{ "model": { "rank": 3316, "code": "thing-q124354", "model_id": "vr.tr.bauhaus", "name": "Bauhaus", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise Bauhaus practices and affiliations, assess the evidence behind Bauhaus attributions, and distinguish historical participation from later influence or stylistic resemblance.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q124354/", "tier": 2, "score": 87, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 87, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q124354", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q124354", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:26:28Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 23.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c42-4779-7da3-8464-de617de18141\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Bauhaus\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 546 things:\n# Batch 003: 1001 register", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 75.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c42-4751-71d3-94f0-582d4836e636\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Bauhaus\nRegistry id: vr.tr.bauhaus\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q124354", "registryId": "vr.tr.bauhaus", "name": "Bauhaus", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q124354/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.bauhaus", "name": "Bauhaus", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise Bauhaus practices and affiliations, assess the evidence behind Bauhaus attributions, and distinguish historical participation from later influence or stylistic resemblance.", "definition": "Bauhaus denotes the German school of art, design and architecture active from 1919 to 1933, and by extension the diverse educational approaches and modernist design traditions associated with its integration of artistic, craft and industrial production.", "scope_statement": "This model owns Bauhaus as a historically situated programme of art, craft, design and architectural education associated with the school of that name, including its changing positions and subsequent reception; this sense is provisional because the registry supplies no definition.", "in_scope": [ "The relationship between the historical school and Bauhaus as a design and educational programme", "Changes across the Weimar, Dessau and Berlin phases and the directorships of Walter Gropius, Hannes Meyer and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe", "Teaching practices, preliminary training, workshops and relationships between artistic experimentation and production", "Competing Bauhaus positions concerning craft, industry, architecture and social needs", "Evidence for participation, attribution, transmission and later claims of Bauhaus influence" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete biographies of teachers, students and collaborators", "Technical specifications, conservation records and ownership histories of individual objects or buildings", "Modernism, functionalism and the International Style beyond their specific relationships to Bauhaus", "Corporate administration of present-day institutions using the Bauhaus name", "The band Bauhaus, the retail chain BAUHAUS and other unrelated uses of the name" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A historical Bauhaus affiliation requires evidence linking a person, practice or work to the school; geometric forms or primary colours alone do not establish it.", "A claim about Bauhaus teaching should identify a period, teacher, workshop or curriculum rather than assume one unchanged doctrine.", "An account of Bauhaus must accommodate relationships among artistic experimentation, workshop learning and production rather than reduce it to architectural appearance.", "Later Bauhaus influence requires a documented route of transmission or an explicitly qualified interpretation, distinct from original institutional participation.", "Claims of a unified Bauhaus style must be tested against differences among directors, teachers, workshops and periods." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Referent sense", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "historical school | educational programme | design position | reception category | unrelated namesake | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents institutional membership, aesthetic resemblance and unrelated name usage from being treated as equivalent." }, { "name": "Historical phase", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Weimar | Dessau | Berlin | post-school reception | cross-phase | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Locates a claim within changing institutional and pedagogical circumstances." }, { "name": "Temporal applicability", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "documented date or date interval, with precision recorded", "why_it_matters": "Limits claims about teaching, participation or production to the period supported by evidence." }, { "name": "Bauhaus connection", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "student of | teacher at | produced in workshop | commissioned through | collaborated with | transmitted through | attributed by", "why_it_matters": "Makes the specific connection inspectable instead of using an undifferentiated Bauhaus label." }, { "name": "Pedagogical setting", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "preliminary course | named workshop | architectural teaching | stage practice | other documented setting | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Connects educational claims to the actual context in which learning and making occurred." }, { "name": "Production orientation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "craft experiment | unique work | prototype | proposed industrial production | documented serial production | mixed | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes ambitions for industrial production from what was actually produced." }, { "name": "Attribution status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "documented | supported interpretation | disputed | unsupported | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Controls whether an agent may assert a Bauhaus connection or should retain it as a qualified claim." }, { "name": "Position and proponent", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "a stated educational, aesthetic or social position linked to its proponent, document and period", "why_it_matters": "Preserves disagreement within Bauhaus instead of inventing a collective doctrine." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a Bauhaus reference by sense and historical phase.", "Assess whether a claimed affiliation or attribution has an adequate documentary basis.", "Compare teaching and production positions across directors, teachers and workshops.", "Separate an original work, workshop prototype, later edition and stylistically similar object when evidence permits.", "Trace a specific route of Bauhaus influence through people, teaching, publications or exhibitions.", "Identify missing evidence and formulate targeted research before accepting or revising a Bauhaus claim." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-historical-phases", "name": "Identity and historical phases", "description": "Establishes what a Bauhaus reference denotes and where its claims apply in the school's changing history.", "rationale": "The same name can denote a school, its varied programmes or a retrospective style category, each requiring different recognition criteria.", "layers": [ { "id": "school-programme-and-label", "name": "School, programme and label", "description": "Separates institutional identity from educational positions and later uses of the name.", "findings": [ { "id": "referent-and-membership-basis", "name": "Referent and membership basis", "description": "Record which sense of Bauhaus is intended and what evidence would make the subject an instance of that sense.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does Bauhaus here denote the historical school, a documented programme, or a later interpretive category?", "kind": "definition", "id": "referent-and-membership-basis-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes membership or direct participation from resemblance, influence or an unrelated namesake?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "referent-and-membership-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "locations-and-directorships", "name": "Locations and directorships", "description": "Places claims within relevant locations, leadership periods and institutional transitions.", "findings": [ { "id": "phase-specific-applicability", "name": "Phase-specific applicability", "description": "Record the period and setting to which a claim applies, without generalising one director's position across all Bauhaus activity.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which dates, location and directorship delimit this claim, and which records establish them?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "phase-specific-applicability-q01" }, { "text": "What changed at a move or leadership transition that prevents this claim from applying unchanged to another phase?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "phase-specific-applicability-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "pedagogy-and-workshop-practice", "name": "Pedagogy and workshop practice", "description": "Captures how Bauhaus teaching organised experimentation, material knowledge and collective making.", "rationale": "Educational practice is central to recognising Bauhaus and cannot be inferred from the appearance of finished objects.", "layers": [ { "id": "preliminary-training", "name": "Preliminary training", "description": "Examines foundational exercises and their purposes in specific teaching contexts.", "findings": [ { "id": "exercise-method-and-teacher", "name": "Exercise, method and teacher", "description": "Record an exercise's teacher, period, materials and intended learning outcome rather than posit a single timeless Bauhaus method.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which teacher and period are associated with the exercise, and what surviving assignment, student work or account documents it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "exercise-method-and-teacher-q01" }, { "text": "What capability was the exercise intended to develop through work with material, colour, form or perception?", "kind": "definition", "id": "exercise-method-and-teacher-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "workshop-learning-and-access", "name": "Workshop learning and access", "description": "Examines workshop organisation, participation and the relationship between teaching and production.", "findings": [ { "id": "workshop-roles-and-participation", "name": "Workshop roles and participation", "description": "Record how learners and teachers participated in named workshops, including documented constraints on access and recognition.", "questions": [ { "text": "How were teaching, technical instruction and production responsibilities distributed in this workshop at the specified time?", "kind": "definition", "id": "workshop-roles-and-participation-q01" }, { "text": "What records establish who could enter the workshop, who actually participated and whether gender or other restrictions shaped access?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "workshop-roles-and-participation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "design-positions-and-production", "name": "Design positions and production", "description": "Connects competing Bauhaus ambitions to the processes and outputs through which they were pursued.", "rationale": "Craft, industrial production, artistic autonomy and social purpose require separate evidence; none should be assumed to explain every Bauhaus work.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-programmes", "name": "Competing programmes", "description": "Records positions on the relationship among art, craft, technology, architecture and social needs.", "findings": [ { "id": "position-proponent-and-counterposition", "name": "Position, proponent and counterposition", "description": "Attribute each programme to its proponents and period, retaining disagreements and distinctions between declarations and practice.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who advanced this position, in which document or teaching context, and what relationship among art, craft, industry or social needs did it propose?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "position-proponent-and-counterposition-q01" }, { "text": "Which Bauhaus participants or practices complicate treating that position as the school's shared doctrine?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "position-proponent-and-counterposition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "from-experiment-to-production", "name": "From experiment to production", "description": "Distinguishes educational experiments, prototypes and realised production across Bauhaus media.", "findings": [ { "id": "production-status-and-authorship", "name": "Production status and authorship", "description": "Record what was made, by whom and under what workshop or production arrangement, including the difference between proposed and realised manufacture.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence establishes whether this output remained an exercise or prototype, entered serial production, or was produced only in a later edition?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "production-status-and-authorship-q01" }, { "text": "How should an agent describe authorship when design, workshop development and manufacture involved different contributors?", "kind": "action", "id": "production-status-and-authorship-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "attribution-transmission-and-reception", "name": "Attribution, transmission and reception", "description": "Evaluates historical Bauhaus connections and the subsequent construction and circulation of its legacy.", "rationale": "Bauhaus is widely used as an attribution and style label, so the model must distinguish documented connections from retrospective interpretation.", "layers": [ { "id": "attribution-evidence", "name": "Attribution evidence", "description": "Tests claims that a person, work, building or practice belongs to Bauhaus.", "findings": [ { "id": "connection-versus-resemblance", "name": "Connection versus resemblance", "description": "Record the asserted connection and supporting evidence, treating visual resemblance as insufficient for historical attribution.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which enrolment record, workshop document, correspondence, catalogue or other evidence supports the claimed Bauhaus connection?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "connection-versus-resemblance-q01" }, { "text": "Should the agent retain, qualify or reject the attribution if only geometric simplicity, primary colours or functional appearance support it?", "kind": "action", "id": "connection-versus-resemblance-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "legacy-and-reinterpretation", "name": "Legacy and reinterpretation", "description": "Traces later transmission while examining how exhibitions, publications and commercial usage reshape the Bauhaus label.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-transmission-and-selective-memory", "name": "Documented transmission and selective memory", "description": "Record identifiable transmission routes and which parts of Bauhaus a later account preserves, changes or omits.", "questions": [ { "text": "Through which named people, institutions, curricula, publications or exhibitions was the claimed Bauhaus influence transmitted?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-transmission-and-selective-memory-q01" }, { "text": "What distinguishes this later adaptation or retrospective style label from a practice documented at the historical school?