Japan Association of Athletics Federations
Enable an AI agent to identify the Japan Association of Athletics Federations, assess its authority and organisational state, and determine which athletics-related actions it may perform or authorise.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled
5 bundles · 9 layers · 15 findings · 23 questions
Identity and national athletics mandate Establishes which organisation the registry entry denotes and the evidenced extent of its athletics authority in Japan.
Legal identity and continuity
Connects federation names and institutional history to authoritative identity evidence.
Identity evidence
Record official names, legal form, identifiers and constitutive instruments, distinguishing initial establishment from later incorporation or reorganisation.
- Which official records establish the Japanese and English names, legal form and identifiers of the Japan Association of Athletics Federations? provenance
- Which historical changes preserved the same organisation, and which required legal succession or transfer of responsibilities? boundary
Mandate and recognition
Defines national responsibilities and separates domestic authority from international recognition.
Athletics authority boundaries
Record the instruments supporting each athletics function and its discipline, territorial and participant limits.
- Which instruments establish the federation's responsibilities for track and field, road running, race walking, cross-country and any other covered disciplines? provenance
- Where does its authority end or overlap with international athletics bodies, Japanese multisport bodies and specialist domestic organisations? boundary
Governance and athletics constituency Represents how the federation makes decisions and how athletics organisations and participants relate to it.
Governing and delegated bodies
Maps decisions to bodies, officeholders and valid delegations.
Competent decision maker
Record governing bodies and committees only with their evidenced appointment procedures, remit and decision constraints.
- Which bodies may amend governing instruments, appoint leadership, approve budgets and adopt athletics policies? definition
- What delegation, quorum, conflict-of-interest and approval requirements govern the particular action an agent is considering? action
Membership and registration
Separates constituent-body membership from athlete, club, coach or official registration.
Relationship-specific rights
Record how prefectural and other athletics bodies, clubs and individuals connect to the federation without presuming equivalent membership rights.
- Which entities are formal members, and how do prefectural associations and any other recognised athletics organisations participate in governance? definition
- How does registration of an athlete, club, coach or official differ from legal membership in rights, obligations and termination procedures? boundary
Competition authority and Japanese representation Captures the federation's institutional role in recognised competition and representative athletics pathways.
Competition recognition
Distinguishes organising an event from authorising it or recognising its performances.
Recognition and ratification remit
Record responsibility and conditions for event approval, technical recognition and performance or record ratification where supported.
- Which competition approvals and performance or record ratifications may the federation issue, and which belong to another body? boundary
- What evidence, technical requirements and policy version must an applicant satisfy for the requested recognition? action
Representative teams and development
Maps selection responsibilities and development programmes to documented federation authority.
Selection and pathway accountability
Record who sets selection criteria, nominates or confirms representatives and administers development support, distinguishing these functions.
- For a specified international competition, who sets eligibility and selection criteria, and who has final nomination or entry authority? action
- Which athlete, coach and official development programmes are administered by the federation, and what published criteria govern access? provenance
Integrity and institutional accountability Represents participant protection, review mechanisms, financial oversight and changes affecting the federation's ability to act.
Integrity and review
Separates federation responsibilities from those of independent integrity, anti-doping and dispute-resolution bodies.
Case routing and due process
Record applicable safeguarding, disciplinary and anti-doping procedures with jurisdiction, reporting routes and review rights.
- Which safeguarding, disciplinary and anti-doping matters may the federation receive or decide, and which must it refer elsewhere? boundary
- What confidentiality, hearing, appeal and deadline requirements apply before an agent routes a report or relies on a sanction? action
Reporting and organisational change
Tracks evidence of financial accountability and institutional events that change authority or continuity.
Standing and continuity assessment
Record reporting obligations, oversight evidence and procedures for major organisational change without treating missing information as proof of failure.
- Which financial statements, activity reports and oversight findings are required, and are the latest available records within their reporting deadlines? measurement
- Which instruments govern merger, dissolution or loss of recognition, including transfer of athletics responsibilities, records and obligations? provenance
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.
Reported evidence
Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.
Check these first
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Japan Association of Athletics Federations this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Identifiers and schemes
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Japan Association of Athletics Federations this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Standards and regulation
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Japan Association of Athletics Federations this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Real-world use
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Japan Association of Athletics Federations this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Failure modes and hazards
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Japan Association of Athletics Federations this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Regional variation
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Japan Association of Athletics Federations this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Japan Association of Athletics Federations this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- Thing Registry
- Category
- Society, people and institutions
- Entry kind
- thing
- Plane
- SOC
- Domain
- SOC.ORG
What it is Filled
The Japan Association of Athletics Federations (JAAF) is Japan's national governing body for athletics, responsible for organizing and developing the sport and representing Japanese athletics internationally.
In scope
- Legal identity, official names, identifiers, founding instruments and organisational continuity
- Authority over athletics in Japan and its limits by discipline, territory and participant category
- Governing bodies, decision rights, delegated authority and accountability
- Relationships with constituent athletics bodies, registered participants and international organisations
- Responsibilities for competition recognition, representative-team selection and athlete development
- Institutional oversight of integrity, safeguarding, finances and organisational change
Out of scope
- Individual athletes' biographies, medical records and performance histories
- Competition editions, race results and operational event schedules
- Athletics rules as independently maintained normative documents
- Stadiums, offices, training facilities and equipment as physical assets
- Affiliated organisations as separate legal entities
- The federation's brand, website and publications as independent information objects
Why it exists Filled
Enable an AI agent to identify the Japan Association of Athletics Federations, assess its authority and organisational state, and determine which athletics-related actions it may perform or authorise.
Distinguishing features Filled
- Identity evidence must resolve to the registered organisation, rather than merely matching an athletics-related name, acronym or website.
- Its documented national mandate must distinguish it from prefectural associations and organisations serving particular educational or participant groups.
- Its authority and affiliation records must distinguish it from international athletics bodies and organisations coordinating multiple sports in Japan.
- A competition bearing its name or approval is a related event, not the federation itself.
- Changes to leadership, offices or visual identity must not be mistaken for creation of a new organisation; succession requires separate evidence.
What robots and AI may and may not do Filled
Must not
- Impersonate the association to recruit athletes, sell tickets or collect fees.
- Publish athletes' medical, anti-doping or personal data without a lawful basis.
- Alter or misreport official results or records.
- Make accusations of doping or misconduct against named athletes without official findings.
Only with a human decision
- Representing the association or acting on its behalf.
May
- Describe the association, its competitions and its role in Japanese athletics from its official publications.
- Report results and records as published by the association or the international federation.
Moral aspects Filled
- Athletes, including minors, depend on the governing body for fair selection and safeguarding.
- Anti-doping processes must protect both clean sport and accused athletes' rights.
Who is affected
- Athletes
- Coaches and officials
- Young people in the sport
Owners Filled
Steward
The association itself, governed by its members and board.
Links to other meta-models Filled
parent
- Q43229 - registry parent class
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled
Identity and identifiers required Filled
- Vercy registry: vr.tr.japan-association-of-athletics-federations
- Wikidata: Q1505454 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1505454)
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
- Verified organisational identity: Official Japanese and English names linked to authoritative identity records and identifiers
- Legal form and organisational standing: Source-supported legal form and dated standing; unverified where evidence is absent
- Athletics mandate coverage: Documented coverage by discipline, territory, participant class and function
- Decision authority: Decision type linked to competent body, delegation instrument, conditions and effective dates
- Membership and affiliation status: Organisation or participant linked by membership, registration, recognition or affiliation, with dated status
- Applicable policy version: Activity linked to an adopted policy, effective period and issuing authority
- Reporting currency: Days since the latest required report, assessed against its actual reporting deadline
Plane SOC: no invented physical properties.
Recognition not applicable Not applicable
Not applicable
The organisation is an institutional entity whose identity cannot be established from visual appearance alone.
Capabilities and actions required Filled
- Resolve a claimed federation identity against authoritative names, identifiers and continuity records.
- Determine whether a proposed athletics activity falls within a documented federation mandate.
- Route a selection, recognition, registration or governance request to the body authorised to decide it.
- Check the applicable policy and appeal route before recommending an action affecting an athlete or affiliated body.
- Trace institutional responsibility for competition recognition, representative teams and integrity procedures.
- Flag expired mandates, unresolved authority conflicts and missing evidence before an agent acts.
Hazards and failure modes required Filled
- Unfair selection or poor safeguarding harms athletes' careers and wellbeing.
- Fake communications in its name can defraud athletes and fans.
Standards and interfaces required Filled
- World Anti-Doping Code, World Anti-Doping Agency.
- Competition and Technical Rules, World Athletics.
Context of use required Filled
- This organisation is encountered in the administration and development of athletics in Japan.
- Athletes, coaches, officials and event organisers engage with it over competitions, registration, national representation and sporting rules.
- Its published decisions and records help establish whether an event, result or representative appointment has official recognition.
Sources Filled
- Wikidata item Q1505454: Japan Association of Athletics Federations - identity and sense of the item
- Wikipedia: Japan Association of Athletics Federations - general description of the item
Open questions
- What are the federation's current official legal name, legal form, authoritative identifiers and incorporation history?
- Which current domestic and international instruments establish its mandate, and what discipline or participant categories fall outside it?
- How are formal membership, prefectural representation and individual registration distinguished in the current governing instruments?
- Which current policies allocate competition recognition, record ratification, representative-team selection and appeal authority?
- Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this organisational identity, requiring this registry entry to link to it rather than receive a separate publication?
Machine files
Provenance
thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed
Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q1505454/spec.json