← Back to catalogue
Generated draft

colorectal polyp

vr.tr.colorectal-polyp · thing-q1209892

Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a colorectal polyp, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.LIV

Generated draft, first pass

This model was drafted by rule from what the registry knows about the thing. It proposes which bundles a real model will need and which questions research must answer. It is not researched and no sentence in it is sourced.

Generator: vr.draft.v3

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Derived, awaiting review

8 bundles · 17 layers · 19 findings · 51 questions

Identity, naming and classification How an agent tells one colorectal polyp from another, and a colorectal polyp from things that resemble it.

Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.

Names and identifiers

The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.

Preferred name, aliases and local names

Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.

  1. What identifies and describes the name of a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the name of a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the name of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action

Stable identifiers and external keys

Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.

  1. What identifies and describes an identifier for a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action

Classification and granularity

Where a colorectal polyp sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.

Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds

The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.

  1. What identifies and describes the kind of a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the kind of a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action

Distinguishing features

What separates a colorectal polyp from the things most often confused with it.

  1. What identifies and describes what distinguishes a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action
Form, composition and condition What a colorectal polyp is made of, what shape and size it takes, and what state it is in.

A physical thing can be measured, and a model that cannot record its measurements cannot support any decision that depends on them.

Form and dimensions

Shape, size, mass and the ranges these take across examples.

Measurable dimensions and their units

The quantities worth recording and the units they are recorded in.

  1. What identifies and describes the dimensions of a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the dimensions of a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the dimensions of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action

Material and composition

Anatomy, parts and life stage.

Parts and life stages

The parts of a colorectal polyp and the stages it passes through.

  1. What identifies and describes the composition of a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the composition of a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the composition of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action

Condition and integrity

Wear, damage, health and the difference between working and broken.

Condition, damage and health

How the condition of a colorectal polyp is judged and by whom.

  1. What identifies and describes the condition of a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the condition of a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the condition of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action
Place and movement Where a colorectal polyp is, how it got there and where it may go (self-moving).

A thing that can move needs its position recorded with a time, or every later claim about it is about a place it has left.

Location and placement

Position, containment and the reference frame the position is given in.

Position, container and reference frame

Where a colorectal polyp is, and what that position is measured against.

  1. What identifies and describes the location of a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the location of a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the location of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action

Movement and transfer

How a colorectal polyp moves on its own.

Movement events and constraints

What counts as a movement, what records it and what limits it.

  1. What identifies and describes the movement of a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the movement of a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the movement of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action
State and lifecycle The states a colorectal polyp passes through and the events that move it between them.

Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.

Lifecycle stages

From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.

Stages and transitions

The stages worth naming and what moves a colorectal polyp between them.

  1. What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action

Observations and current status

What is observed about a colorectal polyp, how often and by whom.

Observation record

How an observation of a colorectal polyp is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.

  1. What identifies and describes an observation of a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about an observation of a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action
Taxonomic placement and identification What colorectal polyp is called scientifically, by whose authority, and how a specimen is recognised.

Names change with revisions while the organism does not, so a name without its authority and date cannot be reconciled later.

Accepted name and synonymy

The current binomial, its author and date, and the names it replaced.

Accepted name, authority and synonyms

What to record so a later revision can be applied without losing the old data.

  1. What is the accepted scientific name of colorectal polyp, with its author and year, and which synonyms does it absorb? definition
  2. Which taxonomic authority is being followed, and what would a competing authority say? provenance

Field identification

The characters that separate colorectal polyp from what it is confused with.

Diagnostic characters and confusable kinds

Features that settle an identification, and those that only suggest it.

  1. Which observable characters distinguish colorectal polyp from its closest look-alikes, and at which life stage are they visible? boundary
  2. What evidence is enough to record an identification as confirmed rather than provisional? provenance
Life stages, condition and behaviour What colorectal polyp does over its life and how its state is judged.

Stage and condition change what may be done - handled, treated, harvested, left alone - and both are observations with a time.

Stages and reproduction

Development from origin to death, including forms that look like different animals.

Life stages and their marks

The stages worth recording and what tells them apart.

  1. What stages does colorectal polyp pass through, and what observable change marks each transition? definition
  2. Which stages are so unlike the adult that they are mistaken for another kind? boundary

Health and condition

How condition is assessed and by whom.

Condition assessment

Signs of health, injury and stress, and who is competent to judge them.

  1. How is the condition of colorectal polyp judged, on what scale, and by whom? measurement
  2. What condition obliges an agent to act, and what act is permitted to whom? action
Habitat, range and conservation status Where colorectal polyp lives and how threatened it is.

Range and status govern what is lawful, and both are assessments with an assessor and a year rather than facts of nature.

Habitat and range

Native range, introductions and the habitat it needs.

Range, introductions and habitat

What to record about where it is found and how it got there.

  1. What is the native range of colorectal polyp, where has it been introduced, and what habitat does it require? definition
  2. What distinguishes a native record from an introduced or vagrant one? boundary

Protection and legal status

Conservation assessments and the rules that follow from them.

Conservation status and legal consequence

The assessment, its date, and what it forbids or requires where.

  1. What conservation status does colorectal polyp hold, under which assessment and year? provenance
  2. What does that status forbid or require of an agent, and in which jurisdiction? action
Provenance, evidence and time Where every claim about a colorectal polyp came from and when it held.

A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.

Source and authority

Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.

Claim provenance and confidence

The authority behind each claim about a colorectal polyp and how confident it is.

  1. What identifies and describes a claim about a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about a claim about a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action

Time, versions and supersession

When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.

Validity period and supersession

How an old claim about a colorectal polyp is retired without being erased.

  1. What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a colorectal polyp, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
  2. Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a colorectal polyp, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
  3. What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse? action

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
organism
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.LIV
Other names and narrower kinds
appendix hyperplastic polyp, serrated polyp, colorectal adenoma, colon inflammatory polyp, colon juvenile polyp, colon sessile serrated adenoma/polyp, adenomatous colon polyp, vaginal tubular adenoma, colorectal tubulovillous adenoma, Sessile serrated adenoma, traditional serrated adenoma, tubular adenoma

What it is Derived, awaiting review

A physical thing registered under PHY.LIV. The registry names it; this draft has not been given a definition yet.

Why it exists Derived, awaiting review

Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a colorectal polyp, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.

Distinguishing features Derived, awaiting review

  • Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: appendix hyperplastic polyp, serrated polyp, colorectal adenoma, colon inflammatory polyp, colon juvenile polyp, colon sessile serrated adenoma/polyp, adenomatous colon polyp, vaginal tubular adenoma, colorectal tubulovillous adenoma, Sessile serrated adenoma, traditional serrated adenoma, tubular adenoma.
  • 19 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.
  • Described in 19 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is.

What robots and AI may and may not do Derived, awaiting review

May

  • observe it, measure it, record its state

Moral aspects Missing, in the backlog

Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.

Owners Missing, in the backlog

Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.

Links to other meta-models Derived, awaiting review

related

  • appendix hyperplastic polyp - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • serrated polyp - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • colorectal adenoma - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • colon inflammatory polyp - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • colon juvenile polyp - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • colon sessile serrated adenoma/polyp - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • adenomatous colon polyp - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • vaginal tubular adenoma - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • colorectal tubulovillous adenoma - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • Sessile serrated adenoma - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • traditional serrated adenoma - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.
  • tubular adenoma - covers: Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Incomplete

Identity and identifiers required Missing, in the backlog

Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.

Direct properties required Derived, awaiting review

  • Made of: a living thing
  • Moves under its own power or of its own accord.
  • Acts on its own behalf.
  • These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing.

Recognition required Derived, awaiting review

  • Recognised by diagnostic characters, and those differ by life stage - the young of many kinds are mistaken for other kinds entirely. A sighting is settled by characters, a photograph and a place, not by a name alone.

Capabilities and actions required Derived, awaiting review

  • observed and measured

Hazards and failure modes required Missing, in the backlog

Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.

Standards and interfaces required Missing, in the backlog

Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.

Context of use required Derived, awaiting review

  • Described in 19 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 19 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.

Sources Missing, in the backlog

Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.

Open questions

  • Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?
  • What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?
  • Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a colorectal polyp, and on what evidence are they told apart?
  • What may an agent decide or do once the name of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse?
  • What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse?
  • What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a colorectal polyp is known, and what must it refuse?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry, generated draft (pass 1) · not researched

Built from: models/draft_model.php, wikidata

Generated by rule from registry facets. No source was read; every derived section awaits the research pass.