{ "model": { "rank": 3863, "code": "thing-q150820", "model_id": "vr.tr.playboy", "name": "Playboy", "purpose": "Help an agent recognise, contextualise and assess the use of 'playboy' as a social persona without treating reputation as verified conduct or a formal occupation.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Society, people and institutions", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "SOC", "domain": "SOC.PER", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q150820/", "tier": 2, "score": 81, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 81, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.playboy", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q150820", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q150820", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T18:56:11Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08786-3977-79b0-8687-fa9b945c8ccd\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Playboy\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: SOC.PER\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 695 things:\n# Batch 004: 1001 register", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 55.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08786-396d-7a91-ab9e-9e044416af4f\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Playboy\nRegistry id: vr.tr.playboy\nPlane / domain: SOC / SOC.PER\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q150820", "registryId": "vr.tr.playboy", "name": "Playboy", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "SOC.PER" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q150820/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.playboy", "name": "Playboy", "purpose": "Help an agent recognise, contextualise and assess the use of 'playboy' as a social persona without treating reputation as verified conduct or a formal occupation.", "definition": "A playboy is a man characterized, often stereotypically, as pursuing leisure, conspicuous consumption and casual romantic or sexual relationships, commonly with an implication of wealth.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the provisional SOC.PER sense of playboy: a conventionally masculine social persona associated with affluent or apparently affluent leisure, conspicuous sociability and a reputation for romantic or sexual pursuits; the registry's intended sense remains unconfirmed.", "in_scope": [ "Self-identification and third-party attribution of the playboy label", "Representations of wealth, leisure and fashionable social participation", "Romantic reputation and its distinction from documented conduct", "Cultural, historical and gender conventions shaping the persona", "Changes, disputes and withdrawal of the label over time" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Playboy magazine, its publisher, trademarks and related businesses", "The complete biography or identity of a person described as a playboy", "Formal occupations, employment contracts and professional qualifications", "Detailed personal finances and ownership records", "Private sexual histories, medical conditions and psychological diagnoses" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The referent is a social persona or attributed lifestyle, rather than a magazine, company or brand.", "The label combines leisure-oriented sociability with romantic reputation; wealth alone does not establish this persona.", "The label need not describe paid work, an employer relationship, training or a licensed profession.", "Being single, attending parties or having multiple partners alone does not establish the playboy label.", "The persona can be projected or attributed without its implied wealth or conduct being independently established." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Attribution mode", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "self-description | third-party description | fictional characterisation | disputed attribution", "why_it_matters": "Separates an adopted persona from an externally imposed reputation." }, { "name": "Person or character bearing the label", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "reference to a separately modelled person or fictional character", "why_it_matters": "Keeps the social persona distinct from the identity and full life of its bearer." }, { "name": "Affluence representation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "documented resources | displayed affluence | attributed affluence | unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Prevents luxury imagery from being treated as evidence of actual wealth." }, { "name": "Leisure and social presentation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "source-described nightlife | elite social events | luxury travel | other leisure settings | unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Records the particular social presentation supporting the label without making any activity sufficient by itself." }, { "name": "Romantic reputation evidence", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "self-presentation | attributed reputation | supported public account | contested account | unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Separates what the label suggests from what an available account supports." }, { "name": "Cultural and temporal context", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "language, community, place and period associated with an attribution", "why_it_matters": "Allows the meaning and evaluative tone of the term to vary by context." }, { "name": "Attribution standing", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "current | historical | contested | retracted | uncertain", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an old or withdrawn characterisation from becoming a permanent identity claim." } ], "affordances": [ "Disambiguate the social persona from Playboy-branded entities.", "Record who used the label, about whom, when and with what supporting account.", "Compare the label with neighbouring descriptions such as socialite, bachelor and womaniser.", "Separate displayed luxury and romantic reputation from independently supported claims.", "Describe a fictional or deliberately cultivated playboy persona within its narrative context.", "Qualify, contest or retire an attribution when its evidence or relevance changes." