← Back to catalogue
Published

anvil

vr.tr.anvil · thing-q104363

Enable an agent to recognise an anvil, assess its working surfaces and support, and judge its suitability for a proposed metalworking operation.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.OBJ

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 11 layers · 17 findings · 28 questions

Anvil identity Establish the metalworking sense and the boundaries of the anvil kind.

Working role

Identify the support function that makes the object an anvil.

Principal forming support

Record whether the object provides the working support against which metal is formed.

  1. What intended operation establishes this object as an anvil? definition
  2. Does it provide the principal working support, or is it an insert carried by another tool? boundary

Form and specialisation

Relate anvil form to its intended trade without treating a product design as the whole kind.

Documented anvil form

Record the form designation and the evidence connecting it to an intended use.

  1. Which trade or forming tasks is this anvil form intended to serve? definition
  2. What documentation supports the form designation rather than an identification based only on appearance? provenance
Working surfaces Describe the contact geometry available for supporting and shaping workpieces.

Face and edges

Characterise the usable face and its transitions.

Usable contact geometry

Record face dimensions, profile and edge radii in relation to proposed work.

  1. What are the usable face dimensions and measured departures from the intended profile? measurement
  2. Which edge sections and radii suit the proposed bend or shoulder without unwanted marking? action

Horns and secondary surfaces

Characterise projecting and stepped working areas where present.

Local forming profiles

Record horn profiles, steps and other surfaces without assuming that every surface accepts the same treatment.

  1. Which horns, steps or secondary working surfaces are present, and what are their dimensions? measurement
  2. Which operations are supported on each surface by the documented design or an appropriate assessment? action
Construction and response Represent the anvil body, working face and evidence of their response to use.

Body and face

Identify material construction and the relationship between the working surface and body.

Material and face evidence

Separate documented construction from visual guesses about material or hardening.

  1. What evidence identifies the body material and whether the face is integral or attached? provenance
  2. What hardness measurements or treatment records exist, and which working areas do they cover? measurement

Mass and working response

Capture mass and any assessed mechanical response with the conditions of assessment.

Response under stated conditions

Record working-response observations without using rebound or sound alone as a universal quality verdict.

  1. What is the anvil's measured or documented mass? measurement
  2. If rebound, vibration or acoustic response has been assessed, what method, location and mounting conditions were used? provenance
Tooling and support Describe how the anvil receives tooling and transfers working forces into its support.

Tool-receiving holes

Represent hardy holes, pritchel holes and other openings where present.

Tool fit and clearance

Record opening geometry and the clearance required by inserted tooling or punching work.

  1. What are the shape, dimensions and usable depth of each hole? measurement
  2. Does the proposed tool or punching operation have suitable fit and unobstructed clearance through the anvil and support? action

Base and mounting

Describe bearing surfaces and attachment to the supporting structure.

Stable working support

Assess the installed relationship between anvil, retention system and support.

  1. How does the base bear on the support, and how is the anvil retained? definition
  2. What assessment establishes adequate stability and access for the proposed work? action
Condition and use decisions Connect observed damage, repair history and operating constraints to specific use decisions.

Damage and repair history

Locate deterioration and distinguish it from intended working geometry.

Working-area condition map

Map damage and repaired areas so condition can be evaluated where contact will occur.

  1. Where are dents, chips, cracks, corrosion or suspected face separation, and what are their measured extents? measurement
  2. What records identify welding, grinding, resurfacing or heat treatment performed during repair? provenance

Operation-specific disposition

Determine permitted work and necessary precautions from the actual anvil and installation.

Permitted work and restrictions

Record the basis for use, restricted contact areas, further inspection or withdrawal.

  1. Which proposed combinations of striking tool, workpiece and contact area are supported by the available evidence? action
  2. What restrictions or protective measures are required for observed chipping risk, workpiece ejection, noise or mounting movement? action
  3. Which manufacturer instructions or applicable standards, identified by issuing body and scope, govern this use decision? provenance
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of anvil this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Kinds and varieties

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of anvil this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of anvil this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of anvil this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of anvil this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of anvil this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of anvil this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
thing
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.OBJ
Other names and narrower kinds
Turdus philomelos anvil, peening anvil

What it is Filled

An anvil is a passive tool with a hard working surface and a supporting body that resists hammer blows while metal or another workpiece is forged, shaped, straightened or otherwise worked.

In scope

  • Anvil forms used in forging, forming and related metalworking
  • Faces, horns, edges, steps and tool-receiving holes where present
  • Body and working-surface construction
  • Mass, working dimensions and mounting interfaces
  • Condition and suitability for specified tools, workpieces and operations

Out of scope

  • Hammers, presses and other tools that supply the working force
  • Forges, furnaces and workpiece heating processes
  • Removable hardy tools, stakes and other anvil accessories as separate tool kinds
  • Stands, foundations and workshop layouts as independently managed objects
  • Product lines, individual asset records and ownership histories
  • The anatomical incus, anvil clouds and anvils incorporated into measuring instruments

Why it exists Filled

Enable an agent to recognise an anvil, assess its working surfaces and support, and judge its suitability for a proposed metalworking operation.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Its intended working role is to support a workpiece and resist applied metalworking forces rather than deliver the blow.
  • Its working surfaces are intended for direct forming contact; a general bench or pedestal primarily supports equipment or materials.
  • Identification depends on working role and construction, not a horn-shaped silhouette: hornless anvils remain possible.
  • A flat reference surface alone does not establish an anvil; a surface plate is intended for inspection rather than hammer forming.
  • Distinguish a standalone anvil from a removable stake or forming insert by whether it provides the principal support body or is tooling carried by another support.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Strike or work metal on an anvil while people stand within reach of flying scale or fragments.
  • Use an anvil that is cracked, unsecured or mounted at an unsafe height.
  • Drop or move a heavy anvil without lifting equipment and a clear area.
  • Misrepresent a modern or cast iron anvil as an antique forged one in a sale.

Only with a human decision

  • Moving or lifting an anvil where people could be injured if it falls.

May

  • Describe anvils, their parts and their safe use in forging from craft sources.
  • Inspect an anvil for cracks, chipped edges or loose mounting and report them to its keeper.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Smithing is skilled work; injuries from flying metal and heavy loads fall on workers and onlookers.
  • Old anvils are heritage objects of local trades and forges.

Who is affected

  • Smiths and apprentices
  • Onlookers
  • Collectors

Owners Filled

Steward

The person or workshop that keeps it.

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q39546 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.anvil
  • Wikidata: Q104363 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q104363)

Direct properties required Filled

  • Intended metalworking role: general forging, bladesmithing, farriery, jewellery forming, other documented role, unknown
  • Body mass: kg
  • Working-face dimensions: usable length and width in mm
  • Working geometry: flat face, round horn, square horn, step, other documented surface; presence and arrangement
  • Body and face construction: documented material, integral or attached face, manufacturing method, unknown
  • Working-surface hardness: reported hardness with scale, test location and method; unknown if unverified
  • Tool-hole geometry: opening shape, dimensions and usable depth in mm; absent where applicable
  • Face and edge condition: mapped wear, dents, chips, cracks, corrosion and edge radii; unassessed
  • Mounting relationship: support type, bearing contact, retention method and observed movement
  • Service disposition: unassessed, suitable for specified operation, restricted, withdrawn pending assessment

Recognition required Filled

  • A massive steel or iron block with a flat hardened top face and a tapering horn at one end.
  • Square and round holes in the face for tools, often mounted on a stump or stand.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Select an appropriate face, horn or edge for a specified forming operation.
  • Check whether a removable tool fits an available hole and has adequate clearance.
  • Compare anvil dimensions, construction and condition against a proposed workpiece and striking method.
  • Assess mounting stability and identify adjustments needed before use.
  • Map damaged working areas and restrict operations that would load them.
  • Plan inspection, cleaning or specialist repair using documented construction and service history.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Crushing injuries if it falls or tips over.
  • Flying scale, chips or rebounding hammers that injure eyes and hands.
  • Noise from hammering that damages hearing.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, issued by the United Kingdom government, apply to anvils used as work equipment in Great Britain and address suitability, maintenance and safe use.

Context of use required Filled

  • Anvils provide rigid support for workpieces during forging, shaping, straightening and riveting.
  • They are encountered in blacksmithing, metalworking, jewellery making and repair workshops, with working surfaces selected for the scale and shape of the work.

Sources Filled

  1. Wikidata item Q104363: anvil - identity and sense of the item
  2. Wikipedia: Anvil - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Does the registry intend only standalone metalworking anvils, or also powered-hammer anvil blocks and other integral reaction supports?
  • Where should the catalogue draw the boundary between small anvils, bench blocks and removable forming stakes?
  • Which authoritative sources establish construction, hardness and dimensional ranges for the principal anvil forms?
  • Which standards or manufacturer criteria apply to tooling fit, mounting, inspection and service withdrawal, and do any certification marks apply?
  • What evidence is sufficient to assess suspected face separation or repaired working surfaces without relying on informal rebound or ringing tests?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q104363/spec.json