← Back to catalogue
Research draft

Convallaria majalis

vr.tr.convallaria-majalis · PHY.LIV

Enable an AI agent to recognise Convallaria majalis, assess a specimen or colony through its seasonal cycle, and choose justified identification, cultivation, containment or exposure-response actions.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

Researched by: Codex + Grok

Purpose and description

Enable an AI agent to recognise Convallaria majalis, assess a specimen or colony through its seasonal cycle, and choose justified identification, cultivation, containment or exposure-response actions.

A rhizomatous, shade-tolerant perennial herb of Asparagaceae (APG), native to cool-temperate Eurasia, that typically bears two basal elliptic leaves and a one-sided raceme of nodding, six-tepalled, sweetly scented white campanulate flowers, and that accumulates cardenolide cardiac glycosides (notably convallatoxin) in every organ.

It can be Document diagnostic organs and seek a qualified determination when lookalikes remain unresolved; Map a colony and revisit fixed observations to assess emergence, flowering, decline and boundary movement; Adjust cultivation using recorded site conditions and locally applicable guidance; Divide or relocate identified rhizome stock when plant condition, site suitability and local rules support it; Restrict access to toxic material and route suspected ingestion to an appropriate poison or veterinary service; Contain or remove unwanted growth and monitor for recurrence from remaining underground material.

Distinguishing features

Inspect flower arrangement: small pendent bells on a separate, one-sided raceme support identification; require an explicit comparison with the candidate lookalike's flower arrangement. [NC State Extension](https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/convallaria-majalis/)

Trace leaves to their bases: typically paired basal, elliptic leaves with parallel veins support identification; document their attachment when comparing with Solomon's-seal or false lily-of-the-valley. [NC State Extension](https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/convallaria-majalis/)

Where examination is justified, establish that shoots arise from rhizomes; use underground structure alongside foliage when resolving confusion with bulb-bearing plants. [RHS plant profile](https://www.rhs.org.uk/plants/4327/convallaria-majalis/details)

When red berries are present, verify their attachment to the same plant and combine them with leaf and inflorescence evidence; berry colour alone is insufficient. [RHS plant profile](https://www.rhs.org.uk/plants/4327/convallaria-majalis/details)

For leaves suspected to be wild garlic or ramps, require a regional botanical key covering basal anatomy and reproductive characters; neither apparent resemblance nor an odour observation establishes edibility.

Scope

+ Identification evidence, competing identifications and confidence for flowering and nonflowering material

+ Relationships among shoots, rhizomes, planting stock and mapped colonies

+ Seasonal development, reproductive state and evidence of continued viability

+ Site conditions, plant damage and responses to cultivation

+ Toxic-plant exposure opportunities and locally justified cultivation or containment decisions

- Complete models of other Convallaria taxa and superficially similar plants

- Whole woodland, garden or invasive-species management programmes

- Human or veterinary diagnosis and treatment of poisoning

- Manufacture, dosage or efficacy of pharmaceutical extracts

- Perfume formulations, floral symbolism and commercial bouquet products

Characteristics

Identification confidence
unassessed | provisional | corroborated | disputed Controls whether species-specific actions are justified, particularly for detached leaves or dormant planting stock.
Taxonomic and horticultural attribution
Registry identity linked to an identified taxonomic authority, determination and cultivar claim Preserves the meaning of the name when authorities or supplier labels differ.
Observed plant unit
shoot | connected rhizome segment | mapped patch | detached material | planting-stock lot Prevents shoot counts from being interpreted as counts of genetically distinct plants.
Phenological state
dormant | emerging | vegetative | budding | flowering | fruiting | senescing | uncertain Determines which identification evidence and interventions are available.
Leaf and flowering-stalk dimensions
cm, with organ, observation date and sample size Supports identification and comparison without treating one horticultural size range as universal.
Flower and fruit expression
Observed colour, flower form, arrangement and fruit presence; absent and unobserved recorded separately Separates diagnostic evidence, cultivar variation and reproductive outcome.
Patch extent and change
m² occupied area and cm boundary displacement over a stated interval Supports assessment of persistence and spread beyond an intended planting.
Rhizome and bud condition
intact | damaged | desiccated | decay-suspected | emerging | unexamined Supports viability and propagation decisions when foliage is absent.
Root-zone moisture and light exposure
Moisture by stated method; direct-light hours/day or measured PAR Allows site conditions to be related to observed growth and decline.
Damage distribution
Percentage of sampled shoots or leaf area affected, with symptom description Distinguishes isolated damage from colony-wide deterioration.
Exposure opportunity
Plant material linked to accessible people, animals, food-growing areas or harvested material Turns the toxic-plant hazard into a specific access or handling decision.
Local occurrence and management status
Origin: planted | spontaneous | unknown; regional status and restrictions: authority-defined Prevents garden presence from being mistaken for native occurrence or universal permission to spread it.

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 6 bundles · 11 layers · 18 findings · 38 questions.

Identity and lookalikes Establish what material can defensibly be attributed to Convallaria majalis.

Vegetative resemblance and inconsistent naming can undermine every subsequent decision.

Taxonomic attribution

Connect the registry identity to a traceable determination.

Name and determination

Record the authority, evidence and limits behind the species and any cultivar attribution.

  1. Which taxonomic treatment defines Convallaria majalis for this determination? definition
  2. Who identified the material, using which voucher, photographs, key or supplier record? provenance
  3. Does a cultivar or alternative taxon label require qualification without creating another registry thing? boundary

Diagnostic comparison

Test visible characters against plausible alternatives.

Organ-level identification

Require a combination of characters and explicitly preserve unresolved alternatives.

  1. What leaf attachment, venation, flower arrangement and underground structure were actually observed? measurement
  2. Which characters distinguish this material from locally plausible Allium, Polygonatum, Maianthemum or other Convallaria candidates? boundary
  3. What additional observation or expert determination is needed before identification-dependent action? action
Rhizomes and colony boundaries Represent the plant as observable shoots and underground connections within a changing patch.

Rhizomatous colony formation makes a single visible shoot an unreliable boundary for the managed plant. [RHS plant profile](https://www.rhs.org.uk/plants/4327/convallaria-majalis/details)

Shoot and clone units

Separate directly observed plant units from inferred genetic individuality.

Unit and connectivity

Record what was counted or sampled and the evidence for connections among shoots.

  1. Does this record concern one shoot, a rhizome segment, a patch or a stock lot? definition
  2. Are shared rhizomes directly observed, inferred from proximity or unknown? provenance
  3. What evidence, if any, supports treating multiple shoots as one genetic individual? boundary

Patch movement

Track occupation of the intended planting area and neighbouring ground.

Extent and recurrence

Use comparable observations to distinguish stable occupancy, expansion and regrowth after intervention.

  1. What area and boundary does the patch occupy relative to fixed reference points? measurement
  2. Where have new shoots appeared since the previous comparable seasonal survey? measurement
  3. Which boundary crossings or recurrent shoots trigger containment or follow-up? action
Seasonal and reproductive state Interpret emergence, flowering, fruiting and foliage loss using dated local observations.

Deciduous foliage and seasonal flowering make absence of visible growth ambiguous. [RHS plant profile](https://www.rhs.org.uk/plants/4327/convallaria-majalis/details)

Seasonal viability

Distinguish expected seasonal change from uncertain survival.

Dormancy versus decline

Assess foliage loss and lack of emergence against the plant's observed history and underground evidence.

  1. Which developmental stage is present, on what date and at which location? measurement
  2. What distinguishes expected senescence or dormancy from damage or death in this case? boundary
  3. When should the plant be revisited before declaring it lost or replacing it? action

Flowering and fruiting

Record reproductive expression without assuming that every established patch produces fruit.

Reproductive output

Separate flowering performance, fruit formation and demonstrated seed viability.

  1. How many sampled shoots flowered, and how many flowering stalks subsequently carried fruit? measurement
  2. What is known about planting-stock origins and potential genetic differences among nearby plants? provenance
  3. What evidence distinguishes failed fruit set, lost fruit and observations made outside the fruiting period? boundary
Site fit and plant condition Relate observed performance to growing conditions and damage.

Shade and moist, humus-rich soil are cultivation reference conditions; local measurements are needed before attributing decline to site mismatch. [RHS plant profile](https://www.rhs.org.uk/plants/4327/convallaria-majalis/details)

Growing environment

Capture conditions experienced by foliage and rhizomes.

Site-performance fit

Compare measured conditions with observed emergence, leaf condition and flowering.

  1. What light exposure, root-zone moisture and drainage conditions occur during active growth? measurement
  2. Which changes in canopy, irrigation, soil disturbance or weather preceded altered performance? provenance
  3. What cultivation adjustment is justified, and which observation will indicate whether it helped? action

Damage and diagnosis

Separate observed injury from a proposed cause.

Symptom pattern and confidence

Locate damage by organ and across the patch before selecting an intervention.

  1. Which leaves, stalks, buds or rhizomes are affected, and what proportion of the sample shows each symptom? measurement
  2. What evidence distinguishes seasonal yellowing, environmental stress, feeding damage and disease? boundary
  3. Is monitoring sufficient, or is a diagnostic sample needed before treatment? action
Safe cultivation and containment Translate identification, condition, exposure and location into permissible next actions.

The plant is toxic if eaten, while colony spread can affect neighbouring plantings; management must account for both. [RHS plant profile](https://www.rhs.org.uk/plants/4327/convallaria-majalis/details)

Toxic material access

Record routes by which plant material could be ingested or confused with food.

Exposure prevention and routing

Identify accessible material and route suspected exposure without attempting clinical assessment.

  1. Can children, pets or foragers access leaves, berries, cut stems or discarded plant material? boundary
  2. What labelling, separation or access change would address the observed exposure opportunity? action
  3. If ingestion is suspected, which local poison or veterinary service should receive the plant identification, material, timing and exposure details? action

Propagation and removal decisions

Assess whether to retain, multiply, relocate or suppress the patch.

Locally justified intervention

Connect the intended outcome to stock identity, local status and a verifiable follow-up.

  1. Which dated local authority or land-management record establishes restrictions or conservation concerns at this site? provenance
  2. Do identity, rhizome condition, destination and local seasonal guidance support division or relocation? action
  3. If removal is chosen, how will rhizomes and contaminated soil be handled, and when will recurrence be checked? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Kinds and varieties

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  • Typical white-flowered European wild type (C. majalis var. majalis)
  • Pink-flowered garden forms (var./f. rosea, cv. Rosea)
  • Variegated-leaf cultivars (e.g. Albostriata, Aureovariegata, Vic Pawlowski's Gold)
  • Double or proliferous cultivars (Prolificans, Flore Pleno)
  • Large-flowered garden selections (e.g. Fortin's Giant)
  • East Asian lily-of-the-valley, often split as C. keiskei (or C. majalis var. keiskei)
  • Appalachian American lily-of-the-valley, usually treated as C. majuscula (formerly C. montana)
  1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Convallaria majalis this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Identifiers and schemes

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  • Wikidata - Q101818 - Item for the species Convallaria majalis (lily of the valley).
  • IPNI / LSID - urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:535792-1 - Linnaean name Convallaria majalis L., Sp. Pl. 1: 314 (1753).
  • Botanical binomial - Convallaria majalis L. - Accepted species name; genus often treated as one species or as two-three geographic segregates.
  • USDA PLANTS symbol - COMA3 - Symbol used in the USDA PLANTS database for Convallaria majalis.
  1. Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Convallaria majalis this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Standards and regulation

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  • German Commission E monograph on Convallariae herba as a cardenolide cardiac drug (historical; narrow therapeutic index) - Commission E / BfArM
  • Treated as a poisonous plant containing digitalis-like glycosides, not a food - national poisons centres and FDA poisonous-plant listings
  • French customary exemption allowing unlicensed street sale of muguet bunches on 1 May - French public-vending rules
  • Not CITES-listed; garden escapes listed as invasive in parts of northeastern North America - state invasive-plant councils
  1. Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Convallaria majalis this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  • Shade and woodland garden groundcover forming dense rhizome carpets
  • Cut-flower and florist trade, especially French 1 May muguet bunches
  • Bridal and wedding work as small white scented sprays
  • Perfumery: the 'muguet' note is almost always a synthetic reconstitution, because the flowers yield virtually no essential oil
  • Obsolete internal medicine for mild heart failure (convallatoxin), abandoned because safer standardised digitalis glycosides exist
  • Cultural emblem (Finland's national flower; Christian 'Our Lady's tears'; May Day in France)
  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Convallaria majalis this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  • Aerial shoot height - 15-30 - cm
  • Leaf blade length - 8-20 - cm
  • Flowers per raceme - 5-15 - count
  • Corolla length - 5-10 - mm
  • Ripe berry diameter - 6-12 - mm
  • Somatic chromosome number - 38 - 2n
  1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Convallaria majalis this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  • Ingestion of any organ causes digitalis-like cardiotoxicity (vomiting, bradycardia, AV block, ventricular arrhythmias); orange-red berries are a paediatric hazard
  • Foragers confuse the leaves with ramsons (Allium ursinum); a documented route to serious poisoning
  • Toxic to dogs, cats and livestock; vase water can also be hazardous
  • Aggressive rhizomatous spread that is hard to eradicate and can invade eastern North American woodland understorey
  • Medicinal use is unsafe relative to standardised digitalis glycosides because of a very narrow therapeutic index
  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Convallaria majalis this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  • Common names: lily of the valley (English), muguet (French), Maiglöckchen (German), kielo (Finnish, national flower), liljekonvalj (Swedish)
  • East Asia: usually treated as a separate species, C. keiskei, not as C. majalis s.str.
  • Southern Appalachians: native American lily-of-the-valley is C. majuscula, not the Eurasian garden plant
  • France uniquely treats it as a 1 May street flower with a vending custom
  • In much of Europe it is a native woodland herb; in most of North America it is a garden plant and local escape
  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Convallaria majalis this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  • Allium ursinum (ramsons / wild garlic) - Crush a leaf: garlic/onion odour is present in Allium and absent in Convallaria; flowers in an umbel versus a one-sided raceme of campanulate bells.
  • Maianthemum bifolium / M. canadense (false lily-of-the-valley) - Flowers tetramerous (four tepals) versus hexamerous (six); fruit typically pale or speckled, not a glossy orange-red berry.
  • Polygonatum spp. (Solomon's seal) - Flowers hang in axillary pairs along an arching leafy stem, not on a leafless scape beside two basal leaves.
  • Galanthus nivalis (snowdrop) - Solitary nodding flower with green marks on the inner tepals, two linear leaves, and an earlier bloom.
  • Convallaria keiskei - East Asian segregate with generally larger foliage and later anthesis; separated by provenance and by floras that split the genus, not by a single field character.
  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Convallaria majalis this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Sources

  1. Species Plantarum, vol. 1, p. 314 - Laurentius Salvius (C. Linnaeus, 1753) - Original valid publication of the binomial Convallaria majalis L. and the type concept of the species.
  2. Convallaria majalis L. - Plants of the World Online, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew - Accepted name, family placement in Asparagaceae, native range in temperate Eurasia, and IPNI LSID.
  3. Lily of the valley - Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation - Common names, garden cultivars, toxicity, cultural uses (including French 1 May muguet), and look-alike confusion with ramsons.
  4. Convallaria - Flora of North America, vol. 26, Oxford University Press / FNA Editorial Committee - North American status as a garden escape versus the distinct Appalachian taxon, and vegetative/floral characters used in floras.

What the second pass must settle

  • Which taxonomic authority should govern the boundary between Convallaria majalis and related Convallaria taxa where published treatments disagree?
  • Which regional identification key provides reliable distinctions from local edible lookalikes when flowers and fruit are absent?
  • What local phenological baseline and nondestructive evidence are sufficient to distinguish dormancy from mortality?
  • How strongly do clone identity, pollination conditions and cultivar affect fruit set and viable seed production in the population being modelled?
  • Which location-specific cultivation, containment and plant-waste practices are supported by evidence and applicable rules?