{ "model": { "rank": 4630, "code": "thing-q122981", "model_id": "vr.tr.anagram", "name": "anagram", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise, validate, interpret and construct anagrams while making the letter-counting rules and linguistic acceptance criteria explicit.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q122981/", "tier": 2, "score": 73, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "ananym", "aptagram" ], "aliasCount": 2, "merged": 2, "knownIn": 73, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q122981", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q122981", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T20:39:38Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 18.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087e4-eebe-78b1-a623-9e2cf9ce75cd\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: anagram\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 005: 1001 registe", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 56.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087e4-eeb8-71a1-b95f-8da0e2e3e057\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: anagram\nRegistry id: vr.tr.anagram\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q122981", "registryId": "vr.tr.anagram", "name": "anagram", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q122981/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.anagram", "name": "anagram", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise, validate, interpret and construct anagrams while making the letter-counting rules and linguistic acceptance criteria explicit.", "definition": "An anagram is a word or phrase formed by rearranging all the letters of another word or phrase, using each letter exactly as many times as it occurs in the original, conventionally disregarding spaces, punctuation and capitalization.", "scope_statement": "This model owns an anagram as a relationship between a source word or phrase and a rearranged expression that preserves its letter inventory under declared conventions, together with evidence of validity and context of use.", "in_scope": [ "The source expression, rearranged expression and direction in which they are presented", "Exact preservation of letter multiplicities under explicit normalization rules", "Language, lexical acceptance and meaningfulness of the rearranged expression", "Distinction between a valid anagram, an unverified candidate and a rejected candidate", "Use as wordplay, a puzzle answer, a name or an interpretive transformation" ], "out_of_scope": [ "General permutation mathematics beyond what is needed to validate or generate anagrams", "Crossword or puzzle systems containing anagram clues", "Palindromes, acrostics and other wordplay defined by different constraints", "Encryption systems and claims of cryptographic security", "The identity, biography or legal status of a person using an anagrammatic name", "Editions, physical carriers and rights administration of works containing anagrams" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "After declared normalization, each letter occurs equally often in the source and result; equal length alone is insufficient.", "Letter order changes rather than letters being substituted, added or removed; unchanged and spacing-only results require an explicit acceptance policy.", "An anagram preserves multiplicities, unlike a test that merely checks whether both expressions contain the same distinct letters.", "Ordinary linguistic anagrams produce accepted words or phrases; an arbitrary permutation may satisfy the inventory test without satisfying that linguistic criterion.", "The defining relationship concerns written letters rather than shared pronunciation, meaning or reversal symmetry." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Source and result expressions", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Paired expressions retaining their original spelling, spacing and punctuation", "why_it_matters": "An anagram cannot be checked or interpreted without knowing both expressions." }, { "name": "Language context", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Source language and result language, including mixed or unresolved cases", "why_it_matters": "Language affects letter treatment and which words are accepted." }, { "name": "Letter normalization policy", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Declared treatment of case, whitespace, punctuation, diacritics, ligatures and Unicode equivalence", "why_it_matters": "The same pair can pass or fail under different counting conventions." }, { "name": "Counted letter total", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Number of letters in each expression under the declared counting policy", "why_it_matters": "Unequal totals immediately rule out an exact anagram under that policy." }, { "name": "Letter inventory difference", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Signed count difference per counted letter, calculated as result minus source", "why_it_matters": "A zero difference for every letter establishes inventory equivalence." }, { "name": "Rearrangement class", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Changed letter sequence, word-order-only change, spacing-or-punctuation-only change, unchanged sequence", "why_it_matters": "Communities and tasks may differ in which transformations they accept." }, { "name": "Linguistic acceptance", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Accepted, disputed, rejected or unassessed against a named lexicon or stated language judgment", "why_it_matters": "Mechanical equivalence does not establish that the result is a usable word or phrase." }, { "name": "Validation state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unverified, inventory-valid, fully accepted under task rules, or rejected with reason", "why_it_matters": "An agent must distinguish a proposed answer from a checked and acceptable one." }, { "name": "Use context", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Standalone wordplay, puzzle solution, anagrammatic name, literary use or other declared use", "why_it_matters": "The intended use determines additional constraints beyond letter preservation." } ], "affordances": [ "Check whether a proposed pair preserves every letter multiplicity under stated conventions.", "Explain a failed check by identifying missing and surplus letters.", "Generate candidate rearrangements subject to language, word-count and task constraints.", "Assess linguistic acceptance separately from mechanical validity.", "Compare candidates for readability, semantic relevance and fit to an intended use.", "Present a validated pair with its rules, attribution evidence and unresolved judgments." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "expression-pair-and-boundary", "name": "Expression pair and boundary", "description": "Establishes the expressions being compared and the sense in which their relationship is called an anagram.", "rationale": "A rearranged phrase in isolation does not identify its source or establish an anagram relationship.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-result-pair", "name": "Source-result pair", "description": "Records the exact expressions before any counting transformations.", "findings": [ { "id": "pair-identification", "name": "Pair identification", "description": "Both expressions must remain recoverable, with presentation direction distinguished from the symmetric inventory-equivalence test.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the exact source and proposed result, including their original spacing and punctuation?", "kind": "definition", "id": "pair-identification-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence identifies which expression was used as the source in this instance?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "pair-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rearrangement-boundary", "name": "Rearrangement boundary", "description": "Distinguishes substantive rearrangement from unchanged strings and neighbouring wordplay.", "findings": [ { "id": "eligible-transformation", "name": "Eligible transformation", "description": "Inventory equivalence and eligibility as a rearrangement are separate checks, especially for unchanged strings, respacing and word-order changes.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the result change the counted letter sequence, only the order of intact words, or only spacing and punctuation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "eligible-transformation-q01" }, { "text": "Do the applicable rules accept this transformation class as an anagram?", "kind": "definition", "id": "eligible-transformation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "letter-inventory-validation", "name": "Letter inventory validation", "description": "Makes the counting conventions explicit and tests exact preservation of letters.", "rationale": "Letter multiplicity is the central mechanical constraint, but a reproducible check requires a declared interpretation of letters.", "layers": [ { "id": "normalization-and-counting", "name": "Normalization and counting", "description": "Defines which written elements are counted and which distinctions are retained.", "findings": [ { "id": "declared-letter-policy", "name": "Declared letter policy", "description": "Validation must state how case, separators and orthographic variants affect the counted inventory without silently altering the original expressions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which case distinctions, spaces, punctuation marks and other nonletter symbols are ignored or retained?", "kind": "definition", "id": "declared-letter-policy-q01" }, { "text": "How are diacritics, ligatures and canonically equivalent Unicode sequences treated when identifying and counting letters?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "declared-letter-policy-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "inventory-comparison", "name": "Inventory comparison", "description": "Compares counts for every letter and records a reproducible mechanical verdict.", "findings": [ { "id": "multiplicity-verdict", "name": "Multiplicity verdict", "description": "An exact inventory match requires zero surplus or deficit for every counted letter, including repeated letters.", "questions": [ { "text": "What is the result-minus-source count difference for each letter under the declared policy?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "multiplicity-verdict-q01" }, { "text": "Does the comparison establish an exact match, and if it fails, which surplus and missing letters explain the failure?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "multiplicity-verdict-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "linguistic-and-semantic-acceptance", "name": "Linguistic and semantic acceptance", "description": "Evaluates whether an inventory-valid rearrangement functions as an acceptable expression for its intended audience.", "rationale": "A random permutation can preserve letters while failing the word, phrase or meaning requirements of an anagram task.", "layers": [ { "id": "lexical-eligibility", "name": "Lexical eligibility", "description": "Establishes the language and evidence supporting the words used.", "findings": [ { "id": "accepted-vocabulary", "name": "Accepted vocabulary", "description": "Word acceptance depends on declared language resources and rules for names, inflections, abbreviations and unusual spellings.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which language and lexicon or other evidence support each word in the result?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "accepted-vocabulary-q01" }, { "text": "Are proper names, abbreviations, archaic forms, inflections or words from multiple languages allowed for this use?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "accepted-vocabulary-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "phrase-and-meaning", "name": "Phrase and meaning", "description": "Separates readable linguistic construction from optional semantic connection to the source.", "findings": [ { "id": "meaningful-result", "name": "Meaningful result", "description": "Grammaticality, interpretability and thematic relevance are distinct judgments; semantic similarity is not established by matching letters.", "questions": [ { "text": "Can the result be interpreted as a word or coherent phrase, and what language judgment supports that assessment?", "kind": "definition", "id": "meaningful-result-q01" }, { "text": "Does the task require a thematic or humorous connection to the source, and how does this candidate meet that requirement?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "meaningful-result-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "use-generation-and-evidence", "name": "Use, generation and evidence", "description": "Connects validation to candidate generation, contextual suitability and supported attribution.", "rationale": "Agents need to know which candidates they may present as answers and which historical or interpretive claims remain unverified.", "layers": [ { "id": "constrained-candidate-selection", "name": "Constrained candidate selection", "description": "Controls how candidates are generated and selected for a particular anagram task.", "findings": [ { "id": "task-fit", "name": "Task fit", "description": "Generation and selection must honour the complete source inventory together with explicit requirements such as answer length, word count and clue fit.", "questions": [ { "text": "What word-count, word-length, fixed-letter, vocabulary or clue constraints must a generated candidate satisfy?", "kind": "action", "id": "task-fit-q01" }, { "text": "Which candidates pass both inventory validation and the stated acceptance rules and can therefore be presented as answers?", "kind": "action", "id": "task-fit-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "attestation-and-presentation", "name": "Attestation and presentation", "description": "Separates demonstrable letter relationships from claims about origin, intention and significance.", "findings": [ { "id": "supported-context", "name": "Supported context", "description": "Mechanical validation cannot prove who devised an anagram, whether it was intentional, or whether an interpretation was historically intended.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence supports any claimed creator, date, deliberate naming choice or published occurrence of this anagram?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "supported-context-q01" }, { "text": "When presenting the pair, which counting conventions, acceptance judgments and unresolved attribution claims must accompany it?", "kind": "action", "id": "supported-context-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes the ordinary linguistic and wordplay sense; no narrower registry sense was supplied.", "The kinds listed are practical distinctions, not a standardized taxonomy.", "No dedicated identifier scheme or governing standard is confidently recalled; individual puzzles may impose additional rules." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of anagram this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Single-word anagrams", "Multiword or phrase anagrams", "Anagrammatic names and pseudonyms" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of anagram this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Word games and recreational puzzles", "Cryptic crossword clues", "Literary wordplay", "Creation of pseudonyms", "Historically, concealment of scientific statements pending disclosure" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of anagram this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Letter count", "typical_range": "Equal in the source and its anagram under the chosen normalization rules; no fixed upper limit", "unit": "letters" }, { "quantity": "Distinct letter arrangements", "typical_range": "For n letters with multiplicities n₁ through nₖ, n!/(n₁!⋯nₖ!); only some arrangements form acceptable words or phrases", "unit": "arrangements" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of anagram this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Adding, omitting or substituting letters invalidates an exact anagram.", "Ignoring repeated-letter counts produces false matches.", "Unstated treatment of accents, ligatures or other orthographic features makes validity ambiguous.", "A matching letter inventory does not ensure a meaningful or grammatically acceptable result.", "Anagrammatic coincidences can be mistaken for evidence of authorship or hidden intent." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of anagram this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Accepted vocabulary depends on the language, dialect and dictionary used.", "Treatment of diacritics and orthographic units depends on language and puzzle conventions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of anagram this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Letter permutation", "difference": "Any rearrangement is a letter permutation; anagrams in ordinary wordplay use arrangements accepted as words, phrases or names." }, { "name": "Palindrome", "difference": "A palindrome reads identically forwards and backwards; an anagram preserves letter counts while changing their arrangement." }, { "name": "Letter bank", "difference": "Letter-bank puzzles may permit letters to be reused beyond their original counts; exact anagrams preserve every count." }, { "name": "Cryptic crossword anagram clue", "difference": "The clue supplies material and an indication to rearrange it; the anagram is the resulting letter rearrangement." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of anagram this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which authoritative definitions should govern the treatment of unchanged strings, spacing-only changes and rearrangements of intact words?", "Which counting conventions should be supported for different scripts, especially combining marks, ligatures and language-specific letter units?", "What level of lexical or grammatical evidence is sufficient to accept a novel multiword result, and how should disagreement be represented?", "Should qualified forms that add, omit or substitute letters be represented as related wordplay under neighbouring models or as explicitly non-exact extensions?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover the anagram relationship closely enough that this registry entry should link to it instead of receiving a separate publication?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 15, "questions": 23 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a anagram, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise, validate, interpret and construct anagrams while making the letter-counting rules and linguistic acceptance criteria explicit.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: ananym, aptagram.", "2 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 73 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a anagram, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "ananym", "aptagram" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 73 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 2 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one anagram from another, and a anagram from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a anagram, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a anagram, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a anagram is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a anagram, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a anagram, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a anagram is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a anagram sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a anagram, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a anagram, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a anagram is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a anagram from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a anagram, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a anagram, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a anagram is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a anagram passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a anagram between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a anagram, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a anagram, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a anagram is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a anagram, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a anagram is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a anagram, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a anagram, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a anagram is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a anagram says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a anagram contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a anagram, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a anagram, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a anagram is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a anagram and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a anagram, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a anagram, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a anagram is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of anagram a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For anagram, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of anagram exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made anagram and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to anagram, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in anagram, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a anagram came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a anagram and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a anagram, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a anagram, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a anagram is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a anagram is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a anagram, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a anagram, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a anagram is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }