plus independently governed evidenceExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Report truth and transition legality as unevaluated
TH-B-adoptionAdoption and continuity2 layers

Adoption and continuity with explicit uncertainty and host responsibility.

TH-L-continuityArchival and import3 findings

Archival and import for one governed temporal assertion scope.

TH-F18

What changes when this timeline is archived?

What changes when this timeline is archived?

Questions
  1. TH-Q18 What changes when this timeline is archived?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Archive commit and unchanged segment snapshot
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Archive commit and unchanged segment snapshotExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Freeze new writes; retain historical reads
TH-F19

How can an imported history avoid forged local knowledge?

How can an imported history avoid forged local knowledge?

Questions
  1. TH-Q19 How can an imported history avoid forged local knowledge?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Actual local receipt and separate sourceRecordedAt
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Actual local receipt and separate sourceRecordedAtExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Admit at local receipt; require actual host receipt for new admissions; static imports cannot prove receipt history
TH-F20

Which precision or calendar adapter is required?

Which precision or calendar adapter is required?

Questions
  1. TH-Q20 Which precision or calendar adapter is required?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Original civil/offset/fractional time and pinned conversion rules
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Original civil/offset/fractional time and pinned conversion rulesExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Reject unsupported input; do not silently truncate
TH-L-integrationComposition and migration2 findings

Composition and migration for one governed temporal assertion scope.

TH-F21

What is the minimum useful Company Dimension setup?

What is the minimum useful Company Dimension setup?

Questions
  1. TH-Q21 What is the minimum useful Company Dimension setup?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • One scope, config, external value/schema pin and first snapshot
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • One scope, config, external value/schema pin and first snapshotExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Install own companion identity and validate nested snapshot
TH-F22

Can we migrate or export without losing recorded history?

Can we migrate or export without losing recorded history?

Questions
  1. TH-Q22 Can we migrate or export without losing recorded history?governed-context
    Expected answer
    • Full same-version ledger, checksums, predecessor and loss analysis
    • If unavailable: insufficient-context; name missing evidence. A denied read remains denied.
Artifacts
  • Full same-version ledger, checksums, predecessor and loss analysisExact references or reproducible report; no implicit truth or authority.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Allow same-version roundtrip; refuse unsupported migration

Research and validation

Claude and Grok completed independent research. Claude completed three frozen static implementation audits after remediation. Grok’s separate implementation audit is unavailable and pending browser recovery; no Grok code-acceptance verdict is claimed. Executed tests and native checks are recorded separately. Research dossier · Review and limits · Tests · Native acceptance · Checksums.

Catalogue identity: vr.profile.enterprise-temporal-history. EM-XCT-04 remains a broader, partially covered research contour. Parent models are semantic references; no subtype or whole-parent conformance is asserted.