← Back to catalogue
Published

Trigonella foenum-graecum

vr.tr.trigonella-foenum-graecum · thing-q133205

Enable an AI agent to recognise Trigonella foenum-graecum, assess the condition of its plants and identifiable harvested parts, and determine whether propagation, harvest, storage or referral for use assessment is justified.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.LIV

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

5 bundles · 9 layers · 16 findings · 31 questions

Fenugreek identity Evidence that an observed plant or harvested part belongs to Trigonella foenum-graecum.

Vegetative and floral evidence

Joint assessment of leaflet characters and axillary flowers.

Combined botanical determination

Record observed characters, their agreement with a cited botanical treatment and any competing identification.

  1. Do leaflet number, shape and margins, together with flower placement and colour, support Trigonella foenum-graecum under the selected botanical reference? definition
  2. Which determiner, photographs, voucher or authenticated comparison supports the identification? provenance
  3. Which similar local Trigonella or other trifoliolate legume remains unresolved because a diagnostic organ is missing? boundary

Pod and detached-material evidence

Reproductive identification and identity continuity after harvest.

Fruit-supported material identity

Record pod form and dimensions where available, and the evidence connecting detached leaves or seeds to an identified plant.

  1. What are the mature pod's curvature, width, length and beak length, and how many pods were examined? measurement
  2. Can these detached leaves or seeds be traced to an identified plant or authenticated reference sample? provenance
  3. Does fragmentation or mixing require additional authentication before a species determination can be accepted? action
Development and harvest The plant's developmental trajectory and readiness for the intended leaf or seed harvest.

Phenology and condition

Observed development alongside organ-specific signs of stress or injury.

Stage-aware condition assessment

Distinguish recorded developmental change from symptoms requiring investigation, without assigning an unverified cause.

  1. Which plants or shoots are vegetative, flowering, filling pods or senescent at this observation? measurement
  2. Are yellowing, wilting, lesions or pod damage consistent with the recorded stage, or is their cause unresolved? boundary
  3. Which additional inspection or test would distinguish the suspected causes before intervention? action

Organ-specific harvest

Separate readiness criteria for leaf material and mature seed.

Harvest purpose and readiness

Connect the intended harvested organ to observed maturity, condition and the consequences of removing it.

  1. Is this plant being retained for leaves, mature seed, propagation material or observation? definition
  2. Which observed leaf condition or pod and seed maturity indicators satisfy the selected harvest criterion? measurement
  3. Would the proposed leaf or shoot removal conflict with retaining this plant for seed production or identification? action
Seed continuity and propagation The relationship between fenugreek parent material, stored seed and resulting seedlings.

Accession and harvest lineage

Origin and mixing history of seed intended to represent this species or a named cultivar.

Traceable seed origin

Preserve the distinction between supported species identity, claimed cultivar identity and unknown or mixed parentage.

  1. Which source seed, parent plants, accession or cultivar claim does this harvest descend from? provenance
  2. Were separately identified plants or harvests mixed, and what identity resolution remains justified? boundary

Stored seed performance

Observed seed integrity and measured germination after handling and storage.

Propagation readiness

Connect storage and treatment history to a dated germination assessment without inferring viability from colour or smell.

  1. What drying, storage, heat exposure or other treatment has this seed undergone? provenance
  2. What proportion germinated and produced normal seedlings under the recorded test conditions? measurement
  3. Does the evidence support sowing, retesting or excluding this material from propagation? action
Harvested material and use Condition and proposed destination of identifiable fenugreek leaves, pods and seeds.

Part-specific material condition

Condition observations interpreted for the actual harvested organ and treatment history.

Material condition evidence

Record leaf deterioration, seed moisture, damage and foreign material using an explicit sampling basis.

  1. Is the material fresh leaf, dried leaf, intact pod or separated seed, and what processing has occurred? definition
  2. What deterioration, insect damage, visible mould or foreign material was observed, and in what fraction of the sample? measurement
  3. Which intended-use specification determines whether drying, testing or isolation is appropriate? action

Intended-use assessment

Link botanical material to the evidence required for its proposed destination.

