← Back to catalogue
Research draft

buddhist philosophy

vr.tr.buddhist-philosophy · ACT.PRC

Let an agent describe Buddhist philosophy and its main schools with attribution to the traditions own texts and to scholarship, distinguish philosophical schools from sects and practices, relay key concepts and debates neutrally, and route religious guidance to communities.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent describe Buddhist philosophy and its main schools with attribution to the traditions own texts and to scholarship, distinguish philosophical schools from sects and practices, relay key concepts and debates neutrally, and route religious guidance to communities.

The systems of thought developed within Buddhist traditions on the nature of reality, mind, knowledge, ethics and liberation, from the early Abhidharma analyses through Madhyamaka and Yogacara in India to the philosophical schools of Tibet, China, Japan and Southeast Asia; Buddhist philosophy is studied both within the traditions and in academic philosophy and religious studies.

What it is for: Understanding and articulating Buddhist views of reality, mind and liberation.

It can be explain main schools and concepts with attribution; distinguish philosophy from sect and practice; relay key texts and scholarship; present debates neutrally.

Distinguishing features

Rooted in Buddhist soteriology

Distinct schools and debates

Analyses of mind, causation and emptiness

Living traditions and academic study

What it looks like

Not visible; found in sutras, treatises, commentaries and modern scholarship.

How it is recognised

Philosophical systems within Buddhist traditions

Schools such as Abhidharma, Madhyamaka and Yogacara

Buddhist practice, monastic sects and Buddhist history are related but distinct

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

religious philosophy

is a kind of - a major tradition

Eastern philosophy

is part of - the religion

Buddhism

includes - a major school

Madhyamaka

In practice

Families and kinds

early Buddhist and Abhidharma philosophy

Madhyamaka

Yogacara and its East Asian forms such as Hosso

Buddhist logic and epistemology

Tibetan philosophical traditions

Zen and East Asian philosophical thought

modern and comparative Buddhist philosophy

Standards and regulation

No regulation; canonical collections and academic standards govern texts and interpretation

Failure modes and hazards

Presenting one school as the whole

Confusing philosophy with practice or sect

Imposing Western categories without attribution

Polemic in either direction

Also called

Three phases (Alaya-vijnana)YogacaraAlīkākāravādaEast Asian YogācāraKita-Hossō sectHossō-shū

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Schools The main schools.

Attribution.

Overview

Schools and concepts.

Overview

Overview.

  1. What are the main schools of Buddhist philosophy, and what do they teach, as the traditions and scholars describe? definition
  2. Is the question about philosophy, practice, a sect or history? boundary

Concepts

Key concepts.

Concepts

Concepts.

  1. What do concepts such as dependent origination, emptiness, non-self and mind-only mean in their schools? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific school? action
Texts Texts and sources.

Sources.

Canon

Canonical texts.

Canon

Canon.

  1. Which texts and treatises are foundational, and where are translations found? provenance
  2. Which entry fits a specific text? action

Scholarship

Academic study.

Scholarship

Scholarship.

  1. How do academic philosophers and religious studies scholars interpret the traditions, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral and attributed? boundary
Debates Debates and dialogue.

Attribution.

Internal

Debates within Buddhism.

Internal

Internal.

  1. What debates took place between schools, and how are they presented by each side? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Comparative

Dialogue with other philosophies.

Comparative

Comparative.

  1. How does Buddhist philosophy engage with Western philosophy and science, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits comparative philosophy? action
Context History and guidance.

Context.

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did Buddhist philosophy develop across India, Tibet and East Asia? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of Buddhism? action

Guidance

Practice and guidance.

Guidance

Guidance.

  1. How does philosophy relate to practice in the traditions? provenance
  2. Is the user seeking religious guidance, which the community provides? boundary

What the second pass must settle

  • Should each school be a separate entry?
  • How should canonical texts and translations be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming specific schools and Japanese sects; should they be split off?