{ "model": { "rank": 5026, "code": "thing-q102877", "model_id": "vr.tr.castling", "name": "castling", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a proposed castling move, establish its legality under the applicable chess rules, and assess its execution and positional consequences.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q102877/", "tier": 2, "score": 70, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "opposite-side castling", "Pam–Krabbé castling", "castling on the kingside", "castling on the queenside" ], "aliasCount": 4, "merged": 4, "knownIn": 70, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q102877", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q102877", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T21:30:01Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08813-03b1-71a2-b6b3-3d4cd125931c\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: castling\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 005: 1001 regist", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 59.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08813-03b1-7892-85ec-c64cacde5ff9\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: castling\nRegistry id: vr.tr.castling\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContex" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q102877", "registryId": "vr.tr.castling", "name": "castling", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q102877/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.castling", "name": "castling", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a proposed castling move, establish its legality under the applicable chess rules, and assess its execution and positional consequences.", "definition": "Castling is a special chess move counted as a single king move in which the king and one rook are repositioned together, subject to restrictions on their prior movement, intervening pieces, and attacks on the king's starting, transit, and destination squares.", "scope_statement": "This model owns castling as a special chess action involving a player's king and a designated rook, including retained rights, position-dependent permission, execution and immediate consequences; standard chess and Chess960 must be distinguished explicitly.", "in_scope": [ "Identification of the king, designated rook and castling side", "Applicable ruleset and variant-specific castling interpretation", "Historical castling rights and present move legality", "Piece relocation, move recording and resulting position", "Immediate king-safety and rook-activation consequences" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete rules and state model for a chess game", "General king and rook movement outside castling", "Comprehensive opening theory and long-term position evaluation", "Tournament administration and general dispute procedures", "Unrelated senses of castles, fortification or defensive organisation" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The action is evaluated as one castling move involving a king and a designated rook, rather than two independent ordinary moves.", "Eligibility depends on retained castling rights as well as the current board position; matching piece locations alone cannot establish permission.", "The applicable rules impose castling-specific occupancy and king-safety conditions beyond ordinary destination-square legality.", "The ruleset determines the king and rook destinations; Chess960 requires recognition even when the arrangement differs from standard chess.", "A strategically desirable king relocation is not castling unless the move satisfies the applicable castling definition and conditions." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Applicable castling rules", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Governing rules document, edition and chess variant", "why_it_matters": "Determines which eligibility, relocation and execution conditions apply." }, { "name": "Acting side", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "White or Black", "why_it_matters": "Identifies the player, king and associated castling rights being evaluated." }, { "name": "Castling side", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Kingside or queenside, with an explicit variant-specific interpretation", "why_it_matters": "Selects the designated rook and intended final arrangement." }, { "name": "Designated king and rook", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "References to the participating pieces and their starting squares", "why_it_matters": "Prevents rights from being attributed to an unrelated rook or inferred solely from occupancy." }, { "name": "Historical castling right", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Retained, lost or unknown for each side of castling", "why_it_matters": "Separates historical eligibility from temporary obstacles to the move." }, { "name": "Relocation arrangement", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "King origin and destination; rook origin and destination", "why_it_matters": "Makes the proposed transition explicit, including unusual Chess960 arrangements." }, { "name": "Present legality", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Legal, illegal or undetermined, with condition-specific reasons", "why_it_matters": "Supports a justified decision about whether castling may occur now." }, { "name": "Execution status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Proposed, initiated, completed, rejected or disputed", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes an intended move from an accepted change to the game." }, { "name": "Positional consequence assessment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Favourable, neutral, unfavourable or unresolved, with evaluation basis", "why_it_matters": "Keeps strategic judgement separate from legal permission." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify a candidate castling move and its participating pieces.", "Reconstruct or flag uncertainty about castling rights.", "Check current legality and explain each failed or unresolved condition.", "Apply a legal castling transition and update the associated rights.", "Interpret or produce a castling record using a specified notation or interface.", "Compare immediate consequences of castling with available alternatives." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "castling-identity-and-rules", "name": "Castling identity and rules", "description": "Establishes which chess action is being considered and which authority defines it.", "rationale": "A castling decision is meaningful only relative to an identified variant and governing rule interpretation.", "layers": [ { "id": "action-recognition", "name": "Action recognition", "description": "Distinguishes castling from ordinary piece movement and ambiguous move input.", "findings": [ { "id": "candidate-castling-action", "name": "Candidate castling action", "description": "Record the acting player, intended castling side and evidence that the action is intended as castling.", "questions": [ { "text": "What identifies this proposal as castling rather than an ordinary king or rook move?", "kind": "definition", "id": "candidate-castling-action-q01" }, { "text": "Which player and castling side does the proposal specify?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "candidate-castling-action-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "governing-rules", "name": "Governing rules", "description": "Anchors the interpretation to a ruleset and variant.", "findings": [ { "id": "variant-and-authority", "name": "Variant and authority", "description": "Record the rule source that governs eligibility, destinations and move execution.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is this standard chess, Chess960 or another variant with its own castling provisions?", "kind": "definition", "id": "variant-and-authority-q01" }, { "text": "Which rules document and edition support the castling interpretation being applied?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "variant-and-authority-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-castling-rights", "name": "Historical castling rights", "description": "Tracks whether the player retains the right to castle with the designated rook.", "rationale": "The visible arrangement of pieces does not by itself establish castling rights.", "layers": [ { "id": "piece-history", "name": "Piece history", "description": "Connects the participating pieces to relevant prior moves and initial placement.", "findings": [ { "id": "king-and-rook-eligibility", "name": "King and rook eligibility", "description": "Record the designated pieces and the historical evidence needed to establish their eligibility.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which rook is associated with this castling right in the game's initial arrangement?", "kind": "definition", "id": "king-and-rook-eligibility-q01" }, { "text": "What move history establishes whether the king or designated rook has lost eligibility?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "king-and-rook-eligibility-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights-evidence", "name": "Rights evidence", "description": "Separates verified rights from rights asserted by an incomplete or imported position.", "findings": [ { "id": "retained-lost-or-unknown", "name": "Retained, lost or unknown", "description": "Record rights independently for each castling side, together with evidence gaps or contradictions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What supports the recorded right: complete game history, supplied position metadata or an explicit assumption?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "retained-lost-or-unknown-q01" }, { "text": "If supplied rights conflict with piece placement or move history, what must be resolved before accepting castling?", "kind": "action", "id": "retained-lost-or-unknown-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "position-dependent-legality", "name": "Position-dependent legality", "description": "Determines whether retained rights can be exercised in the present position.", "rationale": "A player may retain a castling right while occupancy or king-safety conditions temporarily prevent its use.", "layers": [ { "id": "relocation-and-occupancy", "name": "Relocation and occupancy", "description": "Identifies the required final arrangement and squares whose occupancy matters.", "findings": [ { "id": "required-squares", "name": "Required squares", "description": "Record both piece transitions and the variant-specific clearance conditions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the king's and rook's origin and destination squares for this castling side?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "required-squares-q01" }, { "text": "Which squares must be vacant, and how does the ruleset handle participating pieces already occupying relevant squares?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "required-squares-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "king-safety-conditions", "name": "King-safety conditions", "description": "Evaluates attacks relevant to castling permission.", "findings": [ { "id": "attacked-square-evaluation", "name": "Attacked-square evaluation", "description": "Record the attack checks required for the king and the board arrangements used to evaluate them.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which king squares must be checked for attack, and under which board arrangement is each check evaluated?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "attacked-square-evaluation-q01" }, { "text": "How does the governing rule define an attacked square when the attacking piece is constrained by its own king's safety?", "kind": "definition", "id": "attacked-square-evaluation-q02" }, { "text": "Which king-safety condition fails or remains unresolved for this candidate?", "kind": "action", "id": "attacked-square-evaluation-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "execution-and-game-record", "name": "Execution and game record", "description": "Connects an accepted castling decision to its physical or digital execution and resulting game state.", "rationale": "Correct recognition and legality checking must produce an unambiguous, correctly recorded move.", "layers": [ { "id": "move-execution", "name": "Move execution", "description": "Interprets how the player initiates and completes castling in the relevant playing environment.", "findings": [ { "id": "castling-input-and-completion", "name": "Castling input and completion", "description": "Record the execution convention and distinguish intention from completion.", "questions": [ { "text": "How must the player express castling on this physical board or digital interface?", "kind": "action", "id": "castling-input-and-completion-q01" }, { "text": "What establishes that the move is completed, and how is an ambiguous king-rook interaction resolved?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "castling-input-and-completion-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "resulting-state-and-notation", "name": "Resulting state and notation", "description": "Preserves the resulting placement, rights changes and castling identity in the game record.", "findings": [ { "id": "accepted-castling-transition", "name": "Accepted castling transition", "description": "Record the accepted move as a coherent game-state transition with a specified representation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Do the resulting piece locations and castling-right updates match the accepted move?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "accepted-castling-transition-q01" }, { "text": "Which notation or protocol records this castling move unambiguously, particularly in Chess960?", "kind": "action", "id": "accepted-castling-transition-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "castling-consequences-and-choice", "name": "Castling consequences and choice", "description": "Assesses whether an available castling move serves the player's immediate positional needs.", "rationale": "Legal castling is an option to evaluate, not sufficient evidence of improved king safety or a stronger position.", "layers": [ { "id": "king-and-rook-consequences", "name": "King and rook consequences", "description": "Examines the direct effects of relocating the two participating pieces.", "findings": [ { "id": "safety-and-activity-change", "name": "Safety and activity change", "description": "Record concrete changes in king exposure, pawn shelter and rook access after castling.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which attacking lines, pawn-cover features or immediate threats change around the king after castling?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "safety-and-activity-change-q01" }, { "text": "Which files, ranks or tactical interactions become available or unavailable to the relocated rook?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "safety-and-activity-change-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "timing-and-alternatives", "name": "Timing and alternatives", "description": "Compares castling now with delaying it or choosing another legal move.", "findings": [ { "id": "castling-choice-basis", "name": "Castling choice basis", "description": "Record the concrete alternatives and evidence behind a recommendation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What immediate threats or opportunities favour castling now, choosing the other side or delaying castling?", "kind": "action", "id": "castling-choice-basis-q01" }, { "text": "What analysis supports the recommendation, and which opponent replies could overturn it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "castling-choice-basis-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The intended sense is inferred to be the chess move.", "Movement distances given here apply to standard chess, not all Chess960 positions.", "Rule names and notation are recalled without source consultation; exact current wording and Chess960 edge cases should be checked before formal implementation." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of castling this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Kingside castling (short castling)", "Queenside castling (long castling)" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of castling this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Standard Algebraic Notation (SAN)", "value_or_pattern": "O-O", "note": "Kingside castling; uses capital letter O." }, { "scheme": "Standard Algebraic Notation (SAN)", "value_or_pattern": "O-O-O", "note": "Queenside castling; uses capital letter O." }, { "scheme": "Forsyth-Edwards Notation (FEN)", "value_or_pattern": "KQkq or a subset; - if none", "note": "The castling-availability field records retained rights for White and Black; retained rights do not mean castling is immediately legal." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of castling this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "FIDE Laws of Chess, issued by the International Chess Federation, specify castling movement and legality.", "FIDE Guidelines for Chess960 specify castling arrangements for Chess960 starting positions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of castling this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Moves the king toward a position intended to provide greater safety while bringing a rook closer to central files.", "Influences opening plans through the timing and choice of castling side.", "Provides opportunities for attacking play when opponents castle on opposite sides.", "Requires chess software to track castling rights separately from current piece positions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of castling this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "King displacement in standard chess castling", "typical_range": "2", "unit": "squares along the rank" }, { "quantity": "Rook displacement in standard chess castling", "typical_range": "2 on the kingside; 3 on the queenside", "unit": "squares along the rank" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of castling this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Castling is illegal if the king or the participating rook has previously moved, even if it has returned to its original square.", "Castling is illegal while the king is in check, through an attacked square, or onto an attacked square.", "In standard chess, any piece between the king and the participating rook prevents castling.", "An attacked rook does not itself prevent castling; confusing rook attacks with attacks on the king can produce incorrect legality decisions.", "A legal castling move can still expose the king to a strategically dangerous attack." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of castling this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Ordinary king move", "difference": "Normally moves the king one square without moving a rook; castling is a distinct move governed by additional conditions." }, { "name": "Artificial castling", "difference": "Repositions the king and rook through several ordinary moves rather than one special move." }, { "name": "Chess960 castling", "difference": "Uses variable starting squares but ends with the king on the c-file or g-file and the rook on the d-file or f-file; one participating piece may already occupy its destination." }, { "name": "Castling rights", "difference": "A retained entitlement based on movement history, distinct from whether castling is legal in the current position." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of castling this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which governing rules editions should the researched model support, and which castling variants beyond standard chess and Chess960 belong within this registry entry?", "What exact attack-evaluation procedure is required for Chess960 cases where rook relocation changes lines of attack or a participating piece already occupies its destination?", "How should incomplete game histories and contradictory imported castling-right metadata be adjudicated or represented as unresolved?", "Which physical execution conventions and digital move encodings need explicit treatment to distinguish castling from ordinary king or rook moves?", "What evidence and analysis depth are sufficient to support a strategic recommendation without presenting castling as automatically improving king safety?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 18, "questions": 29 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a castling, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise a proposed castling move, establish its legality under the applicable chess rules, and assess its execution and positional consequences.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: opposite-side castling, Pam–Krabbé castling, castling on the kingside, castling on the queenside.", "4 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 70 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a castling, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "opposite-side castling", "Pam–Krabbé castling", "castling on the kingside", "castling on the queenside" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 70 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 4 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one castling from another, and a castling from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a castling, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a castling, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a castling is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a castling, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a castling, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a castling is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a castling sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a castling, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a castling, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a castling is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a castling from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a castling, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a castling, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a castling is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a castling passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a castling between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a castling, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a castling, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a castling is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a castling, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a castling is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a castling, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a castling, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a castling is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a castling proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a castling, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a castling and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a castling, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a castling, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a castling is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a castling consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a castling takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a castling, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a castling, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a castling is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What castling is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of castling are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is castling operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of castling and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of castling?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as castling?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a castling came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a castling and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a castling, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a castling, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a castling is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a castling is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a castling, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a castling, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a castling is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }