sensorimotor integration
Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a sensorimotor integration, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.
Generated draft, first pass
This model was drafted by rule from what the registry knows about the thing. It proposes which bundles a real model will need and which questions research must answer. It is not researched and no sentence in it is sourced.
Generator: vr.draft.v3
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Derived, awaiting review
6 bundles · 12 layers · 14 findings · 38 questions
Identity, naming and classification How an agent tells one sensorimotor integration from another, and a sensorimotor integration from things that resemble it.
Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.
Names and identifiers
The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.
Preferred name, aliases and local names
Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.
- What identifies and describes the name of a sensorimotor integration, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
- Who or what asserted this about the name of a sensorimotor integration, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
- What may an agent decide or do once the name of a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse? action
Stable identifiers and external keys
Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.
- What identifies and describes an identifier for a sensorimotor integration, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
- Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a sensorimotor integration, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
- What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse? action
Classification and granularity
Where a sensorimotor integration sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.
Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds
The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.
- What identifies and describes the kind of a sensorimotor integration, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
- Who or what asserted this about the kind of a sensorimotor integration, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
- What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse? action
Distinguishing features
What separates a sensorimotor integration from the things most often confused with it.
- What identifies and describes what distinguishes a sensorimotor integration, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
- Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a sensorimotor integration, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
- What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse? action
State and lifecycle The states a sensorimotor integration passes through and the events that move it between them.
Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.
Lifecycle stages
From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.
Stages and transitions
The stages worth naming and what moves a sensorimotor integration between them.
- What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a sensorimotor integration, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
- Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a sensorimotor integration, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
- What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse? action
Observations and current status
What is observed about a sensorimotor integration, how often and by whom.
Observation record
How an observation of a sensorimotor integration is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.
- What identifies and describes an observation of a sensorimotor integration, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
- Who or what asserted this about an observation of a sensorimotor integration, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
- What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse? action
Process, inputs and outcome How a sensorimotor integration proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.
An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.
Steps and sequence
The steps of a sensorimotor integration, their order and what may run in parallel.
Steps, preconditions and completion
What has to be true before each step of a sensorimotor integration and what marks it done.
- What identifies and describes a step of a sensorimotor integration, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
- Who or what asserted this about a step of a sensorimotor integration, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
- What may an agent decide or do once a step of a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse? action
Inputs, resources and results
What a sensorimotor integration consumes and what it produces.
Inputs, outputs and side effects
The resources a sensorimotor integration takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.
- What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a sensorimotor integration, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
- Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a sensorimotor integration, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
- What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse? action
Temporal extent and dating When sensorimotor integration began and ended, and who says so.
Dates for events are conventions held by historiographies that disagree, and a single confident date hides the disagreement.
Dating and calendar
Start, end, granularity and the calendar used.
Dates, granularity and authority
What is dated, how precisely, and on whose account.
- What start and end are conventionally given for sensorimotor integration, at what granularity, in which calendar? definition
- Which accounts date it differently, and on what grounds? provenance
What counts as part of it
Sub-events included or excluded, and by whom.
Inclusion and exclusion
The episodes treated as inside the event and those left out.
- Which episodes are counted as part of sensorimotor integration, and which are treated as separate? boundary
- Whose framing is being followed in that inclusion, and who frames it otherwise? provenance
Participants, causes and consequences Who took part in sensorimotor integration and what is claimed to follow from it.
Causation around events is asserted rather than observed, so each claim needs the party asserting it.
Participants and roles
Parties involved and what each did.
Parties and their roles
Who is recorded as involved and in what capacity.
- Which parties took part in sensorimotor integration, in what roles, and on whose account? provenance
- Where do accounts disagree about who was involved? boundary
Causes and consequences
What is claimed to have caused it and followed from it.
Causal claims and who makes them
Antecedents and outcomes as attributed claims.
- What causes and consequences are attributed to sensorimotor integration, and by whom? provenance
- What would an agent need before treating such a claim as settled rather than contested? action
Provenance, evidence and time Where every claim about a sensorimotor integration came from and when it held.
A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.
Source and authority
Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.
Claim provenance and confidence
The authority behind each claim about a sensorimotor integration and how confident it is.
- What identifies and describes a claim about a sensorimotor integration, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
- Who or what asserted this about a claim about a sensorimotor integration, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
- What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse? action
Time, versions and supersession
When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.
Validity period and supersession
How an old claim about a sensorimotor integration is retired without being erased.
- What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a sensorimotor integration, and in what units or vocabulary? definition
- Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a sensorimotor integration, by which method, and when was it true? provenance
- What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse? action
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- Thing Registry
- Category
- Activities and processes
- Entry kind
- event or period
- Plane
- ACT
- Domain
- ACT.EVT
What it is Derived, awaiting review
An activity registered under ACT.EVT. The registry names it; this draft has not been given a definition yet.
Why it exists Derived, awaiting review
Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a sensorimotor integration, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.
Distinguishing features Derived, awaiting review
- Described in 3 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is.
What robots and AI may and may not do Derived, awaiting review
May
- observe it, measure it, record its state
Moral aspects Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Owners Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Links to other meta-models Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Incomplete
Identity and identifiers required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
- Made of: something that happens over time
- Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.
- These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing.
Recognition optional Derived, awaiting review
- Not a thing to see. Recognised by when it happened and who was involved, on the account of somebody.
Capabilities and actions required Derived, awaiting review
- observed and measured
Hazards and failure modes required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Standards and interfaces required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Context of use required Derived, awaiting review
- Described in 3 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.
Sources Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Open questions
- Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?
- What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?
- Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a sensorimotor integration, and on what evidence are they told apart?
- What may an agent decide or do once the name of a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse?
- What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse?
- What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a sensorimotor integration is known, and what must it refuse?
Machine files
Provenance
thing registry, generated draft (pass 1) · not researched
Built from: models/draft_model.php, wikidata
Generated by rule from registry facets. No source was read; every derived section awaits the research pass.