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "playboy-sense-and-boundaries", "name": "Playboy sense and boundaries", "description": "Establishes which meaning of Playboy is being modelled and what distinguishes the social persona.", "rationale": "The capitalised registry name has no definition and could otherwise be mistaken for a branded publication or organisation.", "layers": [ { "id": "intended-referent", "name": "Intended referent", "description": "Resolves whether the entry concerns a social persona.", "findings": [ { "id": "social-persona-sense", "name": "Social persona sense", "description": "The draft provisionally interprets SOC.PER as supporting the social-persona sense; source confirmation is still required.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the originating registry record identify a lifestyle persona, a person category or a Playboy-branded entity?", "kind": "definition", "id": "social-persona-sense-q01" }, { "text": "Which originating identifier or description can confirm the intended sense?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "social-persona-sense-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-personas", "name": "Neighbouring personas", "description": "Tests the contribution of playboy beyond adjacent social descriptions.", "findings": [ { "id": "persona-not-occupation", "name": "Persona rather than occupation", "description": "The proposed model treats playboy as a social characterisation whose boundaries must be distinguished from employment and neighbouring labels.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does playboy add here beyond bachelor, socialite, wealthy heir or womaniser?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "persona-not-occupation-q01" }, { "text": "Is the account describing a lifestyle reputation, a performed character or actual paid duties?", "kind": "definition", "id": "persona-not-occupation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "affluence-and-leisure-display", "name": "Affluence and leisure display", "description": "Examines how apparent resources and leisure participation contribute to the playboy persona.", "rationale": "The persona's association with luxury requires a distinction between public display, attributed wealth and documented resources.", "layers": [ { "id": "apparent-resources", "name": "Apparent resources", "description": "Separates the appearance of affluence from claims about its basis.", "findings": [ { "id": "luxury-does-not-prove-wealth", "name": "Luxury display and wealth evidence", "description": "Record whether an account establishes resources or merely depicts access to luxurious settings and goods.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the account support actual affluence, access through others, or only a luxurious public image?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "luxury-does-not-prove-wealth-q01" }, { "text": "Would the playboy attribution still make sense in this context if the displayed wealth were staged or borrowed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "luxury-does-not-prove-wealth-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "leisure-pattern", "name": "Leisure pattern", "description": "Examines whether leisure-oriented sociability is central to the portrayal.", "findings": [ { "id": "social-life-as-defining-presentation", "name": "Social life as defining presentation", "description": "Distinguish a sustained portrayal centred on pleasure and sociability from isolated participation in a party or holiday.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which described settings or repeated activities make leisure central to this portrayal?", "kind": "definition", "id": "social-life-as-defining-presentation-q01" }, { "text": "What period and range of accounts support a recurring presentation rather than one event?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "social-life-as-defining-presentation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "romantic-reputation-and-evidence", "name": "Romantic reputation and evidence", "description": "Handles the romantic implications of the label and the limits of evidence supporting them.", "rationale": "Romantic reputation is central to the proposed sense but easily confused with verified intimate conduct.", "layers": [ { "id": "reputation-content", "name": "Reputation content", "description": "Identifies what a particular attribution actually claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "claimed-romantic-persona", "name": "Claimed romantic persona", "description": "Record the account's stated portrayal of courtship or romantic pursuits without adding implications it does not establish.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this use imply flirtation, frequent courtship, multiple relationships or simply a glamorous romantic image?", "kind": "definition", "id": "claimed-romantic-persona-q01" }, { "text": "Which implications are explicit in the account, and which would be an agent's inference?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "claimed-romantic-persona-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "claim-support", "name": "Claim support", "description": "Keeps attribution, publicity, reporting and established conduct distinct.", "findings": [ { "id": "reputation-not-conduct", "name": "Reputation is not established conduct", "description": "A playboy attribution should not automatically establish partner counts, infidelity, consent violations or sexual orientation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who originated the romantic characterisation, and do later accounts provide independent support or repeat it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "reputation-not-conduct-q01" }, { "text": "Which claims can an agent repeat with attribution, and which remain unsupported?", "kind": "action", "id": "reputation-not-conduct-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "cultural-attribution-and-revision", "name": "Cultural attribution and revision", "description": "Places the playboy label within social conventions and manages changes in its application.", "rationale": "The term can express glamour, criticism or caricature, and its application need not remain valid across contexts or a person's lifetime.", "layers": [ { "id": "gender-and-evaluation", "name": "Gender and evaluation", "description": "Examines the conventions and judgments carried by a particular use.", "findings": [ { "id": "contextual-gendered-label", "name": "Contextual gendered label", "description": "The draft recognises a conventionally masculine persona while leaving the applicability and tone of specific uses to contextual evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "How do the source's language, period and community shape the gender expectations attached to playboy?", "kind": "definition", "id": "contextual-gendered-label-q01" }, { "text": "Is the attribution admiring, critical, humorous, promotional or ambiguous, and what supports that reading?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "contextual-gendered-label-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "attribution-lifecycle", "name": "Attribution lifecycle", "description": "Tracks adoption, external labelling, dispute and historical relevance.", "findings": [ { "id": "revisable-persona-attribution", "name": "Revisable persona attribution", "description": "Tie each use to an attributing party and period so a cultivated, imposed or historical persona can be revised without redefining the whole person.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who adopted or applied the label, for which period, and has that application been disputed or withdrawn?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "revisable-persona-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence would justify marking this attribution historical, contested or retracted?", "kind": "action", "id": "revisable-persona-attribution-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The SOC.PER domain suggests the social characterization, but the missing recorded sense leaves ambiguity with the magazine and brand.", "This is an informal social label, not a recognized occupation with qualifications or licensing.", "No formal taxonomy, identifier scheme or quantitative threshold is confidently applicable." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Playboy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "An informal label in journalism, biography and everyday speech for a man's perceived lifestyle.", "A character type in fiction and film associated with affluence, leisure and romantic pursuits." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Playboy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The label can turn gossip or perceived behavior into unsupported claims about a person's private life.", "Its use can reinforce stereotypes about masculinity, wealth and sexual relationships.", "Treating it as an occupation or a clinical category gives an informal social characterization unwarranted precision." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Playboy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The label's connotations vary with local attitudes toward wealth, leisure, masculinity and sexual behavior." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Playboy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Socialite", "difference": "A socialite is known for participation in fashionable social circles; casual romantic or sexual pursuits are not defining." }, { "name": "Womanizer", "difference": "Womanizer emphasizes habitual pursuit of women, often disapprovingly; playboy additionally evokes leisure and commonly wealth." }, { "name": "Dandy", "difference": "A dandy is distinguished by attention to dress, appearance and cultivated manners rather than romantic pursuits." }, { "name": "Playboy magazine", "difference": "The magazine is a named publication; the social label describes a perceived type of person." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Playboy this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the originating registry identifier confirm the social-persona sense rather than Playboy magazine or another branded entity?", "Which researched definitions establish the relative importance of affluence, leisure and romantic pursuits across periods and cultures?", "How should this registry distinguish playboy from socialite, rake, womaniser and wealthy bachelor without creating duplicate models?", "Is masculine coding essential to the intended registry sense, conventional but nonessential, or specific to particular source communities?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this persona closely enough that the registry entry should link to it?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 13, "questions": 21 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "occupation or role", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Playboy, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Help an agent recognise, contextualise and assess the use of 'playboy' as a social persona without treating reputation as verified conduct or a formal occupation.", "characteristics": { "substance": "social", "origin": "natural", "agency": "autonomous", "mobility": "self-moving" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 81 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Playboy, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "a social arrangement between people", "physicalCharacter": [ "Moves under its own power or of its own accord.", "Acts on its own behalf.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Not recognisable by appearance, and guessing from dress or setting is how an agent gets this wrong. Recognised by qualification, licence or engagement." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 81 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Playboy from another, and a Playboy from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Playboy sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Playboy from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "place-and-movement", "name": "Place and movement", "description": "Where a Playboy is, how it got there and where it may go (self-moving).", "rationale": "A thing that can move needs its position recorded with a time, or every later claim about it is about a place it has left.", "layers": [ { "id": "location-and-placement", "name": "Location and placement", "description": "Position, containment and the reference frame the position is given in.", "findings": [ { "id": "position-and-frame", "name": "Position, container and reference frame", "description": "Where a Playboy is, and what that position is measured against.", "questions": [ { "id": "position-and-frame-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the location of a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the