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "documented-transmission-and-selective-memory-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The missing sense leaves an ambiguity between the historical institution and its broader intellectual and stylistic legacy; this description covers both explicitly.", "These statements are recalled knowledge, not findings checked against sources.", "Specific objects, buildings and teaching practices require attribution by designer and date; resemblance alone does not establish a Bauhaus connection." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Bauhaus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Foundation courses exploring materials, colour, form and composition in art and design education.", "Workshop-based teaching that connects experimentation with making functional objects.", "Furniture, lighting and household-object design suited to industrial production.", "Architectural and interior-design approaches connecting spatial organisation, materials and everyday use.", "Graphic design and typography that explore visual hierarchy, geometric composition and communication." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Bauhaus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating Bauhaus as a single visual style obscures differences between its teachers, workshops and historical phases.", "Attributing all geometric or functionalist modern design to Bauhaus confuses it with related movements.", "Equating the school's social ambitions with demonstrated affordability or mass production overstates what particular designs achieved.", "Accounts of institutional equality can overlook gendered restrictions on workshop participation and recognition." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Bauhaus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The school operated successively in Weimar, Dessau and Berlin; these locations correspond to distinct institutional and political circumstances.", "Emigration and successor institutions spread Bauhaus teaching internationally, including through the New Bauhaus in Chicago.", "International adaptations combined Bauhaus ideas with local materials, climates and social programmes, rather than reproducing one uniform model." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Bauhaus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Modernism", "difference": "Modernism is a much broader family of cultural movements; Bauhaus is a specific institution and associated tradition within it." }, { "name": "International Style", "difference": "International Style primarily classifies architectural characteristics; Bauhaus also encompasses education, crafts, product design and visual arts." }, { "name": "De Stijl", "difference": "De Stijl was a distinct Dutch movement associated with geometric abstraction and a restricted colour vocabulary, although it influenced Bauhaus practitioners." }, { "name": "Arts and Crafts movement", "difference": "Arts and Crafts emphasised the value of craftsmanship and critiques of industrial production; Bauhaus increasingly pursued collaboration between design and industry." }, { "name": "Bauhaus band", "difference": "The English musical group is a separate entity sharing the name, rather than the German school or its design tradition." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Bauhaus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend Bauhaus primarily as the historical school, an artistic and educational programme, or a later movement category, and does an existing world model already own that referent?", "Which primary records and scholarly accounts should establish phase boundaries and disagreements among directors, teachers and workshops?", "How should evidence thresholds distinguish direct affiliation, collaboration, documented influence and retrospective attribution across different media?", "How should the model represent documented exclusions and unequal recognition, including workshop access and gendered attribution, without assuming uniform conditions across periods?", "Which later institutions and practices warrant explicit transmission relationships, and which are supported only by broad claims of Bauhaus influence?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 13, "questions": 21 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Bauhaus, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise Bauhaus practices and affiliations, assess the evidence behind Bauhaus attributions, and distinguish historical participation from later influence or stylistic resemblance.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 87 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Bauhaus, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 87 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Bauhaus from another, and a Bauhaus from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Bauhaus, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Bauhaus, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Bauhaus is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Bauhaus, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Bauhaus, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Bauhaus is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Bauhaus sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Bauhaus, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Bauhaus, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Bauhaus is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Bauhaus from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Bauhaus, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Bauhaus, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Bauhaus is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Bauhaus passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Bauhaus between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Bauhaus, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Bauhaus, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Bauhaus is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Bauhaus, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Bauhaus is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Bauhaus, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Bauhaus, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Bauhaus is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a Bauhaus proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a Bauhaus, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a Bauhaus and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a Bauhaus, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a Bauhaus, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a Bauhaus is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a Bauhaus consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a Bauhaus takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a Bauhaus, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a Bauhaus, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a Bauhaus is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What Bauhaus is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of Bauhaus are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is Bauhaus operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of Bauhaus and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of Bauhaus?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as Bauhaus?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Bauhaus came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Bauhaus and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Bauhaus, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Bauhaus, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Bauhaus is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Bauhaus is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Bauhaus, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Bauhaus, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Bauhaus is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }