← Back to catalogue
Research draft

self-esteem

vr.tr.self-esteem · ACT.PRC

Let an agent explain self-esteem as a psychological construct, relay measurement, development and research findings from psychological sources with attribution, describe debates about its effects and about self-esteem programmes, and distinguish self-esteem from self-concept, self-efficacy, confidence and narcissism.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain self-esteem as a psychological construct, relay measurement, development and research findings from psychological sources with attribution, describe debates about its effects and about self-esteem programmes, and distinguish self-esteem from self-concept, self-efficacy, confidence and narcissism.

A person s overall subjective evaluation of their own worth, encompassing beliefs about oneself and emotional states such as pride or shame, measured explicitly by questionnaires such as the Rosenberg scale and implicitly through automatic associations as implicit self-esteem, studied in psychology in relation to development, mental health, achievement and relationships; self-esteem varies in level and stability, and its causes, consequences and the value of programmes to raise it are debated.

What it is for: Not applicable; a psychological construct.

It can be explain the construct; relay measurement and research; describe debates; distinguish related constructs.

Distinguishing features

Evaluative

Explicit and implicit

Level and stability

Developmental change

What it looks like

Not a visible object; an evaluation of self-worth.

Physical character

Rosenberg scale: 10 items note - 1965

typical trajectory: rises through adulthood, declines in old age note - meta-analyses

How it is recognised

Evaluation of one s own worth

Explicit self-esteem, implicit self-esteem, global and domain-specific self-esteem

Self-concept is descriptive; self-efficacy is belief in ability; narcissism is grandiose self-regard

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

self-image

is measured by - among others

Rosenberg self-esteem scale

is contrasted with - belief in one s ability

self-efficacy

is contrasted with - grandiose self-regard

narcissism

In practice

Families and kinds

global self-esteem

domain-specific self-esteem

explicit self-esteem measured by questionnaires

implicit self-esteem measured by association tasks

state and trait self-esteem

contingent and stable self-esteem

Standards and regulation

No regulation; psychometric standards for measures

Failure modes and hazards

Agents giving personal psychological advice

Presenting self-esteem as a cure-all

Confusing self-esteem with confidence or narcissism

Cultural bias in measures

Also called

implicit self-esteem

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What self-esteem is.

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is self-esteem, and how does it differ from self-concept, self-efficacy, confidence and narcissism? definition
  2. Is the question about the construct, research or a personal concern? boundary

Kinds

Kinds.

Kinds

Kinds.

  1. What are global, domain-specific, explicit, implicit, state and trait self-esteem? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific kind? action
Science Research.

Attribution.

Measurement

Measurement.

Measurement

Measurement.

  1. How is self-esteem measured explicitly and implicitly, and how valid are the measures? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Findings

Findings.

Findings

Findings.

  1. What does research show about self-esteem s development, causes and consequences, with findings attributed? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Debate Debates and practice.

Attribution.

Debates

Debates.

Debates

Debates.

  1. What debates exist about the benefits of high self-esteem and the self-esteem movement, with positions such as Baumeister s attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary

Support

Support.

Support

Support.

  1. What approaches such as cognitive behavioural therapy and self-compassion address low self-esteem, in general terms? provenance
  2. Is the user seeking personal help, which needs a qualified professional? boundary
Context Culture and history.

Context.

Culture

Culture.

Culture

Culture.

  1. How does self-esteem vary across cultures, with findings attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits cultural psychology? action

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did the concept develop from William James to modern psychology? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of psychology? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should implicit self-esteem be a separate entry?
  • How should psychological sources be linked?
  • How should debates about self-esteem programmes be recorded?