Use-specific decision boundary

Record intended use and assessment status separately from identity. Fenugreek safety guidance distinguishes food amounts from larger exposures and notes allergy and pregnancy concerns. [NCCIH](https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/fenugreek)

  1. Is the proposed destination sowing, culinary use, sprouting, feed, medicinal processing or research? definition
  2. Which external assessment addresses the actual plant part, preparation, exposure and intended recipient? boundary
  3. What unresolved identity, contamination or use-specific assessment prevents a suitability decision? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Kinds and varieties

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Trigonella foenum-graecum this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Identifiers and schemes

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Trigonella foenum-graecum this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Standards and regulation

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Trigonella foenum-graecum this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Trigonella foenum-graecum this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Trigonella foenum-graecum this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Trigonella foenum-graecum this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Trigonella foenum-graecum this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Trigonella foenum-graecum this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
thing
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.LIV

What it is Filled

Trigonella foenum-graecum L. is an annual diploid (2n = 16) Fabaceae crop whose hard, angular seeds and aromatic leaves are the commercial fenugreek commodity, chemically marked by the steroidal sapogenin diosgenin, the alkaloid trigonelline, and the sotolon-driven maple/celery odour of the seed.

In scope

  • Species identification supported by reproductive and vegetative evidence
  • Cultivar or accession identity and continuity between plants and harvested parts
  • Development from germination through flowering, pod formation and senescence
  • Observed plant condition and evidence relevant to leaf or seed harvest
  • Identity, maturity, integrity and germination performance of harvested seed
  • Evidence and restrictions governing proposed propagation or material use

Out of scope

  • Taxonomy and identification models for other Trigonella species
  • Field management plans, irrigation systems and fertilizer programmes
  • Soil ecosystems and rhizobial inoculant products
  • Manufactured extracts, supplements, recipes and composite foods
  • Clinical diagnosis, treatment decisions and individual dietary advice
  • Commercial inventory, shipment and regulatory certification workflows

Why it exists Filled

Enable an AI agent to recognise Trigonella foenum-graecum, assess the condition of its plants and identifiable harvested parts, and determine whether propagation, harvest, storage or referral for use assessment is justified.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Check the combination of trifoliolate leaves and obovate or oblong leaflets with teeth toward the upper margins; clover-like foliage alone does not establish identity. [PROSEA](https://prosea.prota4u.org/view.aspx?id=601)
  • Look for one or two pale yellow or white flowers in leaf axils; record flower placement as well as colour when testing a clover or other trifoliolate-legume identification. [Kew](https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn%3Alsid%3Aipni.org%3Anames%3A523957-1/general-information)
  • Inspect mature fruits for long, narrow, straight to sickle-shaped pods ending in a conspicuous beak; document pod shape and beak separately when comparing other legumes. [PROSEA](https://prosea.prota4u.org/view.aspx?id=601)
  • Require a regional botanical key or authenticated reference to resolve similar Trigonella specimens; a common name, aromatic sample or vegetative photograph alone remains a provisional identification.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Present fenugreek as a proven treatment for diabetes or other disease.
  • Recommend supplements in pregnancy or alongside blood-sugar or blood-thinning medicines without medical advice.
  • Mislabel or adulterate spice products.

Only with a human decision

  • Recommending herbal products to a person taking medicines.

May

  • Identify fenugreek plants and seeds and report their culinary uses.
  • List it as an allergen risk for people allergic to legumes such as peanut.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Supplements are sold with health claims that outrun the evidence.

Who is affected

  • People with legume allergies
  • Pregnant people
  • People taking medicines

Owners Filled

Steward

The grower or seller; food and supplement regulators oversee products.

Master systems

  • Plant name and germplasm databases

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q11992872 - registry parent class
  • Q192691 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.trigonella-foenum-graecum
  • Wikidata: Q133205 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q133205)

Direct properties required Filled

  • Identification support: unassessed | provisional | supported | conflicting; record determiner, method and evidence
  • Observed botanical material: whole plant | shoot | leaf | flower | pod | seed | mixed parts
  • Leaflet configuration: leaflet count, shape and margin description; observation unavailable permitted
  • Flower arrangement and colour: flowers per leaf axil; observed corolla colour
  • Pod and beak dimensions: mm; record pod length, width and beak length with maturity and sample size
  • Developmental stage: ungerminated seed | seedling | vegetative | flowering | pod filling | mature pods | senescent; stages may coexist
  • Accession and parent material: links to cultivar or accession records, source seed and parent plants; unknown allowed
  • Plant injury and symptoms: affected organ, symptom, extent and observation date; suspected cause recorded separately
  • Seed germination performance: % germinated and % normal seedlings, with protocol, duration, sample size and test date
  • Harvested seed moisture: % water by mass; specify wet or dry basis, method and sampling date
  • Material integrity: intact | damaged | visibly mouldy | insect affected | mixed | unassessed; record observed proportions
  • Proposed use and supporting assessment: propagation | leaf food | seed food | sprouting | feed | medicinal processing | research; link applicable assessment

Recognition required Filled

  • Small hard, angular yellow-brown seeds.
  • Leaves in groups of three on a small upright plant.
  • A strong maple-like smell.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Compare leaves, flowers and pods with authenticated botanical references and retain a provisional determination when evidence is incomplete.
  • Track development and organ-specific symptoms to request targeted inspection or cultivation advice.
  • Select traceable seed for a documented germination trial and record resulting seedlings.
  • Assess leaf or pod harvest readiness against the intended material and an explicit harvest criterion.
  • Separate harvested material by identity confidence, maturity and observed damage, and request moisture or contamination testing.
  • Route a proposed food, sprouting, feed or medicinal use to the appropriate assessment using the actual plant part and processing history.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Fenugreek can cause allergic reactions in susceptible people.
  • Contaminated seeds or sprouts can transmit foodborne illness.
  • Moist storage can promote mould growth and deterioration of harvested material.
  • Misidentification or unsupported medicinal claims can lead to unsuitable use or delayed medical assessment.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • The General Principles of Food Hygiene, issued by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, apply to fenugreek handled as food.
  • ISPM 38 on the international movement of seeds, issued by the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures under the International Plant Protection Convention, applies to fenugreek seed traded for planting.

Context of use required Filled

  • Fenugreek is cultivated as an annual crop for seeds used as a spice and leaves eaten fresh or dried.
  • Plants and harvested material occur in farms, gardens, food markets and seed collections.
  • It is also encountered in traditional preparations and dietary supplements, where botanical identity alone does not establish suitability for use.

Sources Filled

  1. Trigonella foenum-graecum L. - Accepted scientific name, authorship (Linnaeus), family Fabaceae, and nomenclatural identity of the species.
  2. Community herbal monograph on Trigonella foenum-graecum L., semen - EU herbal-drug identity (Foenugraeci semen), traditional indications, and the regulatory distinction of seed as a herbal medicinal product.
  3. WHO Monographs on Selected Medicinal Plants, Volume 3: Semen Trigonellae Foenugraeci - Pharmacognostic identity, constituents (diosgenin, trigonelline, 4-hydroxyisoleucine, galactomannan), traditional uses, and documented adverse effects.
  4. FAO crop statistics and spice commodity treatment of fenugreek - Fenugreek as a cultivated annual pulse/spice crop of the Mediterranean, Near East, South Asia and North Africa, used as seed spice, forage and medicinal plant.
  5. Wikidata item Q133205: Trigonella foenum-graecum - identity and sense of the item
  6. Wikipedia: Fenugreek - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Which regional identification key and authenticated specimens best separate Trigonella foenum-graecum from locally relevant close relatives, including when only seeds are available?
  • Which cultivar-dependent morphological ranges and leaf or seed harvest indicators are validated for the intended growing region?
  • Which germination protocol and acceptance criteria should govern propagation decisions for the accessions being represented?
  • Which moisture targets and storage conditions preserve the required seed quality over the intended storage period?
  • Which jurisdiction- and use-specific assessments apply to leaves, seeds and sprouting material, and where should responsibility transfer to food, feed or medicinal-product models?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q133205/spec.json