← Back to catalogue
Research draft

encryption

vr.tr.encryption · ACT.ACT

Let an agent explain encryption conceptually, relay types, standards, history and policy debates from cryptography and standards sources with positions attributed, describe the named methods, recommend reputable tools and standards in general terms, and distinguish encryption from hashing, encoding, steganography and access control, without assisting unauthorised decryption.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain encryption conceptually, relay types, standards, history and policy debates from cryptography and standards sources with positions attributed, describe the named methods, recommend reputable tools and standards in general terms, and distinguish encryption from hashing, encoding, steganography and access control, without assisting unauthorised decryption.

The process of transforming information into a form unreadable without a key, to protect confidentiality, using algorithms such as the Advanced Encryption Standard, adopted in 2001, and public-key or dual-key systems such as RSA, published in 1977, applied in disk encryption, email encryption, transport security and end-to-end encryption in messaging, with historical classical ciphers such as the two-square cipher and research areas such as chaotic encryption; new post-quantum standards were published by NIST in 2024. Policy debates over lawful access and backdoors are attributed, and the model does not help defeat specific protections.

What it is for: Protecting data confidentiality.

It can be explain types conceptually; relay standards and history; describe named methods; relay policy debates with attribution.

Distinguishing features

Keys required

Symmetric or asymmetric

Standards-based

Policy contested

What it looks like

Not a visible object; seen as scrambled data, padlock icons and key management tools.

Physical character

AES adopted: 2001 year - FIPS 197

RSA published: 1977 year

NIST post-quantum standards: 2024 year - FIPS 203, 204, 205

How it is recognised

Transforming data to protect confidentiality

Two-square cipher, disk encryption, dual-key encryption, chaotic encryption, email encryption, end-to-end encryption

Hashing is one-way; encoding is not secret; steganography hides existence; access control restricts use

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

cryptographic data processing

includes -

Advanced Encryption Standard

includes -

end-to-end encryption

is contrasted with -

cryptographic hash function

In practice

Families and kinds

symmetric encryption

public-key encryption

disk and file encryption

transport encryption such as TLS

end-to-end encryption

classical ciphers

Standards and regulation

NIST FIPS standards

Export controls such as the Wassenaar Arrangement

Data protection laws requiring appropriate security

Failure modes and hazards

Home-made cryptography instead of vetted standards

Key loss making data unrecoverable

Requests to break specific protections, which are out of scope

Also called

two-square cipherdisk encryptiondual-key encryptionchaotic encryptionemail encryptionend-to-end encryptionauthenticated encryptionHoney Encryptionfunctional encryptionRasterschlüssel 44backup encryptionpoint-to-point encryptionhomomorphic encryptiondeniable encryptionPerfect cipherDeterministic encryptionJapanese naval codesBook cipheron-the-fly encryptionChaCha20-Poly1305CKKSfully homomorphic encryptionJN-25

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What encryption is.

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is encryption, and how does it differ from hashing, encoding, steganography and access control? definition
  2. Is the question about protecting your own data, understanding concepts or accessing others data without authorisation, which is out of scope? boundary

Methods

Named methods.

Methods

Methods.

  1. What are the two-square cipher, disk, dual-key, chaotic, email and end-to-end encryption? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific method? action
Technical Concepts.

Science.

Symmetric and public-key

Key types.

Symmetric and public-key

Symmetric and public-key.

  1. How do symmetric and public-key encryption differ conceptually? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Post-quantum

Post-quantum cryptography.

Post-quantum

Post-quantum.

  1. Why did NIST standardise post-quantum algorithms? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Policy Policy debates.

Attribution.

Lawful access

Lawful access debates.

Lawful access

Lawful access.

  1. What do governments, security researchers and civil liberties groups argue about backdoors, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral and attributed? boundary

Exports

Export controls.

Exports

Exports.

  1. How have export controls on cryptography changed since the crypto wars? provenance
  2. Which entry fits crypto wars? action
Context Practice and history.

Context.

Practice

Everyday use.

Practice

Practice.

  1. How do people use full-disk encryption and end-to-end encrypted messaging in general terms? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Signal Protocol? action

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did ciphers evolve from classical systems to Enigma to modern standards? provenance
  2. Which entry fits history of cryptography? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should classical ciphers be separate entries?
  • How should standards sources be linked?
  • How should lawful access debates be presented?