{ "model": { "rank": 3073, "code": "thing-q11547", "model_id": "vr.tr.cosmic-radiation", "name": "cosmic radiation", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a cosmic radiation field, assess its relevance to an exposed target, and determine which monitoring, modelling or exposure-control actions are justified by the available evidence.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q11547/", "tier": 2, "score": 91, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "ultra-high-energy cosmic ray", "extragalactic cosmic ray", "galactic cosmic ray" ], "aliasCount": 3, "merged": 3, "knownIn": 91, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q11547", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11547", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:37:42Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.00787134, "turns": 1, "seconds": 123.3, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 89.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c49-5281-7d60-88df-e268d8237dfa\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: cosmic radiation\nRegistry id: vr.tr.cosmic-radiation\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry:" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q11547", "registryId": "vr.tr.cosmic-radiation", "name": "cosmic radiation", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q11547/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.cosmic-radiation", "name": "cosmic radiation", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a cosmic radiation field, assess its relevance to an exposed target, and determine which monitoring, modelling or exposure-control actions are justified by the available evidence.", "definition": "Ionizing radiation of extraterrestrial origin, comprising primary high-energy charged particles (mainly protons and heavier nuclei from galactic and solar sources) and the secondary hadronic and electromagnetic cascade they produce in atmospheres, shielding, or tissue.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the identity, composition, distribution, variability and propagation of radiation attributed to energetic particles of extraterrestrial origin, including secondary radiation linked to their interactions with matter; use of the term for astronomical electromagnetic radiation requires an explicit boundary decision.", "in_scope": [ "Attribution of a radiation field to galactic, solar or other evidenced extraterrestrial particle populations", "Primary particle composition, energy spectrum, directionality and spatial distribution", "Secondary radiation produced in atmospheres, shielding or other material along an identified propagation path", "Changes in the field across observation periods, locations and environmental conditions", "Target-specific exposure estimates and evidence supporting monitoring or mitigation decisions" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Astronomical electromagnetic backgrounds and source emissions without an established connection to the modelled particle radiation", "Terrestrial radioactive sources and artificial radiation generators", "The complete dynamics of solar eruptions, stellar systems or other source objects", "Detector design, maintenance and calibration procedures as independently managed instruments", "Clinical outcomes, biological response models and electronic component reliability models", "Vehicle, habitat or facility engineering beyond its effect on the modelled radiation field" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Recognition requires evidence or an explicit hypothesis of extraterrestrial particle origin; a detector count alone does not distinguish cosmic radiation from terrestrial or instrumental background.", "A radiation component must be identified as an incident primary population or as a secondary linked to an interaction path, rather than grouping every detected species under an unspecified cosmic origin.", "Solar energetic particle attribution must be distinguished from galactic cosmic ray attribution using supporting observations, with unresolved mixtures retained as uncertain.", "A photon measurement belongs within this scope only when linked to the modelled particle population or its interactions; an astronomical direction of arrival alone is insufficient.", "A target dose or device upset is treated as a response to radiation, not as an interchangeable description of the incident particle field." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Population attribution", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Galactic; solar energetic particles; other evidenced extraterrestrial origin; mixed; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines which source interpretation and variability assumptions an agent may use." }, { "name": "Particle composition", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Identified species, nuclear charge or isotope where resolved; unresolved component", "why_it_matters": "Separates radiation components with different transport and target-response behaviour." }, { "name": "Primary or secondary relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Incident population, parent population, interaction medium and resulting component", "why_it_matters": "Preserves the connection between extraterrestrial origin and radiation measured after interactions." }, { "name": "Energy spectrum", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Energy bins in eV or declared multiples; explicitly distinguish energy per particle from energy per nucleon", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison and transport calculations without conflating incompatible energy conventions." }, { "name": "Differential directional intensity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Particles per square metre per second per steradian per declared energy interval, with area convention stated", "why_it_matters": "Describes field strength while preserving energy and angular dependence." }, { "name": "Observation position and interval", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Coordinate frame, position or trajectory, start time, end time and time standard", "why_it_matters": "Prevents observations from different environments or periods being treated as the same field." }, { "name": "Angular distribution", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Direction bins or anisotropy measure with reference frame and acceptance stated", "why_it_matters": "Supports interpretation of directional exposure and instrument coverage." }, { "name": "Intervening material", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Material composition, geometry and traversed areal density in g/cm²", "why_it_matters": "Connects an incident field to attenuation, transformation and secondary production." }, { "name": "Temporal field state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Reference background; elevated; declining; variable; indeterminate, relative to a stated baseline", "why_it_matters": "Supports monitoring decisions without assuming a universal definition of an event." }, { "name": "Target response estimate", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Declared quantity such as absorbed dose in Gy, dose equivalent in Sv or device-event rate; target and method required", "why_it_matters": "Connects radiation conditions to an applicable decision while keeping distinct response quantities separate." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify an observed field by likely cosmic particle population while retaining competing attributions.", "Compare particle spectra and intensities across locations or periods after checking measurement conventions.", "Trace secondary components through an evidenced or modelled interaction path.", "Estimate exposure for a specified person, material or device using an applicable transport and response model.", "Evaluate changes to shielding, route, orientation or timing against a defined exposure objective.", "Trigger additional observation or review when field changes exceed a declared criterion or evidence becomes insufficient." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "icrp-132", "title": "Radiological Protection from Cosmic Radiation in Aviation (ICRP Publication 132), International Commission on Radiological Protection", "url": "https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20132", "what_it_supports": "Definition of the aviation cosmic field, aircrew dose practice, latitude/altitude/solar-cycle dependence, and ICRP recommendations", "url_status": "live" }, { "id": "iso-15390", "title": "ISO 15390:2004 Space environment (natural and artificial) - Galactic cosmic rays, International Organization for Standardization", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "GCR as a named space-environment quantity, particle composition, and the standard model used in spacecraft design" }, { "id": "unscear-2008-b", "title": "UNSCEAR 2008 Report, Volume I, Annex B: Exposures of the public and workers from various sources of radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Sea-level and aviation dose rates, public exposure from cosmic radiation, and occupational aircrew doses" }, { "id": "icru-84", "title": "ICRU Report 84: Reference Data for the Validation of Doses from Cosmic-Radiation Exposure of Aircraft Crew, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Quantities and reference values used to measure and calculate aircraft-crew cosmic-radiation dose" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "cosmic-origin-and-boundaries", "name": "Cosmic origin and boundaries", "description": "Establishes what radiation population is being represented and why it belongs to this registered thing.", "rationale": "An agent must distinguish cosmic particle radiation from unrelated radiation and avoid treating source attribution as an observation.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-population", "name": "Source population", "description": "Captures the evidence and uncertainty behind extraterrestrial origin and population assignment.", "findings": [ { "id": "population-attribution", "name": "Population attribution", "description": "Records the proposed population and the observations supporting or challenging that interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observations support galactic, solar or another extraterrestrial particle origin for this field?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "population-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Which terrestrial, instrumental or alternative extraterrestrial explanations remain unresolved?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "population-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "radiation-lineage", "name": "Radiation lineage", "description": "Separates incident particles from secondary radiation and neighbouring radiation concepts.", "findings": [ { "id": "primary-secondary-membership", "name": "Primary and secondary membership", "description": "Identifies each component's role relative to a declared interaction boundary.", "questions": [ { "text": "At which boundary is this component called primary, and which components are treated as secondary?", "kind": "definition", "id": "primary-secondary-membership-q01" }, { "text": "What observation or transport calculation links each included secondary component to the incident cosmic particle population?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "primary-secondary-membership-q02" }, { "text": "Are photons included because of a particle-interaction lineage, or does their inclusion require a broader definition of cosmic radiation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "primary-secondary-membership-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "particle-field-description", "name": "Particle field description", "description": "Describes the particle population in quantities suitable for recognition, comparison and calculation.", "rationale": "A single radiation level cannot preserve the composition, energy and direction information needed to interpret a cosmic radiation field.", "layers": [ { "id": "composition-and-energy", "name": "Composition and energy", "description": "Identifies resolved particle components and their energy distributions.", "findings": [ { "id": "species-resolved-spectrum", "name": "Species-resolved spectrum", "description": "Records what particle and energy distinctions the evidence can actually support.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which particle species or nuclear groups are resolved, and which are combined or unidentified?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "species-resolved-spectrum-q01" }, { "text": "What energy range and binning are supported, and is energy expressed per particle or per nucleon?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "species-resolved-spectrum-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "intensity-and-direction", "name": "Intensity and direction", "description": "Defines field magnitude and angular coverage without confusing instrument output with a physical field quantity.", "findings": [ { "id": "normalised-field-quantity", "name": "Normalised field quantity", "description": "Makes the reported intensity, flux or fluence interpretable and comparable.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the reported value a count rate, directional intensity, integrated flux or fluence, and what area, time, energy and solid-angle conventions apply?", "kind": "definition", "id": "normalised-field-quantity-q01" }, { "text": "Which directions were observed, and what evidence supports extrapolation into unobserved directions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "normalised-field-quantity-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "environment-and-transport", "name": "Environment and transport", "description": "Connects the field at a stated location to magnetic conditions, atmosphere and intervening materials.", "rationale": "An agent cannot transfer a cosmic radiation measurement between environments without accounting for the path and transformations involved.", "layers": [ { "id": "location-and-access", "name": "Location and access", "description": "Locates the radiation field and identifies environmental assumptions affecting particle access.", "findings": [ { "id": "environmental-reference", "name": "Environmental reference", "description": "Anchors observations or predictions to a position, trajectory and relevant field conditions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where and when does this field description apply, including altitude or atmospheric depth where relevant?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "environmental-reference-q01" }, { "text": "Which magnetic-access or modulation assumptions were used, and what evidence establishes their applicability here?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "environmental-reference-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "material-interactions", "name": "Material interactions", "description": "Represents changes between an incident field and a field behind atmosphere or shielding.", "findings": [ { "id": "transport-and-secondary-production", "name": "Transport and secondary production", "description": "Records the material path and evidence used to estimate transmitted and newly produced components.", "questions": [ { "text": "What material composition, geometry and traversed areal density separate the reference field from the target?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "transport-and-secondary-production-q01" }, { "text": "Which transport method accounts for transmitted particles and secondary production, and where has it been validated?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "transport-and-secondary-production-q02" }, { "text": "Does a proposed shielding change improve the selected target-response quantity when secondary components are included?", "kind": "action", "id": "transport-and-secondary-production-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observation-and-field-state", "name": "Observation and field state", "description": "Establishes how confidently a field is known and whether its current behaviour differs from a relevant reference.", "rationale": "Cosmic radiation decisions require an agent to separate physical variation from detector limitations and modelling assumptions.", "layers": [ { "id": "measurement-support", "name": "Measurement support", "description": "Links field estimates to instrument response, corrections and uncertainty.", "findings": [ { "id": "counts-to-field-evidence", "name": "Counts-to-field evidence", "description": "Documents how observations support the reported particle field.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which detector response, acceptance, background subtraction and dead-time corrections connect recorded counts to the reported field?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "counts-to-field-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which uncertainty, detection limit, saturation condition or unresolved particle discrimination limits interpretation?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "counts-to-field-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "temporal-interpretation", "name": "Temporal interpretation", "description": "Defines reference conditions, departures and the period for which a state assessment remains applicable.", "findings": [ { "id": "background-and-event-state", "name": "Background and event state", "description": "Records changes against a comparable baseline without assigning a source from timing alone.", "questions": [ { "text": "What baseline, averaging interval and energy range define an elevated or changing field at this location?", "kind": "definition", "id": "background-and-event-state-q01" }, { "text": "Could the apparent change arise from trajectory, detector configuration or data gaps rather than a changing particle population?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "background-and-event-state-q02" }, { "text": "What new observation or elapsed interval requires the field-state assessment to be refreshed?", "kind": "action", "id": "background-and-event-state-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "target-exposure-and-decisions", "name": "Target exposure and decisions", "description": "Connects a characterised field to a specified exposed target and a justified operational response.", "rationale": "The same field description can support different decisions for people, instruments and materials; the target and response model must be explicit.", "layers": [ { "id": "exposure-translation", "name": "Exposure translation", "description": "Determines the response quantity relevant to the target and the evidence supporting its calculation.", "findings": [ { "id": "target-specific-response", "name": "Target-specific response", "description": "Keeps incident radiation, accumulated exposure and predicted consequences distinct but connected.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which target, exposure duration and response quantity are being assessed?", "kind": "definition", "id": "target-specific-response-q01" }, { "text": "Which conversion coefficients or response model translate the particle field into that quantity, and do they cover the observed species and energies?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "target-specific-response-q02" }, { "text": "How do field and transport uncertainties affect the target-response estimate?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "target-specific-response-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operational-response", "name": "Operational response", "description": "Identifies available interventions and the criteria for selecting or revisiting them.", "findings": [ { "id": "exposure-control-choice", "name": "Exposure-control choice", "description": "Records the evidence connecting an operational change to a target-specific objective.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which applicable criterion justifies continued operation, additional monitoring or an exposure-reduction action?", "kind": "action", "id": "exposure-control-choice-q01" }, { "text": "Which feasible change in shielding, location, route, orientation or timing is predicted to improve the selected response quantity?", "kind": "action", "id": "exposure-control-choice-q02" }, { "text": "What follow-up measurement would confirm that the chosen action achieved its intended effect?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "exposure-control-choice-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Galactic cosmic rays (GCR): a near-isotropic, high-energy nuclear flux from outside the solar system, solar-cycle modulated", "Solar energetic particles (SEP) / solar particle events: episodic, mainly proton bursts from flares and coronal mass ejections", "Anomalous cosmic rays (ACR): interstellar pickup ions accelerated at the heliospheric termination shock", "Atmospheric secondary cosmic radiation: the muon, neutron, electron, photon and pion field at aircraft and ground altitudes", "Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECR): the observational class above about 10^18 eV", "Albedo secondaries: upward-directed particles from atmosphere or planetary surface, often budgeted with the cosmic field in spacecraft" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of cosmic radiation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Wikidata", "value_or_pattern": "Q186116", "note": "Item for cosmic ray; cosmic radiation as an exposure field is treated as the same phenomenon in most catalogues" }, { "scheme": "MeSH", "value_or_pattern": "D003383", "note": "Heading Cosmic Radiation" }, { "scheme": "ISO standard designation", "value_or_pattern": "ISO 15390", "note": "Names the galactic-cosmic-ray environment used in space engineering" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of cosmic radiation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "ICRP Publication 132 (ICRP) - radiological protection from cosmic radiation in aviation", "ICRP Publication 123 (ICRP) - assessment of radiation exposure of astronauts in space", "Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom, Article 35 (EU) - assessment of cosmic-radiation exposure of aircraft crew", "ISO 15390:2004 (ISO) - galactic cosmic ray environment model", "IEC 62396 series (IEC) - atmospheric radiation effects on avionics", "ECSS-E-ST-10-04 (ESA/ECSS) - space-environment standard including cosmic rays", "NASA spaceflight human-system standard NASA-STD-3001 (NASA) - crew ionizing-radiation limits", "FAA Advisory Circular 120-61B (FAA) - in-flight radiation exposure guidance for US operators", "NCRP Reports 132 and 153 (NCRP) - radiation protection for LEO and beyond-LEO missions" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of cosmic radiation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Occupational exposure of airline crew and some frequent flyers, assessed with route-dose codes (e.g. EPCARD, CARI, SIEVERT) rather than worn dosimeters on every flight", "Design driver for spacecraft shielding, storm shelters, and EVA planning against GCR and SEP", "Single-event-effect qualification of aircraft and satellite electronics against atmospheric and space cosmic-ray secondaries", "Background term in low-level radiation measurements, muon tomography, and underground physics (muon flux after overburden)", "Public natural-background component in national dose inventories, rising with altitude and geomagnetic latitude" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of cosmic radiation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Ambient dose equivalent rate H*(10) at sea level", "typical_range": "0.03-0.06", "unit": "µSv/h" }, { "quantity": "Ambient dose equivalent rate at civil-aviation cruise (10-12 km)", "typical_range": "2-10", "unit": "µSv/h" }, { "quantity": "Annual effective dose, typical aircrew", "typical_range": "1-6", "unit": "mSv/a" }, { "quantity": "Public annual effective dose from cosmic radiation at sea level", "typical_range": "0.3-0.4", "unit": "mSv/a" }, { "quantity": "Integral GCR flux (E ≳ 100 MeV, 1 AU, solar minimum, outside magnetosphere)", "typical_range": "about 4", "unit": "cm⁻² s⁻¹" }, { "quantity": "Primary particle energy (GCR)", "typical_range": "10^8-10^20", "unit": "eV" }, { "quantity": "Radiation weighting / quality factor of the field", "typical_range": "1 (muons, photons) to ~20 (neutrons, HZE ions)", "unit": "dimensionless" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of cosmic radiation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Acute radiation syndrome and mission abort risk to inadequately sheltered crews in a rare, intense solar particle event", "Stochastic cancer risk and, for deep-space crews, tissue and central-nervous-system concerns from chronic GCR (high-Z high-energy ions)", "Single-event upset, latch-up and burnout in avionics, satellites and ground high-reliability electronics", "Underestimated aircrew dose on polar, high-altitude or solar-minimum routes if a code or geomagnetic model is wrong", "False attribution of aircraft or cabin readings to onboard sources when the cosmic field is the actual driver" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of cosmic radiation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Geomagnetic cutoff: polar routes receive a substantially higher dose than equatorial routes at the same altitude", "Solar-cycle modulation: GCR dose is higher at solar minimum; SEP risk is higher near solar maximum", "National practice: EU member states must arrange aircrew cosmic-dose assessment under Euratom; US practice is advisory (FAA) rather than the same statutory monitoring", "Altitude of residence: high cities (e.g. Andes, Tibetan Plateau) have a larger public cosmic component than sea-level populations", "South Atlantic Anomaly is often discussed with space radiation but is trapped-belt, not cosmic, and is geographically specific" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of cosmic radiation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Trapped (Van Allen) radiation", "difference": "Magnetically confined electrons and protons in the belts, including the South Atlantic Anomaly; separated from cosmic radiation by energy spectrum, pitch-angle distribution, and confinement to geomagnetic L-shells" }, { "name": "Solar wind", "difference": "Bulk plasma at ~keV energies that defines the heliosphere; cosmic radiation is the GeV-EeV minority population. Separate by energy threshold and isotropy (GCR) versus flow (wind)" }, { "name": "Cosmic microwave background", "difference": "A 2.7 K photon field, not an ionizing particle radiation field; no dose-rate contribution in radiation-protection inventories" }, { "name": "Terrestrial natural radiation (radon, primordial radionuclides, terrestrial gamma)", "difference": "Originates in crust and indoor air; cosmic dose rises with altitude and latitude and cannot be reduced by radon mitigation" }, { "name": "Anthropogenic ionizing radiation (medical, industrial, fallout)", "difference": "Has identifiable sources, nuclides and time signatures; cosmic radiation is a continuous, particle-cascade field with a characteristic muon/neutron mix at depth" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of cosmic radiation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend cosmic radiation to mean cosmic particle radiation and its secondaries, or also astronomical electromagnetic radiation?", "Should trapped extraterrestrial particle populations be owned here or represented by a neighbouring radiation-belt model?", "Which existing Vercy world models already own source events, radiation fields or exposure assessment, and should this entry link to one of them?", "Which authoritative references and validated datasets should establish the supported particle populations, energy ranges and transport environments?", "Which target-specific decision criteria and uncertainty requirements must be researched before this draft can support operational actions?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 18, "questions": 33 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a cosmic radiation, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a cosmic radiation field, assess its relevance to an exposed target, and determine which monitoring, modelling or exposure-control actions are justified by the available evidence.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: ultra-high-energy cosmic ray, extragalactic cosmic ray, galactic cosmic ray.", "3 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 91 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a cosmic radiation, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "ultra-high-energy cosmic ray", "extragalactic cosmic ray", "galactic cosmic ray" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 91 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 3 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one cosmic radiation from another, and a cosmic radiation from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a cosmic radiation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a cosmic radiation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a cosmic radiation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a cosmic radiation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a cosmic radiation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a cosmic radiation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a cosmic radiation sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a cosmic radiation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a cosmic radiation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a cosmic radiation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a cosmic radiation from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a cosmic radiation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a cosmic radiation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a cosmic radiation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a cosmic radiation passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a cosmic radiation between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a cosmic radiation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a cosmic radiation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a cosmic radiation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a cosmic radiation, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a cosmic radiation is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a cosmic radiation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a cosmic radiation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a cosmic radiation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a cosmic radiation proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a cosmic radiation, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a cosmic radiation and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a cosmic radiation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a cosmic radiation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a cosmic radiation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a cosmic radiation consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a cosmic radiation takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a cosmic radiation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a cosmic radiation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a cosmic radiation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What cosmic radiation is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of cosmic radiation are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is cosmic radiation operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of cosmic radiation and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of cosmic radiation?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as cosmic radiation?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a cosmic radiation came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a cosmic radiation and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a cosmic radiation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a cosmic radiation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a cosmic radiation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a cosmic radiation is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a cosmic radiation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a cosmic radiation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a cosmic radiation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }