{ "model": { "rank": 6219, "code": "thing-q1436734", "model_id": "vr.tr.adventure", "name": "adventure", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a proposed or lived adventure, assess its uncertainty and participant-relative demands, and decide how to support, adapt or conclude it.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q1436734/", "tier": 2, "score": 61, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "aventure", "Microadventure" ], "aliasCount": 2, "merged": 2, "knownIn": 61, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q1436734", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1436734", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T22:55:54Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 16.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08861-9a2c-7773-88a1-65f5916ca89a\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: adventure\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 188 things:\n# Batch 006: 1001 regist", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 61.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08861-9a3a-7022-afd8-b56e3f5e2801\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: adventure\nRegistry id: vr.tr.adventure\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCont" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1436734", "registryId": "vr.tr.adventure", "name": "adventure", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1436734/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.adventure", "name": "adventure", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a proposed or lived adventure, assess its uncertainty and participant-relative demands, and decide how to support, adapt or conclude it.", "definition": "An adventure is an undertaking or experience perceived as unusual, exciting or challenging, involving uncertainty about its course or outcome and sometimes exposure to danger.", "scope_statement": "This model owns adventure as an enacted or contemplated episode of activity experienced or framed as a departure from the familiar, involving exploration, consequential uncertainty or challenge; its defining thresholds remain explicit rather than assumed universal.", "in_scope": [ "The episode's boundaries, participants and reasons for undertaking it", "Participant-relative novelty, exploration, challenge and uncertain outcomes", "The relationship between intended plans and discoveries during the episode", "Participant agency, readiness, exposure and options to withdraw", "How participants interpret the episode and whether they regard it as an adventure" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Adventure as a literary, film or game genre", "Complete models of travel, expeditions, sports or tourism services", "Technical specifications of equipment used during an adventure", "Detailed emergency response and clinical care procedures", "General personality traits such as sensation seeking", "Fictional adventures represented in stories, except as participants' framing of actual activity" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Check whose familiar routine the episode departs from: an unfamiliar experience for a novice may be routine work for a guide.", "Identify what participants must discover or negotiate as events unfold; travel to a different location alone does not establish adventure.", "Separate experienced uncertainty from actual danger: a controlled activity may feel adventurous, while a hazardous routine may not.", "Record whether 'adventure' is a participant's description, an observer's interpretation or a provider's promotional label.", "Examine participation and consent before treating an involuntary ordeal as a chosen adventure; record contested classifications." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Adventure attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Person or organisation making the attribution, episode identified, stated criteria and agreement or disagreement", "why_it_matters": "Makes the classification accountable when participants, observers and providers use the term differently." }, { "name": "Departure from familiarity", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "For each participant: familiar, partly unfamiliar, substantially unfamiliar or unknown; specify terrain, activity, social setting or role", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes novelty for a particular participant from novelty assumed by an observer." }, { "name": "Uncertainty profile", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Uncertainty about route, conditions, encounters, performance, discoveries or outcome, with known limits", "why_it_matters": "Identifies what remains unresolved and what information could support the next decision." }, { "name": "Challenge relative to capability", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Specific demand compared with each participant's demonstrated capability, support and confidence", "why_it_matters": "The same activity can be routine, stretching or overwhelming for different participants." }, { "name": "Participation agency", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Freely chosen, negotiated, constrained, involuntary or unclear; ability to revise or withdraw recorded separately", "why_it_matters": "Guides support and prevents an adventure label from concealing coercion." }, { "name": "Perceived and assessed exposure", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Separate accounts of perceived danger and assessed hazards, consequences, controls and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Keeps excitement distinct from evidence about possible harm." }, { "name": "Time to viable exit", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Estimated minutes or hours to reach a defined exit or support point, with assumptions and confidence", "why_it_matters": "Makes the practical cost of withdrawal visible where an exit estimate is meaningful." }, { "name": "Episode state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Imagined, proposed, preparing, underway, paused, redirected, completed or abandoned", "why_it_matters": "Separates anticipated adventure from lived experience and supports timely decisions." } ], "affordances": [ "Assess an adventure classification against explicit criteria and participant accounts.", "Suggest challenges that fit participants' desired novelty, capabilities and constraints.", "Identify uncertainties to investigate and those participants knowingly accept.", "Compare routes or activity variants by discovery potential, demand and withdrawal options.", "Support continuation, adaptation, pausing or withdrawal as conditions and willingness change.", "Record discoveries and differing interpretations without assuming completion or personal growth." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "adventure-identity", "name": "Adventure identity", "description": "Establishes what episode is being called an adventure and on whose terms.", "rationale": "Adventure is a classification that can differ across participants and uses of the word.", "layers": [ { "id": "classification-and-perspective", "name": "Classification and perspective", "description": "Records the criteria and perspectives supporting the adventure label.", "findings": [ { "id": "grounds-for-adventure-attribution", "name": "Grounds for adventure attribution", "description": "Record who calls the episode an adventure and whether novelty, exploration, challenge, uncertainty or another criterion grounds that judgment.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does 'adventure' mean to the person applying it to this episode?", "kind": "definition", "id": "grounds-for-adventure-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Which participants or records support or contest that attribution?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "grounds-for-adventure-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "episode-boundaries", "name": "Episode boundaries", "description": "Separates the adventure episode from the larger activity or account containing it.", "findings": [ { "id": "bounded-departure-from-routine", "name": "Bounded departure from routine", "description": "Identify the episode's beginning and end and whether adventure describes the whole undertaking or only an unexpected part.", "questions": [ { "text": "What events mark the beginning and end of this adventure?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "bounded-departure-from-routine-q01" }, { "text": "Does the label apply to the whole journey or activity, or to a particular episode within it?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "bounded-departure-from-routine-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "novelty-and-discovery", "name": "Novelty and discovery", "description": "Describes the unfamiliar territory, activity or encounter and what participants may discover.", "rationale": "A model needs to distinguish participant-relative exploration from a mere change of location or a promotional promise.", "layers": [ { "id": "participant-familiarity", "name": "Participant familiarity", "description": "Establishes the baseline against which the episode is unfamiliar.", "findings": [ { "id": "specific-unfamiliarity", "name": "Specific unfamiliarity", "description": "Record which aspects are unfamiliar to each participant, including differences between novices, experienced companions and guides.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which aspects of this episode has each participant encountered before?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "specific-unfamiliarity-q01" }, { "text": "What makes this episode a departure from that participant's ordinary experience?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "specific-unfamiliarity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "discovery-and-script", "name": "Discovery and script", "description": "Distinguishes open discovery from staged surprise and predetermined progression.", "findings": [ { "id": "room-for-unplanned-discovery", "name": "Room for unplanned discovery", "description": "Record what is predetermined, what is unknown only to participants and what remains unresolved for everyone involved.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which discoveries or outcomes are open, and which are arranged in advance?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "room-for-unplanned-discovery-q01" }, { "text": "What choices can participants make in response to an unexpected discovery?", "kind": "action", "id": "room-for-unplanned-discovery-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "challenge-and-exposure", "name": "Challenge and exposure", "description": "Connects the episode's demands and uncertainties to participants' capabilities and possible consequences.", "rationale": "Adventure assessment must distinguish a desired stretch from an unsupported demand and perceived danger from assessed exposure.", "layers": [ { "id": "capability-relative-demand", "name": "Capability-relative demand", "description": "Examines what participants must do and how prepared they are to do it.", "findings": [ { "id": "challenge-fit", "name": "Challenge fit", "description": "Compare physical, navigational, social or emotional demands with participant experience, available assistance and desired challenge.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which demands stretch each participant, and what evidence supports the capability assessment?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "challenge-fit-q01" }, { "text": "What preparation, assistance or activity adjustment would make the intended challenge feasible?", "kind": "action", "id": "challenge-fit-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "uncertainty-and-consequence", "name": "Uncertainty and consequence", "description": "Makes consequential unknowns visible without making danger a required feature.", "findings": [ { "id": "perceived-versus-assessed-danger", "name": "Perceived versus assessed danger", "description": "Record excitement or apprehension separately from identified hazards, potential consequences and the limits of available assessments.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where do participants' perceptions of danger differ from the available assessment, and what remains unknown?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "perceived-versus-assessed-danger-q01" }, { "text": "Which unknowns need resolving before the next commitment, and which can remain within agreed limits?", "kind": "action", "id": "perceived-versus-assessed-danger-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "agency-and-commitment", "name": "Agency and commitment", "description": "Records why participants engage, how freely they choose and how commitment changes during the episode.", "rationale": "The language of adventure must not substitute for a participant's willingness or practical ability to stop.", "layers": [ { "id": "motivation-and-consent", "name": "Motivation and consent", "description": "Connects desired experiences with informed and revisable participation.", "findings": [ { "id": "chosen-experience-and-limits", "name": "Chosen experience and limits", "description": "Record what participants seek, what they understand about the undertaking and what experiences or demands they decline.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does each participant want from the adventure, and which demands fall outside their agreement?", "kind": "definition", "id": "chosen-experience-and-limits-q01" }, { "text": "How can a participant revise their agreement when the experience differs from expectations?", "kind": "action", "id": "chosen-experience-and-limits-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "commitment-and-exit", "name": "Commitment and exit", "description": "Identifies points where proceeding reduces options to change course or withdraw.", "findings": [ { "id": "practical-withdrawal-options", "name": "Practical withdrawal options", "description": "Record available exits, support dependencies and pressures that may make an apparent choice difficult to exercise.", "questions": [ { "text": "At the next commitment point, what time, assistance or resources would withdrawal require?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "practical-withdrawal-options-q01" }, { "text": "How can someone pause or leave without being obstructed by group pressure or avoidable practical barriers?", "kind": "action", "id": "practical-withdrawal-options-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "unfolding-and-interpretation", "name": "Unfolding and interpretation", "description": "Tracks how the adventure changes through encounters, decisions and participants' later accounts.", "rationale": "The experience may diverge from its initial promise, and its meaning cannot be inferred from finishing the planned activity.", "layers": [ { "id": "adaptive-progression", "name": "Adaptive progression", "description": "Relates emerging conditions and discoveries to decisions about the next step.", "findings": [ { "id": "adventure-turning-points", "name": "Adventure turning points", "description": "Record encounters or changes that alter the intended route, challenge, willingness or interpretation of the episode.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which encounter or change altered what participants expected or were willing to undertake?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "adventure-turning-points-q01" }, { "text": "Given the changed conditions, should participants continue, redirect, pause or conclude the episode?", "kind": "action", "id": "adventure-turning-points-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "closure-and-retrospective-meaning", "name": "Closure and retrospective meaning", "description": "Separates activity completion from participants' evaluations of the adventure.", "findings": [ { "id": "participant-defined-outcome", "name": "Participant-defined outcome", "description": "Record what happened and how each participant interprets it, including disappointment, discovery, distress or unresolved meaning.", "questions": [ { "text": "How does each participant's later account compare with what they hoped to experience?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "participant-defined-outcome-q01" }, { "text": "Does completion, redirection or abandonment change whether participants regard the episode as an adventure?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "participant-defined-outcome-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "With no recorded sense, this entry interprets adventure as an undertaking or experience rather than a creative genre.", "Definitions differ over whether danger is necessary or whether novelty, challenge and uncertainty suffice; classification depends partly on the participant's experience.", "The named ISO standards concern adventure tourism, not adventure generally; their current editions and local applicability require verification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of adventure this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Outdoor adventure", "Exploratory adventure", "Travel adventure" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of adventure this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "ISO 21101, issued by the International Organization for Standardization, specifies safety management system requirements for adventure tourism activity providers.", "ISO 21102, issued by the International Organization for Standardization, specifies competence requirements for adventure tourism activity leaders.", "ISO 21103, issued by the International Organization for Standardization, specifies information requirements for adventure tourism participants." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of adventure this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Adventure tourism uses unfamiliar or challenging activities as visitor experiences.", "Outdoor education uses adventurous activities to develop practical skills, cooperation and judgment.", "Expeditions combine exploration or other objectives with uncertain conditions and outcomes.", "Everyday descriptions use adventure to characterize experiences that depart from a person's routine." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of adventure this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Participants may underestimate hazards or overestimate their competence.", "Poor preparation, unsuitable equipment or inadequate supervision can increase injury risk.", "Weather, terrain and remoteness can complicate navigation, communication and rescue in outdoor settings.", "Pressure to continue or demonstrate courage can undermine decisions to stop.", "Adventure tourism can damage environments or disrupt host communities when poorly managed." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of adventure this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "risk", "difference": "Risk concerns uncertain consequences; adventure describes an undertaking or experience, and perceived adventure need not involve substantial actual danger." }, { "name": "exploration", "difference": "Exploration seeks knowledge of something unfamiliar; adventure need not have a discovery objective." }, { "name": "expedition", "difference": "An expedition is an organized journey with a purpose; an adventure need not involve travel or formal organization." }, { "name": "outdoor recreation", "difference": "Outdoor recreation is leisure activity outside; familiar, routine recreation need not be experienced as adventurous." }, { "name": "adventure fiction", "difference": "Adventure fiction is a narrative category depicting adventurous events; the ACT.ACT interpretation concerns undertakings or experiences themselves." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of adventure this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which reference traditions define adventure through novelty, uncertainty, challenge, danger or narrative structure, and where do their criteria conflict?", "Can an involuntary episode qualify as adventure without participant endorsement, and how should competing attributions be represented?", "What operational measures distinguish participant-relative adventurousness from excitement, perceived risk and unfamiliarity?", "How should this ACT entry bound actual participation in virtual or staged experiences relative to fictional adventure and adventure genres?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept, requiring the registry entry to link to it instead of producing a separate publication?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a adventure, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise a proposed or lived adventure, assess its uncertainty and participant-relative demands, and decide how to support, adapt or conclude it.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: aventure, Microadventure.", "2 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 61 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a adventure, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "aventure", "Microadventure" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 61 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 2 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one adventure from another, and a adventure from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a adventure, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a adventure, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a adventure is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a adventure, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a adventure, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a adventure is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a adventure sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a adventure, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a adventure, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a adventure is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a adventure from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a adventure, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a adventure, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a adventure is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a adventure passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a adventure between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a adventure, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a adventure, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a adventure is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a adventure, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a adventure is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a adventure, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a adventure, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a adventure is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a adventure proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a adventure, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a adventure and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a adventure, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a adventure, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a adventure is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a adventure consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a adventure takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a adventure, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a adventure, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a adventure is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What adventure is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of adventure are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is adventure operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of adventure and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of adventure?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as adventure?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a adventure came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a adventure and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a adventure, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a adventure, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a adventure is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a adventure is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a adventure, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a adventure, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a adventure is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }