← Back to catalogue
Published

magic

vr.tr.magic · thing-magic

Enable an agent to recognise, describe and assess practices registered as magic by recording their attributed supernatural powers, operative methods, cultural context and limits on interpretation or use.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems INF.KNW

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 11 layers · 16 findings · 26 questions

Designation and boundaries Records why an art falls under magic and how that classification relates to participants' terms.

Grounds for inclusion

Identifies the practice and attributed power that support inclusion.

Art and power attribution

Record the deliberate practice and the supernatural power it is described as invoking, preserving whose description this is.

  1. What art or prescribed practice invokes which attributed supernatural power? definition
  2. Who supplies this account, and where can it be checked? provenance

Contested classification

Preserves differences between self-description, analytical terminology and imposed labels.

Magic label and neighbours

Record the convention distinguishing this practice from religion, illusion, fiction or metaphor, including disagreement.

  1. Do participants call this magic, use another term or reject the designation? definition
  2. Under the stated convention, what separates or connects this practice and religious ritual, stage illusion or fictional magic? boundary
Accounts of supernatural operation Represents how a practice explains the powers it invokes and the effects it seeks.

Powers and engagement

Records attributed agency and the practitioner's proposed relationship to it.

Invoked agency

Describe whether the account involves petitioning, commanding, channelling or otherwise engaging a named power, using source terminology.

  1. What beings, forces or powers are invoked, and how is engagement with them described? definition
  2. Which source supports this operative account, and does another account disagree? provenance

Targets and correspondences

Records intended effects and any asserted links between symbols, materials and targets.

Claimed path to effect

Document what the art seeks to affect and why its words, objects or actions are considered relevant within the account.

  1. What change or knowledge is sought, and who or what is its target? definition
  2. What source explains any claimed connection between the ritual elements and the intended effect? provenance
Ritual prescriptions and variants Describes the operative form of magical arts and the differences among documented versions.

Operative sequence

Records prescribed ritual components and their ordering.

Required ritual elements

Identify formulas, gestures, inscriptions, objects or preparations treated as required, optional or substitutable.

  1. Which words, actions, materials and sequence define the prescription in this version? definition
  2. Which omissions or substitutions are said to alter or invalidate it? boundary

Qualifications and conditions

Records conditions attributed to successful or authorised performance.

Performance eligibility

Preserve stated requirements concerning initiation, preparation, timing, location and prohibitions without assuming they apply across traditions.

  1. What practitioner qualifications, preparations, times or places are prescribed? definition
  2. Which source or recognised authority establishes these conditions for this version? provenance
Transmission and authority Tracks how magical knowledge is transmitted, attributed and made accessible.

Lineages, texts and versions

Separates documented transmission from asserted origins or authenticity.

Traceable prescription history

Link a prescription to identifiable attestations and record claimed lineage separately from supported transmission.

  1. What identifiable text, teacher, testimony or observation supplies this version? provenance
  2. Which claims about antiquity, lineage or authenticity remain unsupported by the available record? provenance

Restricted knowledge

Records conditions governing disclosure and instruction.

Disclosure and teaching conditions

Identify any initiation, permission or custodial conditions attached to sharing magical formulas and instructions.

  1. Who asserts authority to permit disclosure or teaching, and what is the basis of that authority? provenance
  2. What may an agent quote, summarise or teach under the documented access conditions? action
Efficacy, interpretation and action Separates desired effects from evidence and identifies consequences relevant to agent action.

Outcomes and causal claims

Records how success is defined and what evidence supports each reported result.

Efficacy assessment

Distinguish intended results, participant interpretations, observations and causal conclusions, including how failures are handled.

  1. What counts as success or failure, over what period, and according to whom? measurement
  2. What observations or comparisons support the claimed result, and do they distinguish supernatural causation from other explanations? measurement

Consequences of use

Identifies practical consequences of performing, recommending or labelling a practice.

Prescription and attribution risks

Assess concrete concerns arising from the particular prescription or attribution, such as hazardous materials, non-consenting targets or accusations against people.

  1. Does the documented prescription involve hazardous substances, bodily intervention, non-consenting targets or replacement of necessary care? action
  2. Could presenting this attribution as fact expose a person or group to harm, and how should the agent preserve its source and uncertainty? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of magic this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Kinds and varieties

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of magic this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of magic this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of magic this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of magic this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of magic this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Information and virtual systems
Entry kind
noun.cognition
Plane
INF
Domain
INF.KNW
Facets: substance
information
Facets: origin
conceptual
Facets: agency
inert
Facets: mobility
not-applicable
Facets: scale
not-applicable
Facets: affordances
readable
Other names and narrower kinds
juju, thaumaturgy, mojo, conjuring, conjuration, conjury, invocation, evocation, summoning, sorcery, black magic, black art

What it is Filled

Magic is a culturally situated category of practices intended to produce effects through the invocation or manipulation of supernatural powers, beings, or correspondences, whose boundaries with religion and other forms of knowledge vary historically and socially.

In scope

  • Criteria used to identify a practice as magic and who applies that designation
  • Supernatural powers, beings or agencies invoked within a practice's own account
  • Ritual prescriptions, symbolic correspondences and conditions of performance
  • Intended effects, reported outcomes and grounds for judging efficacy
  • Transmission, interpretive authority and restrictions on magical knowledge

Out of scope

  • Stage illusion and conjuring understood as entertainment through ordinary techniques
  • Religion as a whole, including its institutions and general doctrines
  • Practitioners as people, occupations or social groups
  • Physical properties and custody of ritual objects, substances and places
  • Individual ritual performances as events
  • Fictional magic systems presented solely as features of creative works

Why it exists Filled

Enable an agent to recognise, describe and assess practices registered as magic by recording their attributed supernatural powers, operative methods, cultural context and limits on interpretation or use.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Identify an attributed supernatural power and an art that invokes it; an unexplained occurrence alone does not satisfy the registry definition.
  • Separate claims of supernatural operation from performances explicitly framed as illusion, even when both use the word magic.
  • Record whether magic is a participant's designation, an observer's category or an accusation; the label alone does not establish agreement.
  • Do not classify a practice as magic solely because it includes prayer, ritual or symbolism; record the boundary convention used.
  • Distinguish descriptions of an asserted practice from fictional depictions and metaphorical uses such as a magical experience.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Present magical practice as an effective substitute for medical or psychiatric care.
  • Offer paid readings, spells or curses, or exploit people in fear or grief.
  • Support accusations of witchcraft against any person.
  • Describe a living tradition as primitive, fraudulent or satanic.

Only with a human decision

  • Publishing material about a community's closed or initiatory practices.

May

  • Describe magical practices as the communities that hold them describe them, with sources.
  • Explain scholarly debates about where magic, religion and science are drawn apart.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Witchcraft accusations still lead to violence and killing in several regions.
  • Vulnerable and grieving people are exploited by paid magical services.

Who is affected

  • People accused of witchcraft
  • Practitioners of traditional religions
  • Bereaved and desperate clients

Owners Filled

Steward

The communities and practitioners who hold each tradition; scholars curate the historical record.

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • oewn-05961357-n - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.magic
  • Open English WordNet: oewn-05976844-n

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

  • Basis of designation: self-designation | scholarly classification | external attribution | accusation | disputed | unspecified; multiple values allowed
  • Attributed supernatural agency: Links to named powers, beings or forces, with attribution and uncertainty
  • Intended effect: Record source terms; optional groupings include protection, healing, harm, divination, attraction, transformation and other
  • Mode of invocation: Record source terms; possible forms include spoken formula, inscription, gesture, offering, material preparation and combined performance
  • Conditions of operation: Links to prescribed timing, place, materials, practitioner qualifications, sequence and prohibitions
  • Tradition and transmission: Links to attributed traditions, teachers, texts and transmission accounts, each with provenance
  • Outcome evidence status: unassessed | testimony only | documented observation | comparative assessment | conflicting evidence; assigned per claim
  • Knowledge access conditions: public | permission required | restricted | contested | unknown

Plane INF: no invented physical properties.

Recognition not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

Magic is a culturally interpreted category of practices whose attributed supernatural basis cannot be established from visual appearance.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Classify a candidate practice against the registry definition while preserving disputed designations.
  • Compare accounts of magical operation without merging distinct traditions or asserting supernatural efficacy.
  • Trace a prescription or interpretation to its textual, oral or observational source.
  • Distinguish intended effects, reported experiences, observed outcomes and causal explanations.
  • Identify missing knowledge, access restrictions and practical risks before reproducing or acting on a prescription.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Relying on magical remedies delays effective medical treatment.
  • Accusations of witchcraft lead to persecution and violence.

Standards and interfaces not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

No universal technical standard or official classification governs magic as this broad cultural category independently of a specific practice or jurisdiction.

Context of use required Filled

  • Magic is encountered in culturally situated rituals, traditions and accounts that attribute effects to supernatural agency or correspondences.
  • Practitioners may intend these practices to provide protection, healing, divination or influence over events.
  • Historical and anthropological study examines those intentions and meanings without treating attributed supernatural effects as established facts.

Sources Filled

  1. Open English WordNet 2024, synset oewn-05976844-n - sense and gloss of the concept
  2. Wiktionary: magic - word senses and usage

Open questions

  • Which documented scholarly and participant conventions best delimit magic for this registry without imposing a universal boundary with religion?
  • How should arts described through impersonal occult properties be classified when their sources do not explicitly call those properties supernatural?
  • Which existing Vercy world models already cover this concept or its operative components and should be linked to avoid duplicate ownership?
  • Which sources and custodians can establish transmission, variant relationships and disclosure conditions for the traditions eventually represented?
  • What evidence is available for particular efficacy claims, and which claims remain untestable, insufficiently specified or unresolved?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-magic/spec.json