location of a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the location of a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "movement-and-transfer", "name": "Movement and transfer", "description": "How a Playboy moves on its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "movement-events", "name": "Movement events and constraints", "description": "What counts as a movement, what records it and what limits it.", "questions": [ { "id": "movement-events-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the movement of a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the movement of a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the movement of a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Playboy passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Playboy between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Playboy, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Playboy is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "people-and-responsibility", "name": "People, roles and responsibility", "description": "Who stands in what relation to a Playboy.", "rationale": "Social things are defined by the relations people hold to them, and those relations change without the thing changing.", "layers": [ { "id": "roles-and-parties", "name": "Roles and parties", "description": "The roles that exist around a Playboy and who fills them.", "findings": [ { "id": "role-assignments", "name": "Role assignments and their validity", "description": "Who holds which role over a Playboy, from when, and on whose authority.", "questions": [ { "id": "role-assignments-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a role over a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "role-assignments-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a role over a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "role-assignments-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a role over a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "ownership-and-accountability", "name": "Ownership and accountability", "description": "Who answers for a Playboy and who may decide about it.", "findings": [ { "id": "accountability", "name": "Accountability and decision rights", "description": "Where responsibility for a Playboy sits when something goes wrong.", "questions": [ { "id": "accountability-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes responsibility for a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "accountability-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about responsibility for a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "accountability-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once responsibility for a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "competence-and-licence", "name": "Competence, qualification and licence", "description": "What someone must be able to do, and be permitted to do, as Playboy.", "rationale": "The permission is jurisdictional and the competence is not, and conflating them is how an agent concludes someone may practise when they may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "competences", "name": "Competences and qualifications", "description": "Skills and credentials the role assumes.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualification-record", "name": "Qualifications and how they are evidenced", "description": "What counts as qualified, and what proves it.", "questions": [ { "id": "qualification-record-q01", "text": "What competences and qualifications does Playboy require, and how is each evidenced?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "qualification-record-q02", "text": "Which qualifications transfer between jurisdictions and which do not?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "licensing", "name": "Licensing and the right to practise", "description": "Who grants permission, where it holds, and when it lapses.", "findings": [ { "id": "licence-record", "name": "Licence, issuer and validity", "description": "The permission, its issuer, its territory and its expiry.", "questions": [ { "id": "licence-record-q01", "text": "Who licenses Playboy, in which territory, and for how long?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "licence-record-q02", "text": "What may an unlicensed person not do, and what must an agent refuse to assume?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "tasks-and-accountability", "name": "Tasks, employment and accountability", "description": "What Playboy actually does and who answers for it.", "rationale": "A role is filled by people under an arrangement, and the arrangement decides liability, supervision and who may instruct whom.", "layers": [ { "id": "tasks", "name": "Tasks and typical duties", "description": "The work itself, and how it differs by setting.", "findings": [ { "id": "duty-record", "name": "Duties and setting", "description": "What the role does and where the work varies.", "questions": [ { "id": "duty-record-q01", "text": "What tasks define Playboy, and how do they differ between settings or seniority?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "duty-record-q02", "text": "Which tasks may only be done by this role, and which are shared with neighbouring roles?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "accountability", "name": "Employment and accountability", "description": "The relation under which the work is done and where responsibility sits.", "findings": [ { "id": "responsibility", "name": "Responsibility and supervision", "description": "Who instructs, who supervises, who is liable.", "questions": [ { "id": "responsibility-q01", "text": "Under what arrangement does someone act as Playboy, and who supervises or is liable?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "responsibility-q02", "text": "When something goes wrong, what does the model need to have recorded to answer who was responsible?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Playboy came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Playboy and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Playboy is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Playboy, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Playboy, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Playboy is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 7, "layers": 14, "findings": 16, "questions": 44 } } } }