{ "model": { "rank": 8867, "code": "thing-q1379672", "model_id": "vr.tr.evaluation", "name": "evaluation", "purpose": "Let an agent treat evaluation as a process with a subject, criteria, evidence, evaluator and use, and state findings with their basis and limits.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.PRC", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q1379672/", "tier": 2, "score": 49, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "civil service commission", "data protection impact assessment", "documentation file", "research quality assessment", "nutritional assessment", "needs assessment", "health care outcome assessment", "Zertifikat Deutsch", "food grading", "tea leaf grading", "computer benchmarking", "chicken egg sizes", "football rating", "content rating", "advertisements rating system", "self-applied content rating system", "film rating", "Māori social impact and program evaluation", "ranked list", "evaluation study", "medical ethical review", "habilitation", "Doctor of Economics", "habilitation to Supervise Research", "audition", "military review", "currency grading", "valuation", "blind audition", "screen test", "forest valuation", "business valuation", "customs valuation", "stock valuation", "inventory valuation", "psychological evaluation", "technology assessment", "art valuation", "Learning Design", "psychopathological findings" ], "aliasCount": 241, "merged": 242, "knownIn": 49, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.evaluation", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q1379672", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1379672", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-11T04:52:40Z", "providers": [ "Claude" ], "breadth": "written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify", "pass": 2, "wave": 1, "engine": "claude" }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1379672", "registryId": "vr.tr.evaluation", "name": "evaluation", "version": "0.2.0-wave.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.PRC" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1379672/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.evaluation", "name": "evaluation", "purpose": "Let an agent treat evaluation as a process with a subject, criteria, evidence, evaluator and use, and state findings with their basis and limits.", "definition": "The systematic determination of the merit, worth or significance of something, such as a programme, product, policy, person or piece of work, using criteria and evidence.", "what_it_is_for": "Judging quality and value to support decisions, accountability and learning.", "affordances": [ "design and conduct it", "commission it, from independent evaluators", "use its findings, in decisions", "challenge it, when method or independence is weak" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Judges value against criteria, not just describes", "Needs evidence and a stated method", "Independence affects credibility", "Formative (to improve) or summative (to judge)" ], "appearance": "Reports, scores, ratings, assessments and impact assessments; the process itself involves data collection, analysis and judgement.", "visual_identification": [ "A report with stated criteria, methods and findings", "Named instruments such as data protection impact assessments or needs assessments", "Ratings and scores are outputs, not the evaluation itself" ], "physical_properties": [], "families_and_kinds": [ "programme and policy evaluation", "impact assessment, including data protection impact assessment", "needs assessment", "research quality assessment", "performance appraisal", "health outcome assessment" ], "related_models": [ { "relation": "uses", "target": "measurement", "why": "evidence gathering" }, { "relation": "produces", "target": "rating or report", "why": "outputs" }, { "relation": "is required by", "target": "law", "why": "some assessments are mandatory" }, { "relation": "is confused with", "target": "monitoring", "why": "monitoring tracks, evaluation judges" } ], "identifiers": [], "standards_and_regulation": [ "OECD DAC evaluation criteria", "GDPR Article 35 data protection impact assessment", "National evaluation guidance such as the UK Magenta Book", "Evaluation ethics codes" ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Criteria chosen to reach a desired answer", "Lack of independence", "Weak evidence presented as conclusive", "Findings ignored" ], "in_scope": [], "out_of_scope": [], "characteristics": [] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "subject-and-purpose", "name": "Subject and purpose", "description": "What is evaluated and why.", "rationale": "Purpose shapes design and use.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject", "description": "What is judged.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-finding", "name": "Subject", "description": "The subject of evaluation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What exactly is being evaluated?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "For what decision or purpose?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "type", "name": "Type", "description": "Formative or summative, mandatory or voluntary.", "findings": [ { "id": "type-finding", "name": "Type", "description": "The kind of evaluation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is this formative or summative?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "Is it legally required?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "criteria-and-method", "name": "Criteria and method", "description": "How it judges.", "rationale": "Criteria and method determine credibility.", "layers": [ { "id": "criteria", "name": "Criteria", "description": "Standards of judgement.", "findings": [ { "id": "criteria-finding", "name": "Criteria", "description": "Criteria used.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which criteria are applied, and who set them?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Are they appropriate for the purpose?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "Data and analysis.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-finding", "name": "Method", "description": "Methods and evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence and methods were used?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "What are the main limitations?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evaluator", "name": "Evaluator", "description": "Who evaluates.", "rationale": "Independence affects trust.", "layers": [ { "id": "independence", "name": "Independence", "description": "Conflicts of interest.", "findings": [ { "id": "independence-finding", "name": "Independence", "description": "Independence of the evaluator.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who conducted the evaluation, and are they independent?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Were conflicts of interest declared?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] }, { "id": "competence", "name": "Competence", "description": "Qualification.", "findings": [ { "id": "competence-finding", "name": "Competence", "description": "Qualifications of the evaluator.", "questions": [ { "text": "Are the evaluators qualified for this subject?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Was the evaluation peer reviewed?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "findings-and-use", "name": "Findings and use", "description": "What it concluded and what happened.", "rationale": "Findings matter when stated honestly and used.", "layers": [ { "id": "findings", "name": "Findings", "description": "Conclusions and strength.", "findings": [ { "id": "findings-finding", "name": "Findings", "description": "Conclusions with confidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the main findings, and how confident are they?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "text": "What was not assessed?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "use", "name": "Use", "description": "Decisions and follow-up.", "findings": [ { "id": "use-finding", "name": "Use", "description": "How findings were used.", "questions": [ { "text": "How have the findings been used?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Is the report public?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should kinds of assessment be separate entries?", "How should agents present evaluation findings with their strength?", "How should mandatory assessments be linked to their legal basis?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 4, "layers": 8, "findings": 8, "questions": 16 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a evaluation, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Let an agent treat evaluation as a process with a subject, criteria, evidence, evaluator and use, and state findings with their basis and limits.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: civil service commission, data protection impact assessment, documentation file, research quality assessment, nutritional assessment, needs assessment, health care outcome assessment, Zertifikat Deutsch, food grading, tea leaf grading, computer benchmarking, chicken egg sizes.", "242 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 49 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a evaluation, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "civil service commission", "data protection impact assessment", "documentation file", "research quality assessment", "nutritional assessment", "needs assessment", "health care outcome assessment", "Zertifikat Deutsch", "food grading", "tea leaf grading", "computer benchmarking", "chicken egg sizes" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 49 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 242 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one evaluation from another, and a evaluation from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a evaluation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a evaluation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a evaluation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a evaluation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a evaluation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a evaluation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a evaluation sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a evaluation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a evaluation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a evaluation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a evaluation from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a evaluation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a evaluation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a evaluation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a evaluation passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a evaluation between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a evaluation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a evaluation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a evaluation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a evaluation, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a evaluation is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a evaluation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a evaluation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a evaluation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a evaluation proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a evaluation, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a evaluation and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a evaluation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a evaluation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a evaluation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a evaluation consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a evaluation takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a evaluation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a evaluation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a evaluation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What evaluation is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of evaluation are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is evaluation operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of evaluation and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of evaluation?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as evaluation?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a evaluation came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a evaluation and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a evaluation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a evaluation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a evaluation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a evaluation is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a evaluation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a evaluation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a evaluation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }