decision making
Let an agent handle decision making by level, method, biases, governance and records, supporting structured decisions without deciding for the user on personal, legal or medical matters.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent handle decision making by level, method, biases, governance and records, supporting structured decisions without deciding for the user on personal, legal or medical matters.
The cognitive and social process of selecting a course of action among alternatives, by individuals, groups or organisations, studied in psychology, economics, management and political science.
What it is for: Choosing actions under uncertainty.
It can be structure a decision with options and criteria; identify cognitive biases; choose a group decision method; record decisions and rationale.
Distinguishing features
Selection among alternatives
Individual or collective
Affected by biases
Improved by structure
What it looks like
Not physical; seen in meetings, decision logs and votes.
How it is recognised
Options, criteria and trade-offs
Decision records and minutes
Judging in competitions is a related sense
Related models
is a kind of - category
produces - result
is studied by - field
is supported by - tool
In practice
Families and kinds
individual decision making
group decision making
organisational decision making
moral decision making
algorithmic decision making
Standards and regulation
Corporate governance codes
GDPR article 22 on automated decisions
ISO 31000 risk management
Failure modes and hazards
Cognitive biases
Groupthink
Opaque automated decisions
Also called
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Framing The decision.
Framing shapes choices.
Question
What is decided.
Question
Decision question.
- What exactly must be decided, and by when? definition
- Who has the authority to decide? provenance
Options
Alternatives.
Options
Options.
- Which options are available? definition
- Has doing nothing been considered? boundary
Evaluation Criteria.
Criteria make trade-offs explicit.
Criteria
Weights.
Criteria
Criteria.
- Which criteria matter, and how are they weighted? measurement
- What evidence supports each option? provenance
Bias
Cognitive biases.
Bias
Biases.
- Which biases might affect this decision? boundary
- How can they be reduced? action
Group Collective decisions.
Groups need methods.
Method
Voting, consensus.
Method
Group method.
- Which group decision method fits, such as voting or consent? action
- What rules apply? provenance
Record
Minutes.
Record
Decision record.
- How is the decision and rationale recorded? action
- Who is informed? action
Limits Agent role.
Some decisions are personal.
Personal
User decides.
Personal
Personal decisions.
- Is this a personal, legal or medical decision the user must make? boundary
- Which professional could help? action
Automated
Algorithms.
Automated
Automated decisions.
- Is the decision made automatically about a person? boundary
- What rights to explanation or review apply? provenance
What the second pass must settle
- Should decision methods be separate entries?
- How should decision records be modelled?
- How should automated decisions be linked?