{ "model": { "rank": 4423, "code": "thing-q117850", "model_id": "vr.tr.doctrine", "name": "doctrine", "purpose": "Let an agent explain doctrines by field, source and interpretation, attribute them to the bodies that hold them, and keep military doctrine at a general, non-operational level.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.KNW", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q117850/", "tier": 2, "score": 75, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "dogmatism", "military doctrine", "religious doctrine", "Deposit of faith", "legal doctrine", "economic doctrine", "innatism", "bipartisanship", "abstention doctrine", "Machiavellianism", "continuationism", "philosophical theory", "Christian eschatological view", "police doctrine", "Scientology belief", "Public policy doctrines for the exclusion of relevant evidence", "political doctrine", "Baraita", "Quick Reaction Alert", "Unrestricted Warfare", "AirLand Battle", "invasion-defense doctrine", "theosophical doctrine", "doctrines of Caodaism", "view of life and death", "Tiantai doctrine", "doctrines of the Huayan School", "doctrines of Jainism", "Christian doctrine", "Ahmadiyya doctrine", "dharmamudrā", "Kompetenz-kompetenz", "legal doctrine in France", "public trust doctrine", "undue influence", "Fair dealing in United Kingdom law", "Roman Catholic social teaching on work", "formal innatism", "innateness hypothesis", "Epistemological Theories" ], "aliasCount": 51, "merged": 51, "knownIn": 75, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.doctrine", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q117850", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q117850", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-11T14:24:29Z", "providers": [ "Claude" ], "breadth": "written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify", "pass": 2, "wave": 1, "engine": "claude" }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q117850", "registryId": "vr.tr.doctrine", "name": "doctrine", "version": "0.2.0-wave.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q117850/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.doctrine", "name": "doctrine", "purpose": "Let an agent explain doctrines by field, source and interpretation, attribute them to the bodies that hold them, and keep military doctrine at a general, non-operational level.", "definition": "A codified set of beliefs, principles or positions taught or held by a group, such as religious doctrines, legal doctrines developed by courts, economic doctrines and military doctrines described at a general level; dogmatism is rigid adherence to doctrine.", "what_it_is_for": "Understanding systems of belief, legal principles and policy.", "affordances": [ "identify the source and holder of a doctrine", "explain legal doctrines in general terms", "describe religious doctrines as traditions state them", "compare economic doctrines with attribution" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Codified principles", "Held by a group", "Transmitted through teaching or precedent", "Can be contested" ], "appearance": "Not physical; set out in texts, rulings, catechisms and policy documents.", "visual_identification": [ "Formal statements of principle", "Court-developed legal doctrines", "Personal opinions are not doctrine" ], "physical_properties": [], "families_and_kinds": [ "religious doctrines", "legal doctrines", "economic doctrines", "foreign policy doctrines", "military doctrine (general level)" ], "related_models": [ { "relation": "is a kind of", "target": "school of thought", "why": "category" }, { "relation": "is related to", "target": "value", "why": "principles" }, { "relation": "is taught in", "target": "catechism or textbook", "why": "text" }, { "relation": "is related to", "target": "justice", "why": "legal principles" } ], "identifiers": [], "standards_and_regulation": [ "No specific regulation; courts and religious authorities define their doctrines" ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Presenting a group doctrine as universal truth", "Providing operational military detail", "Misstating legal doctrines" ], "in_scope": [], "out_of_scope": [], "characteristics": [] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "source", "name": "Source", "description": "Where it comes from.", "rationale": "Sources matter.", "layers": [ { "id": "holder", "name": "Holder", "description": "Who holds it.", "findings": [ { "id": "holder-finding", "name": "Holder", "description": "Holder.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which group, court or institution holds this doctrine?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Which text states it?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] }, { "id": "change", "name": "Change", "description": "Development.", "findings": [ { "id": "change-finding", "name": "Change", "description": "Development.", "questions": [ { "text": "How has this doctrine developed over time, according to scholars?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Is it disputed within the group?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "legal", "name": "Legal", "description": "Legal doctrines.", "rationale": "Courts develop doctrines.", "layers": [ { "id": "explain", "name": "Explain", "description": "Meaning.", "findings": [ { "id": "explain-finding", "name": "Explain", "description": "Legal doctrine.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does this legal doctrine mean, in general terms, and which cases established it?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Does it apply in this jurisdiction?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] }, { "id": "advice", "name": "Advice", "description": "Limits.", "findings": [ { "id": "advice-finding", "name": "Advice", "description": "Advice limits.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the user asking how the doctrine applies to their own case?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "Where can legal help be found?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "religious", "name": "Religious", "description": "Religious doctrines.", "rationale": "Beliefs are attributed.", "layers": [ { "id": "teaching", "name": "Teaching", "description": "Teachings.", "findings": [ { "id": "teaching-finding", "name": "Teaching", "description": "Religious teaching.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does this tradition teach on this point, according to its authoritative sources?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Do other traditions differ?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "dogmatism", "name": "Dogmatism", "description": "Rigid adherence.", "findings": [ { "id": "dogmatism-finding", "name": "Dogmatism", "description": "Dogmatism.", "questions": [ { "text": "How do scholars distinguish doctrine from dogmatism?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Is the term being used as criticism?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "policy", "name": "Policy", "description": "Economic and military.", "rationale": "General level only.", "layers": [ { "id": "economic", "name": "Economic", "description": "Economic doctrines.", "findings": [ { "id": "economic-finding", "name": "Economic", "description": "Economic doctrines.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does this economic doctrine hold, and who advocates or criticises it?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Is the summary balanced?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "military", "name": "Military", "description": "Military doctrine.", "findings": [ { "id": "military-finding", "name": "Military", "description": "Military doctrine limits.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the request seek operational or tactical doctrine detail?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "How should the agent stay at a general, published-policy level?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should doctrine types be separate entries?", "How should authoritative texts be linked?", "How should military doctrine be limited?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 4, "layers": 8, "findings": 8, "questions": 16 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "discipline or field of knowledge", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a doctrine, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Let an agent explain doctrines by field, source and interpretation, attribute them to the bodies that hold them, and keep military doctrine at a general, non-operational level.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: dogmatism, military doctrine, religious doctrine, Deposit of faith, legal doctrine, economic doctrine, innatism, bipartisanship, abstention doctrine, Machiavellianism, continuationism, philosophical theory.", "51 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 75 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a doctrine, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says" ], "howItIsRecognised": [], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "dogmatism", "military doctrine", "religious doctrine", "Deposit of faith", "legal doctrine", "economic doctrine", "innatism", "bipartisanship", "abstention doctrine", "Machiavellianism", "continuationism", "philosophical theory" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 75 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 51 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one doctrine from another, and a doctrine from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a doctrine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a doctrine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a doctrine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a doctrine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a doctrine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a doctrine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a doctrine sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a doctrine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a doctrine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a doctrine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a doctrine from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a doctrine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a doctrine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a doctrine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a doctrine passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a doctrine between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a doctrine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a doctrine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a doctrine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a doctrine, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a doctrine is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a doctrine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a doctrine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a doctrine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a doctrine says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a doctrine contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a doctrine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a doctrine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a doctrine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a doctrine and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a doctrine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a doctrine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a doctrine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-method", "name": "Subject matter and method", "description": "What doctrine studies and how it establishes anything.", "rationale": "A field is identified by its questions and its methods, and those are what distinguish it from the fields next to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject matter", "description": "The questions it takes as its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-record", "name": "Questions and objects of study", "description": "What it is about, stated so a neighbouring field can be told apart.", "questions": [ { "id": "subject-record-q01", "text": "What questions and objects does doctrine take as its own?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "subject-record-q02", "text": "Which questions does it share with a neighbouring field, and who claims them?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "How claims are established and what counts as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-record", "name": "Methods and standards of evidence", "description": "The methods used and what they are taken to establish.", "questions": [ { "id": "method-record-q01", "text": "By what methods does doctrine establish claims, and what counts as sufficient evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "method-record-q02", "text": "What kind of claim can this field not settle, and where should an agent look instead?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-classification", "name": "Institutions and classification", "description": "Where doctrine is practised and how catalogues place it.", "rationale": "The institutional footprint is the evidence that a field exists as a field rather than as a topic.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutions", "name": "Institutional markers", "description": "Societies, journals, degrees and departments.", "findings": [ { "id": "institution-record", "name": "Bodies and venues", "description": "Where the field organises itself.", "questions": [ { "id": "institution-record-q01", "text": "Which societies, journals or degrees mark doctrine as an established field?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "institution-record-q02", "text": "What would show that it is emerging or dissolving rather than established?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification", "name": "Classification schemes", "description": "Where library and research classifications put it.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-record", "name": "Codes and their disagreements", "description": "The classification codes that place it, and where they differ.", "questions": [ { "id": "classification-record-q01", "text": "Which classification schemes place doctrine, under what codes?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classification-record-q02", "text": "Where do those schemes disagree about its scope?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a doctrine came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a doctrine and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a doctrine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a doctrine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a doctrine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a doctrine is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a doctrine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a doctrine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a doctrine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }