{ "model": { "rank": 1934, "code": "thing-q160232", "model_id": "vr.tr.hatred", "name": "hatred", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise reported or evidenced hatred, assess its persistence and consequences without equating feeling with intent, and identify proportionate responses.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q160232/", "tier": 2, "score": 121, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "self-hatred", "generalized hate" ], "aliasCount": 2, "merged": 2, "knownIn": 121, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q160232", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q160232", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T09:05:07Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "missingProviders": [ "Grok" ], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": null, "turns": null, "seconds": 69.2, "error": "Error: Internal error: {\n \"message\": \"API error (status 402 Payment Required): Grok Build usage balance exhausted\",\n \"http_status\": 402\n}", "retried": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 94.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07b1b-c807-7482-8868-dcdf5fdfbe49\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: hatred\nRegistry id: vr.tr.hatred\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\nA Vercy mod" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q160232", "registryId": "vr.tr.hatred", "name": "hatred", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q160232/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.hatred", "name": "hatred", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise reported or evidenced hatred, assess its persistence and consequences without equating feeling with intent, and identify proportionate responses.", "definition": "", "scope_statement": "This model owns hatred as a person's or explicitly evidenced collective's target-directed hostile orientation, including its attribution, meaning, persistence, expression and relationship to possible action; its recognition criteria are provisional pending research.", "in_scope": [ "Who reportedly hates whom or what, including uncertainty about the holder and target", "Whether hostility concerns particular conduct or extends to the target's perceived identity or existence", "Reported experience, recurring appraisals and changes in hatred over time", "Expressions of hatred and their relationship to desires, intentions and conduct", "Social reinforcement, target generalisation and conditions affecting persistence", "Boundaries and interventions relevant to reducing harm without demanding reconciliation" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Anger episodes and general emotion regulation as independent phenomena", "Disgust, contempt, fear and aversion without evidence of hatred", "Prejudice, discrimination and ideologies as complete social systems", "Threat assessment, violence planning and incident management as independent processes", "Legal classification of hate speech or hate crimes", "Clinical diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Test whether hostility extends beyond condemning a particular act to a broader rejection of its target; disagreement or moral criticism alone does not establish hatred.", "Test whether the orientation recurs outside an immediate provocation; persistence helps distinguish it from an anger episode but is not an established necessary condition.", "Test whether avoidance reflects hostility toward the target rather than fear, sensory aversion or a protective boundary alone.", "Test whether words such as 'hate' express serious target-directed hostility, exaggeration, quotation, satire or an unwanted intrusive thought.", "Record hatred, prejudice, harmful intent and harmful conduct separately: evidence of any one does not automatically establish the others." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Attribution basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "self-report | attributed by another | inferred from expression or conduct | disputed | unknown; multiple values allowed", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes an expressed experience from an observer's interpretation of another person's internal state." }, { "name": "Holder and collective attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "identified person, organisational position or bounded collective claim, with evidence and limits of attribution", "why_it_matters": "Prevents one speaker's hostility from being assigned to every member of a group." }, { "name": "Target and target scope", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "self | individual | group | institution | practice | idea | other; record specificity and changes in scope", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes hatred of an actor from hostility generalised to associated people or categories." }, { "name": "Hostile appraisal", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "recorded appraisals concerning conduct, character, identity, perceived threat or perceived irredeemability; unresolved where unclear", "why_it_matters": "Captures what the holder rejects without endorsing the appraisal as true." }, { "name": "Experienced intensity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "holder's stated intensity or a declared scale with anchors, date and method; unknown when unavailable", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison over time without treating an unvalidated score as a measure of dangerousness." }, { "name": "Temporal pattern", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "newly reported | episodic | recurrent | sustained | diminishing | no longer reported | unknown, with observation period", "why_it_matters": "Separates current activation from a continuing orientation and preserves uncertainty during silence." }, { "name": "Desired outcome for the target", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "distance | changed conduct | accountability | exclusion | humiliation | suffering | destruction | mixed | unstated; preserve the holder's wording", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes wishes associated with hatred from concrete intentions or plans." }, { "name": "Expression and action relationship", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "reported feeling only | expressed hostility | stated wish | stated intention | preparation reported | conduct observed | unknown; categories may coexist", "why_it_matters": "Keeps evidence about feeling, communication and action distinct while allowing relevant links." }, { "name": "Restraints and boundaries", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "reported commitments, protective distance, support relationships and situational constraints, with evidence of current relevance", "why_it_matters": "Records ways a holder limits conduct without assuming that restraint means hatred has ended." } ], "affordances": [ "Record hatred as a qualified attribution linked to statements, observations and competing interpretations.", "Clarify the target and distinguish hostility toward conduct from rejection of a person or group.", "Track recurrence, intensification, generalisation and reduction using comparable observations.", "Separate hostile feelings and wishes from intentions, preparations and acts, linking concrete concerns to an appropriate safety process.", "Identify opportunities for voluntary distance, interruption of hostile rehearsal, support or changes in interaction.", "Reassess attribution and outcomes without requiring forgiveness, renewed contact or agreement with the target." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "recognition-and-attribution", "name": "Recognition and attribution", "description": "Establishes what supports describing an orientation as hatred and whose description it is.", "rationale": "Hatred is an interpretation of experience and orientation that cannot safely be read directly from a word or isolated act.", "layers": [ { "id": "attribution-evidence", "name": "Attribution evidence", "description": "Separates first-person reports, outside allegations and agent inferences.", "findings": [ { "id": "basis-for-hatred-attribution", "name": "Basis for hatred attribution", "description": "Record the supporting statement or observation, its source and circumstances, and whether the attribution is contested.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who calls this hatred, and what exact report or observation supports that description?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "basis-for-hatred-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Could the apparent expression instead be quotation, exaggeration, performance or an unwanted intrusive thought?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "basis-for-hatred-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-experiences", "name": "Neighbouring experiences", "description": "Tests the interpretation against anger, contempt, disgust, fear and principled opposition.", "findings": [ { "id": "hostility-beyond-an-episode", "name": "Hostility beyond an episode", "description": "Record whether the holder describes broader target rejection and how that differs from their immediate reaction to particular conduct.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does the holder mean by hatred here, beyond being angry, afraid, disgusted or opposed?", "kind": "definition", "id": "hostility-beyond-an-episode-q01" }, { "text": "Does the hostile orientation remain when the immediate provocation is absent, and what evidence establishes that?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "hostility-beyond-an-episode-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "target-and-hostile-meaning", "name": "Target and hostile meaning", "description": "Identifies the object of hatred and the appraisals through which the holder understands it.", "rationale": "Response choices depend on whether hostility concerns an act, a whole person, the self or a generalised category.", "layers": [ { "id": "target-boundaries", "name": "Target boundaries", "description": "Records the target's identity and the extent of any generalisation.", "findings": [ { "id": "specific-and-generalised-targets", "name": "Specific and generalised targets", "description": "Preserve distinctions between a named target, its conduct and associated people or categories.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is hatred directed at the self, a particular actor, a group, an institution, a practice or an idea?", "kind": "definition", "id": "specific-and-generalised-targets-q01" }, { "text": "Has hostility spread to people merely associated with the original target, and where does the holder draw exceptions?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "specific-and-generalised-targets-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "appraisals-and-grievances", "name": "Appraisals and grievances", "description": "Records the holder's account of wrongdoing, threat or intolerability without adopting it as fact.", "findings": [ { "id": "grounds-and-revisability", "name": "Grounds and revisability", "description": "Distinguish reported events from interpretations of the target's character, identity and capacity to change.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which experiences, accounts or claims does the holder identify as grounds for hatred, and which have independent support?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "grounds-and-revisability-q01" }, { "text": "Does the holder describe anything that could change their appraisal, or regard the target as irredeemable?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "grounds-and-revisability-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "persistence-and-reinforcement", "name": "Persistence and reinforcement", "description": "Records how hatred varies over time and what reportedly renews or weakens it.", "rationale": "A model must distinguish temporary activation, persistent orientation and apparent reduction caused only by lack of observation.", "layers": [ { "id": "temporal-course", "name": "Temporal course", "description": "Tracks onset, recurrence, intensity and periods of reduced activation.", "findings": [ { "id": "recurrence-and-change", "name": "Recurrence and change", "description": "Record dated observations and self-reports using consistent descriptions or explicitly defined scales.", "questions": [ { "text": "When was hatred first reported, how often does it recur, and over what observation period?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "recurrence-and-change-q01" }, { "text": "What supports an increase or decrease in hatred rather than a change in willingness or opportunity to express it?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "recurrence-and-change-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "renewal-contexts", "name": "Renewal contexts", "description": "Examines reported links with reminders, repeated grievances and social encouragement.", "findings": [ { "id": "hostile-rehearsal-and-social-reward", "name": "Hostile rehearsal and social reward", "description": "Record whether revisiting grievances, consuming target-focused material or receiving approval accompanies renewed hostility; keep causal explanations tentative.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which encounters, reminders or repeated narratives reportedly reactivate hatred?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "hostile-rehearsal-and-social-reward-q01" }, { "text": "Do particular audiences reward expressions of hatred or discourage moderation, and what observations support that interpretation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "hostile-rehearsal-and-social-reward-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "expression-and-action", "name": "Expression and action", "description": "Distinguishes experienced hatred from its communication, desired outcomes and relationship to conduct.", "rationale": "Hatred alone does not establish harmful intent, while concrete intentions or preparations require attention beyond emotion description.", "layers": [ { "id": "communication-and-wishes", "name": "Communication and wishes", "description": "Records what is expressed, to whom and with what stated desired consequence for the target.", "findings": [ { "id": "expression-context-and-target-outcome", "name": "Expression context and target outcome", "description": "Distinguish private disclosure, public denunciation, targeted abuse and calls for others to act, preserving ambiguity about purpose.", "questions": [ { "text": "What was communicated, to which audience, and was the target directly addressed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "expression-context-and-target-outcome-q01" }, { "text": "Does the holder seek distance, accountability, exclusion, humiliation, suffering or another outcome for the target?", "kind": "definition", "id": "expression-context-and-target-outcome-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "intent-conduct-and-restraint", "name": "Intent, conduct and restraint", "description": "Links hatred to separately evidenced intentions and conduct without treating those links as automatic.", "findings": [ { "id": "transition-evidence-and-action-limits", "name": "Transition evidence and action limits", "description": "Record explicit intentions, preparations, observed acts and stated restraints as distinct evidence requiring their own interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence, if any, distinguishes a hostile wish from an intention, preparation or completed act?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "transition-evidence-and-action-limits-q01" }, { "text": "What restraints are reported or observed, and do concrete threats or preparations warrant referral to a separate safety process?", "kind": "action", "id": "transition-evidence-and-action-limits-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "response-and-reassessment", "name": "Response and reassessment", "description": "Identifies permissible responses and evaluates change without making reconciliation the default objective.", "rationale": "An agent needs to support reduced harm and informed choices while respecting protective boundaries and uncertainty about internal states.", "layers": [ { "id": "response-selection", "name": "Response selection", "description": "Connects the holder's goals, the target's boundaries and the agent's authority to possible interventions.", "findings": [ { "id": "voluntary-change-and-protective-distance", "name": "Voluntary change and protective distance", "description": "Record whether help is sought with distress, hostile expression, unwanted rehearsal or conduct, and whether continued distance serves protection.", "questions": [ { "text": "What change does the holder want, and which actions fall within the agent's role and authorisation?", "kind": "action", "id": "voluntary-change-and-protective-distance-q01" }, { "text": "Would contact, mediation or reconciliation conflict with either party's boundaries or expose someone to further harm?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "voluntary-change-and-protective-distance-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "outcomes-and-revision", "name": "Outcomes and revision", "description": "Evaluates changes in experience, appraisal and conduct separately.", "findings": [ { "id": "reduced-hatred-versus-reduced-expression", "name": "Reduced hatred versus reduced expression", "description": "Distinguish less reported hatred, narrower target scope, reduced hostile conduct and simple absence of new evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which outcome changed: reported hatred, appraisal of the target, expression, desired harm or actual conduct?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "reduced-hatred-versus-reduced-expression-q01" }, { "text": "What new evidence would justify revising or withdrawing the attribution of hatred?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "reduced-hatred-versus-reduced-expression-q02" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which researched recognition criteria best distinguish hatred from sustained anger, contempt and aversion, and how do those criteria vary across languages and contexts?", "Can self-hatred, interpersonal hatred and hatred of practices or ideas share this model without obscuring differences that require specialised extensions?", "What evidence justifies attributing hatred to a collective beyond identifiable speakers, official communications or coordinated acts?", "Which measures of intensity, persistence and target generalisation are sufficiently validated for an agent's intended use?", "Which interventions reduce distress or harmful conduct in different contexts, and when might contact, confrontation or pressure to forgive worsen outcomes?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 10, "findings": 10, "questions": 20 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a hatred, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise reported or evidenced hatred, assess its persistence and consequences without equating feeling with intent, and identify proportionate responses.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: self-hatred, generalized hate.", "2 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 121 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a hatred, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "self-hatred", "generalized hate" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 121 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 2 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one hatred from another, and a hatred from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a hatred, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a hatred, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a hatred is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a hatred, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a hatred, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a hatred is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a hatred sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a hatred, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a hatred, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a hatred is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a hatred from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a hatred, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a hatred, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a hatred is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a hatred passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a hatred between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a hatred, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a hatred, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a hatred is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a hatred, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a hatred is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a hatred, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a hatred, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a hatred is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a hatred proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a hatred, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a hatred and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a hatred, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a hatred, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a hatred is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a hatred consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a hatred takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a hatred, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a hatred, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a hatred is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What hatred is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of hatred are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is hatred operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of hatred and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of hatred?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as hatred?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a hatred came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a hatred and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a hatred, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a hatred, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a hatred is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a hatred is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a hatred, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a hatred, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a hatred is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }