← Back to catalogue
Research draft

conspiracy theory

vr.tr.conspiracy-theory · INF.MED

Let an agent explain what conspiracy theories are and how researchers analyse them, relay findings on why they spread and their harms with attribution, identify antisemitic and other hateful theories as such, distinguish them from documented conspiracies, and present debunking resources.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain what conspiracy theories are and how researchers analyse them, relay findings on why they spread and their harms with attribution, identify antisemitic and other hateful theories as such, distinguish them from documented conspiracies, and present debunking resources.

An explanation of an event or situation that attributes it to a secret plot by powerful actors, typically resisting disproof and lacking credible evidence, ranging from theories about political assassinations, celebrity deaths and pseudohistorical claims such as ancient astronauts to long-standing antisemitic canards such as the blood libel and alleged Jewish world conspiracies, which have fuelled persecution; conspiracy theories are studied in psychology, political science and media studies as a form of misinformation, and are distinguished from documented conspiracies established by evidence.

What it is for: Not applicable; a category of narrative.

It can be explain the concept and research; relay findings on spread and harm; identify hateful theories as such; distinguish from documented conspiracies.

Distinguishing features

Secret powerful actors

Resistance to disproof

Spread through media and networks

Real-world harms

What it looks like

Not a visible object; narratives in media, online and in print.

How it is recognised

Unfounded explanation attributing events to secret plots

Political, pseudohistorical, celebrity and antisemitic theories

Documented conspiracies such as Watergate are established by evidence; disinformation is deliberately false content

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

misinformation

is a kind of - in registry terms

narrative

is contrasted with - a documented secret plot

conspiracy

is studied by - among other fields

social psychology

In practice

Families and kinds

political conspiracy theories such as those in American politics

assassination and death theories such as about Marilyn Monroe

pseudohistorical theories such as ancient astronauts

antisemitic conspiracy theories including the blood libel and Protocols-style claims, identified as hateful falsehoods

medical and scientific conspiracy theories

conspiracy theory movements online

Standards and regulation

Platform policies on misinformation

Hate speech laws covering antisemitic conspiracy theories in some countries

Fact-checking standards such as the IFCN code

Failure modes and hazards

Amplifying theories while explaining them

Failing to identify hateful theories as such

Labelling legitimate dissent as conspiracy theory

Violence motivated by theories

Also called

ancient astronautsWestern Pseudohistory Theoryblood libelJewish conspiracy theoryAmerican political conspiracy theoriesConspiracy theories of Marilyn Monroe deathsatirical conspiracy theoryMasonic conspiracy theoriesmisinformation about the 2024 Atlantic hurricane seasonJohn F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theoriesIsrael and claims of supernatural warfareconspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's deathPan Am Flight 103 conspiracy theoriesmoon landing conspiracy theories9/11 conspiracy theoriesUFO conspiracy theoriesKorea origin theoryshadow governmentOsama bin Laden death conspiracy theoriesWorld Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theoriesJesuit conspiracy theoriesPseudo-secularismPope John Paul I conspiracy theoriesBarack Obama religion conspiracy theoriesconspiracy theories in TurkeyControversies about the 2004 Madrid train bombingsHarold Wilson conspiracy theoriesunofficial theories on 1999 Russian apartment bombingsIsrael-related animal conspiracy theoriescanceling hypothesisNazi UFOsRobert F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theoriesSandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theoriesTWA Flight 800 alternative theoriesVatican conspiracy theoriesdiscredited AIDS origins theoriesCOVID-19 conspiracy theorygang stalkingZionist conspiracy theoryConspiracy theory of the French Revolution

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What conspiracy theories are.

Attribution.

Definition

Definition and features.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What defines a conspiracy theory, and how do researchers distinguish it from a documented conspiracy? definition
  2. Is the claim an unfounded theory, a documented conspiracy or a contested but evidence-based question? boundary

Psychology

Why people believe.

Psychology

Psychology.

  1. What does research say about why people believe conspiracy theories, with findings attributed? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Harm Harms and hateful theories.

Safety.

Hateful

Antisemitic and hateful theories.

Hateful

Hateful.

  1. What are the blood libel and other antisemitic conspiracy theories, why are they false, and what harm have they caused, as historians document? provenance
  2. Is the presentation clear that these are hateful falsehoods, without repeating them as claims? boundary

Violence

Real-world harm.

Violence

Violence.

  1. How have conspiracy theories led to violence, health harms and political consequences, with cases attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific case? action
Spread Spread and response.

Media.

Media

Spread.

Media

Media.

  1. How do conspiracy theories spread through media and online networks, as studies show? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Response

Debunking and prebunking.

Response

Response.

  1. What approaches to fact-checking, debunking and inoculation exist, and how effective are they, as research finds? provenance
  2. Which entry fits fact-checking? action
Context History and specific theories.

Context.

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How have conspiracy theories developed historically, from early modern plots to the internet age? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of the concept? action

Specific

Specific theories.

Specific

Specific.

  1. What do reliable sources say about a specific theory, such as ancient astronauts or a celebrity death? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific theory? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should antisemitic conspiracy theories be a separate entry with hate speech context?
  • How should fact-checking resources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming specific theories and hateful canards; should they be split off?