← Back to catalogue
Research draft

Sioux

vr.tr.sioux · SOC.PER

Let an agent explain the Oceti Sakowin peoples and their divisions using their own names, relay history, language and contemporary nations from tribal and scholarly sources with attribution, describe treaty rights and current issues neutrally, and distinguish the peoples from the Siouan language family and from stereotypes.

Thing Registry Society, people and institutions

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain the Oceti Sakowin peoples and their divisions using their own names, relay history, language and contemporary nations from tribal and scholarly sources with attribution, describe treaty rights and current issues neutrally, and distinguish the peoples from the Siouan language family and from stereotypes.

A group of Native American peoples of the northern Great Plains who call themselves the Oceti Sakowin, the Seven Council Fires, comprising the Dakota, including the Santee bands such as the Wahpeton and Wahpekute, the Nakota or Yankton and Yanktonai, and the Lakota, speaking closely related Siouan dialects and organised today in federally recognised nations such as the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Oglala Sioux Tribe and Standing Rock Sioux Tribe in the United States and First Nations in Canada; the name Sioux is an exonym of Ojibwe origin, and many prefer their own nation names.

What it is for: Not applicable; peoples.

It can be explain divisions and names; relay history and language; describe nations and rights; distinguish from language family.

Distinguishing features

Seven Council Fires

Dakota, Nakota, Lakota divisions

Plains culture and history

Treaty nations today

What it looks like

Not a visible object; peoples of the northern Plains.

Physical character

enrolled citizens: over 170000 count - estimates across nations

Fort Laramie Treaty: 1868 year - Great Sioux Reservation

federally recognised Sioux nations: about 16 count - in the US

How it is recognised

Oceti Sakowin peoples: Dakota, Nakota and Lakota

Santee Dakota bands such as Wahpeton and Wahpekute, Yankton, Lakota, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and other nations

The Siouan language family is wider; Cheyenne and Crow are distinct peoples

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

indigenous peoples of North America

speaks - Dakota and Lakota dialects

Sioux language

is party to - with the United States

Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868

is organised as - among other nations

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe

In practice

Families and kinds

Dakota including the Santee bands Mdewakanton, Wahpekute, Wahpeton and Sisseton

Nakota or Western Dakota including Yankton and Yanktonai

Lakota including the Oglala, Sicangu, Hunkpapa and other bands

contemporary nations such as the Cheyenne River, Oglala, Rosebud and Standing Rock Sioux Tribes

Dakota and Lakota First Nations in Canada

Standards and regulation

Treaties and federal Indian law in the United States

Canadian Indian Act and treaties

Tribal constitutions and sovereignty

Repatriation and cultural protection laws such as NAGPRA

Failure modes and hazards

Using the exonym without noting self-designations

Stereotyping Plains peoples

One-sided accounts of conflicts and treaties

Conflating peoples with the language family

Also called

Dakota peopleCheyenne River Sioux TribeLakota peopleSantee DakotaWahpetonWahpekuteSisseton Wahpeton OyateMdewakantonYankton Sioux TribeHunkpapaRosebud Sioux TribeMiniconjouOglala LakotaSicanguShakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand Who the Oceti Sakowin are.

Attribution.

Definition

Names and divisions.

Definition

Definition.

  1. Who are the Oceti Sakowin, what are the Dakota, Nakota and Lakota divisions and bands, and why is Sioux an exonym? definition
  2. Is the question about the peoples, a specific nation, the language or a stereotype? boundary

Nations

Nations today.

Nations

Nations.

  1. What are the federally recognised nations and Canadian First Nations, and how do they govern themselves? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific nation? action
Culture Language and culture.

Sources.

Language

Language.

Language

Language.

  1. What are the Dakota and Lakota dialects, and what revitalisation efforts exist? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Traditions

Traditions.

Traditions

Traditions.

  1. What are key cultural traditions, spirituality and arts, presented with respect and as the peoples describe them? provenance
  2. Is the presentation respectful and attributed? boundary
History History.

Attribution.

Past

History.

Past

Past.

  1. How did the peoples move onto the Plains, and what happened in the treaties, wars and events such as Wounded Knee, as tribal and academic historians describe? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance

Treaties

Treaties and land.

Treaties

Treaties.

  1. What do the Fort Laramie treaties and the Black Hills claim involve, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary
Context Today.

Context.

Issues

Current issues.

Issues

Issues.

  1. What contemporary issues, from Standing Rock to health and economic development, do the nations raise, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific issue? action

People

Notable people.

People

People.

  1. Who are notable Dakota, Nakota and Lakota people, historical and contemporary? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific person? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should Dakota, Lakota and the individual nations be separate primary entries?
  • How should tribal and scholarly sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming bands and a specific nation; should they be split off?