← Back to catalogue
Research draft

definition

vr.tr.definition · INF.MED

Let an agent explain definitions and their kinds, relay rules for good definitions from logic and lexicography, describe formal definitions in ontologies and science, and distinguish definitions from descriptions and explanations.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain definitions and their kinds, relay rules for good definitions from logic and lexicography, describe formal definitions in ontologies and science, and distinguish definitions from descriptions and explanations.

A statement of the meaning of a term, concept or object, whether intensional by stating necessary and sufficient conditions, extensional by listing members, ostensive by pointing, stipulative, lexical or operational, used in dictionaries, law, mathematics, science and ontologies where concept definitions such as cell type definitions follow formal patterns; definitions can be circular or defective, are governed by logical rules, and their limits are debated in philosophy, including the many rival definitions of philosophy itself.

What it is for: Fixing the meaning of terms.

It can be explain kinds of definition; relay rules and pitfalls; describe formal definitions; distinguish from descriptions.

Distinguishing features

Genus and differentia

Kinds by method

Logical rules

Formal and informal uses

What it looks like

Not a visible object; statements of meaning.

How it is recognised

Statement of meaning

Intensional, extensional, ostensive, stipulative, lexical, operational, ontology concept definitions; circular definitions

A description characterises without fixing meaning; an explanation gives causes; an axiom is assumed

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

proposition

is studied in - and philosophy of language

logic

is used in - as lexical definitions

dictionary

is formalised in - for concepts

ontology

In practice

Families and kinds

intensional definitions

extensional and enumerative definitions

ostensive definitions

stipulative and precising definitions

lexical definitions

operational definitions

recursive and mathematical definitions

ontology concept definitions such as molecular cell type definitions

defective definitions such as circular definitions

Standards and regulation

ISO 704 and ISO 1087 on terminology and definitions

Ontology definition conventions such as genus-differentia patterns

Legal drafting rules for statutory definitions

Failure modes and hazards

Circular and too broad or narrow definitions

Confusing definitions with descriptions

Presenting contested philosophical definitions as settled

Also called

circular definitionpreviously published description or definitionintensional definitionmolecular cell type definitionontology concept definitionDefinitions of philosophynature of educationlegal definitiondefinition of indigenous peoplemathematical definitionReal meaningsynthetic definitionoperational definitionworking definitionstatistical definitiondefinition of planetdata element definitionWikidata property definitiondefinition of religionrecursive definitionlambda calculus definitionostensive definitioncircumscriptioncoordinative definitiondefinitions of Japanese war crimesdefinitions of abortionextensional definitionlexical definitionprecising definitionstipulative definitionTechnical definitiontheoretical definitionenumerative definition

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Also registered as vr.tr.definition-attribute

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What a definition is.

Definition.

Definition

Definition of definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is a definition, and how does it differ from a description, an explanation or an axiom? definition
  2. Is the question about definitions in general, a kind of definition or a specific term? boundary

Kinds

Kinds.

Kinds

Kinds.

  1. What are intensional, extensional, ostensive, stipulative, lexical and operational definitions? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific kind? action
Craft Writing definitions.

Practice.

Rules

Rules.

Rules

Rules.

  1. What rules make a good definition, and what faults such as circularity should be avoided? action
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Formal

Formal definitions.

Formal

Formal.

  1. How are definitions written in ontologies, terminology standards and science, such as cell type definitions? provenance
  2. Which entry fits ontology? action
Domains Domains.

Sources.

Law

Law and lexicography.

Law

Law.

  1. How do statutes and dictionaries define terms? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance

Mathematics

Mathematics.

Mathematics

Mathematics.

  1. How do mathematical and recursive definitions work? provenance
  2. Which entry fits mathematical definition? action
Context Philosophy and history.

Attribution.

Philosophy

Philosophy.

Philosophy

Philosophy.

  1. What do philosophers from Socrates and Aristotle to Wittgenstein say about definition, and why is philosophy itself defined in rival ways, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral and attributed? boundary

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did the theory of definition develop in logic and lexicography? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of logic? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should intensional definition and operational definition be separate entries?
  • How should terminology standards be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming defective forms and domain conventions; should they be split off?